So this is what it is on the outside and respecting...

Here I am in blog form in what is absolutely for the world to see while prior there was not.

I think about what is so done and should not be an issue from November 2, 2018 on in the matter knowing my website was attacked internally and not published then while I moved on with life at the point of it’s creation in 2017.

I severely was amazed of what life looks like once I compiled to my own place of ownership of life’s accomplishments and, considering the timeframe, all of the work on the website is of my ownership.

I was completely disgusted at the slamming of the keyboard then and then reaching out after protective measures shortly after.

Anything there is still of owner conversation and government contract of approval or else quite a problem on the clock and salaried.

I cannot and will not pacify wbat was a direct attack towards my property then and then where there are clear cut off points of morality moving forward and most certainly from “Curated” on in which someone’s lifetime achievement needs a fucking reality check of cross roads.

I will be adult here and I know more than likely this blog post on my own owned website will not do anything in consideration of awareness of everything prior to make a point of perspective own and not of partnership.

Anything here is an awareness of on the clock and if that be a problem, then that is either your brand or not on this watch of brand as well.

I spent my time in this capacity testing then and then having to in other entities before I ever entered the college system on the matter.

I heard what I heard and tested what I could of sanity to make sure prior where once something came into a second place of business it was absolutely all sense on deck of what was a violation off human rights and confirmed or could be fact checked over and over to what I already swore to for all time.

The life experience of entering into SCAD, The Savannah College of Art & Design, is a pre-industry awareness and passover to consider of what has occurred there in which is surely not just my story but a Beyoncé awareness of wish to control optics and angles when all cannot be blocked.

That reference comes with a direct attack towards my mother and verifiable of non-variable of someone did not anticipate the back-feed on of willful intention.

I staunchly defend the Beyoncé brand humanistically but that fucking bullshit is accounted for and federally reserved.

I have never met the Carters and they have never met I to make sure in that Churnal Coil, that shit Is awareness of forced position of statement of The Carters or be a far greater problem than P. Diddy.

I’m pretty sure of anything of Bonnie here there is a Cylde’s Dale to consider of how much in this lifetime people have fucked up and needed to stop.

Budweiser will get there of your advantage of dispresct of human life and will go Light with this moving forward.

On the clock and understood of your brand and then not your brand.

At this point of any country fully aware of getting back to the point of generational and making sure of something in isolation of what occurred on American soil.

That is important since that was brought to global awareness in 2022 and here we are in a position where partner all you want on the matter, it is global recognition to make sure of the number 1 example on the matter.

Internally, I had my moments where by all means the idea of “President of Student Body” matters here and never came to any level of fruition nor of any reality to also make a statement of, “Don’t fuck the student body” and that being applicable of a check your wife and find why that stays right where it does.

I think about this in knowing SCAD has relinquished their rights to their ADRPA and private arbitration based on my lifetime experience.

I have copywriter everything of complaint from wrongful termination on while trying to defend an institution at the same time.

Considering the constant attack towards I on the student loan aspect, I am not a protectorate of the college in what would have been sound morality at this point over and over.

I don’t give a shit in this capacity as there is federal oversight of what your brand could have done and what seems apparent of Cocaine Cowboys of problem areas to consider Florida and Miami upbringings.

Perspective wise I have had officially the president of the college rip me off post employment and student and then proclaim that in a mater piece of go fuck yourself in parenting on the matter.

That was done so in her Lessons of Leadership book and for that you have the highest paid college president in which is fucking ridiculed for all time in quick get rich schemes.

That was an insult of generations and in all the leasdership of understanding SCAD doesn’t follow their own procedures is a reason why class action can happen to the entity as it is designed of learn some fucking respect of privilege new money.

I use the term new money very sincerely and to the point of a first generation where in book form I stated what I stated and did so in considerable of respect.

SCAD rips off the generationals.

Capitalistic society allows it where they have no blockade to have on the matter of any teacher taking over anything of creative and intellectual value.

They couldn’t unless they invade privacy on the matter and as it stands I still wrote “Curated Jellyfish” and protected it before becoming a student which is an Employee fuck over waiting to be uncovered.

Human rights are all over this, to the point that I did raise legally and federally protected of anyone else’s problem with divorce and how to deal with that.

Now presented in the ultimate divorce and making sure anything of awarness human fucking respects adultism here of my my lifetime guarentee of Federal protection.

