I received the above letter via email from SCAD council on December 2, 2024 at 9:28PM with the attached image of a falsified claim that they FED-EX a response from their legal team denying any future arbitration claims in what was already a series of years of witness intimidation, electronic attacks and copyright infringement violations by the college post employment/education where alligations were directed against the president of the college during that time to non-procedurals wishing to dismiss, not provide any evidence of investigation and an entire lack of following their protocol of ADRPA/private arbitration while contesting it’s enforceable legality in first approach of Superior Court of Chatham County and then neither SCAD’s legal team nor the hired Federally Retired Judge followed that procedure to any amount other than mediation, denying myself both discovery and witness testimony which comes with arbitration proceedings despite request for such.
Email Attached image.
SCAD’s legal representative attached the above low-resolution picture as a pseudo confirmation of a FED-EX package that was never sent, and still would violate SCAD’s ADRPA procedures by handing any matters of HR responsibility to legal outside council of undo cost.
As I am completely proactive on all aspects of this case since my wrongful termination on February 10, 2022, I respond quickly with a series of emails that have since been submitted back to the Superior Court of Chatham County with the cover letter page above being the only thing sent in along with as it would of been both the Judge and SCAD’s legal council to submit an insult of a Federal Judge’s statement to the court to satisfy the judges order to arbitrate back in 2023.
Legally, they have surpassed any and all legal time limits to satisfy the Superior Court of GA on any motion required to respond and I am not doing their job for them, especially when already laid out how SCAD failed and demolished any future stance of their ADRPA/private arbitration being a credible or constitutional outlet for the entity to explore.
That would pave the way moving forward for anyone to cite GA Case SPCV22-01289-ST, to challenge any attempt SCAD has moving forward to uphold their private arbitration with anyone, while hopefully finally moving to a different phase of life that has been catastrophic to I on my life and intellectual property while noting the dangers of that for any investor or collaborator of The Savannah College of Art and Design.
The series of events leading to this day involve another ADRPA form filed and sent personally through the SCAD mail room to be delivered to the VP of Human Resources and then doing so again via email at a later date through the the hr@scad.edu email address, while blind copying SCAD Security.
Once the 30 day limit past to respond on either side, I filed back into Superior Court citing statues of timing in with 30 days past from that and SCAD did not respond to the court once again defaulting on legal requirements of response to motion.
As SCAD and private arbitrator JAMS did not submit back to the court, they failed to uphold the arbitration requirements of order over a calendar year while stretching out unnecessarily what was once originally a wrongful termination matter that compounded into intellectual property theft by the college and their partners as outlined in the fully written and copyright protected book, “No ‘Starving Artist’s”, which was submitted into private arbitration completely and is in SCAD possession of further possible damage and to no response or discussion on the matter during private mediation.
My email responses back to SCAD legal’s council was quick and many, as testiment and testimony of the last 3 years of complaint. Once SCAD passed the legal deadline resulting in factual default of a court case, I revealed via email that I had also blind copied The Atlanta Journal Constitution, The Washington Post and The New York Times for possible third party credible source of fact check of non-response from SCAD of their legal obligations to address and investigate any and all complaints brought to the attention of private arbitration in which SCAD never responded to opening up the door for an unsafe campus and one where in my experience was met with vast retaliation during legal worker and student rights complaints that were ignored, dismissed and then insulted in during investigation.
Those email responses were,
10:02AM
“Let’s be clear here.
That letter never arrived and SCAD has no rights to deny any arbitration procedure at any point and time, especially in alligations of the president of the college copyright infringing on my works post employment.
We have had this conversation in what was SCAD’s flat out disrespect of their own arbitration procedures that have been resubmitted back to the state of Georgia into public record and verification of federal government.
It is my right to jury trial based on federal law at any point and time based on the already submitted evidence that could or could not have sparked a federal investigation at this point to which your attached letter of deny here is your entities official position of no longer a leader of the educational system nor over anything of federal and state law on the matter of human rights violations,personal liability issues and control issues in which they have their own community of partners to consider of private investigation and affordance.
If I ever received that letter prior I would of most definitely responded the same way and will consider that picture to be misleading and probably the original letter confirmation of when your law office was first hired and again misleading of fact. “
10:04AM
“As it stands, Arbitration is not binding when the paid for Federal retired judge closes a case with no chance to respond, which is back to state court on that matter on what you are legally bound to and failed over and over again in the failure of private arbitration.
-Philip Bonneau”
10:13AM
“By the Way, SCAD should have responded to the addition to the State Court Case where you once again did not follow State Law and Defaulted on this matter in binding of oversight state wide and federal, regardless of whatever fabricated FedEx you sent privately.
Your law firm had an obligation to the court which your entity failed to adhere to of private arbitration in which the judge was supplied the procedures in which to adhere to as well.
Have a gret Monday.
Please note all recipients on this matter of unsafe school campus and a hazard to American history and Global awareness due to the fact that according to procedure nothing legal leaves SCAD without President Paula Wallace’s sign off which is made quite clear at this point in court case, mediation at best procedures and available to the press at this point along with more than likely federal and state judicial overview in the same manner of illegal search and seizure SCAD has already done in copyright infringement claims.
