In case I ever mind myself in an Office position. How was your 2024? Here was mine.

W-2’s of full earnings for 2024.

That was fun and at least disclosure for one reason or another.

-Philip A, Bonneau

Follow up Added 1/25/2024

Good news, I can write off the legal fees associated with my SCAD lawsuit in a factual recorded amount of self-representation and officially held and submitted to public record. Time was accounted for and placed on the matter, yet any return is capped at what was taken out of so it wouldn’t even be a percentage of what was owed in factual and actual legal represenation of self, defending not only myself, the entire college system and whatever needed to be on American Soil to a point I really am done on the “Solo” factor here to say “history will do one thing or another on that.”

That should be fun. 

The amount was not disputed by the state or opposing council, whom couldn’t respond to public record legally anyways.

The amount was submitted to the court in knowing of perjury if falsified and was accurated explained on median amounts of fairness. There would not be a federal problem on this issue as the legal aspect was reported federally as well and it was both state and federal obligation to resolve anything that incurs legal fees of longevity as they are required to uphold constitution and state/federal law. I did not perjure and the amount was factually based and supplied in 2 arenas

It isn’t like SCAD isn’t going to write off their legal expenses as well anyways, which becomes a conundrum of perpetuity and longevity with the legal world. You can literally write off legal expenses every year and recoup some of that, but then recoup all of it when you self-represent out of necessity of landscape. That is not a negative or positive on the matter as I move on with my life and see where that goes into the new year.

Please be mindful it is still illegal to impede on someone doing their taxes which was a known issue now proven since 2019. 

If anything in conclusion, here is what I have learned of Tax Code here.

Tax whomever all you want at any percentage, the more money, the more itemized reductions to retain the full amount back which was borrowed by the government and they sustain off the interest aspect in hold during that time. 

Amazingly I can see where that becomes more affordance of chances in life where right-offs on many things of business is what it is, and still probably why people don’t divest in some cases into trusts for a period of time. They become liable for different rightoffs that may or may not be limiting to what they have grown accustomed to that becomes basicallly, “I pay a great deal in taxes, but I write it all off legally.”

No conflct there on that, completely understood at at least I get around 3000 dollars back this year. 

In fairness, I don’t see an argument. 

The wealthier percentaghes are basically acting as bank loaners in trust to the government in which they can or cannot afford for the year temporary to get it all back the following year and repeat of whatever interest is there. 

Harder for the middle and lower class to do that, but at least thats an across the board understanding of respect. 

My W-2’s for 2024 are showcased the disadvantage of financial I was in while weighing the weight of my accomplishments in art, literature, human rights and civil liberties while trying to uphold the constitution and be as best of an internal model citizen as I could be while the physical aspect is maintain and gym without the weight of what others could afford to just get paid for one way or another.

I rather enjoy, I am never a classist here, but still continue to learn everyday along with the wonders and joys of what I and others can do while setting up boundaries where if anyone wonders what I or others do, “Be mindful of boundaries and private property as we all stand our grounds one way or another.”

____________________

In further follow up since I now know the write-off clauses of interest gains and losses.

Look. Stop with the iteration of prosecution here or if you are using that as some legal ease to impede on everyone else’s electronics. 

Considering how long this has been, the community might be aware at this point and you are not my lawyer, so that you need to be very careful about in community building or breaking exercise. 

To no one's surprise of capitalism, that area was exploited and that can stop because the indirect continual prosecution comments have come to the point of “Do you want to keep your license and credibility or are we just giving up on any aspect of privacy on this matter and onto barter systems where it doesn’t matter how much money you have as it would be worthless in comparison to community building.

We could and can talk normal at any time, but I am still saying I’m done with your legal loop holes here in infinity loops and hum-dingers. 

Seriously, you have people who have placed enough in the real world to let us all enjoy life a bit or consider what reconciliation of past actions of others is like. 

Trust me, I am sure I am quite entertaining in legal thrillers as well. 

and still pretty humorous about it. 

Anyways, vying for a home office position or a very much needed vacation with privacy re-learn and travel plans of my own adventure that could be supported or at least protected in the near future while alive vs. whatever happens if I no longer here and that all incorporated or reviewed anyways.

Happy Tax Season. :)

Back to You Unpaid Captain Britain and anything of you of Canada of Marvel Jesus.

This is important for Britain on the matter and severely my Butter Knives move.

My time in valuable.

Fine, Let’s further waste my time while calling out your credibility of leadership and to self-govern.

I’ll do this myself if I have to on the matter and still make sure everything you have ripped off in my life is applicable to anyone and you have a trial by peer ahead of you on the matter.

Well, that was fun America. Let's invest somewhere else.

At any point and time I can motion for a jury trial on this where my constitutional and human rights have been violated.

What this judge did was close out the credibility of American Judicial and any influence that SCAD or the State of Georgia wishes to have. If they want to close out American History and then start auctioning off state by state we can go into the Louisiana Devalued Over and over and over again.

This was pathetic of prior practice and people who needed to adapt mentally to the internet again because far than enough information is globally available at this point.

-Philip Arthur Bonneau

Enough of this shit on American Soil.

With all respect of My Private American Citizen.rights and calling bullshit on a judge’s choice “Go fuck yourself”.

And I already stated by you should be disbarred in your life investment and have zero credibility on this matter.

If this is what is of this landscape, FUCK this country and by all means in morality to do whatever with it globally of awareness. I am absolutely done being moral police of this country and thaat being a detriment to I on the matter.

Fuck this country over and over globally in nest egg protect and financial awarenes of guaranteed coming for you in creditor.

SCAD Falsifying of Evidence and Admittance that their Lack of Following ADRPA/Private Arbitration is Legally Binding.

I received the above letter via email from SCAD council on December 2, 2024 at 9:28PM with the attached image of a falsified claim that they FED-EX a response from their legal team denying any future arbitration claims in what was already a series of years of witness intimidation, electronic attacks and copyright infringement violations by the college post employment/education where alligations were directed against the president of the college during that time to non-procedurals wishing to dismiss, not provide any evidence of investigation and an entire lack of following their protocol of ADRPA/private arbitration while contesting it’s enforceable legality in first approach of Superior Court of Chatham County and then neither SCAD’s legal team nor the hired Federally Retired Judge followed that procedure to any amount other than mediation, denying myself both discovery and witness testimony which comes with arbitration proceedings despite request for such.

Email Attached image.

SCAD’s legal representative attached the above low-resolution picture as a pseudo confirmation of a FED-EX package that was never sent, and still would violate SCAD’s ADRPA procedures by handing any matters of HR responsibility to legal outside council of undo cost.

As I am completely proactive on all aspects of this case since my wrongful termination on February 10, 2022, I respond quickly with a series of emails that have since been submitted back to the Superior Court of Chatham County with the cover letter page above being the only thing sent in along with as it would of been both the Judge and SCAD’s legal council to submit an insult of a Federal Judge’s statement to the court to satisfy the judges order to arbitrate back in 2023.

Legally, they have surpassed any and all legal time limits to satisfy the Superior Court of GA on any motion required to respond and I am not doing their job for them, especially when already laid out how SCAD failed and demolished any future stance of their ADRPA/private arbitration being a credible or constitutional outlet for the entity to explore.

That would pave the way moving forward for anyone to cite GA Case SPCV22-01289-ST, to challenge any attempt SCAD has moving forward to uphold their private arbitration with anyone, while hopefully finally moving to a different phase of life that has been catastrophic to I on my life and intellectual property while noting the dangers of that for any investor or collaborator of The Savannah College of Art and Design.

The series of events leading to this day involve another ADRPA form filed and sent personally through the SCAD mail room to be delivered to the VP of Human Resources and then doing so again via email at a later date through the the hr@scad.edu email address, while blind copying SCAD Security.

Once the 30 day limit past to respond on either side, I filed back into Superior Court citing statues of timing in with 30 days past from that and SCAD did not respond to the court once again defaulting on legal requirements of response to motion.

As SCAD and private arbitrator JAMS did not submit back to the court, they failed to uphold the arbitration requirements of order over a calendar year while stretching out unnecessarily what was once originally a wrongful termination matter that compounded into intellectual property theft by the college and their partners as outlined in the fully written and copyright protected book, “No ‘Starving Artist’s”, which was submitted into private arbitration completely and is in SCAD possession of further possible damage and to no response or discussion on the matter during private mediation.

My email responses back to SCAD legal’s council was quick and many, as testiment and testimony of the last 3 years of complaint. Once SCAD passed the legal deadline resulting in factual default of a court case, I revealed via email that I had also blind copied The Atlanta Journal Constitution, The Washington Post and The New York Times for possible third party credible source of fact check of non-response from SCAD of their legal obligations to address and investigate any and all complaints brought to the attention of private arbitration in which SCAD never responded to opening up the door for an unsafe campus and one where in my experience was met with vast retaliation during legal worker and student rights complaints that were ignored, dismissed and then insulted in during investigation.

Those email responses were,

10:02AM

“Let’s be clear here. 

That letter never arrived and SCAD has no rights to deny any arbitration procedure at any point and time, especially in alligations of the president of the college copyright infringing on my works post employment. 

We have had this conversation in what was SCAD’s flat out disrespect of their own arbitration procedures that have been resubmitted back to the state of Georgia into public record and verification of federal government.

It is my right to jury trial based on federal law at any point and time based on the already submitted evidence that could or could not have sparked a federal investigation at this point to which your attached letter of deny here is your entities official position of no longer a leader of the educational system nor over anything of federal and state law on the matter of human rights violations,personal liability issues and control issues in which they have their own community of partners to consider of private investigation and affordance. 

If I ever received that letter prior I would of most definitely responded the same way and will consider that picture to be misleading and probably the original letter confirmation of when your law office was first hired and again misleading of fact. “

10:04AM

“As it stands, Arbitration is not binding when the paid for Federal retired judge closes a case with no chance to respond, which is back to state court on that matter on what you are legally bound to and failed over and over again in the failure of private arbitration.

-Philip Bonneau”

10:13AM

“By the Way, SCAD should have responded to the addition to the State Court Case where you once again did not follow State Law and Defaulted on this matter in binding of oversight state wide and federal, regardless of whatever fabricated FedEx you sent privately.

Your law firm had an obligation to the court which your entity failed to adhere to of private arbitration in which the judge was supplied the procedures in which to adhere to as well.

Have a gret Monday. 

Please note all recipients on this matter of unsafe school campus and a hazard to American history and Global awareness due to the fact that according to procedure nothing legal leaves SCAD without President Paula Wallace’s sign off which is made quite clear at this point in court case, mediation at best procedures and available to the press at this point along with more than likely federal and state judicial overview in the same manner of illegal search and seizure SCAD has already done in copyright infringement claims.

