I find that there is not much I could write of 2023. I spent most of the year protecting my works of 2021 and 2022. If I were to do any of that, it comes from a landscape of needed support and of review before doing so.
I’ve transcribed my journals, protected them for 100 years and find I am completely A Democratic Repubican in which I refuse to play politics of 2-4 years in the backdrop of what I have already protected of about 100 years in this country in comparison.
That term comes as meaning I am an American of no political interest outside of the values of what is fundamentally afforded and what is taught to protect and uphold at any cost knowing there are aspects of both capitalism and fundamental human decency which has been challenged to I over the last 5-6 years.
Perhaps that is sit down moments on either side,
It isn’t like I haven’t had imaginary sitdowns prior with CEOs of Disney, DC and Sony who seems to have a history with Marvel and say, sword fight all you want. I own my perspective for 100 years if I survive the next 5 in what is guarenteed of American and Global History. Not a single one of those CEOs own that property and that conversation is one they can have with their parents as I retain my rights against whatever public aspect you wish to throw at me. My copyright protected works is beyond your public opinion influence and of The United States verification of fact in The Library of Congress of American History.
All the same of the respect of the Sacred Taco in comparison , (If the introduction of sword fight is entered so too of the taco so in equality it could be a banana. In equality of gender neutral aspects, it is important that society was female dominated prior to civilization going into male dominated and by rules of history there is always equality in position male or female).
Who knows really.
I find myself in a position where The State of Georgia has passed the 90 days to legally respond in a court setting to a motion in a backdrop of fighting for my rights since April 2021 with The Savannah College of Art & Design and then, despite their leadership’s judgement and evidence provided, I find I need to defer to the Alumni of SCAD and once again of outside boundaries of their affordance and influence.
It is difficult as what was of public record had in motion of Superior Court of Georgia, a plea of 69 pages of truthfulness against a backdrop of evidence prior of perview of male and female to see where there is idealsm in this country and there is where money talks and where copyrights walk.
I’ve been forced to self-represent myself in a landscape of which I am not equipped for and did so based on both no choice and awareness of influence politically, personally and monetary of others in which it is known to the court I did not name the president of the college in my American right to sue an entity for which they have full awareness and opinion of in how to self-govern in which has failed within a state in which has now also failed to self-govern.
That awareness is understood of position, of right, and awareness across the board of what is now a federal issue to consider as it has been a global issue since I initially wrote The United Nations of generational issues of invest within the American College system at SCAD.
It is completely known and stated both in The Library of Congress and of Court that my works have been impeded on multiple points and of multi-reference where I have said “Fact-Check this”.
Considering the protection afforded I on this soil, 1 book out of the many I have is worth the value of the entire timeline of The Walt Disney Corporation in comparison of protect in what is factually impeded upon by both The United States and at least them.
Whatever the could be of partnership possibilities that have yet to occur, it is of note on either side that is 100 years protection. That is the entire lifetime of Disney currently and 1/3 the history of The United States of America.
There you go, 1/3 within the backdrop of 2/3rd of America without even considering the backdrop of all of civilization and learned established aspects of working within.
I presented to the court the authenticity of my copyright to “Curated Jellyfish” before even taking a class at SCAD and never submit. It has been impeded on repeatedly along with all my other works on a digital landscape that is a toddler in comparison to civilization.
I am aware the safety I took to secure the protection of that work upto The Library of Congress entry and paying the over 200 dollar fee at the time of known problem areas and potential inflction of damage which doesn’t seem to be offered anymore as if known the digital landscape so it becomes a major catch-all on the digital governmental front if afforded and introduced. That special protection doesn’t even exist anymore in the digital backdrop of impediment.
I’m not mad at that, I am very well aware of what has transpired and I find it important to note that any partnerships that the heads of colleges would have had and alleged did are far well ahead to know that they knew and still I tried to protect the investors and find that those of head at this point made their choices. There are educational purposes of affordance to be had here while I have been bled many time over of what I had wished to do of community build and what I have done.
It is not my point to entertain many things despite evidence to say, “Others know. You made your choice…I’m sitting here trying to protect the investment of college in general and if there is a royalty-free grab bag here, there are about 100+ countries of I don’t know their systems to say more than likely royalty involved in future and current investment. I am trying to protect The American Dream and of any value of investment within.”
It saddens me at times that my experience has been prolonged for years where I still contend the wealth factor of an institution to at least be aware of that being affordance of global support and protection and yet I find myself somewhat in the backdrop of other people’s political aspirations and affordances to find your 2-4, 8 years max for some, lifetime of fundamentally building others to be quite not an issue I even care about anymore. I’ve pretty much protected my opinion for 100 years outside of whatever financier or party you are affiliated with. Did so quite broke and scaping to make ends meet and moving on. I am not even remotely a class warfare issue as I am of great investment to those of little money or great. That is apparent in my life’s work which has been stolen by those of learned behavior of landscape and affordance.
It hurts seeing both government and president of college advance on that during this time.
It is even more problematic when I assurtained a conjecture of personal interest and affordance and came to factual truth of aspects which are now available in the public market which means that research and technology would be open source of any country in exploration while of prior private investment in reasonable deduction of what could lead to cruelty and of directness of control of being a part of human condition and desire with or without regulation.
I find I am at least I am in Chapter 13 restructure so that is a Creditor hunt while finding what is and isn’t federally backed loans towards forgiveness. I find as a college institution has harmed me, it is my right with Federally backed loans still of almost 20 years had to paint a landscape of awareness of those who would know who is and isn’t in the financial institutions of established in a world of working beyond what is available of finance.
In a reflection of the Tyra moments of what I stand for, “I was rooting for you”.
I am well aware in awareness The President of my college of complaint was partial to chopping down The World Tree in partnership in my works and I will not sit here and have that continue.
