A Not Locked Thread

this is a locked note.

Maybe not. 

Why would a locked note have to be connected to iCloud? 

That is the sharing and storage of privileged information that is deemed lockable and yet still on a database system outside that of the personal computer?

That seems to come off as a red flag of interest for others. 

What systematic red flag is this?

There is still automatic sharing of recorded keystrokes and private notes to that of the Google mail system on here. 

Seriously, what do I do at this point of Invasion. You obviously wanted my intellectual property, I’ve gone to the FBI before. I’ve tried to do everything by the book and apparently others are too…it just happens to be my books for some of it and definitely was not paid for. What indirect direct retaliation is this to the point that this disrupts the entire structure because this known behavior since 2018-2019 has been reported with major questions of the Apple system and others. I have updated to the latest Ventura Blvd. and I am pretty sure Tom Petty in regards is going on a playlist. 

A Question considering what has occurred directly for years. 

involuntary servitude

(8) Involuntary servitude The term “involuntary servitude” includes a condition of servitude induced by means of— (A) any scheme, plan, or pattern intended to cause a person to believe that, if the person did not enter into or continue in such condition, that person or another person would suffer serious harm or physical restraint; or (B) the abuse or threatened abuse of the legal process.

It is basically slave trade where I have continued to try to work to make a living and others have been reaping from what I sowed on my private computer. Far different from the known term, ‘indentured servant’ which still is not applicable to modern standards of venacular. 

I can attest that that would apply to my experience at Alfred Angelo as I was threaten to work far below fair market value at the threat of corporatology and pay disputes. My question here is that I am continually working towards sustainability of my life’s work and all of it is completely compromised and ultilized elsewhere while I of no financial benefit to date from such and no means to an end on postively reenforced negative behavior detrimental to my way of living and life and abusive in practice, invasive and denotes false ownership over my property and that of superiority tactics based on their wealth, means and advantage pulling me from my home and space into their own world for their benefit and not my own in current form. 

This is going somewhere to someone and does showcase the complete disregard to humanity’s desire for privacy and security of shelter. 

5 years of this directly now. 

3 times a place of employment.

I could look at this completely seperate from I for a second, I imagine it the below market value that I consider a thought process in, where there is what I was looking at in question at SCAD. Although, it is not a forced servitude aspect to that of the guise of SCADpro, there is an exploitative aspect of such that is of no provided market value while a gain of such on the otherside where most definitely the students have to sign non-disclosures before entering into that agreement while still citing question on if they were properly educated on such an agreement prior and if it was for the best of the student to go into such an agreement of that kind without legal representation for that of the protection of the students from that of real-world application projects that result in real world financials of gain and still a cost of tuition for the student. Although it may not fall under this per se, it still goes into my thoughts on the revamp of the age discrimination law for protection of those under 40 and definitely of those of degree-seeking nature before entering the workforce without proper training of what does and does occur in such. 

False arrest and obstruction of justice: The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures and prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process—meaning a person accused of a crime must be allowed the opportunity to have a trial. 

Failure to keep from harm: The public counts on its law enforcement officials to protect local communities. If it’s shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm, that official could be in violation of the color of law statute.

Below pulled from the FBI website, feel free to visit, they have tons of fun Educational Purposes available.

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights 

This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).

It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law  

This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.

This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race.

Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

I did hear enough internally to consider that of my massive stances against discrimination and of race.

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245 - Federally Protected Activities 

1) This statute prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference, or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person or class of persons because of their activity as:

1. A voter, or person qualifying to vote...;

2. a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States; (Unemployment, EEOC)

3. a juror or prospective juror in federal court; (I’ve been a prospective juror in my life)

2) Prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person because of race, color, religion, or national origin and because of his/her activity as:

1. A student or applicant for admission to any public school or public college; (does this apply to private colleges?)

How TOC Groups Operate 

Transnational organized crime (TOC) groups are associations of individuals who operate, wholly or in part, by illegal means. There is no single structure under which TOC groups function—they vary from hierarchies to clans, networks, and cells, and may evolve into other structures.

These groups are typically insular and protect their activities through corruption, violence, international commerce, complex communication mechanisms, and an organizational structure that spans national boundaries.

• cyber crime

The vast sums of money involved can compromise legitimate economies and have a direct impact on governments through the corruption of public officials.

Today, TOC groups are more commonly incorporating cyber techniques into their illicit activities, either committing cyber crimes themselves or using cyber tools to facilitate other crimes. Technology also enables TOC groups to engage in traditional criminal activity, such as illegal gambling, but with a greater reach.

TOC poses a significant and growing threat to national and international security with dire implications for public safety, public health, democratic institutions, and economic stability across the globe. It jeopardizes our border security, endangers our health through human trafficking and counterfeit pharmaceuticals, and seeks to corrupt officials domestically and abroad. 

There is definitely that of my digital presence being trafficked. 

Countering Transnational Organized Crime 

To combat the ongoing threat posed by these groups, the FBI has a long-established—yet constantly evolving—transnational organized crime program dedicated to eliminating the criminal enterprises that pose the greatest threat to America. 

Due to the transnational nature of these criminal enterprises, the FBI leverages relationships domestically and abroad to combat the influence and reach of these organized crime groups. The Bureau deploys subject matter experts to international locations to develop strategies to address TOC matters impacting the region, as well as to identify targets of mutual interest.

The FBI also participates in selecting TOC groups to appear on the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Top International Criminal Organizations Target List and contributes to the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Asset Control efforts to pursue criminal enterprises. Further, to pool resources and leverage technical and investigative expertise, the Bureau participates in many organized crime task forces with our state and local law enforcement partners.

Major Theft Crimes 

Major theft crimes have a devastating impact on the U.S. economy, not only contributing to the rise of consumer prices but also to the loss of tax revenues to states and communities. The FBI focuses its resources on the most egregious major theft activity that crosses state and sometimes international lines, particularly thefts of:

• art

Art Crime 
Art theft is the illicit trade in art and cultural artifacts. Although tremendous strides have been made to combat cultural property crime, intelligence reveals this is a growing global threat, demanding proactive FBI measures and resources. The FBI established the National Stolen Art File (NSAF) – a computerized index of stolen art and cultural property as reported to the FBI by law enforcement agencies throughout the U.S. and internationally. It also formed a specialized Art Crime Team to investigate art and cultural crime cases. 

Corporate Fraud 

As the lead agency investigating corporate fraud, the FBI focuses its efforts on cases that involve accounting schemes and self-dealing by corporate executives, as well as obstruction of justice (activities designed to conceal this type of criminal conduct).

The FBI’s corporate fraud investigations primarily focus on:

• Illicit transactions designed to escape regulatory oversight

Self-dealing by corporate insiders:

• Insider trading (stock trading based on material, non-public information)

• Kickbacks

• Misuse of corporate property for personal gain

• Individual tax violations related to self-dealing

Intellectual Property Theft/Piracy 

Intellectual property theft involves robbing people or companies of their ideas, inventions, and creative expressions—known as intellectual property. This can include everything from trade secrets to proprietary products to movies, music, and software.

Intellectual property theft costs U.S. businesses billions each year.

The FBI's intellectual property investigations focus on the theft of trade secrets and copyright infringement on products that can impact people's health and safety, like counterfeit parts for cars and electronics. The FBI works with partners in the private sector and other law enforcement agencies at all levels to investigate these cases.

Learn more at the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center.

Similarly, economic espionage costs the American economy hundreds of billions of dollars per year and puts our national security at risk. In these cases, foreign competitors deliberately target economic intelligence in advanced technologies and successful U.S. industries.

This one gets thrown around allot but what does it actually mean anymore? Still, banking on honesty and bravery in secret.

-P.

The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, 18 U.S.C. § 249

(1) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin of any person or (2) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person and the crime affected interstate or foreign commerce or occurred within federal special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. (proof on why you don’t attack through dating apps)

It could also be discussed that attacks on mental health can be perceived as physical harm as the mind is of physicality and if able to prove with evidence that of constant attacks towards such, the long-term effects on attacks towards mental health definitely have a physical toll on such which does not warrent it as self-harm, but that of environmental conditions that the victim has to cope with and sustain based on other abusive or unlawful practices. Everything the body does is through that of electronic signals to the brain, proven of such of toll on physicality, this could actually be discussed as just as severe or greater based on the previous notion that mental health can be attacked in-directly and then of ‘false innocence’ from those who actually inflict it directly or in-direct base on a case-per-case basis. 

Consider this as it goes through my email as physical evidence of proof of that which has been difficult to process, shouldn’t be allowed and still consideration in the same vein as battered victims looking to get out of an environment but put in a strained and strapped position by their abuser that never should had happened, nor continued for as long as it had in a capacity of understanding the physicality aspect of abusive tactics in positions of power. 

What this does prove is that someone out there knows the behind the scenes on some things or that of straight up personal property. Consider that while I am left currently without medical insurance against other’s known liability and refusal to accept responsibility while going through a system now where they can be judged by their peers, the neighbors, other business and other countries for their continued action of violations of human rights while in America for that of corporate advancement. 

What this proves is someone has inside access to a private citizen’s computer, all of my intellectual property and probably waiting for me to say something online or on social media to run with that which they have already stolen and say, ‘Hey…I came up with a great plot point for our own property and not off of other peoples’. Is that about right? I am not freely giving away my intellectual property, I am not puting things in my internals of my website because that has already been captured, corrected in that of this format to copyright before laying it out again in InDesign and you may or may not had been caught off guard by that while those who invaded my website definitely were or will be caught off guard by the difference of twice over protected. I am not playing that game on that front and I am not freely posting important things on the internet so others can take it and run in different directions and still leave me in the dust and still not proper citation. Your system has been seriously challenged and your methods are pretty easy to spot just as much as mine are. I keep you on your toes while not even comprehending the difference between my 800-900 dollars take home pay bi-weekly against what I am up against and I guarentee my paycheck is not attached to anyone in this method who could had stopped this years or others who can chime in on any time. The only difference is I told the truth from the beginning and other people have been trying to retrace steps and backtrack from the damage done based off their issues and arrogance or whatever the issue may be. 

