Possible Pitch of Movie Beginnings or Streaming Series of The Copyright Protected works, "Philip Arthur Bonneau v. The Savannah College of Art & Design: a law novice story"

A Work in Progress Pitch.

I am wondering if I can do a GoFundMe for Philip Arthur Bonneau v. The Savannah College of Art & Design: a law novice story to turn it into a documentary film or streaming series. 

I find it would be cost effective enough to purchase a single camera and rent a small space apartment and home to film myself in the fully owned. complaint and copyright of over 4 years of battle of what was already established law and should of been followed and was not.

I stated to The Library of Congress and copyright my sole ownership over the entire legal case based on the matter that SCAD lawyers and the retired federal judge are considered contract to hire on case-by-case bases of employment and have no legal rights of ownership, nor SCAD as I was the original filer of the Superior Court Case in Chatham County and paid for that to be done so and legally served to the college. 

It would be documentary style and I own my words, my perspective and time investment on the matter. 

The entire complaint goes into Obstruction of Justice, what occurred prior and then what crept into an internattional art college of America where I was forced to fight on my own while knowing I was stripped of my constitutional rights as well as human rights to fight not only for the protection of myself, my family, my property but for any Student Investor of a college that molds into not only a national discussion, but a global one of secondary education and the question of American investment of current generation and the weighing of value on that for future generations. 

As SCAD has already self-protected themselves illegally off my property intellectual and during complaint, the idea of teaching myself to be a filmmaker and a documentarian is easily affordable and capable of being done here. SCAD has waived all rights to the complaint and damage has already been done, so I can move on with my life and become a leader of environments unknown one way or another in a self-contained narrative of abuse of power within college landscape and America within the digital age. 

The landscape is ripe for discussion as fair use and educational purposes are put to task and challenged to a point of a potential jury landslide on the matter. 

Protectorate of government backed federal student loans a question on if a bubble bursts or floats off. 

If government is going into the Department of Education anyways, a challenge here is had on what they can and cannot act upon of copyright protected works in which The American government has already violated in fact on, and would more than likely do the same within the education system of current stance. 

A very good Harvard counterance of intrigue in student investors and naive ingenuity, where that goes both ways as the young mind, or of heart in this case, gets very creative in challenge of exploit and human labor trafficking within the digital age. 

It could be an exibitionist’s collaboration knowing the percentages rates of I to screener would be far more sustainable while tackling the rip off of creative property by The Walt Disney Corporation on my works and having that funnelled through The Savannah College of Art & Design to do so after already aware of prior incidents leading to a suicide attempt and others continuing with psychological warfare. 

It does have festival merit to it before possible Award Season, where I contend to myself, “I’m totally a Starving Artist” during trying to figure out what to Ware for these events.

I’m still probably just more balanced of diet on the matter and slimming down, but those are the ropes and thats the Read Carpet. 

What would I need here for this to get off the ground?

A Space.

A Camera.

Some learning Experience.

Comfortability of cost of living.

Comfortability that when someone says “Cease and Desist” that means narrative stops and stop intimidating witnesses or we start going Biblical on that matter that some witnesses knock on doors and are actually quite polite to talk to but they don’t freaking invade people’s private property and houses. 

Side note, I see where that Read Stain of Doorframe is going. 

If Mary had a little Lamb, that lamb grew up and did one thing or another. 

And that lamb had their own lamb, and from there generations of lambs come to Lambda legal. 

They do get you when you are young one way or another. 

I digress….

I see that a reasonable 200-250K budget for this is amazingly doable.

I am pretty sure less is needed, but I am looking at not doing anything else for the rest of the year.

I’m totally going to Blair Witch this. 

"Re-Claimed: a law novice story of time spent.”

I see this as an individual documentary style that can evolve if ever picked up and gained traction.

A story of trials and tribulations, but not without some experisence of Mock Trial of both lawyer and witness, so that helps leading to the production of something without SCAD approval leading to an illusion that a case is carefully considered of film and narrative between plaintiff and defendant of a jury of 12 peers selected from both sides to find out at the end SCAD defaulted and has not rights or business on the matter and have the defenant side walk over to the plaintiff side and leave the defendant space empty for the entire jury to side eye the mess out of them of full disclosure before getting to that reveal. 

My student body.

My choice. 

Your Student Body.

His Perjure Official of SCAD.

The low budget can totally expand and integrate into reinactments of which contracts, agreements and even insurance is available to intertwine and expand on time’s investment and where an idea goes once it is read or experienced. 

A challenge to hold onto the American Dream, knowing there is always another Dreamer out there. 

Soldier Boy of Love can say of ever Sade there is a Sadé. 

Mining the field one way or another of plow. 

:)

The documentary would be contained to the narrative of "Philip Arthur Bonneau v. The Savannah College of Art & Design: a law novice story.”

Although “No ’Starving Artist’s” was submitted federally to copyright and of conversation to SCAD in legal and legally bound methods, they chose not to discuss any bit of content within and due to budget constraints I can mention it is there but do not have to go into any of the content of character there in documentary form.

That would be a separate project entirely as it maps out 12 years of actual life and does the best they can with a landscape seemingly and then landscape most certainly real.

Side eye continues…..

PS. I love my side eye. 

Makes me think of generations and what to say and when to of perspective.

I can’t anticipate everything, but that is a satisfying JAWS awareness from a different angle. 

12 Sets of Side Eyes continue one way or another. 

Anyways, I have already in text and book form talked about America’s Cheap Asses and look at me being all kinds of affordable in chomping at the bits. 

It pays off in multipliers. 

Dividends are completely different. 

I’ll yank the A from that one and say, “befriend golithes”. 

It gets back to math, art and word of mouth in variety one way or another.