There is not one bit of circumstance of elementals that I give a shit about a family that would leave someone for dead.

I m pretty sure in what is factually a Beyoncé moment waiting to happen of brand based on fact will happen at some point or completely make a point of “fuck that entity for human life”.

The Churnal matters and when in element of understanding that is provided of who stood up for generations and who had awareness of that occuring this many years in.

It is the same of SCAD and quite a problem between industry and pre-industry.

In that nest egg, I’ve done what I could and I have all the legal rights to fucking destroy a family and a college entity while protecting the college system in general on the matter.

If someone was so problematic in boundaries, then they needed to fucking respect personal space and intimacy, which was not provided in this circumstance nor would had been if not called out for their behavior.

As it stands of this website, I am well aware of what I never fucking would have touched of Frued/Diablo and never did.

Whatever that level of intelligence went to is the same as clearance level of others not passing the test of getting off the pot knowing everyone shits anyways and then still continued from that point of stopping point and didn’t anyways.

I feel so sorry for 2018-2019 in continuance in 2024.

You are a country take-over away in morality and your brand is attached to it in morality of what is already recorded.

I’ll wait for my paper from the Federal Government of a full review of the matter which is beyond any brand of could of respected and never a part of while standing up once and formal on the global investment of child.

That bubble will burst.

That is a guarentee if you rip off future generations before they hit the market and find how that is justified globally of leadership and could have stopped at any point in leadership and awareness.

I stand by why you are and are not knowing those ideas travel .

That is not agreement while others may of been had.

As it stands, my experience protecting the student body is federally recognized while The State of Georgia can get their shit together just as much any global brand of headquarters can start respecting the “Everyday.”

Do you realize how much fucking bullshit has occurred over the last 6 years in the State of Georgia that would be globally recognized and federally backed for all time?

Your narrative went to a point of bullshit and that is where that goes in open for all lawsuit over and over and zero defense ever of SCAD’s ADRPA due to non-response and problems back in 2022 that was not upheld in life experience after.

I can’t even say, “Go Fuck yourself.”

You did that already.

Written on the 30th day of legal standing of not following procedure and any complaint which should be valid of SCAD to address at any point of global nest egg and chose not to.

“I am writing to SCAD again in follow up to a valid ADRPA request that went unresponsive since hand delivered to the mailing room in which security cameras can attest to of October 10th, and what was redundant of email form.

I have tried my best with you to follow procedures and you have failed on that matter of not even responding as if a problem just wishes itself away, which doesn’t happen of liability of scope of wish of what was presented involves direct engagement of the president of the college. 

It is noted notthing legal leaves the college without their awareness and this would be known of already perjury by the human resources department in full awareness of the judicial landscape as well as internal oversight of what is absolutely a perspective of the president on the matter. 

SCAD has been presented legally with a choice to address something legally to the point of wishing to arbitrate privately and then failed to do so during a full calendar year.

During that time the stipulations of the ADRPA attempt to upheld also go into violations of it of working with retired state judges instead of federal and then continuing in my case of within limits of time to be a failure to arbitrate and simply end at mediation in which SCAD council agreed upon, didn’t contest and Complaining party went back to public record of what was required originally and not fulfilled. 

As it stands of no response to a valid complaint utilizing SCAD’s procedures in in violation of GA stateue 9-11-6 of 30 days to respond legally to any matter.

Considering the court case and private discussion where time limits are important, it is to note SCAD violoated GA law in court before violating their own procedures in attempted private arbitration that went to mediation at best as witness and discovery was not entertained in court nor in private arbitration.

It is noted to I that SCAD, and the president of the college infringed on property post education/employment in side by side comparison while in case noted their partners of Disney were doing the same.

I should be noted the book, “Curated Jellyfish”, now available in 2 parts of “Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Stolen” was initially named “Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Lost.”

This book has been ripped apart in refence by Disney in particular and as it was in court stated, this was copyright protect prior to becoming an active student at SCAD and would be consider damage to an employee in which no rights are afforded in that capacity. 

The case of multi-tiered went to the BBB to argue the rights of students and their works on copyright citing SCAD has no ownership to anything creative loan taken out on without inviting financial borrowing of interest and backing which is at jeapordy. 

THe intitial complaint of EEOC compounded in enviroment of what is federally protected of retaliation and awareness of what occurred and was stated factually. 

