I wrote this today, regardless of party and what I was drawn to and what needs to be clarified for the sake of the country. I write it as it is handwritten above knowing that I am not a candidate, I have not been approached to be one, more will I trade 4 years of ridicule for a life-time of work already built and stolen knowingly since 2018.
“I was thinking of being passed over today at the gym. The term applies to positions with thoughts of my father’s pass over in the Coast Guard when we lived in Puerto Rico. Why is one passed over and how does it apply on the armed forces sides and in everyday work places?
The term denotes a refuse to promote, transfer or elevate while those under you rise in pay grade. According to HRC.army.mil the question and answer is quoted as,
“Why is an officer passed over promotion?
A Soldier is normally passed over for promotion because he/she is not educationally qualified or because he or she doesn't have enough OERs in the board file for the board to make an informed decision about the officer's potential. Occasionally, an officer may also be passed over because the OERs in the file do not meet promotion standards or because of adverse information in the file (flag, disciplinary, etc...). It is also possible there was a material error in the "My Board File" that caused the officer to not be selected. If the Soldier suspects the board members were unable to consider critical documents, the Soldier may request review by a special consideration or standby board. Call Promotions Branch for more information if applicable.’ (accessed 11:51 AM)
I jump now over to the 22nd Amendment.
“Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.” (accessed 9/19/2022)
Now, based on the 22nd Amendment alone, nor prior president who loses an election can be eligible to run for a non-consecutive term. That is clearly defined in the language of the first sentence. The creation of the 22nd Amendment came from the 4-terms of Franklin D. Roosevelt. As the language was created to prevent the accumulation of power, it is further strengthened in 2022 by the expansion of the United States & through the technological/propritery aspects of security. As proven inside knowledge can lead to outside advantage while undermining successors in order to regain position and regain power which goes against American principles.
The ineligible statue after an election loss denotes a military & civilian ‘Pass Over’ of the Commander-in-Chief based on performance, votes and weighed decisions of the general public and strengthened more than likely privately on the military side. Questions remain on the eligibility of the family of the unelected president based on security purposes that could be looked at individually and is in reference to the core family to hold-back/prevent grudges against another president (which goes against American values of leadership) as already have protection in retirement as. ‘Former First Family’ and afforded rights & protection not provided to other citizens in their status.
The question is intention and purpose but does not rule out. The security and intel is the question.
I am unsure of the ‘Pass Over’ aspects the higher the ranks on the military side but existing law denotes severity and importance of integrity for a one-pass retirement in this regard. Between the Military and 22nd Amendment side, it becomes essential to the aspect of not dividing the country with intelligence and security provided to no one else but a sitting president where one can not make false promises of privilege that they no longer have once the end of term is complete. I.e. false executive orders and privileges. (Pardon promises contingent of an election win. Those promise denote a degrade of law and order to privilege and promise.)
I imagine if strengthen by a 3rd realm of thought would be to look at existing corporations and the handling of higher executives & CEOs who I imagine have non-compete clauses at the end of their term in position (that still is short-lived vs. ownership). I’ll research more.
-Philip A. Bonneau
2/19/2022
Philip Arthur Bonneau
(As a person of 4 years known victimization, anything above came from generations prior to prevent what has happened while adding on the aspect of what the digital world and security has brought on. To hold any office is to represent all people and values. Whatever my story…this is in the constitution and amendments of prevention that makes anyone who loses a term ineligible for re-election based on their privilege of knowledge and proof of character. )