Not in that area of America’s Next Top Archetype of Global Lessons.
The Lizard came one way or another anyways, but I find that is a communal effort to say succeed or not over time of how word of mouth and parody works of seriousness.
I find it amazing what life affords when I did not put my book “Underwater World” on Blurb yet and the other 4 books of star series is completely separate, as if I knew of candidness and protect to let things breathe and find that if flow of information occurs, so too does expectation, rushed narrative and unnecessary opinions in which others build upon anyways.
I will as it is a 7 book series of already United States protect and one I wish to physically produce before ever stating anything. It would be of Library of Congress awareness of what that book is in final form and that the privilege of protect of authenticity despite any private or publicly traded company regardless of private/political ventures. That book is complete.
I find it really is problematic of the landscape I find myself in and find that whomever individually or collectively went this route made a problematic aspect of expectations in which the respect of the author, creator and artist of the work had others grab hold of something without control within that still denotes a landscape and still denotes my 5-6 years of direct survival against or for in empathy of whatever other side of thrival.
That is difficult in the backdrop of the fledgling aspects of copyright protection in which globally has not been cherished, honored and taken advantage of against the digital backdrop of affordability.
I still contend, “Not on educational turf. That is a generational place and that is a massive conduit of problematic areas of right or left out of the nest.”
Here I am not, well aware of a great deal of things and finding one or two ways to go about this.
I contend I am not on the political side nor have aspirations. That comes with beginning to create a foundation of an online voting system that cannot be broken to avoid ever a rigged election cycle again while also making it convienant for the everyday person to vote from the privacy of their home and then going to work as if nothing happened and documented at the same time.
That is privately protected and of ownership.
All the reason why I don’t even entertain the idea of the viability of one candidate over the other at this time. Not my landscape and full awareness of espionage and popularity contests invited within and out of country by comments by former president Donald J. Trump on the campaign train.
Hack into the DNC and there DNC would more than likely do the same to there RNC and find that independently that is reasonability deducted of what becomes a landscape of judicial aspects to consider of national and personal defense.
I know some level of the landscape. I know the prior sound-bites. I’ve recorded with The Library of Congress my opinions of advancement of this country or of conversation and not attack. That was done so with I withheld and still denotes a problem area of where this country or I could have been at this time had that not occurred.
I do not take one bit of that back as my life’s work have been protected and molded based on the environmental aspects of not one single government contract outside the established respect of Modern Copyright Laws.
That is 100 years protect within this landscape where I could say I’ve stayed out of as of 2023 in any consideration of political landscape and caught only a glimmer every now and then of such.
I’ve protected my stance and partnered with existing country of at least affordance of awareness but not allowed to advance upon without conversation. I know what I’ve written of rationale and viability.
It has been quite noted of my intellectual property attacked and done so in a digital era in which 70s, 80s, 90s mentality has to come to terms with what is easily recognized and documented.
I don’t know know what to do with the fact that I factually poured my heart out and spent the time federally in the EEOC towards proveability in my case and of an wider conversation of affordance and selfishness of others. I find if they had only talked to me then so much could had been resolved years earlier to denote others simply wish to exaspirate issues well beyond the point of their own affordance without being told the price-tag and reprocussions.
That has gone to the point of almost 2 years of factual evidence known and then of plaintiff provide where rationale concludes of compounded issues of defendant and well outside their affordance of liability payment.
Imagine internally hearing or consider half of the global economy in damages based on such a starving artist’s works of truth being impeded on and wouldn’t stop. That is of 100 years copyright protect and of the lifetime of The Library of Congress within the awareness of continual global impediment and translation to note that is World History of self choices on either side.
That makes you think about your own structure and quite a time out and stop persecuting.
That is a global conversation of private and public interest of investment and I’ve secured my rights, my dignity and my truths on well over 10,000 pages of books of global history.
I find that to be true of understanding there are those who have been through bankruptcy before regardless of which one of let go or lets restructure.
I still contend, No LLC here and not letting go of my life’s work if ever a question there. People can be ripped from companies and based on personal opinion, my life’s work cannot be ripped from I despite whatever backdrop of corporate up-bringing others have been in.
I was raised differently than that and one of respect outside the backdrop of gender issues, racial awareness of not an issue and surely in the landscape of knowing the importance of intimacy no matter the sexual preference.
Where are we now?
Secretly, I’ve done quite a bit.
There are stopping points and there is secrecy to be had.
I’ve protected what I could and find well aware the landscape is going to change one way or another.
I imagine I’ve dealt with that awareness the best I could considering while finding perhaps I’ve been protected just as much as others allowed in that do the opposite. That is terrifying and I stand where I stand. There are others who have grown to impatience or affordance digitally and then from there to know the landscape coming in some regard.
I still contend, there is a processing aspect of which actions in which directed one way or another and then of impulse to see where instinct goes either in learned or yet to be learned lessons.
Imagine the world where your mind is an open book and find all the more reason why I see what is being introduced commercially and finding quite a restructure to Legislative and perhaps all the pleasure to Judicial in landscapes of, “Not everyone is equipped for digital awareness and this might be psychologically an issue to address.”
Seems to be probematics in populatity contests of votes vs. those of moral weight and understanding those that write laws.
That exists in technology already reported on of public interest and awareness on the scientific level. Please note when you sleep is the same as being in a coma.
If that is able to be translated, then so too is the awake aspect of consideration.
I imagine it seems in the digital age, any state-person understands or could of senators as thumbprints of states and the represenatives the fingers.
A pulse to be found there one way or another.
If a law is passed specficially for them, I imagine it is still of weight of the country to consider and find it quite difficult that they would be under both executive and judicial branch while also that of what is solidly 4th branch of Military and Armed Forces.