I have stated illegal aspects of Jonathan Goldstein that are upheld in court of sworn testimony as well as going into factual represenation of SCAD impeding on my copyright protected works post employment and education that constitutes retaliation and irreparable harm that SCAD cannot afford in the business they rest in of global invest while whistleblowing thier procedures of ripping off the global nest egg of any student investor in what is an entity primed for business takeover.

Considering the facts of what was stated in GA court case 

Case # SPCV22-01289-ST

SCAD has already relinquished their rights to private arbitration and that is proven in motive of entering into and and still not following procedure based on legal awareness and federal judge allowances. 

As SCAD has continued to harm during of intellectual property that pushing in the direction of motive of wrongful termination, it is noted that SCAD has failed to respond to a valid ADRPA form within the statues of legal limits, while failing privately to uphold that procedure anyways in what surmounted to private mediation at best.

I find that legally it is known and can be argued that SCAD cannot hide behind it’s private arbitration ADRPA ever again as they do not uphold it nor follow it in procedure when anything presented to the court. 

Legally of account, the series of events that happened to I from April 2021 of Private Federal Compliance investigation to wrongful termination of Feb. 10, 2022 do not exclude the events of timeline of Legally filing a lawsuit on Dec. 27, 2022 and then privately entertained SCAD’s wishes to uphold in court their ADRPA to private arbiitration to their complete lack of failure of following on that privately which went back to public record anyways.

I do the best for SCAD as I can, but I am also a 2005 alumni who still has student loans outstanding.

During the testimony, it was discovered of SCAD’s policy of full rights globally of anything creative of a student, which my discussion that SCAD dismissed instead of stating liable or not is never an escape of liability as that is against SCAD ADRPA to do so as all claims must be investigated and recorded for insurance purposes. 

It was stipulated that was in the direction of Crimes against humanity of ripping off generations of global investments while strapping them in student loans in an area where intellectual property would be prime for picking by those more aware.

SCAD legal in private mediation made a point of saying SCAD officially doesn’t protect an idea and it is still noted nothing legal of position statement comes out of the college without the president’s approval of message. 

That was done in regards to protected property created outside of SCAD as employee or student while still noting the infringement of the entity on books made post either capacity and a desire to move on.

Claimant mentioned many thing in court and mediation on the matter and finds whatever of that case did not uphold ADRPA of SCAD and the door is open for any and all lawsuits publically in which SCAD cannot ever uphold or defend their own private arbitration desires.

This is important in intellectual propety theft claims as well as SCAD’s awareness of that heading to the masking of copyright clause in the current handbook to go into matters of defrauding student investors.

I write this as legally SCAD cannot change one bit of thier policies on the matter during complaint and it is defintely a danger to the private entity while noting danger to the students as well in a not-safe campus of investment and that is corporately aware as well as third party. 

The lack of response on the matter is a detriment to the college in which if not resolved, I too would say the same thing already stated legally that all the intellectual property of SCAD’s entire history is up to grabs of others in the liabilities faced while the defraud of student’s is abundantly clear. 

The importance of responding to anything private is a fundamental to keep anything private and the door has been open based on trying to follow procedures that SCAD no longer had any private defense of what was basic procedure that was not followed.

I thank you for legally allowing any and all lawsuit public to SCAD, individual or class action as the entity did not uphold their positions or practices in which requires governance and rationale of 3rd party. 

Failure to act is failure of position while creating an unsafe campus on the matter. 

It was attempted since 2021 to secure the campus and everything that happened Feb. 10, 2022 was a clear invitation of criminal motive in which SCAD can no longer defend their ADRPA on the matter by failure to meet any reasonable deadlines or those compariable of court. 

In understanding it is SCAD procedure and understanding of ownership of student work contested during complaint, there is a major problem on the employee side in which legally SCAD relinquished any arguement or defense on that matter while raising claim through their procedures of question of “What happens when the president of your institution indfringes on Copyright Protected material?

Especially after the fact of employment and education.

As it stands of alumni 2005 in graphic design, 

"Once a bee always a bee in hive protection.”

Failure to respond in 30 days is failure to do your job while others are in danger. This is noted of valid legal complaint since April 2021, but sought and in statue of timelines of wrongful termination and criminal motive since February. 10, 2022 while all court and private mediations are copyright protected and federally observed. “

Snort while you can but globally your investors and partners will adult the shit out of your habit.