-Philip Bonneau

10:31AM

Just so we are clear on the matter of presidential awareness,  paula wallace is copied moving forward on this thread

(I add the president’s email personally for this to avoid any notion of what was originally understood of an entity with cut-throat patterns of professionalism within the company and did so back in 2020 when a major concern and liability to the college expanded towards I having an interview opportunity of SCADpro Director/SCADartsales Director position just before my wrongful termination on Feb. 10, 2022. That was done so to make sure all parties in email is aware of the hazard to campus, danger to the investors and myself can once again move on from unnecessary drag out and to make clear the president if copied via email to do their own due diligence.)

11:51AM

Please retain the photograph of the mail delivery as the meta data would be a part of evidential discovery of date of creation from this point forward in question of fabrication of facts and truth.

I shall submit this thread into evidence on the Superior Court Case in which SCAD defaulting on as SCAD’s position of the ADRPA is legally binding in what they didn’t adhere to while still hilariously for all time laughing at opposing council to constantly cite time limits and statues in pertaining to this case within public record.

-Philip Arthur Bonneau

(I take note to myself, that it is highly suspect that my Mother has a Santa Statue on her front porch in October and the only FED-EX I ever received from Littlier was in December 2022 which matches in falsification in which they would have to supplied FED-EX Tracking number, FED-EX email to a third party and the meta data of the original image can be reviewed for a letter that was never Received)

(I file back into Superior Court)

7:12PM

I’ve submitted this entire thread to public record of Superior Court Case in the State of GA under 

Case # SPCV22-01289-ST

Please don’t fuck with global investment ever again on the matter, let alone rip off in thinking your president had any credentials of fucking over anyone in which they have their own Lacoste problem of De’Sade to consider of adult and morally knowing when to end a phase of what is coming for them anyways in disrespect and evidence accounted for. 

SCAD legal cannot respond to the court case on the matter and at best we see what the state of Georgia does in which they legally could not close of case anyways and that being federal and global awareness on the matter. 

7:13PM

Still went with full oversight here of president of the college in no deniability of anyone underneath fucking over the global nest egg and required statement at this point. 

7:17PM

At best you have a SCAD Star that roams free of friends with the Wolves and making sure of financial loan of anything prior.

Comes with their choice and what they do with it is probably will legal council sat down on the matter and shut up of what they are legally responsible for telling their client that they were bested by an art degree that as zero alliance with SCAD at this time in Jocasta’ed. 

9:02PM

I imagine there will not be a legal response while imagine all of us are curious of Superior State court of GA. 

December 3 - 3:10PM

By the way,  that's a santa image in what your company tried to pass off as a verification of a package delivered in October.

I'm pretty sure my mother doesn't keep it Christmas 24/7 in her to verify that was the fedex from dec 2022 when I first filed in court against SCAD which verified your negligence as a law firm, the guilt of your client and the ridicule of the nightmare before Christmas on the matter of trying to consider that a verification of a package sent in october.

Let me know when any of you want to be serious. 

(This is done so for any verification of future falsification on their part)

My final email written around 2:34AM on December 5th had quite a bit of typos which are corrected below.

Please note that as scad’s illegal council has upheld their position of private arbitration, they was submitted to state court in evidence submitted prior in which they failed it with both state and federal criminal possibilities of obstruction of justice and any and all claims of what would be separate cases and matters public or private at this point which cannot be denied.

As SCAD found the case closed to them, zero illegal search and seizure would be tolerated and there is no more pre-discovery zone of legal interest without a legal global entity losing all legal rights of practice before chiming in on American college exploit.

Best of luck in front facing and the comminity is watching you as it is public record of choice of entity that did not respond according to private and public procedures set in place by established law and private business of nest egg global trust.

-Philip Arthur Bonneau

______________

Considering the Superior Court Case is public record, it would have to be addressed anyways, which at best SCAD can only issue public statement at the time as they have wasted the the court’s time, the JAMS system of integrity of private arbitration along with 3 years of my life before robbing me of my intellectual property and time as a student investor as a full-time employee who is afforded Worker Rights that were violated and addressed properly and with all statues of limitations and timelines accordingly.

I have had to do so without legal council, not only from finance point, but the removal of privacy rights and violations of electronics where all is now left in full awareness of Paula Wallace, SCAD Security, The press and what needed to be end of narrative on many points of contention into new realms of consideration. Acting as pro se during proceedings was a requirement according to the ADRPA to be deemed a separate entity of the college during the matter in which any prior employer or student with legal representation should be considered separate entity anyways despite the contrary.

It is a difficult PR move and honesty, but the uphold of protection to the college, the student investment and the college structure as a whole was important and necessary for I while protecting my own rights and property that was laid out in case. I did not submit to the State of Georgia the entire private arbitration proceedings and have no intention to as they were all sent through the federal government and Library of Congress to retain my life rights and intellectual proper as SCAD did not have any entity outside of case-based employment lawyers interact during.

That was done so to question and uphold The State of Georgia legal system in what has been 6 years of compounded issues reported between multiple businesses and choice of state.

I hope SCAD the best in what is a required resolve for the State, Federal and Globally on the matter.

I posted the picture above early in the morning on December 3rd with the comment, “He knows when you’ve been Naughty".”

A Review and Continuance of "Curated"

I received a professional review of one of my books today and spent about an hour and a half on a professional call with a literary agent in New York that I enjoyed immensely of what could and can be of my life moving forward.

They wrote, what others have said as well in industry the following in their own words of The Regency Partners.

“Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Stolen (Part 1) is a raw, unflinching dive into personal resilience and the fight for justice in a world dominated by corporate greed and systemic exploitation. The author’s candid exploration of their struggles—both external and internal—resonates with anyone who has ever felt crushed by the weight of power imbalances, whether at the hands of corporations, governments, or societal systems.

This book stands as a beacon for individuals across the globe who are battling to reclaim their rights, their dignity, and their sense of purpose in the face of adversity. It reflects the resilience required to navigate a world where profit often takes precedence over humanity and where personal hardship can be overshadowed by larger systems of oppression.

The author’s courage in recounting their journey, including the deeply personal moments of despair and the resolve to rebuild, is a testament to the human spirit. In every corner of the world—whether dealing with economic inequality, corporate misconduct, or social injustice—this book reminds readers that the fight for fairness and recognition is universal.

The narrative also underscores the importance of creative expression and the protection of one’s intellectual and personal rights. It’s a story not only of survival but of defiance, and it speaks directly to the global audience struggling to maintain hope and humanity in the midst of challenges. Curated Jellyfish is a must-read for anyone seeking a powerful story of perseverance, courage, and the enduring fight for what is right.”

I was told I could publish with their permission, and I reiterate it is an honor for anyone to take the time to reach out and review my work or consider one partnership over the other on many things.

How awesome is it to have a professional review of my works and then still have caution on the matter of what has been approached before?

During the conversation and towards the end I candidly email them where any price point for I at this matter is still a conflicting of weight on the matter of knowing they said literary agents are of commission based and where I am at now is in desolate from what others already made billions off of anyways and still went at it up until about 2-3 days ago which has been a nice reprieve to finally get some sense out of whatever advantage was there anyways on the matter.

I wrote privately here of which is now in the understanding of a literary agent that reviewed my book in which I can say only 2 legal copies of “Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Stolen” were purchased at this point before going into the conflation of markets and ethics of what is and isn’t a book reviewer and some false notion of Hollywood script writing passing all through town before you get a perspective of hit with a fine artist attached to it to create the movie, “Alien”.

That discount is there just as much as the revere which I love most of “Once you read.”

I wrote, “I was left with no savings and no retirement while there is an honor that you have professionally read this book along with this book knowing there is a matter of credible and then what is not. 

What you read of my work is a country and institution has left me in poverty where if you read this book and reviewed, others have been in a position to save and sustain from.

Thank you for the time while knowing time was spent to get to know business wise on what is in the book.”

I humbly write this knowing I can say for a fact I was infringed one while in college of master’s education after what already was a corporate advantage point and attempt prior on how I got there.

There isn’t one bit of excuse a college could submit of copyright infringe on my property post wrongful termination if they wanted to at this point and any further attack on I is a matter of I picked up others for far longer than they ever would of I, which is evident of landscape and all the more patience of which structure is what it is and if that is broken in top-tier, that is seemingly addressed with fate and destiny to correct itself.

I struggle a bit with the notion of investment and investment opportunity, where in no struggle of my first book in awareness that is a contemplation of my entire life’s work and then a conflict of landscape which already has gone to the point of Digital (some other name for Nazi collect because Germany probably would not put up with this in continuance).

If my first book is written like that in review before getting into any aspects of part 1 and part 2, then I am solid on any other book written after and that be a major confection poiut of “Hey, we have reviewed your work and would like to pick you up now, you have basically Neutered The Walt Disney Corporation on their practices and we are not unaware of Time-Warner in what became a Flash Point of Great Beyond.”

Where I sit in human history is a matter of probably great proprietary.

I can only imagine myself saying in a phone call of a pick me up from New York saying, walk into your board of directors conversation of prior 6-7 figures and lets go 9-10.

Paraphased of course, but I do recall my entire life experience from 2017 on here.

I don’t regret it, and I have no problem being an asshole on the matter as whatever occurred in life, that is part of the litmus test on the matter of things we aren’t going to know about anyways.

Could be, but I’m pretty open in global respect and love translations and that brought be great joy as much as I know they try to calm me down as well."

In 2017, I applied to be a teacher in China where I could have learned basic English just as much as find the joy of working with children learning a second language as much as I would have.

I didn’t accept the job because I couldn’t leave my Husky/Shepard “Lacey” nor would I ever with her already being a rescue dog and now knowing China’s limitations on breeds in their country.

Anything that happened towards I directly on American soil from 2018 to present has that to consider that wherever I go this far of direct attack, I have full rights to live action Disney princess/Queen storyline attached to I and what would be nice to say 6 years of MCU, but really about 10 years of full rights to the brand in any capacity that would of been factually checked over and over at this point and still of community awareness.

Considering what happened at SCAD, I’m pretty sure I can be picked up knowing what rights I have there as well and we are not playing the Christmas Game at this point with them in this capacity. Their lawfirm tried to falsify evidence after one fuck up after the other of “Let’s continue to disrespect and not make this right. This will totally work out for our long term goals of being financial royalty to the United States.”

“Oh you are….Oh you will be.”