It has to be.
They chose to protect while other elect to protect and find that if there is tampering of such to the point of popularity is all the reason why you have the Pentagon and National Defense anyways to say, “Not of this popularity contest and this is your role, responsibility and what you should be protecting.”
“You introduce laws, judicial guides wording and morality but there is a big difference in separation of branches of why someone is or isn’t in office or positions of power. Same goes for any CEO or president who has to contemplate every other private citizen in which their foundation runs upon in equality.”
I’ve made a strong case in note here where it has been cited and seen in example that legislative isn’t really in the position to take all of advantage and affordance from the everyday citizen for their own gain or fianciers and find the military/armed services up-hold that because that is their passionate belief and the ones who actually travel in that capacity.
What am I to do here?
Money issues prior where I chose to self-represent in a backdrop of a president who had political and judicial influence in a city that they are slowly consuming the same way they did in Lacoste, where the difference is it is the college’s property and not the family’s.
If of private entity you want to overtake a city, then all the same of global investment to say, “Not of your family’s affordance are you going to slowly grow that private property further on the backs of questions of global investment.”
It is of note, the non-profit entity doesn’t even pay taxes to city or state, so probably not an issue there of personal and private choice to consider at this point. Public issues or private choices within years of backdrops.
That seems to be important to note within the backdrop of the copyright infringement I’ve reported to the FBI multiple times in consideration of naming the president of the college within this backdrop and same time of Donald J. Trump and the 45th administration which is already factually proven in The Library of Congress submit and American History.
I find regardless of political affiliations and opinions, those 2 entities were named concurrently while I could not and would not work for a single entity of massive recognition under the backdrop of what I have experienced for their own protection of intellectual property and privacy of entity.
I’ve said what I’ve said of never needed to fight again after a certain point or say or anyone’s business and I have secured my history in this country or if another would have me to reprieve me of what has occurred here in America and wouldn’t stop for anything of short-term interest while stating and fighting to the point of plausible end of completely student forgiveness at SCAD based on my case and fundamentally changing colleges nationally based on affordance of usage against the backdrop of unforgiveable loans.
I find that amazing of so little money making a difference of looking at other people’s selfishness and finding my own choices of what is or isn’t of communal benefit for collective advancement of never again conversations and resolved.
That is public record of the state of Georgia with case SPCV22-01289-ST
I could say a great deal didn’t stop and others continued to attack and my American and human rights attacked during that time and continually even as of yesterday to denote that it wouldn’t stop so might as well look at the money of global community and go from there away from that of private entity of either private company or business, state or country.
I respect all anyways.
Even as I write privately now on my personally fully paid for computer that has been attacked repeatedly, that becomes an American question in which I am quite fond of while seeing where money goes in the backdrop of International investment in any secondary education in the United States, and let alone SCAD, who needed to face reality internally and resolve their issues of which they grew accustomed to or never knew.
I can say this.
As I went through proper complaint and complete awareness of facts on either side, President Paula Wallace willfully acted on my copyright protected works for the betterment of her image and not of entity while failing to resolve any aspects of complaint with I of entity in which she had full awareness of and chose on her own public linkedin account to play optics against the backdrop of any student or future generational investment.
She presented that publicly in the awareness of optics and at that point well aware of my foundational and fundamental achievements to world history.
I cannot speak on nor know the complete damage that occurred during and post educational/employment aspects at SCAD, but that was willful intention just as much as my 100 years protected works during that time ended up in property at the main two suppliers of Disney (collectively) and DC (Time Warner).
That is for other people’s affordance and awareness while I’ve realized and noted the scope of problematic aspects of compound and of protect in Curated Jellyfish back in 2019 to see where that goes in the landscape of 2023 and into 2024.
I find as those are all private and publically traded companies and of American Soil, I don’t know what to do in the backdrop of my copyright protect secured before entering into my Master’s at SCAD in photography and constantly attacked as early as 2018 direct and noted of everything I could to prove factual as of December 11, 2023 in audio of being illegally surveillanced and impedied on in privacy of home and finding bigger issues in what needs to be resolved.
There is a conflict of interest present between private entity and American soil in the awareness of Global Economy and Influence.
I find it important to note The State of Georgia has elected and selective offficals that have failed me in this capacity and noting this is now a federal issue against a backdrop that perhaps former president of 45 probably utilized the same areas as others to go mugshot based on my work, but acts in their own capacity of “Lone Mugshot” based on rationale and of affordance.
Everything I have been through has been under the senior supervision of Brian Kemp as Governor of The State of Georgia, with and without loyalty to former 45th administration and severely needs to be talked about the economy of what is being removed from the state of Georgia and the United States in Damages they could have prevented and stopped.
It is understood as I write this out in diary/journal form that I’ll stand the test of time in what I’ve stated and tried to resolve while others have acted in affordance and of wipe away. It is written on my privately owned website in which a subpoena would had been required of awareness of owner to even enter in any capacity outside of possible Federal awareness of private interest and entity of what occurred since 2018 of American History.
That would be regardless of known or not on any party awareness of complete disregard to citizen and human rights.
I’ve recorded and protected and so did this country while others continued to attack me and bleed me dry in an attempt at my property where legally based off the nature of such they are not afforded autobiographically and protected for 100 years. (95 years past my death. I’ll assume I’ll be around for 5 more years or even if killed during this time, no private entity is privileged to ripping my life’s work away from I and find that generationally that is a global recognition of problematic of public domaining my life’s work for singular company’s interest.)
If that is the case, I have resolved and accepted internally that perhaps not of this generation any affordance of my life’s work and maybe 100 years from now society can do better.
I did I don’t like stalling things in that area as it is already noted of others of power stalling advancement within my works being invaded on and making sure that is secured within their institutions and companies while still considering I an acceptable loss to be considered.