Just Food for Thought. 

It is understood based on the ovbiously proven recorded keystrokes aspects of this, that the compromised aspects denotes leverage on the Apple side while still someone caught off guard by “No ‘Starving Artist’s” in this manner and continued to send out through my Google paid for email, which is also known compromised by that of recorded keystrokes to another place of presumed looked at and documented as such of tampering by others since 2018-2019 to the point that I am using this method as proof I am not sending through my email, this is illegal search and seizure. At some point it has hit the point that if you don’t want to talk directly and you don’t want to accept any liability that can be flat out proven from multiple sources at this point, you probably shouldn’t be in the business you are in and still considered a danger to the stability of society. 

If this was for investigative reporting purposes, they could talk to me at any time which has never occurred who that route doesn’t work. 

If this was for legal investigative purposes, I have not been talked to directly. There may be a reason for that while any opposing party will find this as still illegal and some were beginning to learn about laws back in 2018…I wouldn’t advise this as a continued method if of opposing council or hired private investigative purposes…there are flaws in such leading towards ethics and the protection of intellectual property. 

If this was a hacker aspect of such, same rule apply with that of further charges. 

If this was governmental for that of favors to corporations, there are always going to be United States Citizens but companies come and go and get eaten all the time. 

If this was constantly trying to blame me for something to extend that of investigations internal or that of external, there are time limits to things, there are reasons for extensions, and there comes a point 5+ years of such might be considered abuse of power. If you know more than you should on a private computer, you can love or hate someone on just about everything. If it was longer, I would need more clarification before saying one way or the other. 

If for some strange reason this is for protection of myself, it does wonders to wrap it up and use accordingly. 

They seemed to have gotten the memo after ‘danger to the stability of society’ and stopped. Extended content if I post on my website. 

The Re-assembly Cut. 

Honestly, this is everyday for me….just another day of the same thing where perhaps I’ll explore other Tom Petty songs. There are Heart-breaking moments out there on how long this has occurred.

Love thy Sister. A message to Tiffany...

I’m posting this tonight knowing that I have asked for guidance and I have asked for help. There is much I still try to protect but at there same time I said good-bye to a support group this evening. I did so knowing there are many who where never afforded an answer and others who publicly and vocally stated things left unsaid that has lead to questions of the detriment of my assets after the employment of what was a dream job for I and an amazing opportunity to be connected to marriage that I didn’t have prior on multiple fronts and that directly of Disney in what would always be in their vault and mine.

Whatever occurred in life after is always going to be a contention point for I on what was years unnecessary to my detriment once I created my own website of what I did prior to Alfred Angelo compiled to a website of necessity based on ‘unexpected’ closure which was completely false.

I share this excerpt knowing what I tryic to protect and the attacks I’ve had since from 2018 directly on to the point that it went places well beyond childhood topics and adulting. I fought my heart out to the best of my ability and I am doing what I can in a capacity of team upon team more than likely and you still cannot steal people’s lives for live a life of screwing people over and taking over their lives.

I struggled so much with my experience with Alfred Angelo.

I struggled so much that even when in school I was attacked. I struggled if that happened to me that could happen to anyone and I am sitting here with the children of the United Nations who are my working peers. This continued for something that cannot happen and yet it did.

Who wanted to make this a vengeful moment towards I?

I look at this as get out of your personal bubble and understand the damage that occurred in 2021.
How self-centered were you?!

I reflect on how I asked in the private Alfred Angelo support group yesterday to please remove the image of my dog, Lacey from their cover photo. I stated of such that she was a registered Emotional Support Animal to me and that was proven in the entire company in which she was the only canine allowed in such. That was done in understanding that she is a part of the former Alfred Angelo assets along with minors and children in which she will always be a bridal dog but always my legal right to say you have absolutely no control over any aspect of her image in any capacity.

I understand what I fought and I have had many difficult issues with thoughts afterwards. I had to deal with many aspects of first times and then grapple with the fact my assets were far more valuable than Alfred Angelos and that I revoked so much status from discountment and non-payment while employed towards the tail-end. I became a target afterwards and based on a series of events allowed to believe based on evidence of personality and trait that some people gave no consideration for my life or that of the unborn while trying to say story driven or system as go.

I state and say it can always be fact check that Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Lost is 100% owned by I as Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Stolen and any prior version of such is under my complete control.

That can be fact checked.
That is history in this universe and others that others wanted to build.

I present below what was my lasting gift out of context to that of an empathetic soul who found his way to bridal and dared to say Norman Rockwell to agree to such.

I have nothing else to offer other than this and I am not responsible for Alfred Angelo. I am not responsible for those who talked surveillance and didn’t want to respond and this is my gift knowing it is 100% copyright protected of knowing I have been attacked every way possible since the end of that company.

_________________

Everything below in text and image is 100% United States Copyright protect with I the ownership of such text and image. It is an understanding that what I present in part of what is copyright protected of ‘No ‘Starving Artist’s’ is my right and for my benefit while understanding that shortly after this was copyright protected this was illegally sent out through my email in the same manner of retaliation and unresolved issues that I never wanted to know about thst could happen to anyone. This happened and this is my right.

OK. THIS IS PERSONAL IN THIS SPACE. I AM READY FOR THE REVEALING OF DISCORD TO COMMENCE.

In Discord Fashion, an avant-garde approach. August 30, 2022 Philip A. Bonneau Calling himself out from 2014. Philip A. Bonneau.

Excerpt from Disney Fairy Tale Weddings by Alfred Angelo. I as Creative marketing lead and concepter of all Proof-of-Concepts and visual presentations with way too much responsibility on the backend but knowing exactly who’s castle I’m in from the beginning and how that translated later in multiple fronts and why I was there to begin with. Sometime in 2014…July…August? I’ll figure it out there where all-nighters involved in saving moments of undermined responsibility of those I was to learn from and did.

Sign-offs occur prior to investing to film. Discussions had and the phoenix-like image of my own factors into this from The Phoenix city of Atlanta to Disney in official capacity of being born of Drag-Theatre Bred in 2012 to taking on the most Sacred aspect of intimacy unions and Disney combined in plot-points and on a budget. Later in transformational acceptance from adult conversations to iconic legends of branding and what one did and didn’t hide in it while being completely respectful to past, present and future. If Disney wants to get into the real-life wedding business, adult conversations and advancement of brand is a requirement. At some point we are all adults who still have our childhood dreams that evolve through life not stunted by psychological immaturity in some areas. It is destined generation-to-generation there is always going to be mistakes, over-and under-compensation…(we are definitely in the under-compensation era but incredible respect of talking points are a necessity when going into real life marriage. It is not always happily ever after but you imagine it at first or whatever…it is a case-by-case basis on how those arrangements work out and some of that is a very respected cultural tradition based on preserving the stability and survival of family in cultures on the other-side. In America, the traditional color for a wedding gown is white. Overseas…actually red is a very popular choice with a whole different meaning.

Screengrab from Facebook, January 16, 2022. Author Philip A. Bonneau

‘Today was a hyper-intensive thought day. Always on the go and always trying to process and make things work out one way or another. I like that my mind has been on venture capitalism for quite some time and it comes from a distinct place of trying to find something to latch back onto. So many avenues to explore and the I think about what I have. (Venture capitalism - Seeking adventures that profit towards the value of life and expands upon it in sustainability)

One thing in particular to question…having not been properly compensated during my 3-years of visual creative control of Disney’s Fairy Tale Weddings by Alfred Angelo in the capacity as senior creative manager, art director, compositor, retoucher, final signer before going to a company that has no input in the process and signed and went with it…do I own the unofficial wedding license on any future live-action Disney Fairy Tale Weddings? (This would be both reality and fictional) I ask as that story is important on exploitation, abuse and things other companies can reign in on for clarification and resolve. I’m a peace-keeper, but something has to change.

I ask in advance as 3-years in an officially licensed abandoned capacity matters in a Norman Rockwell sense. I was not there for the live-action Little Mermaid ceremony and I did not sign-off on Vanessa-Eric’s Wedding.’ -Philip A. Bonneau, Facebook post, January 16, 2022.

Case-in-point when dealing with duality and the things we do for family. A creative decision as I never controlled any aspect of dress design would be that when Mulan was introduced in the 2017, I actually would had and probably said it anyways that an appropriate introduction of her into ‘The Disney Fairy Tale Wedding’ line would had been in a Male Tuxedo or Suit opening up the door for respect of characters that did factually live while the question still remains on which one of the princesses did and did not actually live. Although I did not design the 2017 Mulan dress, the imagery matches the dress style and that is where we can join in conversation. Representation is important and I made very sure in our advertising to make sure as close to what budget could afford of proper representation front-facing.

The same thought patterns went elsewhere when they wanted to introduce Merida. In being Brave, you have to look at the narrative and what was not inspiration from the story and work your way to it rationally and conceptually through storytelling. Merida never would had been introduced in a wedding dress. She would not have allowed it and stormed off somewhere else leaving her mother to bear the burden of being the first official Mother-of-the-Bride concept to The Disney Fairy Tale Weddings line. But hey…what do I know? Those clones were brought in already on multiplicity.

In the beginning, there were talks of Anna being introduced that never made it to final production. I see why at the time where maybe…maybe she could or could not be hidden as a bridesmaid somewhere until her chance comes down the line.