By all means unforgiveable curse. That House Bubble was nothing of a one-off and spun into a series anyways.

I don’t have an answer there, I just know my public record is amazingly entertaining and that profile check is completely acceptable before getting into any aspects of “Curated” that cannot be contested in awareness in the same time of review as well and wondering, “Who pays for that and where do ideas travel?”

As it stands of college or one industry or another, I am quite inviting but I do come with narrative explaining and contemplating the Papal slap and applying that to understanding of anyone front-facing of something needing to be addressed.

Of all the realms of 30 years in, if you expect things for free constantly you might as well just go into legal in their run for most sure profession, which was sadly mistaken yesterday of a law novice calling out a profession who I hope still doesn’t have student loans because Littlier probably wouldn’t be their employer for much longer in global optics.

Here we are in “Free-Advice” and it isn’t.

There is moral codes all over the place and sound business to not be a part of standard practice that could absorb and and all that brought harm to the community on the matter.

I’ve literally legally sold two books of “Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Stolen”

By all means full rights of investor/friend contract of what that opens the doors in which is a straight up lawsuit of any impediment moving forward of “No ‘Starving Artist’s” on SCAD and the community landscape they built of turn around of landscape or never have a front-facing child in your department ever again or all the points of consideration of landscape of investment opportunity of trustee.

“Don’t you put that shit on me, Human.”

In all the Coffey references I could make of “No” Man is an Island of Unicorns in Lottery, do not put that ethics and moral committee on me.

I am well aware of under the hood and where I worked full circle of Light Tower References of what seems to be a misconstrue of opposite of “Dollar Babies”.

I still wait for the day that I in defiance and intrigue of my own accord, pull 3 random unproduced scripts from a box of literature waste and not at the same time looking up with my eyes all of gleaming, “Do you want this to be about you now?”

Proof of Ownership of “Philip Arthur Bonneau v. The Savannah College of Art & Design: a law novice story”

Proof of Ownership of “Philip Arthur Bonneau v. The Savannah College of Art & Design: a law novice story”

This includes all complaints and evidence on the matter of complaint in EEOC, BBB, Superior Court of Chatham County from the time of copyright submit, including once again the full final version of “No ‘Starving Artist’s”

I am the sole and legal rights owner to this as far as private entity goes while United States their their portions on file for safe keeping between the multiple branches above, with federal review done on all versions of the matter to date of copyright submit on September 17, 2024.

Attached is the Copyright Certificate to any and all matters public or private contained with the complaint brought forth procedurally correct to SCAD’s Arbitration procedures that have been violated by the entity of SCAD and cannot be enforced. 

I’ve re-attached SCAD’s arbitration procedures along with the note within that any party proceeding without a lawyer, which was done so in this case is considered a “separate entity” from the college in any and all rights of privilege in confidentiality that upholds the idea of American law and ownership of time invested, private expense and proprietary nature of life story and business accomplishments in an attempt to rectify known harm of entity while attempting to protect the college investment and SCAD themselves from further damages possible from negligence in following procedure and cited and proven criminal activity.

-Philip Arthur Bonneau

So this is what it is on the outside and respecting...

Here I am in blog form in what is absolutely for the world to see while prior there was not.

I think about what is so done and should not be an issue from November 2, 2018 on in the matter knowing my website was attacked internally and not published then while I moved on with life at the point of it’s creation in 2017.

I severely was amazed of what life looks like once I compiled to my own place of ownership of life’s accomplishments and, considering the timeframe, all of the work on the website is of my ownership.

I was completely disgusted at the slamming of the keyboard then and then reaching out after protective measures shortly after.

Anything there is still of owner conversation and government contract of approval or else quite a problem on the clock and salaried.

I cannot and will not pacify wbat was a direct attack towards my property then and then where there are clear cut off points of morality moving forward and most certainly from “Curated” on in which someone’s lifetime achievement needs a fucking reality check of cross roads.

I will be adult here and I know more than likely this blog post on my own owned website will not do anything in consideration of awareness of everything prior to make a point of perspective own and not of partnership.

Anything here is an awareness of on the clock and if that be a problem, then that is either your brand or not on this watch of brand as well.

I spent my time in this capacity testing then and then having to in other entities before I ever entered the college system on the matter.

I heard what I heard and tested what I could of sanity to make sure prior where once something came into a second place of business it was absolutely all sense on deck of what was a violation off human rights and confirmed or could be fact checked over and over to what I already swore to for all time.

The life experience of entering into SCAD, The Savannah College of Art & Design, is a pre-industry awareness and passover to consider of what has occurred there in which is surely not just my story but a Beyoncé awareness of wish to control optics and angles when all cannot be blocked.

That reference comes with a direct attack towards my mother and verifiable of non-variable of someone did not anticipate the back-feed on of willful intention.

I staunchly defend the Beyoncé brand humanistically but that fucking bullshit is accounted for and federally reserved.

I have never met the Carters and they have never met I to make sure in that Churnal Coil, that shit Is awareness of forced position of statement of The Carters or be a far greater problem than P. Diddy.

I’m pretty sure of anything of Bonnie here there is a Cylde’s Dale to consider of how much in this lifetime people have fucked up and needed to stop.

Budweiser will get there of your advantage of dispresct of human life and will go Light with this moving forward.

On the clock and understood of your brand and then not your brand.

At this point of any country fully aware of getting back to the point of generational and making sure of something in isolation of what occurred on American soil.

That is important since that was brought to global awareness in 2022 and here we are in a position where partner all you want on the matter, it is global recognition to make sure of the number 1 example on the matter.

Internally, I had my moments where by all means the idea of “President of Student Body” matters here and never came to any level of fruition nor of any reality to also make a statement of, “Don’t fuck the student body” and that being applicable of a check your wife and find why that stays right where it does.

I think about this in knowing SCAD has relinquished their rights to their ADRPA and private arbitration based on my lifetime experience.

I have copywriter everything of complaint from wrongful termination on while trying to defend an institution at the same time.

Considering the constant attack towards I on the student loan aspect, I am not a protectorate of the college in what would have been sound morality at this point over and over.

I don’t give a shit in this capacity as there is federal oversight of what your brand could have done and what seems apparent of Cocaine Cowboys of problem areas to consider Florida and Miami upbringings.

Perspective wise I have had officially the president of the college rip me off post employment and student and then proclaim that in a mater piece of go fuck yourself in parenting on the matter.

That was done so in her Lessons of Leadership book and for that you have the highest paid college president in which is fucking ridiculed for all time in quick get rich schemes.

That was an insult of generations and in all the leasdership of understanding SCAD doesn’t follow their own procedures is a reason why class action can happen to the entity as it is designed of learn some fucking respect of privilege new money.

I use the term new money very sincerely and to the point of a first generation where in book form I stated what I stated and did so in considerable of respect.

SCAD rips off the generationals.

Capitalistic society allows it where they have no blockade to have on the matter of any teacher taking over anything of creative and intellectual value.

They couldn’t unless they invade privacy on the matter and as it stands I still wrote “Curated Jellyfish” and protected it before becoming a student which is an Employee fuck over waiting to be uncovered.

Human rights are all over this, to the point that I did raise legally and federally protected of anyone else’s problem with divorce and how to deal with that.

Now presented in the ultimate divorce and making sure anything of awarness human fucking respects adultism here of my my lifetime guarentee of Federal protection.

There is not one bit of circumstance of elementals that I give a shit about a family that would leave someone for dead.

I m pretty sure in what is factually a Beyoncé moment waiting to happen of brand based on fact will happen at some point or completely make a point of “fuck that entity for human life”.

The Churnal matters and when in element of understanding that is provided of who stood up for generations and who had awareness of that occuring this many years in.

It is the same of SCAD and quite a problem between industry and pre-industry.

In that nest egg, I’ve done what I could and I have all the legal rights to fucking destroy a family and a college entity while protecting the college system in general on the matter.

If someone was so problematic in boundaries, then they needed to fucking respect personal space and intimacy, which was not provided in this circumstance nor would had been if not called out for their behavior.

As it stands of this website, I am well aware of what I never fucking would have touched of Frued/Diablo and never did.

Whatever that level of intelligence went to is the same as clearance level of others not passing the test of getting off the pot knowing everyone shits anyways and then still continued from that point of stopping point and didn’t anyways.

I feel so sorry for 2018-2019 in continuance in 2024.

You are a country take-over away in morality and your brand is attached to it in morality of what is already recorded.

I’ll wait for my paper from the Federal Government of a full review of the matter which is beyond any brand of could of respected and never a part of while standing up once and formal on the global investment of child.

That bubble will burst.

That is a guarentee if you rip off future generations before they hit the market and find how that is justified globally of leadership and could have stopped at any point in leadership and awareness.

I stand by why you are and are not knowing those ideas travel .

That is not agreement while others may of been had.

As it stands, my experience protecting the student body is federally recognized while The State of Georgia can get their shit together just as much any global brand of headquarters can start respecting the “Everyday.”

Do you realize how much fucking bullshit has occurred over the last 6 years in the State of Georgia that would be globally recognized and federally backed for all time?

Your narrative went to a point of bullshit and that is where that goes in open for all lawsuit over and over and zero defense ever of SCAD’s ADRPA due to non-response and problems back in 2022 that was not upheld in life experience after.

I can’t even say, “Go Fuck yourself.”

You did that already.

Written on the 30th day of legal standing of not following procedure and any complaint which should be valid of SCAD to address at any point of global nest egg and chose not to.

“I am writing to SCAD again in follow up to a valid ADRPA request that went unresponsive since hand delivered to the mailing room in which security cameras can attest to of October 10th, and what was redundant of email form.

I have tried my best with you to follow procedures and you have failed on that matter of not even responding as if a problem just wishes itself away, which doesn’t happen of liability of scope of wish of what was presented involves direct engagement of the president of the college. 

It is noted notthing legal leaves the college without their awareness and this would be known of already perjury by the human resources department in full awareness of the judicial landscape as well as internal oversight of what is absolutely a perspective of the president on the matter. 

SCAD has been presented legally with a choice to address something legally to the point of wishing to arbitrate privately and then failed to do so during a full calendar year.

During that time the stipulations of the ADRPA attempt to upheld also go into violations of it of working with retired state judges instead of federal and then continuing in my case of within limits of time to be a failure to arbitrate and simply end at mediation in which SCAD council agreed upon, didn’t contest and Complaining party went back to public record of what was required originally and not fulfilled. 

As it stands of no response to a valid complaint utilizing SCAD’s procedures in in violation of GA stateue 9-11-6 of 30 days to respond legally to any matter.