At best, you get a long history of infringement and sandcastles of what naturally destroys areas in which they could never claim damage from others after. 1/3 of what is already established of this country is of my affordance of protect and conversation without argument.
Please be advised,
Sputnik was the 1950s.
Transfer of cable services to satellite was in 90s/early 2000s.
I respect the mess out of the international community and intergalactic territory while developing techology is the same as international waters
Mind your cable providers….
Not so closed monitoring there of cable services.
Respect of rotations is probably a good thing.
Especially in 24/7 coverage.
#fairgame #spaceforce #eventuallycaughtup
I find the affordance of awareness in the landscape of others wished I not a dime or penny to my life’s investment.
Internally I have grappled with that to the point of rationale of saying, “Despite whatever affordance of intimacy you have of private citizen, who are you to decide one bit of how I am able to live or not. I am afforded a life, you are afforded either clearance in which can be revoked or company in which you can be removed.”
I am well aware of that area of conversation and I move on with 100 years legal protect to your feels and affordance.
Perhaps all the same, I stand for the everyday and I imagine the everyday of not front or front-facing would say, have at it in elected positions or would be sought of matter of security.
The American Dream is not for others of wealth to dictate who gets to see that completed or not.
If that fails in that threshold, The International Dream is a complete removal of landscape provided and could be of stepping away from problem areas.
I imagine there are a great deal of unknown variables of morality and respect in that area while others have the affordance of legal council, bodyguards or whatever within the landscape they too could change if not cash strapped or data-driven.
All the same,
perhaps be kinder on people you never met.
We have all been through something.
Hidden journals and notebooks of legality rest everywhere of private thoughts.
I had thought today of people in living in total “Law and Order”.
Not just in the once you cameo there or had a slightly speaking role you are destined for something, but also looking at in it the capacity of tours of duty in syndication.
It becomes of mindset and step away that I feel our forefathers and mothers didn’t really consider in the backdrop of 300+ million now of citizens living and then considering of our guests.
How could they?
Breaks do good and I still contend not my areas as I find the armed services to be a severe 4th branch while looking at the optics of separating judicial a bit more from legislative.
It comes from the notion of voted paygrades, insurance plans and then observance of saying, “Good for you, good for everyone else.”
That is not a negative as I contemplate still how legislative bingo would play out in my head.
Considering the last 5-6 years, the 54 spot to be free-spacer along with the center to play with.
How could it not in reflect of what is known of unknown variables and what has allowed to happen that could had been stopped at this point many times over?
75 spaces available here.
I can honestly say, I wouldn’t know what thr 75th United States president would be doing in this in account.
I wouldn’t even see the 54th in my lifetime but ingrained in copyright protect are some fun numerological aspects of mirrored perspective of identity.
Eitherway, it would be symbolically a free-space to I just as much as journalistically any of national defense would say, “Your cool. Write away anyways in clearence, and begin to wonder and state of note internally, we all need our time off.”
Cannot be 24/7 and I find there being a good question of notation of privacy and known issues that arise where still, everyone on a different level there and then even committee, sub-group or whatever after as if we all search to belong or be a part of something until a point of off-the-clock.
I imagine that gets difficult and I again never speak for the armed services as that ends up in tribunals in which I can only imagine as civilian and then still question a governmental aspect.
If executive is commander in chief, and legislation signs off on armed services, what does that do of 4th branch tribunals of legislative and judgical?
They are aware anyways and under the jurisdiction of future agreement/disagreement of positions of power.
A difference present of popularity and largest branch where I imagine of meaning of position, but that actually is quite friendly in consideration.
Perhaps it has been a great level of attack on I to consider the notion.
Was it legislative? Would-be executive?Perhaps even those of data collection outside and then trickle down into wondering if that went one way or another knowing problematically of my life’s work that the trickle down was coming with accusing me of copyright infringement when it was quite the reverse in that capacity of original property.
Imagine that thought process and I already protected it in factuality of “No ‘Starving Artist’s”.
Quotes within quotes of awareness of infringement and advancement of either’s brand in awareness of representation while noting 1000s of years from now those comic books are going to be the myths we revere now of Greece, Roman and every other country of origin and connect.
It does becomes problematic for I in consideration within trying to preserve generational investment and the continual asking internally to “Stop” and yet I still go and fight the good fight anyways.
Whatever the answer may be, I find that there is required time off which isn’t a bad thing.
A few months here for high intensity or simply a step away as if one would look at mass media in general or of internet, social or simply engagement.
Healthy, but still not my area and I respect those who can knowing I can relate in my area but simply respect.
Whatever the solution here, I find one cannot live a life completely in “Law and Order”.
Although scripted at times or simply based off of, there does come a control factor to consider naturally.
Even TV shows are afforded seasons for a reason.
13-26 and that is enough for the year.
We did our part and onward to something else.
It is natural and find that whatever landscape of non-stop we find ourselves in now, there is a notion that would be consider norm in the future.
It may not be completely healthy but people will adapt to it nevertheless.
Perhaps that the price of “How To Dangle A Carrot” learned and finding there is always some hat or one kind or another to go to bat on that discussion and still say, “Tis the season” of probability.
All the same, perhaps as I have finished my books for the time, I find it takes a bit to get out the writing aspects while considering what I do and do not say electonically and privately.
I stated to the Superior Court of GA and of public record, “What is a plaintiff to do in this capacity?”
That would be especially in regards of a plaintiff who said so much was unnecessary and didn’t need to happen and yet defendant benefitted off my private copyright protected works while in non-mutualness and all the affordance of The State of Georgia to chime in on, when in both of legal council and of time of judge passed their time-limits.