With the inclusion of Mulan in the final year also came the inclusion of Pocahontas. Things were getting very real in the end and how one presents themselves is very important. I was slighted on the approach of the brand and let’s be honest. Popsicle sticks from what was before, but it was unique and deadlines could had been extended to properly deliver. If only I had a team… It is an interesting brand to bring respect to while it has it at the same time in where American brides at the very least are very DIY and heading in that direction in a majority. That trend and pattern comes from wage gap issues and not being able to afford nicer things while appreciating the mess out of what you have and working with what you got. This trend and fact was further proven during The Age of Quarantine when the DIY’ers had to survive with support of others from an International Health Crisis where they dealt with isolation, loss of family and loss of income and social security of making sure 6 ft. Away. That resonated in Paris for me. Very transformative that when people are buckled up and strapped for cash, they start getting creative on how to survive while also re-assessing exploitation in areas of employments. Some adjust to much simpler means for added life and happiness while no longer at the expense of ‘Self’ towards a company that you aren’t profiting from, just getting a paycheck or maybe you have coworker issues and found that working from home too adds happiness back to your life minus inter-office drama. We can zoom on that conversation a multiple different ways on when internally people actually prefer to have comfortable, safe environments that can be further enhanced through ‘Home Economics’, ‘The Rule of Ate’ and Paralegals in the HR structure.

Could be so much more, but we relate. Secretly, I even was working with Team Amateurs on trying to figure out if there could be a Star Wars bride. I say this knowing full well there were 5 different types of brides in me the brands I co-oversaw with an awesome Scorpio twin of vast industry knowledge. She too was disrespected by management at the end by them not even talking to her about important information of what was going on in the company and can attest to the rug pull moment of non-payment options. I think her and I may actually have major ownership of this brand in the long-term. Number 1 and 2 unite with the fashion side of this and you have a powerful team of wronged rights owners. Disney was already copying her and I anyways afterwards and I love carrying and honoring the past with me, just as much as she in my 3rd year let me spread my wings with support and watched vs. well…internal things elsewhere between year 1 and 2 of being ‘shown how professionals do it’. I’ll sit back now and watch.

I’ve fixed my other crowning moment and achievement on the America’s sides elsewhere afterwards.

Individuality is very important to a great portion of weddings these days. It is important to any social structure while understanding where you come from and where you are going in choices. Traditional vs. Non-traditional approaches where one is no less than the other to make something your own that is special and unique. It is very important to any wedding day especially as it is your own between someone you choose to be with and unite silently in private gaze or with family and friends to celebrate. About half the population know there are reboots all the time in that arena.

(Wait..Is this whole not teaching people how to cope and relate properly in society a ploy from those above the bridal industry to promote repeat business there? Is that what this is? Who has flooded those gates of hate in society to prevent people from being happy with someone or in life in general? Perception of talking points leads towards streams of conversations away from the bends and breaks of social angst towards living your life or solving world hunger. I say that in jest but at the same time…can’t do that one alone but there is ‘starving artist’ content available to support that at least there was a good DIY try there. Maybe I will accept as a major badge of honor a title of Non-Delusional, Delusional Artist. It denotes dreams of grandeur that one aspires for that may or may not occur without the help and support of others based on talking points, credentials and awareness of time and patiences in learned traits and practices. Persistence of dreams that may or may not play out down the line. Hope remains and you continue anyways through the sea of Delusional Critics and Authentic supporters. What is a’ Delusional Critic’? Is it usually one who could or could not be objective of their opinion where they too are spending their lives talking about other people’s works and accomplishments while trying to figure out that their contribution is really the critical analysis of those who are in a position to be front-facing, recognized and working. Quick slights pay off for someone in the long-run doesn’t necessarily work, but there are those that speak it and there are those who took it in, wrote it down and translated it into their lives because once you speak something it becomes a part of them positively or negatively where creatively it can be many things of empowerment to say no one but yourself is going to police your words, but in certain places your words and actions can be very policed and how that is translated in factuality is important. There are professional critics who spend their lives discussing their interests of what was important to their lives one way or another and how they translate that into theirs and how society can translate that as well. That is usually been done of the unspoken artist after their death while now we look at what contemporary art is where the artist becomes a brand and has to give so much more than what came before and allowed. I love critiques and critical thinking. The back-and-forth in messaging complex or simplistic denotes an advancement of conversation and thought counter to a ‘Delusional Critic’ who tends to break down talking points and others for their own gain or momentarily fleeting self-gratification. How does that work with a wordy contemporary artist that still leaves so much open for interpretation but weaves a tapestry throughout their entire low-budget career up until a certain point in full spectrum? Can you imagine me with a budget outside of what I’ve worked with prior? I can’t because it involves a team which is standard contemporary art practices.

The Bridal business is actually smaller than you think and they all know each other…franchisees everywhere can attest to that who all know that bridal is very emotional. Memories that last a lifetime is the start-game on their chance to be a major emotional part of a family indirectly. You wear their emotions on your sleeve. You are wrapped around their thoughts and that marriage is a silent blessing and thank you from our family to yours. This is why people stay in that industry while also branching out elsewhere. It is the sacredness of transformative meanings towards a happy life that eventually leads into children’s wear in some cases.

(I get it now…this is why you went after me wasn’t it. I talked about ‘Imagine happily ever after…’ and you were like not on my watch…I’m team repeat business here…I’m expecting 2-3 marriages out of people while you sit down there and say wait 5-years to have the blow-out after time earned and served in testing low budgets and how that works out in sustainability. Well it works. Rocky relationship but no bull on it’s effectiveness to future plot points.

The Autumn of Angelo. Philip A. Bonneau 2022

In my final year of Alfred Angelo, I outlined it accordingly to set up the company for success while I took my non-compensated disrespected professional body (and work) elsewhere after moving things to a direction where things could had gone with the Disney line while still 5 other lines also in co-responsibility and 1 other one that I am saying is Truly Mine. When it comes to Pocahontas in particular and her introduction into the Bridal side of Disney Fairy Tale Weddings. Historical accuracy is to be considered in any adaption of the Pocahontas person while understanding the Disney side of it as a What if…? to reality. Taken far younger and too went over to Europe, the winds of her death echo in what can be a way to look at the animated film of greatness wondering what point of the movie is reality and what point of it is a dream and the after-life of what could or couldn’t be. It is with the utmost respect, and again a major honor to say that I own very exact rights to visual translations of any of the Disney princesses in some capacity that Disney may finally talk to me about. I own these rights from false promises. Exploitation. My Land invaded. My intellectual property taken, translated while I was completely disregarded and set to be ridiculed by society.

Disney, as proven in their translation of my life and property through the movie “Cruella’ have absolutely NO RIGHT to ever do a live-action Pocahontas without full permission and respect from the tribes of those who are sovereign to this land and when I connect with and my mother’s parents have given complete respect and introduction throughout their lives. They have no right to even Disclude me from that conversation that could be done at the same time or prior. It has been proven by haphazard franchising that respect is to be paid of any character based off of that level of significant with a door open discussion of Tears and what is not Disney’s arena anyways. From fiction back to reality, a change of seasons for those epic silent moments of internal reflections #memories from a starving artist who can privately talk about Thanksgiving in its transformative aspects that could or could not be a reality but already written down elsewhere. When introducing Pocahontas into the bridal line…that denotes age of consent and taking children away who die too soon. Mulan gets me.

In the end of where things need to transform in my contributions of my time in Alfred Angelo and 3 years of princess and queen trilogies, it boils down to I love my popsicle sticks that I’ve worked with. I love the popsicle sticks I’ve been afforded to work with. I love where my popsicle sticks came from and where the meaning behind them can go. I’ve elevated the popsicle stick beyond where it was before and that may be a single pedestal of popsicle power, but others too like popsicles and the riddles behind them. Throughout my life and my career I’ve been picked up and survived where I could while investing in my own passions on the side. From 2017 I’ve been brought down to a ‘Starving Artist’ status that while playing with my food elevates the ‘starving artist’ as a movement of discussion. That was done while not having a home but provided shelter with the second essential of life very important to me on the paths I’ve walked and the paths I’m leading for others. Perhaps I could be guided in the right direction or path. Plotted courses where not of destruction but of ideas to focus on and build momentum of change. I’ve played with popsicle sticks and I’ve done the shoe-string budget.

The fate of broken glass slippers. A non-responsibility response. Philip A. Bonneau Written and drawn 5/20/2022

5/20/2022

Shoe String Budget

The idea of Shoe Strings as I look at a 400,000 dollar Birkin bag that I now know is by Hermès. The ignorance of never having that in my radar of price points is what it is knowing 1 bag is 2 years annual budget for Disney Fairy Tale Weddings by Alfred Angelo. Daunting knowing at least perspective of what I was working with as major leap from what came before of 10-15 dollars to 20-30 dollars(in Heroes+Villains) to that(Disney) and then back to 1-10 dollars in 'Starving Artist’ with the continued help of friends and family.

The idea of the Shoe String brings me to the idea of how there are several nostalgia aspects to the shoe string as a child. Leather laced, rope strings & flat laces.

As one learns to tie their shoes it becomes a connection with learning experiences and discovering the world. Lesson from any elders who show us one technique over the other. Would a Shoe-String Budget be of educational purposes then?

The idea crosses my mind on shoe strings on if they are tied or not, coiled as they are to help protect your feet and keep you in place while you learn to walk in them. Even Velcro could factor in some expensive aspect outside the shoe string. Imagine couture fashion wrapped around this in an elevated status of learning the value of concept and intrigue. The idea shifts to sculpture of Jeff Koons nature of laces tied in bows and patterns echoing childhood.

'Laces Out…Laces In?’ Could be a thing.