Considering the court case and private discussion where time limits are important, it is to note SCAD violoated GA law in court before violating their own procedures in attempted private arbitration that went to mediation at best as witness and discovery was not entertained in court nor in private arbitration.

It is noted to I that SCAD, and the president of the college infringed on property post education/employment in side by side comparison while in case noted their partners of Disney were doing the same.

I should be noted the book, “Curated Jellyfish”, now available in 2 parts of “Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Stolen” was initially named “Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Lost.”

This book has been ripped apart in refence by Disney in particular and as it was in court stated, this was copyright protect prior to becoming an active student at SCAD and would be consider damage to an employee in which no rights are afforded in that capacity. 

The case of multi-tiered went to the BBB to argue the rights of students and their works on copyright citing SCAD has no ownership to anything creative loan taken out on without inviting financial borrowing of interest and backing which is at jeapordy. 

THe intitial complaint of EEOC compounded in enviroment of what is federally protected of retaliation and awareness of what occurred and was stated factually. 

I have stated illegal aspects of Jonathan Goldstein that are upheld in court of sworn testimony as well as going into factual represenation of SCAD impeding on my copyright protected works post employment and education that constitutes retaliation and irreparable harm that SCAD cannot afford in the business they rest in of global invest while whistleblowing thier procedures of ripping off the global nest egg of any student investor in what is an entity primed for business takeover.

Considering the facts of what was stated in GA court case 

Case # SPCV22-01289-ST

SCAD has already relinquished their rights to private arbitration and that is proven in motive of entering into and and still not following procedure based on legal awareness and federal judge allowances. 

As SCAD has continued to harm during of intellectual property that pushing in the direction of motive of wrongful termination, it is noted that SCAD has failed to respond to a valid ADRPA form within the statues of legal limits, while failing privately to uphold that procedure anyways in what surmounted to private mediation at best.

I find that legally it is known and can be argued that SCAD cannot hide behind it’s private arbitration ADRPA ever again as they do not uphold it nor follow it in procedure when anything presented to the court. 

Legally of account, the series of events that happened to I from April 2021 of Private Federal Compliance investigation to wrongful termination of Feb. 10, 2022 do not exclude the events of timeline of Legally filing a lawsuit on Dec. 27, 2022 and then privately entertained SCAD’s wishes to uphold in court their ADRPA to private arbiitration to their complete lack of failure of following on that privately which went back to public record anyways.

I do the best for SCAD as I can, but I am also a 2005 alumni who still has student loans outstanding.

During the testimony, it was discovered of SCAD’s policy of full rights globally of anything creative of a student, which my discussion that SCAD dismissed instead of stating liable or not is never an escape of liability as that is against SCAD ADRPA to do so as all claims must be investigated and recorded for insurance purposes. 

It was stipulated that was in the direction of Crimes against humanity of ripping off generations of global investments while strapping them in student loans in an area where intellectual property would be prime for picking by those more aware.

SCAD legal in private mediation made a point of saying SCAD officially doesn’t protect an idea and it is still noted nothing legal of position statement comes out of the college without the president’s approval of message. 

That was done in regards to protected property created outside of SCAD as employee or student while still noting the infringement of the entity on books made post either capacity and a desire to move on.

Claimant mentioned many thing in court and mediation on the matter and finds whatever of that case did not uphold ADRPA of SCAD and the door is open for any and all lawsuits publically in which SCAD cannot ever uphold or defend their own private arbitration desires.

This is important in intellectual propety theft claims as well as SCAD’s awareness of that heading to the masking of copyright clause in the current handbook to go into matters of defrauding student investors.

I write this as legally SCAD cannot change one bit of thier policies on the matter during complaint and it is defintely a danger to the private entity while noting danger to the students as well in a not-safe campus of investment and that is corporately aware as well as third party. 

The lack of response on the matter is a detriment to the college in which if not resolved, I too would say the same thing already stated legally that all the intellectual property of SCAD’s entire history is up to grabs of others in the liabilities faced while the defraud of student’s is abundantly clear. 

The importance of responding to anything private is a fundamental to keep anything private and the door has been open based on trying to follow procedures that SCAD no longer had any private defense of what was basic procedure that was not followed.

I thank you for legally allowing any and all lawsuit public to SCAD, individual or class action as the entity did not uphold their positions or practices in which requires governance and rationale of 3rd party. 

Failure to act is failure of position while creating an unsafe campus on the matter. 

It was attempted since 2021 to secure the campus and everything that happened Feb. 10, 2022 was a clear invitation of criminal motive in which SCAD can no longer defend their ADRPA on the matter by failure to meet any reasonable deadlines or those compariable of court. 

In understanding it is SCAD procedure and understanding of ownership of student work contested during complaint, there is a major problem on the employee side in which legally SCAD relinquished any arguement or defense on that matter while raising claim through their procedures of question of “What happens when the president of your institution indfringes on Copyright Protected material?

Especially after the fact of employment and education.

As it stands of alumni 2005 in graphic design, 

"Once a bee always a bee in hive protection.”

Failure to respond in 30 days is failure to do your job while others are in danger. This is noted of valid legal complaint since April 2021, but sought and in statue of timelines of wrongful termination and criminal motive since February. 10, 2022 while all court and private mediations are copyright protected and federally observed. “

Snort while you can but globally your investors and partners will adult the shit out of your habit.

Press Release for "The Other Companion to Ugly Simple Truths" published November 15, 2024

Book Release Statement

Synopsis:

"A re-exploration of a shadow self 11 years later.

If life left someone in shade, then where did we go in purview of others?

A heart to heart with ourselves knowing what became of good intentions prior and then how that looks on outskirts and misunderstood notions.

Even the ISBN investment is a desire to protect ourselves and document.

The idea that someone knows everything of what is presented is a boundary discussion possible and then not even needing to address ever again when it comes to intimacy and understanding that the only one that matters our own mind before going into any aspect of appreciation of what is beyond the boundaries and appreciation of approach and trying to understand.

A love letter continues in what is the a move from an area of Purgatory while protecting it as well.

Of wishful bliss and then think conflict doesn't continue is all the same of trying to make a relationship work where if there isn't a perspective conflict or engagement, there is simply a float and not even considered of anything other than the norm and not worth noting.

11 years, where have we gone my love?

I know where others have gone prior and at best I can say it was noticed of outside voice and still not the same relationship.

Let's build this and continue knowing we have already moved forward anyways then and will continue to do so while loving any partner.

A solid sistem of bromances to consider life in what was then and hard for any of us to consider, but here we are so much older and far more aware of each other and our boundaries.”

Explore a world internal, where out-of-context is taking both figuratively and literally.

Philip A. Bonneau closes yet another chapter and begins a new one in practicality.

The book, a companion to “Companion Writings of Ugly Simple Truths” explores a question of who is and isn’t a companion and how that pertains to literature as a whole.

The original book, a part of the Art Series, “Ugly Simple Truths” was done in 2013 and preserved in a manner where of United States Copyright, a question where stories go once released into the world.

Book Available Online at Global Internet Retailers Soon.

15-page preview available at https://www.blurb.com/b/12185278-the-other-companion-to-ugly-simple-truths

Companion Writings of Ugly Simple Truths available the same way, where preview available at https://www.blurb.com/b/11612551-companion-works-to-ugly-simple-truths

Photo Art Book available for preview at https://www.blurb.com/b/9901528-ugly-simple-truths and available for sale online.

Any questions on any of the works can be directed to the email connect section of the website as Philip A. Bonneau holds all rights in copyright on the works.

I'm sorry state of Georgia.

This has been 6 years on your turf.

I am sorry in all capacity that I will live on in literacy and I severely don't give a fuck of your position at this point.

I was left for dead, attacked to self harm in this area and I severely want to live and not give a fuck of your established want to be of fucking over the everyday and that being known.

I am well aware that a judge who should have been disbarred at this point repoonded to what they lost the rights to in time’s table prior and a year of fucking hell of affordance was felt.

Let me tell you of judge of morality on what you could or couldn’t do is a matter of private property and telling you absolutely to fuck off in your life investment while mine was attacked over and over and over again.

You had you fucking chance.

You could have and you didn’t.

Whatever of the loss leader of this state is not the same of country and the debt there is not something this many years in that any one state of country can replace.

That is systematic and my responses are public record as much as the judge to make sure I don’t give a flying fuck how much you have in your bank account. What I have done in minimal is worthy of you backing the fuck off or being absolutely eliminated.

I’m not entirely concerned in First Amendment and making sure the Financial investment of College is.a loan worth having or making sure those people are read for filth on the matter for all eternity.

The state of Georgia fucking sucks in crimes of humanity claims in which are valid.

I had one official public record submitted of question of revelancy of state in continuance in making sure whatever fucking persecution of this country is known of I am another country away of protection of others saying, :Get the fuck away from human rights violations”.

It is documented enough in which I severely know there is a difference between American government and some corporation underneath in privlilege on the matter.

I absolutely need help, I have said so before and this is an absolute documentation that the state of Georgia has read a response to the court of United States and went where they went in which seems to be a paid for of probably should of sold this ages ago.

I am absolutely sick and tired of the OK of non resolve and death of others of a grand mother of entice to globally invest in their college.

I shouldn’t have to put up with this level of bullshit and not one bit of their PR problem here after.

Now What? New Chapter

Now that all of that is over, what do I do for a career?

Time Spent for one thing or another, but when it comes down to it, where do I even begin on that matter.

I have my books and art, clearly a knack for discovering problem areas and liabilities, but what am I to do in order to sustain myself and work towards a place of retirement eventually, in which currently I have none.

That was a fun time sticking up for everyone else and I have nothing financially at this point to show for it, but at least I copywrote the whole case anyways in time stamps while also doing my books.

Who knows what life point complaint is here, but probably means the website isn’t going to be as forthcoming as before, which wasn’t anyways.

A matter of I’ll figure this out and go from there.

Not like there isn’t a trust factor there of as long as I’m not invaded then I pretty much am just as fine as the next purpose.

Filed Into Superior Court of Chatham County - A Final Response to this Chapter

Mistakenly file contempt of court yesterday with evidence where I went into detail of Motion of Default Judgement with a letter of empathy and understanding on the matter. Resubmitted properly today, where contempt of court was considered and is there, but the draft was not complete when compiling with evidence.

As it stands of case, there is not much to say outside of life story and what is more than likely simply attached to public record for future generations to consider.

Filed on Sept. 20, 2024

M.I.A. Recognition Day, in honor of those who have yet to build a brand and simply unsung while others soar for one reason or another.