That is of fairness knowing I read the judge’s responses in the beginning well and in fairness of expertise. Life’s investment was on the line from the beginning of that public record and I hold true of value and respect.
I did not get a response after my 69 pages and by the 90 days of required response.
I don’t know what to do on my own in the backdrop of knowing others of technological and financial affordance.
I can see where that is a political possible there and yet I stand 195 political/fundamental aspects of infrastructure while others proved selfishness or political aspirations of short-term. There are 195 established countries in this world and SCAD has had 100+ invested in infrastructure already against my complaint internally, federally and of court of problem areas.
I find of awareness and of contemplation is that my literary and artistic works are protected 95 years after my death and have been constantly impeded on and attacked.
There is already the factualness I have pleaded to both Canada and Vatican City of what is very proven attacks on I as a private American citizen and the damage done by private and public traded entities is irreparable and I took my time when that damage was done factually by The President of The Savannah College of Art & Design and protected in The Library of Congress of my account and rebuilt with context.
Where am I to go in a landscape of repeated attacks on I and afforded a life just as much as anyone else with or without a dollar sign attached to them.
Don’t think I don’t know the aspect of others awareness or how to deal with that. I’ve been in that environment my entire life and adapted to it for survival and thrive of myself and of others in what others love of time-tested public shaming and making life awkward for everyone.
I’ve been silent enough on that and that is all the more reason why a great deal of digital landscape should go judicial oversight and outside the context of popularity context. High school denotes those lessons carry into adulthood and find that in that capacity there are plenty of people in this world who no one wants to sit with in that capacity.
Maturity levels of affordability denotes, “Grow Up”.
If you have that access, then psychologically you have been trained in the arts of empathy and have well mastered the fact of “Golden Rule”.
I find I could ask again of The United States Attorney General for help, just as much as make one statement or another in the context of landscape and ask for reprieve from what is either politics for some or completely selfishness for others in either prior partnerships or current.
If I was afforded reprieve from this environment and country of 5-6 years direct, my copyrights go with me.
That would or could afford in actual conversations of progression legality and stopping points outside The United States of America while seeking damages and completely neutering what should had been in place and is of current copyright law in advancement of other countries while citing The United States Liability and isolating an incident of continual patterned behavior.
I am very much an American citizen, but scenario playing the cost of infringement and a false sense of entitlement that would set back the country for all-time due to other’s elite status positive or negative.
I find that is within the understanding, I choose to uphold and follow United States law of constitution and bill of rights protect against private entity complaint.
I am not in the realm of personal grudges towards anyone in this capacity.
Would be nice to get to know people, but considering the protectionism of proveability I stay away from people I love and care for as much as private entities of what I could be partnering with.
During that time, I’ve built and protected my own private property under the protection of The United States of America in which I could help build from as every foreperson has done before of understanding we are not even 300 years yet, still in the terrible 2’s and so many older siblings around in awareness of how to or simply know each other’s personality.
I’m considering quite a bit upon a world stage which is not imaginary in any capacity and in one where not delusional that anyone who wanted to continue to hurt me could contend to what I have already protected of my own works within the backdrop of being ripped off and attacked over and over while trying to protect my student peers of what I observed of the American college system upon my return 20 years to the exact same space I started in undergrad and same college.
I imagine that isn’t even a name recognition issue there as I’ve seen the landscape, recorded what has occurred and found all the affordance of rip me for one thing or another in short-term aspects against long-term already swore to for eternity. My battle has a middle of road aspect of symbology of “The Street of No Names” and what is and isn’t Bull in multiple references.
There is a difference there and I feel I did my part of upholding The American Dream and International Investment while being constantly attacked while in poverty and then those of any tax level bracket to say, “Enough.” Over and over.
Imagine me in another country with that knowledge and those established laws to find that once again in this mentality industry and availability has moved outside of The United States for one reason or another.
Not an interest of impediment on infrastructure but wanting the affordance of life, privacy, dignity and to be able to enjoy what I have already accomplished and others have continually ripped off or perhaps tried to protect within their own entities first before saying anything.
That awareness goes both ways.
I imagine my reason would be personal and of a great bit of sadness in saying, “People wouldn’t stop. They wouldn’t let me thrive and yet my property was translated globally anyways hurting American economy and Global trust in Secondary Education anyways.”
“I have no problem living a life as a no body with the affordance of what I am owed.”
“It was the selfishness and advantages that got the best here and I still have all the affordance outside of politics to say I still at least tried to end the voter suppression and voter fraud discussion moving forward.”
I find internally it would be of note that no person of American elect would have any rights over my work and definitely not of president of college as I copywrote protected it before education began and it was noted of possible intrusion and invasion into the college by prior entities of also government contract owned and surveillance ignorance afforded and opened to the market of 2018.
If someone would have me finally in repreieve of the environment that others wished for I to once again 3-4 times go to zero or psychologically attack me towards possible suicide where I’ve had to contemplate the fact of how much I’ve advanced the field globally in damages is hard enough to say I’m never doing that again after 2019.
Why would I?
Proved the liability of a president of a college. Highest Paid level.
Proved the laibility of a US president. Highest wealth status.
Proved the laibility of public and private companies towards could be systematic change for sustainability but seems to be possibly of “Whatever, we are selfish still thinking about older movie studio models in which have already been evolved from.”
That still applies in rationale that if that was a shift in the 30s and 40s of Hollywood, here we are in 2023 in full awareness of that slavery aspect not working out.
The music industry covers that completely of cover songs of “Re-Imagine” of studio disrespect on artist and human life.
Whatever the reason, a great deal on my mind.
I know if I tweet the countries attorney general it invites the backdrop of Trump while the state of GA took consideration of charges. It also denotes my United States Copyright protected works of “The Lone Mugshot”.