Wearable fashion of bracelets and necklaces of metallic nature symbolizing always learning and guided by others.

Can a dress or jacket be made of various shoe string patters or simply echo the ship in exaggerated form.

The tip important as much as the wearing in and out.

Diagram and illustration images of necklace application, clasped bracelet unified by plastic tip reference transformed into metallics and the shoe-string sculpture that echoes to balloon sculptures of Jeff Moons. Knot References. Possible collaboration with Tiffany’s on “Tying the Knot”.

I stick to the sculpture aspect of Jeff Koons & Tiffany’s. An awesome wedding present represent the unity of learning from one another and the bond of childhood memories to adult ones where seriousness & lightheartedness combine together. A statement piece where each is unique? I’m unsure the process, but statement of product & materials talk about the uniqueness of each relationship and the building from it with what each other have. Possible  ‘have and have knot’, but always make it through. Aspirational goals of relationships & nostalgia of art introductions.

I’m alien at this, but I’m sure in discussion it is about the shoes & statements. I rest my Case, mate. Sometimes the bridal industry is fun to stick around in children’s concepts, famous artists, aspirational goals and wedlock.

I imagine the gift a great parent’s gift to their children as welcome a family harkened in the ceremony of marriage when actual knot clasping occurs in some, the breaking of glass in particular which can be remelted and molded based on specific substrates by the brands to be wrapped in instant connection of personalization of the event, the moment and the celebration.

Family heirlooms of personal connection that eventually becomes ‘our youth’ anyways based on the longevity of partnership. Or simply if impossible to control the variable, “From our house to yours. Congrats on tying the knot” - From the Tiffany Co. & Jeff Koons. The proprietary Tiffany Blue in interest that on the day of is always(possibly) something blue.

Side note - Jeff Koons - “Glass Monopoly house sculpture”

If specific glass is required for uniqueness, this brings in the design of glasses in particular which is its own separate thing before being transformed into the knot joined together from other elements. ’Strange what comes from looking at one Berkin Bag.’

Shirt/Jacket design, stitched shoelace patterns of a tornado.

laced pattern of shoestrings to form a tornado. I’m envisioning it on a jacket on the back in particular patterns interwoven of probably white or grey leathers. Grey scheme of colorations with subtle hints that can be pushed into subtle muted palettes.

'Tornado on your back.’ ‘Uplifting message or ‘destruction’ of an argument? Dream symbology accordingly to bigbraincoach.com/biblical-meaning-of-tornado-dreams

-'Something from your past is ready to get healed.’

-Biblically, direct messaging about the happening of the future. Protection & strength to face obstacles.

-If hiding from a tornado may symbolize avoidance & emotion that needs attention.

White Tornado - Peace & Healing, guardian angel. Could be also in dark tones as guardians also are there at night and in dark times.

-possible pregnancy but could also be the conception of a concept.

Shirt/Jacket design, stitched shoelace patterns of a hurricane.

Possibly inclusion of hurricane to reference the Odyssey? Questions as the region did/does not have hurricanes often. Typhoons in the other region of Pacific. “They came in like a hurricane””They left like a tornado” denotes placement preference of things seen and tracked vs. what appears unpredictably.

The second half scanned at lunchtime. 12:00 PM EST.

_______________________________________________

I think of the glass knots and what they represent in regards to my life experience. Thoughts before in Section J(of Curated Jellyfish) of the affects of negativity affecting people’s wedding by association of being a former Alfred Angelo employee. I shall contend on what was written in ’Starving Artist’ on my site and I think of everything written after to process that as my dreams and days were shattered into the areas they are today.

Was it from that experience that I found myself locked in basements of guidance and thoughts for 3-years?

The model with the broken glass slippers surround in glass and shouldn’t/couldn’t move.

A dress of torn nature but intentional in couture possibility. Beauty in the things that respect time and patiences. A heritage prior in some areas of mother’s dreams and parental union ripped apart for selfish purposes rethought to where stitches and creative decisions done with intention of seemingly haphazard approach?

Would the collection of those glass slipper pieces put yours and my soul at ease? Collecting them all and melting them together to represent limited editions of how to make things beautiful against from shattered moments of hope. Collectively they represent the time and the thoughts and meanings of them. Glistened moments were temporarily constrained by the thoughts of the affect we have on one another.

Lessons had on falling hard in what you put your soul into as that applies to the families of the supposed Alfred Angelo weddings. Swept together and combined, a story possible of outside that connection and back to the ideas and dreams of those that know that your day is important and supported with love. Heritage and history of fairytales that could come true in unity knowing that the meaning behind anything is what is important most of all with the realization heritage transforms once shared. This is why fairytales is one word and not two in the bridal business. Although hidden fairies in every tale, the stories themselves are not directly about fairies but are about the belief of wonder and imagination with watched over protection in unity. The common folktales prove valid argument. That comes with A lure of never forgotten lore.

Perhaps a way to pay respect to those influenced negatively of every picked up pieces. A brand promise where we learn as a child into adulthood and pass down that knowledge to our peers, friends and possibly children.

Everything broken can be transformed.

I suppose if I were to do a book of my trilogy of work with Disney Fairy Tale Weddings by Alfred Angelo from 2014—2017, it would have a cover of a contemporary art piece of Manderella’s Popsicle Stick Castle. Hidden with Riddles and stories added on of what happens when 3 years of fairy tales are engrained based on what happened in real life, both prior and after. Imagine two made and placed next to a single Birkin Bag on what had equal price tags for a season.

___________________________________________

Hurricanes - As they can be found in dreams and in real life, they can represent many things of positive/negative connections. A slow moving force that builds momentum over time that always expresses gravity of situations and danger. Warning signs if by SEA, danger if by land.

Do hurricane and Typhoons negative affect aquatic life if never hit land? Biologically they sense storms differently and possibly preemptively. Change of behavior and dive deeper when perhaps panic takes over in cases. The eye of the hurricane represents calmness surround by elemental brute forces.As everything collides around in the changing winds, a search of center knowing things can turn in any direction based on volume.

As hurricanes have always been a part of my life it is representation of our actions towards others on a personal level, cognizant of reaching mental center when need be.

As a child of New Orleans born and Puerto Rico stationed by my father’s Coast Guard background from my time and my grandfather’s Coast Guard time  before ours, as with Georgia and Florida, the connections to hurricanes can be negative in nature or positive in coming together after disaster when humanity is shown one way or another. To explain how hurricane have affective my life is still always appreciation to my size vs. the size of nature and others in humility and real life consequences.

Perhaps the symbol represents coming together for a cause which happens in any disaster relief effort of significance and notice. Center of focus with the eye on what drives you. An influx of thought where to some it could be destruction, but for I it is about build/rebuilding and coming together in banded patterns. A possible representation of knowing who you are, what you stand for and never backing down but always open for discussion with fair warning of preventative measures.It all depends on how you land the argument or anchor your point-of-view.

To see water spouts in a hurricane could suggest pocket areas of thought and centering being pulled into a bigger picture gradually which absolutely answers the (physical) negative affect on aquatic life. A precursor to connective surfaces where the sky and earth combine where 2 things are now wrapped around a center of thought. An agreement of two sides? Or a strengthening of an arguments in multi-perspective?

Tornadoes - Free Flowing thoughts that can go in any direction once they land. Patterned behavior where it is expected but room to travel and grow. More isolated based on conditions of perspective. Testing of positive/negative, hot/cold responses. Uplifting messages where we get uprooted from one thought to another. A thought that takes hold of you that when acted on leaves you in another place.

Most of these 3 are associated with severe conditions, yet also could leas to imagination and beauty when out of harms way.

When I was a child in Savannah, my childhood friend and I built a raft for the lagoon we had in our neighborhood. On the water in a sense of adventure…A slight tornado/sprout forms. A beautiful moment of wonder as if someone was there to provoke and provide imagination.

(Illustration provided)

Not drawn to scale but amazing as the wind was focused, friendly and went in patterns towards land. #truestory.

While Playing the Waiting Game against those of money and retaliation practices....

A start from The Law Novice on my non-fabricated number in my un-responded to serving of a lawsuit.

The very real number attached to my wrongful Termination from SCAD, How I came to it and not including any aspect of my creative property compromised. Still just a drop in the bucket in the DIY world of former basement dwellers such as myself and nothing of people’s salary or overall revenue but multiplies beyond belief in consideration.

It is understood that I have been retaliated in ways one can only imagine for several years and amped up after February 10, 2022. In the I needed and need help category and have not been able to seek council, this was how I got to my figure in the lawsuit in which is clear cut in evidence of SCAD’s liability. It was stated by SCAD’s lawyer and available according to the freedom of information act that SCAD would be liable if proven of such. It was further stated that Mr. Bonneau has not been able to do that. Mr. Bonneau can and Mr. Bonneau is aware of false statements made to the EEOC on such and what that means based on the minimal evidence supplied by SCAD and attached to the EEOC investigation. Mr. Bonneau is also aware that the lawyer was well aware of the events reported and went through compliance in April 2021 and Mr. Bonneau copy-wrote protected his BBB complaint, final statements of the EEOC and position statements marked up in how SCAD can and cannot use Mr. Bonneau’s name in any capacity of further slander and libel practices that were done officially to The State of Georgia, internally and towards the detriment of my career and mental health.

I’ll wait…understanding United States copyright is protected 70—95 years after the originators death.

#OscarsSoBlackTie

Or is it #OscarSoBlackTie one of them came first.

A post to Twitter,

Who's watching the Oscars tonight? #OscarsSoBlackTie

@oscarmayer @TheOscarsRP

followed by #oscarssoblacktie.