All exhibits have already been published.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CHATHAM COUNTY

     PHILIP ARTHUR BONNEAU v. THE SAVANNAH COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN

Superior Court of Chatham County Case Number SPCV22-01289-ST

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT BASED ON TIME-BASED PROCEDURE

SCAD has failed to Aribrate according to their own procedures (Exhibit A) in over a full calendar year since ordered to do so on September, 7, 2023 and wishes the court for Default Judgement on real-world figures produced and weighed upon by Opposing Council and Judge during private mediation.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Claimant filed lawsuit with the State of Georgia against the Savannah College of Art & Design on December 27, 2022.

The State of Georgia did not dismiss the dispute, but “ordered it to arbitration.” Based on the Federal case of Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc., 539 U.S. 52, 56 (2003), it was Federally ruled that when ordered to arbitration, a case must be put in Stay while arbitration proceeds.

October 13, 2023, was a 30-day deadline for SCAD to respond to the court and missed the deadline, by not filing their response until October 16, 2023. This should had been a default on the part of SCAD from that point on in time-barred document, and yet the judge continued to allow their statements. GA Code § 9-11-12 (2020)

Order to Arbitrate, is not a matter of verdict on the merit of the case one way or another, but procedural based on landscape in which self-governance has their own outlets to consider choice of fairness and law privately instead of publicly and record.

By time of order to arbitrate on Sept. 7, 2023 no witness testimony or discovery was allowed by Claimant which constitutes a non-beginning of trial settings and requirements.

Despite Claimant’s opposition on the matter, citing slavery of non-compensation in private matters procedural by citing the Constitution, Claimant went into non-compensated areas of procedurals to a private entity the best they could towards mutualness at the order of the judge.

Claimant requested arbitration to begin on September 21, 2023, and yet that did not begin until April 30, 2024.

It took months to get that going as SCAD found it allegedly, non-essential of both the court and of private resolve, despite their arbitration procedures proclaiming

The reasoning, as SCAD is required to organize and initiate dealt with the fact that they wished to utilize a State Retired Judge, Judge Wright. (also of the JAMZ community), in which they have utilized before which violates their ADRPA requirement of Federal Retired Judge mandate, as well as questions of prior interactions with and procedures of arbitations that would have been a requirement to disclose to Claimant.

Once a a judge was selected, even with Claimant’s statement that they are not a Federal Judge, SCAD council proceeded to wish to try another set of judge options outside the already agreed upon JAMS community citing costs as a reason for such. With Claimant, fully aware of how much was paid to the officially selected, Judge Johnson, in Jams, this matter of prolong was over a dispute of what became lower 5 figures in retainer fees at the end of September 17, 2024. A Retainer isn’t a bill, as hourly rates were different before any judge.

It was alleged by Claimant, this was done so to remove from electronic 3rd party website and infrastructure and proceedings began where SCAD knowingly were aware they had defaulted on timeliness in Superior Court.

What was an attempt towards Arbitration, was done so through the JAMS Network of retired State and Federal Judges of 3rd party, the Hon. Retired Federal Judge Johnson of Texas.

During proceedings, Claimant began compiling lists of witnesses to be called and mandatory discovery requests that would be essential of any trial, which never occurred or provided.

No deposition of Claimant was taken and considered as such in state. In claimant’s pro se aspects of self-offense of legal representative, they considered any and all of their testimony deposition and testimony as the only “Witness” and “Council” for Self Entity, while none existed on the SCAD side outside of legal representation and what was already of public record of Superior Court or available from the freedom of information act of the original EEOC investigation.

At no time did any representative outside of SCAD’s legal council enter in directly into what is clearly defined as “Mediation” while defining “Arbitration”.

Mediation, according to commerce.gov is “Mediation involves the intervention of a third person, or mediator, into a dispute to assist the parties in negotiating jointly acceptable resolution of issues in conflict.” Followed up with, “Matters unique to the mediation discussion have been held by Federal courts to be privileged and inadmissible in any adversarial administrative or court proceeding with the exception of certain issues such as fraud, waste and abuse, or criminal activity. If a settlement was not resolved during a mediation session, and the dispute was litigated in any administrative or judicial proceeding, neither the mediator nor his/her notes can be subpoenaed by either party.”

As no agreement was made of acceptable resolution, it understood that arbitration never took place on the part of SCAD, who continued their cames of “Dismiss” in court and defer to private arbitration to be of official final position and all throughout to “Dismiss” any and all valid claims which was noted as not a removal of liability, but a removal of rights in privacy to defend in which is now considered “Default” and non-arguable, based on failure to uphold the court’s order to arbitrate as well as not able to move forward to disprove their liability that they had their chance to privately.

As it stands in timeline, and of their own matter to consider of weight to prolong, Claimant Requests a Summary Judgement on all counts listed with relief and explaination of such presented and weighed upon.

Statues of limitations have noted Claimant’s claim of criminal and illegal acts against the constitution on the matter to bring to the court’s attention, and yet that would be a (USA v. SCAD) for them and not of my concern outside of witness of uphold of law and judicial.

As it stands, Claimant weighed out and provide an excessive amount of evidence of claim in which SCAD had nothing but procedurals in counterence, while going into non-factualities of case, personal comments and refusal to discuss any of the actual merits of evidence side-by-side or otherwise in which any move to jury trial would be barred from then moving past their official position to “Dismiss” and cannot be retroactively considered without examining and weighing on the waste of time in private arbitration, knowing they could not avoid that in judicial of judge and most certainly of jury.

That time frame is a full calendar year+10 days since order to arbitrate.

During that time, copyright claims during complaint and post Superior Court of the college upon Claimant are noted, and that too would be a separate trial by jury if need be.

For sake of discussion and rationale, SCAD exploited and squandered the private arbitration procedure without credibility to resolve, nor escaped any liability of present in which they can never counter of “HEY, NOW WE HAVE TIME”.

“Great, I don’t,” and statues of limitations could of ended this a long time ago, but not in criminal investigations, in which there too a need to protect victim, witness and creator on.

Claimant Submits Exhibit B, C, and D on the matter

Arbitation Definition as set by Common Definition, JAMS and SCAD ADRPA procedures

What is arbitration?

“Arbitration is a procedure in which a dispute is submitted, by agreement of the parties, to one or more arbitrators who make a binding decision on the dispute. In choosing arbitration, the parties opt for a private dispute resolution procedure instead of going to court.”[1]

Even the JAMS website quotes as saying, “Think of arbitration as a binding, adjudicatory process.” And then further goes into, “Unless otherwise agreed, the decision is legally binding and non-appealable, except in extremely limited circumstances, such as in the case of fraud or collusion on the part of the arbitrator.” In which was noted in this case of misleading the arbitrator, false claims of fact, unjust enrichment upon Claimant’s work during times of complaint and then change of Student Handbook (Student Copyright Policy) in removal, which was a protected aspect of on-going complaint resulting in a factor labor confict of human trafficking, not only through the school of student investors, but so too the the non-compensated Claimant in which SCAD benefitted and advanced their brand off of the perspective of an opposing party while leaving them in poverty and non-resolve.

That position was noted and expressed to the JAMS session at Time of Award of Mediation, which did not contain discovery or witness testimony of any claims in which are set to have never gone into the arbitration procedures according to SCAD’s ADRPA.

Exhibit A outlines the Arbitration procedure as,

Section III. Selection of Arbitators, and all aspects of (Completed)

Section IV. Scope of Arbitral Authority

Questions here that federally would had been protected by EEOC initial complaint of cease and desist all forms of damages and (retaliation) during times of procedures. As the initial Superior Court Case began to go into aspects of Copyright, BBB complaints, and the initial EEOC, there were criminal aspects of motive to consider of landscape left harmful to Claimant on multiple fronts to consider.

Claims and evidence were submitted during JAMS session in which was reviewed by the arbitrator on the matter. Those are noted in final award of being submitted and looked at, where Claimant could assume protection from in statement of both 3rd party awareness and opposing council on the matter.

Client confidentiality would apply to opposing council of already known legal liabilities before entering into private mediation towards arbitration. That would not pertain internally as it is SCAD’s policy to report all illegal activity if noted and found.

Section V. Required Conferences

Step 1 of asserting legal was met.

Step 2-6, pre-hearings was met, and concerns come in during mediation.

Section VI. Answer to a Request for Arbitration, Counterclaims, Third Party Claims, Reply to Counterclaims, and Motions

It is here SCAD faultered in their procceedings.

It is a requirement to Admit or Deny the factual allegations of the counterclaims, third-party claims,or third-party notice to arbitrate.

Procedurally wishing to “Dismiss” all claims without saying one way or another is a violation of their own policy and a compound of legality and liabilities that would not be upheld of further employment on the matter.

As that never occurred, SCAD failed to preserve themselves from any liability on this matter as they had all the affordance to confirm or deny and then go into evidenciatary aspects to support or defend which are since forfeited in 2ndattempts.

Section VII. Discovery

This process never occurred and one of the foundational requests from Claimant of discovery was the initial April 2021 Federal Compliance Investigation that occurred for about 2 months and noted psychological damage during.

As no discovery (legally or loop-hole) took place, no arbitration occurred and thus another SCAD violation of their own procedures.

No witnesses were called on either side to support or hinder discussion of claim, so liability falls on Respondant in which Claimant has started in written swore and in evidence provide what cannot be challenged in reasonable doubt during or after the final official “Dismiss” of all claims request by SCAD.

Section VIII. Summary Judgement

When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this section,

an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of the adverse party’s pleading, but the adverse party’s response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided by this section, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for the arbitration hearing. If the adverse partydoes not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against the adverse party. Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to discovery, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

As SCAD representatives already violated Section VI and VII of these mediation proceedings over a year since ordered to arbitrate, Claimant requested a Summary Judgement, as SCAD had already lost their case, any further defense and stood by “Dismiss” of which they were warned repeatedly on the matter.

Section XI. Arbitration Hearing

Does not apply on this matter as prior steps were missing, and this was considered mediation under 3rd party supervision.

Section X. Awards and Orders

Questions here as SCAD demands Arbitration and the JAMS session constitutes Mediation.

The award presented, is of it’s own question of Merit in which Legally SCAD has failed the statues of their own limitations and time-barred over and over, before going into what is a suggestion to the court in weight of evidence, but is not binding to SCAD procedure as Mediation is the SCAD’s ADRPA complete procedure. In that regard, the initial requests held in JAMS for relief should be awarded in default of SCAD and their failure of procedures throughout the length of complaint that began in April 2021.