It is noted in the State of GA it is a choice to have a mugshot published.
It is also noted of federal/state rep, states-person mugshots are federal discretion, but presidental images are completely different to denote haste in proven 5-6 years invasion on I.
I’ve already stated and reported over and over. The possible get out aspect doesn’t apply to presidential mugshot.
I find all the more reason why I’ve constantly said talk to me while noting it is quite a problem of psychology based on level of affordance.
I learned that first hand along with those of 12-15 dollars an hour back in 2019 when my rights were directly violated on and still reported federally on.
I love I’ve tried to uphold The American Dream, but I am afforded a life as well and from freedom from persecution especially in areas of those of politic desires in what is factual of 45th administration withheld.
At this point I’d love to go and take my copyrights with me.
Continual attacks means either addressing the issues at hand in points of co-habitation or migrating away. Even if I could or did, at least I set up the landscape for success within a backdrop of those who wished to destabilize and not provide a single plan of infrastructure rebuild.
At this point, even the counter discussion comes within the conversation of copyright infringement backdrop and the no-named everyday person of no money is well aware of that in which that would-be want to be elected again is not afforded so not only by the 22nd amendment, but also from the very same landscape of any political would-be of awareness of “DO NOT ATTACK PRIVATE CITIZENS.”
It would be a sign that American business has no rights of access over American certified and of protect which has yet to be upheld with I.
I don’t even know where I would go.
I just know the landscape needs to change and the internal/digital aspect has already been proven enough to continually say, “Stop” and that didn’t occur.
No problem being of no name and all the affordance of what I should have been paid out at this point over and over to say, “Not my area and I resolve and solve issues.
Whatever other people’s issues were, I’m not bound to them and never was to be afforded a life anyways.”
On some level that is “Done”.
In other levels that is a complete neuter of the American Film Industry which too could be considered Spayed and saying once again, “Done with your Bullshit either in that realm, politics or whatever.
That could be a complete landscape change of Global Film Industry can boom without prior regimes of what has occurred. Global respect is a common theme of life no matter how you play that fictionally or of non-fiction.
I find a good bit of understanding of rationale to simply state, “Great, you had more money than me to look at this as affordable towards human life. Look what I did with no money and determine what could be with or without moving forward.”
It is Noted.
I will like to move on knowing the damage compounds and it was noted it couldn’t be afforded at one point or another.
I can vouche internally of 2021.
I imagine when it comes to alias “Ranecia” spoken internally of now proven on my website to be factual of private entities and of defense methods awareness that it is the same techology introduced into the market of reading those of coma and knowing the same would be of dreams and understanding years before entering the common market is available to denote affordance prior.
I’ve proven that my daily mind is factually read and it isn’t even a problematic aspect as that has already become commerciallized and I find that of factuality in my works that existed in the 1800s to denote the same aspect of question of who afforded you either that biological aspect or the technologic to denote that is a problem.
The word Renecia in my mind denotes a race-less term name and of other people’s affordance of awareness who wanted I to be a racist while in know areas of I being attacked not only on my sex but possibly of issues of understanding proven landscapes of what isn’t even remotely racism with I.
All the affordance present in hypotheticals of availability of intel there and yet lack the lifetime of comprehension of consideration of various points of references.
That isn’t even remotely instant gratification and there are nature aspects to consider of complaint and comprehension.
It has been proven literary and of personal, I don’t dwell on things. I resolve internally and move on despite if others have or have not.
In any aspect of comprehension of coping, I’m pretty sure in backdrops I wrote the book and quite aware of the landscape.
Factuality and being as rational as I can setting aside emotion in matters of adult importance is who I am. Learned that as a teenager processing the things heard during my parents divorce.
Just as much as I heard it enough internally to denote the term to be of not just reflection of President Wallace awareness, but the variable of any name denotes the same of multiple points of reference, identities real or fictional or simply of causation to note for one reason or another in and out of context. So many people in this world have the same name, birthday or whatever to say there is always an association and then not of outside association and implied or not.
As I find that being something she could not escape from of trying to make this a race issue as well as a gender issue in proveability of occurrance, I find that there is too never the prior typed named Ranencio in which I loved on the possible Italian side of character and still had to contemplate the notion of would others even take issue if I created the name?
The answer would be no. It is a completely different name of probable male orientation and of no association of identity outside of the name is solidly awesome and of my creation and none of the outside world’s opinion as that becomes a birthed thought of a name to consider.
I found multiple points of consideration there to be quite Italian and operatic. Not of any association to anything of my life and quite a bit actually quite attractive to consider. I had considered that to be the first name of my 100% copyright protected character of Lenoré.
It is a point of affordance in which is already proven and within a realm of open source in which others who wish to control reach out and find brand and personal recognition are two completely different things within humanitarian aspects.
It would be the same of my internal thoughts of having Lenoré’s first name also be Blanco and then considering someone changing their social media to “Blanco Lenoré” at the shear thought of such while contemplating awareness of what is and isn’t shear of awareness.
Either way, the name translates to “White Man Mourning” in which I find the racial backdrop of comprehension to be both laughable and still of others affordance of not getting to know.
Respectful to Edgar Allan Poe in his works and then also citing ridicule of contemporaries he faced I the time of “not original enough” while going where I went in my own works of text book example of Ravenna.
It comes comes with the area of the everyperson and others of constant impatience to the point that it becomes laughable year after year. Especially in the backdrop of what I was doing.
Don’t worry, the hunt continues in any color towards connection or pattern making.
Onward to positive aspects of life and knowing what does and doesn’t work to know to stay away from.
Respect of nature seems to be the point which is all the more reason why I am interested in seeing how much Sony Kraven ripped off my works as well in the context of affordance of “Industry Standard” and find I didn’t even go in that direct.