@oscarmayer

‘Many a tie to be seen here but a truce in others could be Met in opening up perspectives. Full range present every year in every category. Range-Free (Egg Emoji) (Planted Emoji) here. Enjoy the evening. Never know what (Chicken Hatches Emoji) . :)’

As I have slowly begun to enter into modern heiroglyphics of the land of Emoji, I travel small at first as I try to use my words and symbols correctly.

I’ve been grilled of the possibility of what could unfold here. #OscarsSoWhite #OscarsSoBlack. So much food for thought. While looking at you, I suppose there is that of what Me and DynaGlo and do. Who knows where we go from here. I’ll follow something one way or another or mind my own in curiosity. Friendly gestures and that of from Savannah, GA. #OscarsSoBlackTie @oscarmayer @dyna_glo #Oscars @TheOscarsRP

A B+W perspective at first to lead towards that of colorful journeys.

Perhaps I was not too nice with the @oscarmayer @dyna_glo, there are starving artists out there that have worked hard to be invisible from the sidelines on the red carpet. 2 if by @tictac. @TheOscarsRP #OscarsSoBlackTie

I imagine everyone is rocking it out one way or another. There is what I see and don’t see from certain angles. The Hunger Games of Award season almost over. #AnActorsLifeforSome#OscarsSoBlackTie #InvisibleContourLines @tictac @TheOscarsRP

With #OscarsSowhite such a plight if I might as I tie things together in all of my might. #OscarsSoBlackTie #ATruceofChartreuse or perhaps maybe #Peuce #OscarAnnualColorThemeTrends #PickYourPalette or have your palette picked for you. It shall be around for at least a year from there.

Some go for the Gold. Others for the Glory.

All fun + games 'til you discover Starvation Station from Thanksgiving to St. Patrick's Day. #awardseason B kind to artists. Recognition is deserved in dedication.

In every thinning there is bulkin'. #OscarsSoBlackTie @TheOscarsRP

I don’t know about this battle here. I see a great deal of ties in discussion here. But Red seems to be winning for now on carpets. A Fool’s Errand for Later Palette of Covet wondering if the carpet matches the drakes. #OscarsSoBlackTie #PickYourPalette

I know @OscardelaRenta has already jumped on the red room with the Guild in statement pieces. What bluntness awaits tonight on bold statements in #predictivepalettes or that of #OscarsSoBlackTie #RollRedTie #CrimsonTie #TheyPickedYourPalette

Killing it with the fashion statements and looks.
Can’t wait for the Platforms of the evening.
’I could really use a hot dog right now.’
I’ll settle for popcorn. #OscarsSoBlackTie
@oscarmayer @JenniferCoolidge @TheOscarsRP

I’m completely out of the loop here and not sure what flies. In costume design no doubt Black Panther could be the bee’s knees of the evening. #OscarsSoBlackTie #costumedesign @TheOscarsRP @Gover #SuperStatements #OscarSoBlueTie #Seewhattheydidthere #OscarsForever #alumnistatementsofsuccess

Well no Oscars showing up on our air'ish. TV. Couldn't afford cable but was able to catch what The Fox Says with A Profound Simpsons episode. Enjoy the evening. It is a night of team support and those who believed in projects and backed them up. #OscarsSoWhiteTie

Since I can't watch it and not a part of that world, here is the last thing I had of professionalism and going with the flow. #OscarsSoBlackTie Now that everything is in the can, ‘What is everyone going to be talking about at the end of tonight? @OscarTheGrouch

@TheOscarsRP

#OscarsSoBlackTie Who will go from Oscar Gold to Oscar Green? Stay Tuned. #OscarsSoGreenTie #SustainableTalkingPoints #birdsarereal

I wrote at the time prior that I’ll more than likely add on as I go throughout the evening based on one thing or another. In every version of my website saved for one reason or another without talking to me, life goes on and separates in many ways from such in any capacity where I understand I was not wanted or of what could be fired be even mentioning I or #OscarsSoBlackTie.

As understood, I have my own interests and never an invitation where there is the idea of what could be or what could had been or what is. In either aspect. I’m focused elsewhere the rest of the night. I have other things to do and others of wanting me to be continued discount maybe while I continue to do my thing on my own minimal dime. #enjoyinglife #decisionsmadelongago

Lorem Ipsum: Child of Someone Now Available for Sale.

Lorem Ipsum: Child of Someone Now Available for Sale.
https://www.blurb.com/b/11474669-lorem-ipsum-a-child-of-someone-second-edition

As none of my books have never been approached on rights management or purchase, I find it best as I revamp my bookstore to note that I am the sole owner of every publication or book I have every created prior and will re-release as such. It is understood that whatever methods of used in industry standard practice, I imagine I am new to the world and have much to learn. I am the only one that can be approached at this time for current or past works where I never of management had reintroduce a chance opportunity of introduction of my works in book form. It is understood if picked up, the re-release of books becomes cheaper, far more expansive in areas I could not do alone in production areas and where things could go.

In either regard, please read the info below if interested in discussion of licensing of rights or in any collaboration of such. As with any author, a book can go one place or another, but completely understood of the impact any work could have if utilized properly. I remain steadfast in my revamp and reissue of multiple books over a period of time to get back to where I was before.

ISBN: 979-8-88955-381-6

Title: Lorem Ipsum: A Child of Someone

Description:

An introduction course study of the history of storytelling and a step into the world of fiction for I. With Me, a first chance to tackle topics of perception, perspective and the importance of introductions or conclusions in after-thoughts. A combination of paths had and stories told, a proven thesis and dissertation on the way to help build another story collaboratively one way or another. A journey of life's work and a piece of my soul, barefoot and aware. Collections and excerpts from some of the greatest works of literature towards something new in understanding and different paths walked. A Book of many Genres where hard to place where one actually is. 

Contributor Name: Philip Arthur Bonneau, publisher, author, artist, designer, collector, critique, editor, critical theory

Artist Bio:

Senior Creative marketer. Photographer. Author. Artist.
Southern charmer if you think pronouncing "ing" like "in'" is charmin'.
A Platypus of many different worlds. (Although I think currently a unicorn in this one.)
SAV based physically. Connected everywhere digitally. :)

It is my core philosophy that you have to understand the past in order to achieve anything new. 
Where do we go from here knowing this bio is outdated before I walk out the lot with it. 
www.philipbonneau.com/about

Hardback - Psychology, Literature History & Criticism, Philosophy, Art, Agriculture, Bible Commentaries, United States - History, Wit & Humor, Spirituality, , Self-Help, Political Science, Photography, Mind & Body, Literature - Collections, Language Arts, Interpersonal Relationships, Law, Performing Arts, Genealogy, Finance - Personal, Fiction - All of the Above(or below, its all the same plane anyways to some extent), Family, Education, Economics, Curiosities and Wonders

Format: Hardback

Number of Pages: 460

Print Date: 2/8/2023

Target Audience: (Rough)Trade for now. 

Retail Price? US $120.11

Custom Made per Order is the reason for the price. $23 dollars of each sale goes to I and can help support where the 3rd Edition could go while continuing to match forward in narrative.

At least my little ISBN that could is reserved. :)

Of course there is much to do on the art side before I am ready to release this. Eventually I’ll need teammates. Where minor keys and details to be had beforehand in an introduction of my little pocket world before roping back around to how I go there elsewhere while moving forward in one direction or another. Constantly Spicing things up one way or another to see what happens.

-P.

'a' divine comedy

I spent the last 12 years of my life working towards something publicly and of artistically,

My life experience adds to such where it is important to note what that could mean to others who never knew or perhaps only knew me from Heroes+Villains since which opened the following week of ‘Beautiful Layered Lies’ while I explored things in different realms.

Perhaps you didn’t know me or perhaps you never wanted to. That is always ok and understood. There is a purpose of such on either side of reality and escapism wondering which one is which and what has occurred in my life in notice or what others wanted to do in advantage of one thing or another while others obliged in trust and understanding.

I’ve never publicly mentioned my stages of coping in an official capacity. I’ve done so in the process if you bought the first book and then fleshed it out behind the scenes in timestamped aspects towards what I needed in life and then extended from Ugly Simple Truths to try to understand others to see where the flaws are and what is connective in such.

To I, I’ve perfected a coping process based on Dante’s Divine Comedy where I am far outside the sect of such to consider that of the social issue of limbo in the process in consideration of breaking down something social to that of personal and intimate. That psychology was always intimate and always understood where perhaps others saw the value prior and did what they did and still I get to this point of Super Bowl to understand what is and isn’t the Super Bowl for one person or another.

My life. Your Life. Our Lives.
I’ve fought towards an answer that didn’t come without happenstance and doesn’t happen over night. Struggles from others towards answering even my obsession (which isn’t one to begin with) of the number 23. To note any number is a sign of respect where it is understood where people discount one way or another.

In any aspect of what was my initial break into the art world and public speaking, where the series ended up is a powerful statement of my curated life and what occurred to constantly try to do good and well towards others in understanding coping and breaking my 9 stages of such into originally the 3 stages of Hell, Purgatory and Heaven with the understanding of whatever name others wanted to use to explain such, the definition came from my understanding and is non-secular in such but easy to understand.

In any aspect of such of my basic understanding of Dante.’ ‘a’ divine comedy’ is Not Public Domain but of Public Interest Possibly. Whatever others wanted to do to not have me afford my life and yet still take from me is probably noted and documented.

It is understood I am permanently attached to Dante Alighieri’s work just as much as Gustave Doré was hundreds of years later. Psychology is where modern aspects of discussion could be had with my works in current aspects and it is an understanding that there could be no cinematic version of Dante’s Divine Comedy without at least respecting the fact that he preferred to call it ‘La Commedia’ and everyone else did there thing one way or another in influence after.