Section XI. Appeals

Considering the constitutional rights of Claimant and that Arbitration never occurred, despite a year from being to order such, any appeal should be time-barred on the matter and would have to come from the original preferred Arbitrator of Superior Court of Chatham County based on evidence, procedure and timeliness of questions within “governance”.

As JAMS session ended on September 17, 2024 with a matter of closed, there is no digital way in order to entertain appeal on the matter on either side. Ending statement forces a discussion here in which a reach out to within 30 days is appliable on either side and then still a matter of resolving the original State of Georgia’s request to “Move to arbitrate” in which is required for any case to do so to remain in “stay” until satisfied, where in this matter never occurred in a full calendar year.

Reasonable deduction would consider of constant dismiss of Respondant, that the ADRPA procedure here is invalid and cannot go through either the selected arbitrator nor be trusted through human resources of an entity that “Dismissed” everything against procedure and non-escape of liability.

As SCAD council did not respond to the arbitrator by the 7 days of award letter, it is presumed SCAD was acceptable of no compensation of time on the matter in which they benefitted from a victim of their own institution with alleged awareness of landscape.

As SCAD ADRPA states, “The costs and expenses of the second Arbitratorshall be apportioned among all parties according to the number and breadth of the issues being

appealed by each party.”

As no arbitrator, but mediator acted privately, Claimant defers back to the first arbitrator of Superior Court of Chatham County in which Claimant paid the full filing fees of the case and own it as well, something that would be assumed of matter of conversation of ownership in Private Mediation/Arbitration proceedings.

SCAD bears the burden of court fees. “The second Arbitrator shall make this determination.” which falls back on Superior Court of Chatham to review the claim, and full case if need be for second arbitrator on the matter.

Section XII. Cost and Fees

Claimant considered a private stance in mediation on the matter, where any aspect of employee complaint leading to ADRPA is procedural of the entity in which attempts to adopt private approaches to Constitutional rights and questions.

At no time, should a valid reporting party ever have to burden the cost of factual claims against a private entity, as it promotes work environments of known abuse and damages unspoken.

“B. Any party entitled to an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and/or costs under the law governing the claim being arbitrated is entitled to such costs and/or fees upon a proper showing under the legal standards applied to award of such costs or fees.”

It is here, several claims of entitled were made and SCAD wished to attempt to “Dismiss” and not “Discount” them where in 2nd arbitrate or trial by jury denotes an entitlement of valid claim in which was revoked from further argument and sent back to court.

This would remove any chance of “Dismiss” on the matter and open the door towards mutualness moving forward in perpetual copyright claims and remedies compounded towards greater good.

Section XIII. Confidentiality

Claimant upheld their end on this all the way to time of award in which judge recommended nothing despite evidence.

As questions of copyright and electronic attacks towards claimant were had during the entire time of complaint, Claimant is unsure and unaware of that landscape outside of evidence probable and then probable cause on why that would be.

As award occurred and judge told in paraphase “An idea cannot be protected and may show up in other people’s work”, was a clear path to my personal website in which “Help, of human traffic and constitutional right violations were present in what had occurred.” As award was set, that was the ending of procedures. Claimant responded back to the JAMS session the following day with the same position of human trafficking of students and then of myself as noted since 2022 on the same website, www.philipbonneau.com

Section XIV. Service of Papers (All in reference to occurred has been served properly.)

Section XV. Filing of Papers (All in reference to occurred has been served properly.)

Section XVI. Computation of Time (Perhaps too much.)

Section XVII. Extension of Deadlines (No longer applies.)

Section XVIII. Construction

Section XIX. Severitability (This is where we are at in court to decide unenforceable)

Section XX. Revisions to the Arbitration Procedures (That comes with mutualness, and cannot be modified during this case in which began as Ordered of SCAD’s ADRPA procedures on Sept. 21, 2023.)

This would apply to fundamental aspects of the college including the publication of The Student Copyright Policy in the SCAD student handbook, which was modified and removed in the 2024—2025 Student Catalog of Sale’s Kit and present and noted as problematic in all other subsequent years towards mutual discussion.

FINAL OFFICIAL POSITION FROM SCAD

SCAD submitted their final position to mediation on 8/23/2024, again reiterating their stance of complete dismissal of all allegations, potential discussions, and any good-faith efforts in counterance to timely resolve. (Exhibit D)

Claimant browsed through the response quickly to see the pre-disposition did not change in any aspect and the cite of other people’s time and effort was done so to procedurally reject and future conversation of good-faith towards remedy.

Claimant responded they got 2-paragraphs in and then didn’t read the rest.

Claimant was already aware, SCAD failed their own procedures on borrowed time of others and was perfectly fine in what they wrote of dismissal requests prior to their final response, that wish to dismiss does not escape liability of what has already been presented which must be investigated and proven by Respondant of “NOT EXISTING" to avoid damages.

Claimant “Dismissed the Dismissals” while browsing through it anyways noting they had heard this since 2022 and yet it is 2024. 

That was official stance prior warned and Claimant moved into “Summary Judgement” knowing it was futile to continue on based on SCAD’s own arbitration procedures and all facts afforded of discussion.

Considering the landscape, most notable on 8/27/2024 of the release of the SCAD student Catalog, SCAD had once again changed their procedures, approach or forthcomings based of Claimant’s position and copyright protected property legally wrapped in connection with the college and located in the BBB, Superior Court of Chatham County and the JAMS session.

The move to Summary Judgement procedural of “not of good faith” while the noted questions of longevity of complaint in points of areas of hard personally, privately and of intellectual property not available on the open market, or never legally purchased as alleged an showcased.

During the case, Claimant was called a waste of time, so here Claimant becomes a time saver and cost saver as well, so that can never be said of me again on that matter, especially when legal loopholes of impede on Georgia citizen rights were violated by SCAD, The State of Georgia and SCAD’s legal council by failing to respond in the required timeframes of Oct. 16th, 2023.

Seems according to judge award, she agreed and did the same in perceived to dismiss the Claimant and reiterated mostly what she already wrote prior so I didn’t have to read it until the case was closed. 

It is noted next, where questions of if the Judge read enough to have their opinion stand or would court appointed review of the entire case be necessary on questions of arbitration in general.

Retired Judges Ruling claims during Mediation of JAMS Session.

(Exhibit E of professional stance.)

Judge ruled, despite SCAD’s issue to Time-Bar valid claims, that everything was procedurally submitted at the correct timeframe of Federal and State Law, which went to no advancement of conversation moving forward on reposition of stance of “Confirm” or “Deny” in which Respondant chose to retain “Dismiss” in private arbitration motions towards, but never got past mediation purposes.

It was noted that Judge’s final award noted contained heavily of their original position before Claimant was afforded a chance to reformulate their stance clearly on discrimination side and then onto the copyright side, separately, and with overlap within to resolve Respondant’s continued positions moving forward.

Judge noted lack of contract and found that fatal to Claimant’s position, while Claimant stated in second attempt that the contract was the federal student loan started in 2001 along with the student and employee handbooks of the Institution, signed relatively in the beginning of employment which is enforceable on either side.

If no contract present between employee/employer, then the handbook is inadmissible and unenforceable as it would not be considered “Contractual” in this matter of enforce and thus SCAD would fail in enforcing arbitration over constitutional rights to remedy.

The Judge goes into arbitration law, which claimant did so prior to entry within stating claim of private benefit without compensation in which both judge and council received and direct opposing council never entered.

There is an interesting legal challenge and question here attached to copyright claims as well as legality of structure and replacement of to override and consume market which could be quantified of number of private arbitration cases vs. legitimate and important legal case.

A Fun legal question in which was presented in private arbitration.

Considering the ruling, especially when judge could not weigh in on a required jury trial of copyright claims, what happens when United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 334 U.S. 131 (1948 is now focused on private arbitrations? When it came to student rights and basically considered Cartels, which would be an insult as well as they are like Mafia and of family mentality.

It would be here that lawyers and retired judges cannot own and operate their own make-shift substitute for the judicial system nor profiteer or create a system in which over-rights or negates the prior established of land and of the protection of few within.

The same case was mentioned in arbitration to SCAD owning their own movie studio in a realm of “Student Royalty-Free Copyright Waiver" to the college with global rights involved, while Claimant cited the profitability vs. budget of The Blair Witch Project, originally a student film in counterance and point of SCAD policy of any of their student’s works copyrightable able to be seized without compensation and what constitutes massive damages of creative integrity and profitability to the student body.

As SCAD’s position of that position of policy has been challenged by Claimant since 2022 through originally the Better Business Bureau and then introducted in Superior Court of Chatham county, it is noted that they have discovered a liability during complaint and tried to adjust to it which would be a violation of their ADRPA procedures and ethics.

During that time, trial had not begun, discovery was not authorized and witness testimony was also not allowed before ordred into “Arbitration” by the Judge on September 7, 2023.

It is now September 19th, 2024 and the arbitration process remained in mediation only to the time of it’s closing on September 17, 2024.

As discovery and witness testimony never accorded in this matter, the arbitration at best stayed in mediation and is a failure and direct violation of SCAD’s own ADRPA in which discovery and testimony is essential of process. 

That was requested in writing in the beginning of arbitration and discovery requests were peppered throughout the proceedings held by the JAMS system to no mutualness or provide.

Considering over a calendar year since order to arbitrate of either side has been done in Superior Court of Chatham county, SCAD has failed in that regard beyond excessive timelines and patience to do so.

The Judge goes into their position of Title VII and ADA with my claim.

The honorable judge found that within the same time frame of a known investigation upon a supervisor who went to points of commenting on their penis and “Not getting fired for this sorry person” were considered non-discriminatory, despite what occurred under their supervision and SCAD’s liability of mental health aspects of detriment to 3 males and one of incarceration who too is entitled to damages of years lost to his life and the negligence of SCAD of disregard then and then failure to adapt from there.

That comes with all the respect of someone I know unbiased of 20 years in intial complaint in which is a major factor of outside opinion.

I have documented their statement and seen their lawful appeal.

I validate and would cooberate their story in same-stance situation.

The Hostile Work Environments were discussed along with gender biased in EEOC with complaints of hersay or fact in which SCAD can state or others can testify on the matter of gender biased and also problematics when going through a divorce which concerns no one of employment on the matter towards future employment opportunities.

The judge found these claims fail, and rationale does not.

ADA on matters of Retaliation.

“It is known history of Paula Wallace Retaliation” is and would have been recorded testimony of employees within their circle. Including in paraphrase, “They will let them have a short win, but will continually go after them.”