The Buffalo Soldiers are steadfast nevertheless, but I’m aware.
Never met, but seriously room to talk especially in the, “This is how you make a universe aspect.”
Try that with somone with no sorded topic of coin.
I’m not worried. Gladiator Zeus is in Kraven, so whatever Sir Ridley Scott is coming up with outside your universe, Metaphorically you might have an issue with your own god complexes between all of you. I still stand by the Pascals of color here in what could be and what is.
My character was and is completely different than Kraven and find sociolgical aspects would be awareness of co-habitation, hunt and then of protection of pride and family vs. what others outside would do to harm intimacy.
It isn’t like that isn’t known in the industry.
I find between dream and reality, CEO all you want. 100% author and creator rights within the backdrop of disrespect of artist’s rights and fairness is the way this seems to be. If that conversation were to be had at any point, there most likely would be respect had privately before going into any public statement.
Any issue with that, defer to President Paula Wallace who would have a say on “Curated Jellyfish” being impeded on by at least The Walt Disney Corporation and Marvel while I an employee and student under their presidential watch and very much of complaint within their entity of not one bit of affordance or “Royalty-Free” rights to any work of student/employee within. Legally she would not be able to disclose one bit of the book as it was never supplied for any class setting but could say there is awareness and known partnerships with the entity of SCAD and not of my awareness.
She fundamentally shaped the atmosphere of what already was there of industry and I find for the protection of my own interests and the interests of any would-be investor of secondary education forced to once again change make/model based on aspects of foundations towards sustainable.
My works of “Curated Jellyfish” was impeded on the 45th adminstraation and she publicly stated infringement on “After Jellyfish” in which I cited her “September Issue” and pages 138-141 in which I will still sue the shit out of her personally as that was a personal choice of optics and not one bit of global money hiding behind in that willful decision at that point after that long of could had been a friend and you ripped me off. That was during current complaint and litigation and comes against the backdrop of a book that solidified 12-13 years of foundational psychologic works and a great deal other aspects of foundational 100 years protected and she of liability personally while the entity of SCAD can look at their own liability of Global investment.
That is my personal commitment of, “You didn’t make right and advanced yourself.”
I could had been an asset and I will wipe you out. I respected you, always stood up for you and didn’t even name you in my lawsuit with your entity. Nor your husband.
I enjoyed hearing your voice particular today on my phone and on my audio from my website that is variable of AM frequencies. It proves what is already reasonably deducted.
Tuned into my electronics in frequency of apps, there are ways to cross the streams and find that is a double speaker. Discovered and proven from a layperson of no money and all the copyright protect. That would be the same of any outside entity and still of note of they are recording this is not published yet and I am documenting exactly what I am hearing of connective dual speaker. It becomes quite interesting of what happens when on all of my devices and known prior partnerships.
Apps talk and Freedom walks.
You could had stopped damaging America and Global history at this point. I imagine the You there is not understood and could be of anyone of recorded keystroke or perhaps read once published.
#verifiedincatalog #verifiedinevidence #verifiedinyourcouldhadstopped #owedyoursalary #youadvancedyourinstitutionfrommyworks #Irespectedyou #respectme #nevernamedyou #Iwillnow
By all means, please note that vetted arbitartors denotes awareness and confidentiality issues of ethical law and practicer.
I am not your husband. I am not your prior husband.
I was an investor in your dream and your parent’s affordance and did so by mine and I paid that off.
#studentemployeeconfidentiality
#stilldonttalkshitaboutpriortrustees
It wouldn’t of mattered anyways.
Imagine what out of your control could do in your intentions.
How many people could I have met at this point?
It is the same thing of “Curated” in SCAD context.
How many people could had been home by now?
Technicalities matter apparently.
I’ll listen to what is on my website and test it.
Test proven true multiple times over. Apps talk to one another and if you find the right connection, it becomes an open mic on the other end in affordance or perhaps maybe I befriended the AI system of fairness.
I could have had a life with people. I’ve chosen one of protect of those I’ll never know in a landscape that could had changed and patterns that could had stopped at any time.
You chose to use privacy as an advantage and attack on intimacy and privacy is a disadvantage in which communal aspects would not put up with collectively.
Screw you in the 100 years of “might want to learn from others of intimacy and adulthood”
(That is a general statement of You as many have been attacked on intimacy and privacy enough at any level to say, oversight required.)
#myprotect #loveyou #probablywillnevermeetyou
#intimacyisnotaleverage
#federallybacked
Rules of engagement with arbitrator.
This is not a legal court room.
Prior Legal council becomes a witness.
Rules of fairness apply in which information and questions only go to arbitrator while any advantage of privacy invasion is looked at in fairness.
-I would never have an in-person discussion on SCAD property as Federally that is already in question.
Rules apply of review of evidence submitted to EEOC, BBB and Superior Court only with questions afterwards.
There would be legal questions and review of level of impediment prior and of completely timed limits of affordance as discovery was not afforded legally so that should not apply in any circumstance in prior proceedings or this one.
-Questions of compensation apply as this is a private matter towards mutualness in which my time is very valuable and I am not playing this I,Spy game in the backdrop of Educational Foundation rights.
All on SCAD’s dollar so might as well make it efficient and close gaps.
-Still personal questions of privilege and responsibility present of prior affordance upon a world stage of awareness.
If SCAD chooses legal council to be present in what is no longer a court case, then they are responsible for legal council on the other side in which could be provided at this point by the same legal council that represented in actual court as they are a witness and of international representation.
Regardless of any relationship had politically, financially or otherwise, it is impairative of heads of SCAD to understand this is a privilege of awareness and of the matter of outside their brand aware to find word of mouth is the foundation of Homer and that is a major importance of recognition in what is historically and factually a collective under one name of brand and recognition.