In any aspect, in all my attacks, I claim my right that my answer to ‘‘a’ divine comedy’ is 100% intact and respect of every religion or civilization in the same vein of Dante to express an denote what is and isn’t ownership.

In that regard, never have my 9 stages been on social media, nor will they ever.
I’m trying to sort out what occurred and perhaps other people are looking one way or another.

Heroes+Villains elsewhere in a whole different conversation.
In this regard, it is understood there are monumental characters translated on the Dante front and there is privacy and private citizen rights held in my realm.

In either way, ‘a divine comedy’ is understood and 100% copyright protected by The United States Government with complete respect where I come from an understanding of the 195.

Onward 2/9

ISBN: 979-8-88955-381-6

Title: Lorem Ipsum: A Child of Someone

Description:

An introduction course study of the history of storytelling and a step into the world of fiction for I. With Me, a first chance to tackle topics of perception, perspective and the importance of introductions or conclusions in after-thoughts. A combination of paths had and stories told, a proven thesis and dissertation on the way to help build another story collaboratively one way or another. A journey of life's work and a piece of my soul, barefoot and aware. Collections and excerpts from some of the greatest works of literature towards something new in understanding and different paths walked. A Book of many Genres where hard to place where one actually is. 

Contributor Name: Philip Arthur Bonneau, publisher, author, artist, designer, collector, critique, editor, critical theory

Artist Bio:

Senior Creative marketer. Photographer. Author. Artist.
Southern charmer if you think pronouncing "ing" like "in'" is charmin'.
A Platypus of many different worlds. (Although I think currently a unicorn in this one.)
SAV based physically. Connected everywhere digitally. :)

It is my core philosophy that you have to understand the past in order to achieve anything new. 
Where do we go from here knowing this bio is outdated before I walk out the lot with it. 
www.philipbonneau.com/about

Hardback - Psychology, Literature History & Criticism, Philosophy, Art, Agriculture, Bible Commentaries, United States - History, Wit & Humor, Spirituality, , Self-Help, Political Science, Photography, Mind & Body, Literature - Collections, Language Arts, Interpersonal Relationships, Law, Performing Arts, Genealogy, Finance - Personal, Fiction - All of the Above(or below, its all the same plane anyways to some extent), Family, Education, Economics, Curiosities and Wonders

Format: Hardback

Number of Pages: 460

Print Date: 2/8/2023

Target Audience: (Rough)Trade for now. 

Retail Price? (I don’t think I can answer this now as it will get pricey in one realm and cheaper in the other.) TBD. I have to work out the kinks

This really shouldn’t be a requirement in the on-going ISBN process. If interest of publishers and picker-uppers there, the most information available at the time should be variable based on application. There are swiffer picker-uppers but that seems to be a hold back. It pretty much is the same as what salary are you looking for and others not telling you their range. 

At least my little ISBN that could is reserved. :)

Of course there is much to do on the art side before I am ready to release this. Eventually I’ll need teammates. Where minor keys and details to be had beforehand in an introduction of my little pocket world before roping back around to how I go there elsewhere while moving forward in one direction or another. Constantly Spicing things up one way or another to see what happens.

-P.

No Contest?

In Good Faith I sent off my filing legally through The Superior Court’s Office notification of my lawsuit and the stipulations of such that were posted online the day prior.

As noted in such at the bottom in official SCAD capacity of the address they use online that the ‘Above address is for students only, no admin’ this is considered a ‘No Contest’ officially on all claims made against The Savannah College of Art and Design as apparently their official address of 516 Drayton St. Savannah, GA 31401 is fully run by students without supervision of any faculty, staff or administration.

I’m not sure the purpose of that official address, but completely Student Run or Alumni Run is a correct answer.

In court, this will be submitted where there is no longer argument or discussion, simply a 3rd party determining the actual total they own myself the plaintiff.

Kepler's Law

My first time seeing this tonight and took a crack at it in thought.

Took a Crack at it, expanded it and sent to copyright.

Fight for your right...

In good-faith I tried to file online. It was unsuccessful.

I could not do it online, I will file in person tomorrow.

Whatever the reason for not being able to file electronically was user error or something else. I swear by my words as I have since 2019. My filing is true or student status, employ, or alumni well aware of what came into my life prior and who thought they had a free pass. Anything below would be a freedom of information anyways and sworn testimony by the Plaintiff. (I) 

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CHATHAM COUNTY

STATE OF GEORGIA

PHILIP BONNEAU

                   Plaintiff,

         v.

THE SAVANNAH COLLEGE
OF ART & DESIGN

                   Defendant.

Case No.: 

COMPLAINT

1.     PLAINTIFF, proceeding pro se, brings this complaint against DEFENDANT and alleges as follows:

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

2.      Jurisdiction and venue in this Court is proper per O.C.G.A 9-10 because Defendant resides in Chatham County.

PARTIES

3.     Plaintiff is an individual and a resident of Chatham County.

4.     Defendant is a entity doing business in Chatham County.

FACTS ALLEGED

1.     On June 1, 2019. (June 3, 2019 by Defendant’s multiple records), Plaintiff began
full-time employment with Defendant as an assistant manager of Defendant’s restaurant, Art’s Café located at 345 Bull Street in Savannah, GA. This decision was made by
The Plaintiff and was accepted so by The Defendant through meetings with the
Hiring Coordinators, The Manager of Arts (Male, Caucasian, under 40) and proper background checks.

2.     It was noted post interview the smell of The Plaintiff’s clothes and brought about in second-hand conversation by the General Manager (female, Americanized Spanish decent) to The Plaintiff (Male, under 40 at the time, Caucasian) after interview, whom they had lunch with prior to the interview and was not a part of the interview process. It was at this lunch and prior conversations where The Plaintiff past employment history was brought up leading to their suicide attempt on Feb. 21, 2019 and stated that the number 1 priority was to find employment and of the General Manager on a personal level to get The Plaintiff health insurance to re-introduce required treatment based on mental health and based on prior work-place experiences. The General Manager was not part of the hiring decision process.

3.     As part of the employment package of benefits considered taxable income, Plaintiff was able to begin Master’s Studies in a Degree-seeking Program of Secondary Education after 6-months of consecutive employment at capped rate of 1 class per quarter award. Plaintiff was accepted into the On-line Masters of Fine Arts - Photography program on November 7, 2019. They began student studies in Winter Quarter January 2020 with an estimated graduation date of 18-quarters from time of entry plus 3 pre-requisite classes for a total of 21 quarters to completion. This would equate to 5.25 years of study with no quarter breaks at 4 classes available per calendar year in conjunction to a guaranteed assumed 5.25 years of full-time employment co-currently by Plaintiff towards their degree-seeking incentive for employment. Each Master’s study class is currently valued at $4,450 per class of taxable income with around the first $5000 considered non-taxable annually before taxable status begins as income and withheld each paycheck for tax liability purposes. As of January 2020, the Plaintiff was considered officially both an Employee and a Student to The Defendant.

4.     The Plaintiff is already of Alumni Status with a Bachelor’s of Fine Art Degree – Graphic Design earned from the Defendant from 2001-2005, in their 4-year degree-seeking bachelor program through student loans, scholarships, personal income, investment of time, creative-skills and life experience. As part of the requirement to earn a degree from The Defendant, The Plaintiff and other investors of degree-seeking nature have to maintain a 3.0 GPA throughout their course of study to satisfy graduation requirements as well as have all debt of payments secured before receiving official diplomas and certifications. Failure to do so extends the length of degree-seeking nature.

5.     It was during this time that a trial was being held for a previous manager(male, Caucasian, under 40) of Gryphon who suffered a mental-break due to interactions with the General Manager that led to arson of The Scottish Rite Temple where Art’s Café/Gryphon share space in the building and downstairs basement areas for operations. Discussions of the trial were had as both the manager and general manager were called witnesses, while cited conflict of text messages between That manager and that of The General Manager leading to agitation and conflict leading up to the multiple attempts of arson within The Scottish Rite on The Gryphon side of the building. This was second-hand to The Plaintiff by first-hand witnesses.

6.     Due to COVID, the restaurant and in-personal classes were shut down from March 18, 2020—May 5, 2020. During that that time period The Plaintiff was ‘furloughed’ and receiving paychecks from accrued time-off, government stimulus and the equivalent of 1 to 2 weeks of unemployment benefits before coming back to work as one of 3 essential workers towards the reopening of Art’s Café. It was noted that the unemployment checks where mis-addressed to my previous residence of 18 years prior when I was in undergrad and did not receive it until brought back into active employment status. The Defendant had the proper address on file. During that time, active student status was held and continued classes in ‘Heroes + Villains: The Age of Quarantine’ with PHOT 503 – Portfolio Process.

7.     From May 6 2020 —March/April 2021, Art’s Café ran on a reduced staff of 3 full-time employees, (The Plaintiff, The Manager and The other Assistant Manager (female, under 40) of Equal Status to The Plaintiff since beginning of employment also utilizing the employee/student benefit. They were employed slightly longer than The Plaintiff. The day-to-day operations were held by the three where during the week of on-boarding before re-opening it was verbalized the disdain of coming back to work by The Manager and The other assistant manager while no complaints from The Plaintiff. It was during the on-boarding of reentry a tipping structure was already in place that never went to the managers and the need to modify that as no student work-study was to be employed for months. It was verbalized by The General Manager, ‘The minute the students come back, tips are gone.’ That staffing situation occurred for several months where there was the inclusion of a 4tth, 5th, and 6th employee of part-time status to alleviate the responsibilities of what once was 3 full-time employees +250 allotted work-study hours per week. It was noted plans to bring back 90 work-studies hours per week although sales numbers were same if not higher per date to the same time last year. A difference of 250 weekly hours was absorbed by 3 employees, and then 4 or 5 in unprecedented times without proper compensation.