-Philip Bonneau
10:31AM
Just so we are clear on the matter of presidential awareness, paula wallace is copied moving forward on this thread
(I add the president’s email personally for this to avoid any notion of what was originally understood of an entity with cut-throat patterns of professionalism within the company and did so back in 2020 when a major concern and liability to the college expanded towards I having an interview opportunity of SCADpro Director/SCADartsales Director position just before my wrongful termination on Feb. 10, 2022. That was done so to make sure all parties in email is aware of the hazard to campus, danger to the investors and myself can once again move on from unnecessary drag out and to make clear the president if copied via email to do their own due diligence.)
11:51AM
Please retain the photograph of the mail delivery as the meta data would be a part of evidential discovery of date of creation from this point forward in question of fabrication of facts and truth.
I shall submit this thread into evidence on the Superior Court Case in which SCAD defaulting on as SCAD’s position of the ADRPA is legally binding in what they didn’t adhere to while still hilariously for all time laughing at opposing council to constantly cite time limits and statues in pertaining to this case within public record.
-Philip Arthur Bonneau
(I take note to myself, that it is highly suspect that my Mother has a Santa Statue on her front porch in October and the only FED-EX I ever received from Littlier was in December 2022 which matches in falsification in which they would have to supplied FED-EX Tracking number, FED-EX email to a third party and the meta data of the original image can be reviewed for a letter that was never Received)
(I file back into Superior Court)
7:12PM
I’ve submitted this entire thread to public record of Superior Court Case in the State of GA under
Case # SPCV22-01289-ST
Please don’t fuck with global investment ever again on the matter, let alone rip off in thinking your president had any credentials of fucking over anyone in which they have their own Lacoste problem of De’Sade to consider of adult and morally knowing when to end a phase of what is coming for them anyways in disrespect and evidence accounted for.
SCAD legal cannot respond to the court case on the matter and at best we see what the state of Georgia does in which they legally could not close of case anyways and that being federal and global awareness on the matter.
7:13PM
Still went with full oversight here of president of the college in no deniability of anyone underneath fucking over the global nest egg and required statement at this point.
7:17PM
At best you have a SCAD Star that roams free of friends with the Wolves and making sure of financial loan of anything prior.
Comes with their choice and what they do with it is probably will legal council sat down on the matter and shut up of what they are legally responsible for telling their client that they were bested by an art degree that as zero alliance with SCAD at this time in Jocasta’ed.
9:02PM
I imagine there will not be a legal response while imagine all of us are curious of Superior State court of GA.
December 3 - 3:10PM
By the way, that's a santa image in what your company tried to pass off as a verification of a package delivered in October.
I'm pretty sure my mother doesn't keep it Christmas 24/7 in her to verify that was the fedex from dec 2022 when I first filed in court against SCAD which verified your negligence as a law firm, the guilt of your client and the ridicule of the nightmare before Christmas on the matter of trying to consider that a verification of a package sent in october.
Let me know when any of you want to be serious.
(This is done so for any verification of future falsification on their part)
My final email written around 2:34AM on December 5th had quite a bit of typos which are corrected below.
Please note that as scad’s illegal council has upheld their position of private arbitration, they was submitted to state court in evidence submitted prior in which they failed it with both state and federal criminal possibilities of obstruction of justice and any and all claims of what would be separate cases and matters public or private at this point which cannot be denied.
As SCAD found the case closed to them, zero illegal search and seizure would be tolerated and there is no more pre-discovery zone of legal interest without a legal global entity losing all legal rights of practice before chiming in on American college exploit.
Best of luck in front facing and the comminity is watching you as it is public record of choice of entity that did not respond according to private and public procedures set in place by established law and private business of nest egg global trust.
-Philip Arthur Bonneau
______________
Considering the Superior Court Case is public record, it would have to be addressed anyways, which at best SCAD can only issue public statement at the time as they have wasted the the court’s time, the JAMS system of integrity of private arbitration along with 3 years of my life before robbing me of my intellectual property and time as a student investor as a full-time employee who is afforded Worker Rights that were violated and addressed properly and with all statues of limitations and timelines accordingly.
I have had to do so without legal council, not only from finance point, but the removal of privacy rights and violations of electronics where all is now left in full awareness of Paula Wallace, SCAD Security, The press and what needed to be end of narrative on many points of contention into new realms of consideration. Acting as pro se during proceedings was a requirement according to the ADRPA to be deemed a separate entity of the college during the matter in which any prior employer or student with legal representation should be considered separate entity anyways despite the contrary.
It is a difficult PR move and honesty, but the uphold of protection to the college, the student investment and the college structure as a whole was important and necessary for I while protecting my own rights and property that was laid out in case. I did not submit to the State of Georgia the entire private arbitration proceedings and have no intention to as they were all sent through the federal government and Library of Congress to retain my life rights and intellectual proper as SCAD did not have any entity outside of case-based employment lawyers interact during.
That was done so to question and uphold The State of Georgia legal system in what has been 6 years of compounded issues reported between multiple businesses and choice of state.
I hope SCAD the best in what is a required resolve for the State, Federal and Globally on the matter.
I posted the picture above early in the morning on December 3rd with the comment, “He knows when you’ve been Naughty".”