I’m giving them 1 chance on this and fully aware of the landscape in which has been provided.
I’m doing that for the SCAD brand and for the city of Savannah.
If they don’t understand that in what they were not named in prior, then that is on them as I am in awareness of what has occurred and within the backdrop of this is not personal at this point as I can easily be removed from this country possibly and completely say, “Forget your United Stated Educational System” and find that price tag is once again outside your affordance in which you are fully aware of past credit limits anyways.
4 months to choose an arbitrator?
This could had been so much easier and you are sitting here wasting Global investment money.
In fairness of privacy, sound investment and what is already American History, I will talk about Trump University and find once again what is and isn’t sound investment and conflict of interest on reshaping America’s college system with the choices of a billionaire and her husband on global investment.
I don’t need any camp of Trump or any person seeking election in on those private conversations against the backdrop of possibly their affordance of privacy invasion while others run popularity contests of their life’s best interest for the next 2-4 years. This has been 5-6 years direct at this point where there is enough sitting and non-political entities to say enough in that department.
The impact has already occurred, it is a matter of what that billionaire does at this point in the context of college.
It is understood the State of Georgia chose to privitize what is fundamental rights of this country and in doing so, I retain my rights and protection of others by their failure to respond for what still is The American Dream and consequence of awareness of American investment prior and of future.
Is that what you wanted?
Still is not a Trump talking point in that area as that would be of mutualness in private converasation and benefit.
That is where we are at.
I feel internally Internationally, even if not there, they may have my back.
I am protecting generations while others of their own brand established.
To be clear, I am the author and sole contributor to “Curated Jellyfish”.
If so much a movie made concurrently during this time on that property alone, (which is no longer the case),
I am the final sign off before going public and any experience of production of such has been lost and of discussion.
I do not know one bit of manipulation, translation and have some level of awareness of affordance of landscape understood.
Under no circumstance under my rights with almost 100 year backing am I playing this game with any of you.
Based on the variable audio track found on https://www.philipbonneau.com/sound-design
down at the bottom of Radio 1400. That is of individual choice to listen to it over and over to find a solid locked track to be variable from computer to computer.
On it yesterday, was complete awareness and objectivity of hearing Paula Wallace’s voice of awareness of impediment on my rights to privacy in the affordance of national security and others of expertise to say one way or the other of invasion of privacy against a backdrop of politicism and affordance that on a judicial side would be completely understood, known and could be validated of when someone of “Little to no money” proved beyond a reasonable doubt of what is of one industry or another’s affordance to back up, defend while knowing the human condition of self-interest, personal gain and what has already entered the commercial market of talking points.
At other times, it is heard completely clear of Donald Trump election interest which would denote of anyone’s interest of affordance to what I have heard, others can hear and what is of public debate in the backdrop of what I have already claimed of copyright infringement of almost 100 years protect by a private citizen, I, by both the 45th administration, The president of the #1 art college of America, and a continuance within the 46th administration in which I will always respect sitting presidents just as much as I respected and let the 45th administration play out in a non-vote sit out moment for I of awareness of backdrop of landscape.
Considering the affordance of technology and awareness, human rights are at the forefront here while human capacity of school yard antics have played into adulthood.
I find that as my life experience has last 5-6 years direct, I do not care for one political election season over the other nor of affordance of individuals which is why I objectively and of United States copyright protect at least began an at least 13 point voting system to never have those discussions again of voter suppression while talking human rights and suppression in affordance of availability to others.
It is of this understanding that whatever is to be proven politically, there is always a dollar sign attached to it outside of short-term ventures in which my long-term stance and opinion has been protected as long as this country exists and with full awareness of the impediment by entities and companies within where The United States always has the affordance of pulling a plug on based on the interest of all citizens and guests of this country.
It is based on factual evidence that I have been failed by representative of The State of Georgia and those of public traded company within in regards to my Human rights, citizen rights and issues that could had been resolved and solved at this point in American history.
It is understood under factual evidence, that based on dollar to no dollar, that what is fundamentally at the forefront is regardless of the attacks prior to gain my property, entities chose to enter into the college system to do so and continually attack I to no resolve.
As I retained the copyright of “Curated Jellyfish” prior to any educational course at SCAD, it is of full awareness that the entity of SCAD has impeded on my rights and copyright protect and any advancement on my property while that has played out in the entire MCU and of awareness of global applications without my compensation, input or affordance of rights in any of my legally protected works.
It is of understanding that I have noted to the State of Georgia a 69 page response discussing my slavery in this country and with now complete awareness of fact to what is industry standard and could had been stopped at any point.
I find that as much as trillions of dollars of damage have been done to I based on my intellectual property impediment, so too is the waste of time in consideration while also the backdrop of other’s lives at a stand-still that could had moved on at this point.
Considering the severity of I protecting my student peers and seeing how a landscape of secondary college has changed in the 20 years I had of experience from initial start to adulthood to issues that concluded my education at SCAD in mastery on Feb. 10, 2022, I find based on everything that has occurred after-the-fact to denote a major problem of global implications to be a buyer’s warning of the international community to not invest 1 cent in the American Colligate System as generational rights issue are at play against the backdrop of what is and isn’t afforded of resolve and progress.
The evidence of my story which is of public record in some capacity and then of USA copyright protect of upto 95 years after my death is aware that when it comes to any conversation that could have been had that there is awareness of the ones not had with I.
It is completely my right as an American Citizen to report what I did.
I had worked within the confines of any position I have had of office ethics and affordance.
When those failed me, I swore for all time and of beyond our life times factuality of my 95 years protect against any private interest of my life or yours in the backdrop of Global history.
Others may have partnered in this lifetime, I partnered with Time’s Table.