8.     3/27/2021, an official letter was sent to The Plaintiff’s direct supervisor of Manager of Art’s Café and their supervisor, The General Manager of auxiliaries. Both are salaried employees of The Defendant where the General Manager has been employed by the Defendant for around 20 years of employment and the then Manager was employed by the defendant was employed for a few years prior to the Plaintiff’s employment until their resignation from The Defendant around June/July 2021. The letter states clarification on tipping structure proposed that was told indirectly, how it did not make sense and questions of pay changes and work-study employment pre- and post-COVID isolation required by The Defendant and Federally Mandated.

9.     On 4/1/2021, an email response from the General Manager was received by The Plaintiff. It was documented in correspondence change of responsibilities while attempting to cite error to my increase in wages while not answering the question on number of bodies/added responsibility. As understood by The General Manager’s official response, my compensation is defined. A response from The Plaintiff was sent back with clarification of response, acknowledged the position responsibility has been changed,  while citing unhealthy workplace conditions, lack of breaks (especially due to reduced numbers) while citing health concerns of other employees and myself while noting ‘free class’ as something that is not free to The Plaintiff. It is noted that the General Manager had discussions with her supervisor (Caucasian, male) about some of the discussion points, but it is unclear if the General Manager sent the email to her boss for proper consideration or discussion.

10.  On 4/1/202, a separate email was sent to both the Manager and General Manager citing an incident report with another coworker (Presumed Latino male of Puerto Rican decent) on matters of unhealthy work conditions and lack of breaks leading toward their physical and mental health. Pay issues and conversations were also noted of created workplace environments by management decisions.

11.  On 4/13/2021, an official complaint was sent to the Head of HR (Caucasian, Male), full-time salaried for The Defendant, about the initial correspondences and additional talking points confidential to HR, citing change of behavior by the General Manager towards The Plaintiff with cited examples. In addition to the previous talking points, workplace questions on legal work-break laws were included where The Plaintiff cited and corrected federal law to both General Manager as well as the Head of HR who did not provide the correct information on such to the General Manager to pass down to The Plaintiff and others. The letter brought to attention to the right internal department disputes and questions of pay/wage changes and threats of garnishment/allocations based on emotional decisions by The General Manager that The Plaintiff professionally asked for clarification on as well as unhealthy work conditions based on practices and mental health awareness of both The Plaintiff and one other coworker (both male). It further cites scheduling conflicts that goes against The Defendant’s Employee Handbook (User Manual), lack-of-staffing and adequate work-study employment that was available leading to compensation and duty issues and questions. The Plaintiff noted threats from the General Manager against their student status, employment status with confidentiality breaches that brought in-direct conflict from workplace into private life. The letter discloses mental health issues to HR and that the General Manager was aware of such and events surrounding it in past employments outside The Defendant. Citation made of the presence of retaliation by General Manager whom they have known for about 20 years personally and professionally as they were his direct supervisor at The Defendant’s other restaurant, The Gryphon Tea Room (Now known as The Gryphon) from 2003—2005. The correct length of time in 2021 is 18 years known.

12.  Response was had from The Defendant’s Head of HR and a meeting was schedule with The Plaintiff, The General Manager’s Superior and the VP of the department that The Plaintiff resides in. It was in this unpaid meeting that the Head of HR raised concerns about the initial email and that they vocalized to the other two and The Plaintiff that it has been escalated to compliance while questions were asked pertaining to several aspects to the initial email and compliant. A scheduled meeting was to be placed separately with compliance by The Plaintiff.

13.  Meeting was had off-site, unpaid with Compliance Officer regarding the initial complaint via zoom at The Plaintiff’s place of residence. In that meeting it was further discussed what had occurred in the letter while citing again workplace conditions and mental health. As confidential as the meeting is supposed to be outside of The Defendant’s purview, it is later questioned after Feb.10, 2022 if that is possible as compliance officers have a @scad.edu email address. Interview was had, documents were forwarded to compliance officer and interviews with coworkers occurred where I know of at least the general manager and manager to be had. Concern later is had that if confidential investigations are occurring and confidential information is sent through The Plaintiff’s @scad.edu address, what confidentiality privilege is there in potential breach of trust?

14.  It is noted during the next several months from compliance investigations occurring, the agitation of the General Manager in conversation with the Manager (male). No discussion points were expressed of the meeting to The Plaintiff outside of ‘It was intense.’ Spoken by the Manager to I. It is over-heard by The Plaintiff comments from the General Manager from their office and I the basement where I worked of such comments during that time as, ‘I am not about to lose my job over this sorry person.’, ‘I’ve seen his penis.’ And ‘They have tried this before and I am not going to let them do this to him.’ This caused mental health to be exasperated with The Plaintiff as it was overheard over the span of the investigation which went far beyond the initial good-faith discussion with supervisors, HR and compliance. Behavior patterns changed where General Manager avoids discussion with The Plaintiff or minimal interaction. Other Assistant Manager is told to stay away from certain topics with The Plaintiff and left as that without going into detail, citing mental health. Manager does have a background in Mental Health and Rehabilitation and since the beginning was aware with compassion and expertise on the manner. It is understood there was probable discussion surrounding both the investigation and emails pertaining to such. As Manager and General Manager were privy to the initial correspondence, the HR email contains private matters that were not resolved. I’ve interacted with the Compliance Officer on some of the documented behavior asking for a clarification on if that was said or not for my own mental health and what had occurred in patterned behavior of past employment history. It is noted as the Manager telling The General Manager that, ‘You are setting yourself up for a lawsuit.’ During this this time that conflicts existed into legal questioning. While heated discussions had between the two that does not occur with any of her female counterparts, I heard a great deal of things on many occasions where I was not afforded the chance to leave nor asked to do so as job responsibilities were to be met.

15.  Correspondence was had with HR on request to transfer or apply for other positions via email. Resumé was sent.

16.  6/4/2021 Plaintiff reaches out to Compliance officer on updates to investigation that has been on-going since March. Noted effects on my mental health from unresolved aspects, change of behavior. I cite a desire for FMLA not from my detriment of leave time and noted the mirrored effects of past employment occurring that had not occurred at any point in my employment prior to my initial email to my General Manager. I cited in email for the crassness of a 2-sentence letter towards the termination of a student and how The General Manager wanted me to terminate at the end of their shift which I handled differently and compassionately in letting them know immediately and giving them the chance to solve the issues with The Defendant in a manner they felt appropriate. I cite in Compliance, I am not in a position of hiring/firing and that responsibility goes through the General Manager and more than likely HR. I mention due to the repeat exposure that I have not been able to sleep where at the time of email I had been awake from 24-36 hours straight.

17.  6/4/2021 The Plaintiff checks into ER to seek treatment on not-sleeping after regular psychiatrist unavailable for meeting, discussion or prescription. The Plaintiff is treated for Acute Stress and to help with the sleeping disorder.

18.  It was soon after the initial investigation was completed where they found no proof of retaliation, there was kick-back to the Head of HR, my questions needed then went unanswered and it was cited confidential and personal that I was not to be privy to anything else pertaining my initial claims.

19.  6/7/2021 The Plaintiff requested FMLA information. They did not choose to take it out of responsibility of others in their employment. They took a quarter off of school to do what they could to recover while not affecting other people’s employment.

20.  Direct Supervisor, Manager, resigns from salaried position at the end of July. The Plaintiff and other Assistant Manager absorb responsibilities of Manager without compensation. Job posting for position is published. The Plaintiff advertised for it socially on 7/3/2021. The Plaintiff officially applies for the position and others on August 9, 2021 and does not tell anyone to not create conflict, but if doing the work anyways, might as well be compensated for it. I interview with Hiring Coordinator and General Manager’s Supervisor aware of prior Compliance/Complaint. The Plaintiff’s actual resumé was supplied and discussed while The Plaintiff was not offered the position nor an email that stated they were not selected. The Manager position went unfilled until abolished 6 months later towards the end of The Plaintiff’s employment. Staffing minus 1 salaried employee and buffer between The Plaintiff and General Manager.

21.  From August —December 2021, The Plaintiff, was absorbed of partial Manager responsibilities where student work-study reliance was necessary yet still in contention of hours allotted, yet did get advanced from the previous 90. From there mostly in basement settings, the job normally of 2-3 full-time employees was now met with 1 for a period of time with 2 at overlap on most days except for twice out of the week where there is only 1 full-time manager on-site to account for days off on the others. Exasperated work conditions continue as mentally pulled from one position to the other with no time to talk, think or act accordingly. Mental processing still occurring from unresolved compliance. Months of pulled in multiple directions from positions formerly required of many. It is here re-staffing and support for the Gryphon was had by General Manager while ignoring the obligations towards success of Art’s Café. Although some help provided on the Gryphon-side, it was non-permanent with expectations of The Plaintiff to continue prepping for a restaurant they are not hired to be a part of. The same support is done in the bakery setting of added on teams of help and the advancement of salary of the lead baker by the General Manager in advice, suggestion and resumé writing while the Art’s Manager position remains unfilled and not of their concern. It is noted at this time, responsibility is higher than it was at the same rate and expectations rose. Singled out behavior continued from General Manager towards Plaintiff in unwarranted and unnecessary quips and comments directly solely towards The Plaintiff (male). That behavior was witness to occur with the Manager now resigned(male) and is again noted to not be ever expressed towards any female. The distance of behavior is perceived by The Plaintiff as a possible ripple effect from initial compliance meeting unresolved.