The aspects of disability here is Institution fired on the exasperation of disability in which they had full awareness of and then wished to exasperate and leave in an environment towards suicide attempt again while they reserved and retained intellectual property not their own.

That is not even alleged as SCAD acted on property ver baitum in which they didn’t even pay for and apparently had access to without discovery privileges or legal outlets of permission or documentation.

Arbitrator found that they did the best with failure of citizen procedure of witness and testimony beyond initial complaint as afforded of jury or arbitration to note that anything they say they didn’t find was outlined accordingly read or not or which they were hourly anyways.

Judge’s opinion was Claimaint “Failed to allege facts to sta a claim that he was terminated “Because of” a disability.”

Claimant stated and recorded they disregarded one over and over and knew about it from multiple places who could testify of detriment and awareness of based on what seems in part for some as awareness in partnership and ignorance of human life and compassion in others.

Reasonable Accomodation.

Claimant supplied their resume.

Applied for several positions, including top tier of SCAD of awareness of president of the college.

Claimant is pretty well aware they were more than qualified for outside café management of the college and that was entertained.

Judges opinion doesn’t apply in factually documented positions of evidence interviewed.

Claimant is aware of plaintiff’s position on gender in the workplace and “Someone’s penis” entered into the workplace of supervisor purview of discussion in the workplace at the exact time of Federal Compliance Investigations.

Claimant still does not weigh much merit to Supervisor’s claim of telling Claimant to treat his new (African American Counterparts of Equal Employment like his students.)

That came discriminatory from the same penis questions that could have been resolved at this point as well of the confidentiality question of “Which president she talked too after confidential meetings in which Claimant was not the problem.”

That still proves gender biased of female and goes into racial unnecessary and without fact to warrant.

ADA claims come from multiple sources to remove Claimant while noting modification of procedure, singling out and their supervisor singling in on something has mentally and fundamentally affected claimant to warrant documentation in full awareness of supervisor liability and federal compliance investigations during to compile evidence.

Copyright Claims.

Anything the judge wrote on the matter of dismiss is horrific to a college to present and then for a federal United States Judge to permit despite side-by-side comparisons that actually did have conversations, citations and notes as Claimant does not waste their time.

SCAD is a conduit globally of investment of creative and if it was both SCAD’s position and of the Number 1 protector of Copyright being United States on ideas and claims, then that is an absolute no vote of confidence in any capacity of nest egg at SCAD of creative investment.

Valid claims were stated, witness and discovery would have assurtained and stopped and that was never allowed.

As it stands of Claimant’s counterance of dismiss, I find that a disgrace of the The American legal investment and globally would not uphold of any further investment in American Education. “Can’t protect an Idea, don’t run a college.”

“They are full of them of which to nurture.”

All the more reason why not to entertain an environment ripe for exploitation in which they proved by advancing on in hiding Student Royalty Free Policy and creating more liability while doing so.

GA Code § 9-9-5. Section 9-9-5 - Limitation of time as bar to arbitration (a) If a claim sought to be arbitrated would be barred by limitation of time had the claim sought to be arbitrated been asserted in court, a party may apply to the court to stay arbitration or to vacate the award, as provided in this part.

As SCAD had over a full calendar year to begin arbitration and did not get any far as mediation of judge professional opinion, can there be a vacate of award based on “failure to arbitrate” and “Dismiss during attempts” towards in support of Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc., 539 U.S. 52, 56 (2003

It could be weighed on if the judge’s award and opinion would matter here in the absence of witness testimony and discovery to assurtain and resolve questions raised in which SCAD officially “Dismissed” and did so with prejudice.

The reading goes on to awareness of fact there is zero reason the president of SCAD doesn’t know what is going on, as it is legally of their procedure for them to sign off on anything.

Judge acknowledges the new student catalog and claim of un-just of what was fundamental of BBB aspects and of moral procedure to do correctly in this manner.

Judge found it fails to meet relieve in which that becomes a problematic aspect of structure between judicial and private matters in which globally that is of concern.

That is without a doubt in evidence of fundamentally applied before and then in the same way as legal and procedure an attempt to hide and create more damage to consider.

It is here Claimant is remorseful of Judge in their statement and raises question of their morality despite facts read or not on the matter.

When it comes to global investment, they made a stance on the Number 1 of copyright standard which has failed in their own structure and globally or anyone’s privilege and of the utmost of college to protect in which they do not and find privilege in arrogance of.

As it stands, the judge’s opinion is of mediation without witness or discovery and is of professional of opinion to consider in public court.

As it stands my Claimants comment in judicial of private mediator’s opinion of sifting through facts and evidence.

It is you job to do so.

You are paid so accordingly and you spent your life upholding the law until you hit a point where you had validity of statement and still not of cohersion or payment of opinion of waste of time in which this factors to the common folk on the matter.

As it stands, you are paid hour by hour for your judgement and you applied about 38-40 hours total on the matter in which is your right of normal or of statement piece

It is noted the judge did not read everything of fact of this case nor consider it the same of what a legal trial would be in which the opinion of the judge is not the same as arbitration which never occurred and their opinion does not uphold SCAD standards of ADRPA in which they too have failed on the matter.

I respect a life time opinion, but it is not without scrutiny and of full evidence to be legally setting nor or any professional standing based on evidence in credibility.

Based on evidence, I site the same Anti-Laws of “United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 334 U.S. 131 (1948 is now focused on private arbitration of what is a desired need for second glance of credibility and noted already of judicial oversight over all cases.

The judge’s opinion matters, but it defies what was already presented as fact to warrant a ration al decision easily paid off in an environment of private of which is under discrepancy.

As it stands, Claimant has the right to produce everything of Private Mediation if of further question outside the fact SCAD failed to arbitrate within a year and hoping that is the end of such.

The same questions are present anyways of SCAD prior arbitration council of State Retired that fails to uphold their own ADRPA.

The opinion is respected, but it was not of legal bounds in which SCAD can stand on.

(I rest on Exhibit B and C of what is presented and withheld of private arbitration and of legal rights nots not disclose of public record.)

COST of Damages Outlined and Submitted in JAMS SESSION

All of this is expressed within and summed up here

Backpay from Date of Wrongful Termination to Time of Submit to JAMS

By being a valid reporting party and allowed compensation return based on SCAD handbook.

$82,393

Claimant’s Breach of (Education Investment).

$34,855.45

Loss of Income from what would had been a Master’s Degree and lifetime of average market value.

$14, 815,564.20, done so of a 5x multiplier of the bare minimum of retirement of

$2, 963, 112.84

Copyright Claims and Damages

Reserved for future discussion of mutualness of future litigation on repeat offenders.

As it states in claim.

$6,750,000

(Based on Found SCAD Student Royalty-Free Policy,

Refund wad Requested of Undergrad/Masters study of SCAD 2001—2005, 2019—2022

$119,475

Response to Claim for Failure to Pay Accrued Vacation Time Should be Dismissed because Claimant Cannot Establish Legal Entitlement to Such Pay

$1131.13 + Interest + Any Applicable Damages

G. Calculations of Pro Se Legal Fees and 24/7 constrain based on Averages

Standard Legal

$7,636,992 (21,696 hours since date of “wrongful termination”.)
Copyright Lawyer Fees, $8,005,824.

CONCLUSION

Complete Total of Spelled out Damages of Failure to Arbitrate or Challenge Validity of Claim is $37,446,234.78 was accounted for in the Jams Mediation session.

That is neither a innocent of guilty outside of damage of time-barred and failure to arbitrate within a year, of which guilt was already proven within of what SCAD failed their own ADRPA by choosing to “Dismiss” everything which would not hold up in court based on their own procedures.

According to even the mutually agreed upon JAMS system, it is a requirement to have arbitration be completed within a year or else it is defaulted.

As SCAD and Claimant was ordered into Arbitration on Sept. 7, 2024, that timeline has expired and this figure does not take into consideration the emotional damage that has occurred before going into what The World thought of Not being able to protect Copyright material.

As that is something the State of Georgia can award without prejudice, that is a request of Claimant who has for the rest of their life, a story of what became of 1 year of slavery and able to tell a story about it moving forward.

As private arbitration is private business, As it stands, the mediation of Philip Arthur Bonneau v. SCAD is confidential and proprietarty of Philip Arthur Bonneau and under copyright protect in sole ownership.

Not a single SCAD representative participated in mediation of testimony or otherwise, and attorney of opposing council and Judge of Jams are considered Contract to Hire, Per Case basis legally, in which they have no claim on per assignment based.

As I was forced into this pro se, and stripped of my Constitutional rights on the matter, it is my choice to preserve and protect or showcase of my position into this case and claim on what is considered of SCAD’s ADRPA as a separate entity.

Anything of that private session of mediate cannot be utilized by The Savannah College of Art & Design for private gain or purposes without my expressed permission in which is not granted at this time.

There can be no challenge to that as they did not invest anything directly outside cost, except what is written of official position by their contract attorneys, whom would be aware of public record anyways and of professional stances of legality. Claimant is not an employee and in procedurals, bear all cost, especially when not followed. This is stated in their Arbitration procedures as, “A party proceeding without anattorney is considered to be a separately represented party.”Where in this case successfully upholds the argument based on SCAD’s own ADRPA procedures that claimant is not considered an “employee”.

It is understood no party would have the rights to the mediator’s notes during this and official position was done by all in fear of perjury or other crimes. Any idea or procedural change from private mediation matters is timestamped by a major 3rd party of history.

Claimant and SCAD officially went to “Dismiss” everything which is a relinquish of any future rights and default judgement according to their own ADRPA procedures of any and claims in which they had the chance to property defend and did not for over a year since ordered to do so. 

Claimant notified Lead Attorney for Littlier, Aaron Saltzman on September 18, 2024 via email of valid copyright claim at 10:08AM EST with the message.

"Thank you for your time in litigation

Please let your client know all aspects of complaint and court has been completely copyright protected by myself and they cannot in any way impede on my property or life story without compensation, agreements and respect as no non-confidentiality was signed, anything of lawyer or judge is per contract employment and used to public record anyways.

There was zero testimony by any scad representative on defense side during arbitration and they have no legal rights to anything of the case from april 2021 to present.

It was a pleasure working this out and making something out of zero.

Philip Arthur Bonneau”

“When you lose a great deal of things, you always have a story to fall back on.”

Claimant wrote this to resolve an issue of vulnerability of their own legal council, as well as the JAMS community based on the allowance of SCAD’s financial resources during time of complaint in which defaulted argument and discussion on failure to respond in time by Friday, October 13, 2023 to a 30 day time limit of window to legal do so.

By Claimant, copyright protecting the entire case from start to finish, they are noting there are proprietary aspects of this case that could be utilized elsewhere without the advantage to Claimant in which was showcased in copyright upon copyright violations noted during complaint.

As SCAD proeeeded to use contract/fixed-assignment contractors and no official representative on the matter, the same rules apply in which they have done so to the students of SCAD in the SCADpro position in which SCAD has no legal rights to anything in this case presented at this point.

They can not screw out the law firm they hired by the vulnerability discovered by the Claimant too wished they wished to screw out of rights, and they cannot utilize anything of the private mediation in defense as they legally do not own any of it at this point and have their own debts to settle or conversations to be had.

In that regard, SCAD cannot perpetuate what they already took of granted of other people’s time and relied on other people’s time legal to defend “No looking here”, which seems to be fundamental of my original case and now moreso globally to award “Default Judgement” on a year’s worth of could have and yet did not.

Integrity there that Defending parties time is saved in cost as well as JAMS, and then all the more reason for The State of Georgia to go Default on this and have SCAD actually begin good-faith efforts or let them go (USA v.) and allow me to live my life a someone freed slave while trying not to think of the damage of copyright infringement upon myself globally and of difference before taking for granted public record, which still comes from copyright protected asepcts and need for Respect, that was mentioned before going into the past year in uphill.

The factual decision of copyrighting everything of my time of complaint is to make sure that if I am not respected in life while I was placed in poverty and danger along with my entire family, you are not playing with my life rights and property in my death and public record will account for that landscape accordingly in which is laid out of fact of this American Choice.

That is a guaranteed 75-90 years after my death before people can touch my property in the disrespect I have been treated in life and all the more public display of affection then globally if it got that far.

All of my books have gone through Library of Congress.

That is not a poor man’s copyright, that is valid of claim and if that of attack of American Dream, I know where life stories of the past lay when lost everything and lose teeth of value.

That was worth it uncompensated at this time.

Considering the impediment upon my first novel, “Curated Jellyfish” and what is protected there and could had been a conversation of arbitration of SCAD that only stayed in mediation, it begs the question, “Who are you to judge outside of wanted to be the name attached when many and all are.”

As it stands, the loophole change of protection of IDEAs are amazing to consider, and it was noted in private arbitration that if electronic ideas cannot be protected, namesake can and life story as well in which SCAD officially never entered outside of perjury in Superior State Court and cast no representative in Private Mediation in the year of their already known legal awareness and continuance of.

Whatever was assurtained and alleged in private mediatation and beginning to be addressed in Superior Court of Georgia and EEOC before going back to 2019-2018 is perhaps all the more reason why I was left out of many things of fact and all the sadness of attack during to consider of an Idea going out the window and needing protection.

That would be of statement of fact in which SCAD has and didn’t provide despite testimony during time of incident and of mediation of 3rd party of the value of mental health in resolve of partners and liabilities of what came before.

That never came to fruition, and so that respect of mental health is understood as discounted and something they don’t wish to entertain personally, professionally or if it happened to anyone else of a 2-month (outside) report of 2021 which would prove liability, crimes in which were preventable and something I have accepted they have and wish not to divulge, which is fine of self-protect as they respect my own on the matter of what was factually laid out and not allegated, either in legal of my ownership or books impeded on in which I did not gain the profit or recognition I should have while others blatently took.

Within the legal case was the submit of evidence of “No ‘Starving Artist’s” in which was prior copyright protected  3-times over and created and produced post education and employment, where it is noted there would be legally bound to question if infringed upon and, if prior rights were a question before, they absolutely are definitive of source on this matter and of their partners of which neither have my permission of Philip Arthur Bonneau’s time in Slavery and complaint within this country.

“No ‘Starving Artist’s” is readily available for sale since December 24, 2023.No copies to date have ever been purchased legally on that matter and legally that is tracked while knowing the full book was submitted in faith towards conversation of 10 years od damage and escalation that occurred while at SCAD as employee/student that never occurred and went into “DISMISS”.

There is no “Dismiss” a book is legally available and valid of no liability within.

Claimant was told in the beginning of mediation that “Can’t protect an idea” But you can protect a source and CDC it.

All the more reason to copyright protect for corporate of political purposes moving forward of source and timeframe, something I had to do with my work very drastically in an infringed market of fact and check of timeframe.

SCAD cannot do anything legally or creatively outside of entities within process their own morality and what they can and cannot translate from that time with either that work, any of my works or of legal complaint without conversation of RESPECT with I and of agreement, and that is the way it should be of protecting any idea and making sure a college does it as well. Globally that matters and rule of law is sound before going into other countries of consideration of such.

Anything of court on the matter would be what their ADRPA required of statement of Affirm or Deny in which they did not and cannot moving forward in this matter as they abused the everyday person who meant well and tried to protect.

 As any default judgement goes, I cannot elaborate further towards that judge decision who knew my initial concerns of slavery and abuse prior and then saw them come to fruition in which could be of testimony outside of this.

The matter is it has been a year since ordered to arbitrate and that did not occur and what did during times of isolation are aspects of the law that would not put up with continued abuse, exploit and strip of citizen rights.

Claimant comes back to judicial, in the state of Georgia in which default already occurred, after going federal on the matter privately to get to points of self-governance on either side under the affordance of The Constitution in which none of us can escape from in protect.

There should be no appeal as arbitration did not occur.

Based on behavior the prolonged pattern of detriment towards I would of continued in non-resolve in which anything official of the court from SCAD would be an attempt to “DISMISS” valid claims that must be heard and accounted for or else find that no evidence of investigation or debunk proves liability in what occurred here,

 There is a year lost personally to get to arbitration and they have all the global nest egg of affordance on the matter of wasted time to afford what is minimal of damages in which they chose to “Dismiss” without reason outside of other people’s time in litegation that they did not earn.

SCAD asked for arbitration and then wished to dismiss and discount all claims privately without investigation or evidence to dis-prove.

In that regard, I ask for default judgement on the valid request in which SCAD could no longer argue anyways so that I can move on from my life and finally be free of whatever copyright hell and workplace criminal motive caused me to blip this many years of my life and cost me more yet to be had.

SCAD disrespected timelines and of saving face by going into private arbitration.

During that time they still harmed the claimant and did not uphold their own policies in which have been a year past and still no resolve and constant damage.

Under their own procedures and of § 9-11-55.

Claimant would like to wish default judgment in the state of Georgia, where their non-discussion is truth of one thing and never a resolve on the other, so they can at least alieviate the bare minimum and we can all move on separately of not a waste of time.

Anything else from here would be a cease and desist along with restraining orders of executive of the college based on their life time and rape of human life contribution.

According to GA Code § 9-11-55 (2021), SCAD had no intention of resolving this privately and have forfeited any position of defense moving forward.

At best all claims were presented factual and not even a fraction of a presidential salary to consider of compensation of non-mutualness and disrespect of time.

I have laid out the grounds of contempt of court which comes with criminal aspects in this matter and wish to proceed with this first before doing so in matters of good faith and done with as wel

SCAD failed to uphold the motion to arbitrate under GA Code § 15-1-4 (2020).

Any aspect of self-government review is excessive in human rights and court consideration against their affordance.

Claimant owns all of mediation at this point and can present any evidence outside of what is of rationale of law of default in which human life was exploited beyond the awareness of The State of Georgia the First time and now with mor with more global nest egg protection to weigh in on and hopefully resolve the timeliness aspect without here or there on the matter.

Thank you for your time in consideration of default Judgement.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated:

SEPTEMBER 19, 2024

Electronic Sign – Philip Arthur Bonneau

Name:

Philip Arthur Bonneau

Title:

Self-Represented, Former Student, Former Employee, Alumni

Address:

Address:

City, State, Zip:

Phone:

Fax:

E-Mail:

     philip@philipbonneau.com

Attorney No.:

     Self-Represented

 

 

[1] https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/arbitration/what-is-arb.html#:~:text=Arbitration%20is%20a%20procedure%20in,instead%20of%20going%20to%20court.

NOTHING TO DO ABOUT Being Brave about Anything....

Just so we are clear of validness, “No ‘Starving Artist’s” has already gone through Federal Balances and not so many Checks at this point of Traffic Claims and where the spin-offs are of 3 times over copyright protected.

Once a Slave in Traffic....

And in a plea for help or move on nevertheless….

If ever an issue, I will uphold in court exactly the same non-constitutional private arbitration procedure others chose to defend.

I am sound in that decision and it will always be upheld in court of decision of best interest of SCAD and American history. 

Citizen 2-Ply, where Apple knew enough of the References to Stay away from Citizen Kane Kramer

When it comes to private arbitration, it should be considered a mirror to the court system.

Anything and everything of professional capacity should be considered in that capacity as official and possible of public record.

In that regard, there is absolutely no privacy issues to how things play out in televised or reported document of a legal matter in which privately could play out until the end in which Non-Disclosures are advised and in this case was never had or offered.

It is my personal stance of what would be public opinion and review anyways in court of law, that I take ownership of perspective prior and make absolutely sure for the benefit of everyone I Swore by by word and so did opposing party in which couldn’t be hidden in non-mutualness and absolutely my royalty-free right of towards royalties of my life experience.

I respect everyone named or involved in this private arbitration and welcome the challenge of what couldn’t come from anywhere other than a conversation with the United States of America as every other party was paid and the events took place indirectly of SCAD and their only representative of official purjured in official knock-out of credibility of the college and at best moving forward a matter of how much money to pay legal and stay out of things officially.

I imagine now that I am done with any official discussion knowing there is no payment of time or investment, I said what I said of professional thank you and handshake.

I am well aware Littlier is an international law firm in which also has ethics to uphold and do so in multiple countries.

It was an amazing first time of Law Novice in counterance of professional law firm and moving forward it would be remembered of what does and does not strike intrigue after-the-fact.

I’m basically a junior assistant to a para-legal position of note-worthy position of landmark challenges all day every day while moving on with my own property in which has been vastely impeded on by the global market and those wishing to command it in attention.

Even they could pick me up knowing that wouldn’t be a problem.

Would make sense as that is actually not bound to America anyways while knowing the problems in confidence.

They would know that I said, “I am not an American Slave” in paraphrase.

And that concludes my American Full Frontal.
I will Dance around this in Depot of Discussion in continuances of Rated Sistems.

My Right and Honor for Future Generations.

The Following Text is Copyright Protected and aspects of it contained in the book “Underwater Word 3-4: The Land of Far Away Government Assistance”.

The context in its entirety went through Better Business Bureau Discussions of The United States of America.