22.  December 2021, The inclusion of two other assistant managers into Art’s Café from sister restraurant Café 78, which is overseen by General Manager who did not visit or directly supervise as their main priority was Gryphon. As not normally interactive with others, the General Manager states before they work with I, ‘Do not treat them like your students.’. The comment was translated by The Plaintiff as hostility, possible discrimination from her or the other two who I had not interacted with and non-knowledge-based off how I interact with the students as they do not monitor that interaction of such in their job title position. Grades drop with the first non-A in Masters study course due to workplace environment, coping and exhaustion.

23.  The Plaintiff took a week long vacation during the Thanksgiving Holiday to Paris, France. Approved by former Manager before they resigned from the position.

24.  December 29, 2021. The Plaintiff, still looking to be transferred or hired for positions outside Art’s Café and internally within The Defendant’s entity, takes note of a prior position applied for of SCADpro Director back in 2019. Now combined as a position of SCADpro Director/SCAD ArtSales Director, a confidential email is sent to the president of the college and their husband (also a VP of the school) introducing myself, asking questions in introductions and where I could see things going for or against the position in change for the entire program. That email was sent through my private email and noted myself as an employee. It was responded positively.

25.  The Plaintiff requested Feb 23—March 3rd off for vacation to New Orleans. Request went to General Manager. Request sent Jan 3, followed up the next day in person where General Manager said they had to check schedules and would get back to The Plaintiff on the matter. Plaintiff approached all managers/Full-time employees on Art’s Café side that day and found no conflict of schedule and roped back around to General Manager who said they would get back to me. A week later, I follow-up again with them and their supervisor on the request. Vacation request approved on Jan. 13, 2022.

26.  January 7, 2022 – The Plaintiff was confronted and blindsided by the three female assistant managers where hostility was noted and built-up aggression from the three of them towards The Plaintiff was noted and expressed. Meeting was held outside General Manager’s purview. Cited vocalizations by The Plaintiff professionally in prior manager meetings and in GM singling out behavior of 2 of the assistant managers not clocking out for breaks longer than 15 minutes. Perceived and probable retaliation on their part as they overheard it and it was stated to directly the first time. It is noted by the hostile Assistant manager that she mentioned cigarette smell to the moderator assistant manager, yet The Plaintiff does not smoke in public, nor while working and had not done so for months. It is noted as fact The Plaintiff clocked-out with permission to go for a walk while the other two assistant managers did not clock out, removed themselves from the building and were not doing their official duties while on the clock. Plaintiff returned from his requested 10-15 minutes and performed business as usual clocked back in. Questions arise by The Plaintiff as such as Plaintiff never discussed habits had or changed in that regard, but of interest as Plaintiff is the only He in that regard and the talking point of discussion at the time. It would be unknown knowledge one way or the other from the other assistant manager and still would be an ADA violation if it was a problem, regardless of whomever they were speaking about.

27.  January 12, 2022 12:21AM– Letter sent to Head of HR and General Manager’s Supervisor in preparation for a meeting that specifically outlines and documents with evidence The Plaintiff being discriminated against, retaliated and false accused of things they did not do. Head of HR and GM Supervisor both had this evidence prior to the meeting and chose not to act on it accordingly. General Manager was not copied on the email. The email outlines specifically the Events from Jan 5- Jan 11th, with screenshot evidence provided by students to support my claim or discrimination, retaliation and factual reasons to be transferred. In email form, my resumé is sent again on request to be removed from the basement position. In preparation for meeting it was requested that the senior-employed assistant manager be present for the meeting as she was a mediator to the meeting that was put together by herself.

28.  Jan. 12,  2022 – Meeting is had, and request for assistant manager to be present is denied. In the meeting, Plaintiff was made out to be the problem by the moderation of Head of HR despite evidence proving otherwise. intimidation of The Plaintiff occurred in 4 against 1 settings where nothing from the email was addressed in that meeting despite The Plaintiff citing it and acknowledgement of HR having it. I don’t recall if they read it at the time, but was willing to showcase it from my phone. It is possible GM’s supervisor may had read it. The meeting caused The Plaintiff to get emotional to the point of tears and to leave the room when the thought of physicality was mentioned after months of abusive aspects of employment psychologically already occurred. Plaintiff stepped outside, was talked to privately by Head of HR and returned to finish up the meeting. One-on-one meetings were set-up afterwards only with The Plaintiffs and none of the other assistant managers despite the evidence already provided to them. Afterwards the General Manager is seen and heard after the meeting breaking confidentiality trying to figure out what was in the email that was sent to HR and their supervisor. On phone call immediately after the meeting, GM mentioned in quote, ‘He wrote the president…’. As questions remain on which president they were speaking about, it denotes someone of information-needing searching for information or providing it to someone. When it comes to presidential correspondence in email form, that information would only be privy to that of The Defendant’s presidential office or if observing social media in policy would be in reference to a tweet on Jan. 9, 2022 when The Plaintiff wrote The President of The United States of America about opening of conversation about a literary work written by The Plaintiff and copyright protected in December 2019 and impeded on. That book is ‘Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Lost.’ In any regard, it denotes a breach of confidentiality on the part of one or multiple entities of The Defendant as any interested parties were in the meeting that had nothing to do with the president on either side of discussion. The GM’s other comment of ‘I got one thing he wrote…’ denotes either outside influence/sharing or a need to understand what The Plaintiff did or didn’t write wondering one thing or another about course of actions during meetings by interested parties.

29.  January 25, 2022 Employee Performance Review compiled and sent to The Plaintiff by their request to have a copy of such. Performance Review is skewed, in-accurate and misleading. Date created was not the date supplied to The Plantiff. Upon receipt, Plaintiff added onto the review to paint a more accurate picture of Head of HR and General Manager’s Supervisors notes and returned back to intended parties the same day unpaid. That was sent to both of them in response and an in-person follow-up meeting was had with a handed print-out of my version from the General Manager’s Supervisor to I. The Defendant’s HR only supplied their original version to the EEOC without the marks of good-faith that were in The Plaintiff’s.

30.  Continual meetings occur from that point on, where again pointed discussions and decisions made from 2nd hand experience and without proper documentation. As all female managers and GM have already expressed and proven retaliation, discrimination and lack of consideration for mental health or a decent work environment as others would refuse to even say hello when greeted, The Plaintiff in a meeting with The Defendant’s Head of HR and GM’s supervisor expressed, ‘we have passed the point of no return’ on damage and this has caused mental harm. Another plea asking to be transferred while told by HR, ‘We can’t just put you anywhere.” While The Plaintiff also cited the riding of the clock and the GM’s disregard of the claim and allowance of such in favoritism towards female co-workers and the discard of the male Plaintiff status. Plaintiff was not transferred and it was at this point the it was expressed by entities of The Defendant that the Manager position has been dissolved. The Plaintiff brought up initial questions needed to be answered from Compliance, to no answer while saying the initial complaint went unresolved since April 2021.

31.  Towards the end of January, an email was sent to General Manager about a discriminatory policy towards students held that assistant managers do not have to follow through on. Plaintiff cites discrimination by the other assistant manager towards students and is quipped at in the same regards. The Plaintiff sends a letter General Manager asking in good-faith for clarification. 1/31/2022, General Manager sends out a group response, calling out The Plaintiff, once again unnecessarily, while trying to resolve issues and still proving discrimination towards students on policies.  

32.  1/27/2022 Plaintiff sends email to compliance, HR and blind-copies one other entity within The Defendant’s entity. It documents illegality, lack of procedure, what is occurring, the mental health aspects of the what is being presented, alleges abusive tactics and is presented with respect of the institution from both a employee and as a student. In yet another scheduled escalation from entities of The Defendant, a required meeting was scheduled the next day with Head of HR, GM’s Supervisor and VP of the Auxilleries. The Plaintiff, refused the meeting, disclaimed he has an interview the next day for SCADpro Director/SCAD ArtSales Director Position tomorrow and that they do not have to singled-out and forced into meetings when not the problem. Compliance was notified and Head of HR and VP dropped out of the meeting yet it was still told to be mandatory by GM’s Supervisor. In good-faith, I accepted the meeting and it was discussed my amended performance review and frivolous topics of Edamame as being of importance that again was not created by The Plaintiff with arguments had over a salad in front of coworkers.

33.  1/28/2022 – Plaintiff was scheduled for in-person meeting for SCADpro Director/SCAD ArtSales Director Position. Originally scheduled for in-person, it was changed at the last minute to zoom and conflict of such occurred as Plaintiff did not want to have interview at The Scottish Rite Temple. The Plaintiff made every attempt to honor the zoom meeting dressed for such an interview in confidential space of The Defendant’s property outside The Scottish Rite Temple. The Plaintiff was able to hold that Zoom meeting/interview within a classroom setting via telephone more than likely recorded by The Defendant with not all parties prior reserved for such present. The Plaintiff had done their research on the position, applied for a SCADpro as a student in good-faith to understand a proper assessment of how the assets are treated to other investors of The SCADpro program and was ready to discuss it in interview if needed. In the interview, acknowledgement of the original email to The Presidents was had but not discussed. After a successful interview, the Plaintiff returned to work, changed back in clothes of normalcy and completed the work shift as if nothing had occurred and business as usual.

34.  February 2, 2022 – In-person compliance meeting held on-site of The Defendant’s property. Cited complaints and documentation already provided via email to compliance and to HR. In it discussed retaliation documented, wrongfully accused constantly as the only male working with 3 female assistant managers and one female General Manager who continually discriminates and retaliates. It is during the meeting on The Defendant’s property that The Plaintiff cites in the interview, ‘These walls are thin.’ As The Plaintiff hears commentary on the discussion had in the compliance meeting. It is acknowledged by the compliance officer as much as the commentary gave great pause as if a ‘red flag’ was raised. Regardless if that was able to proven one way or another, a Defendant hired 3rd party was present upon exit of the meeting being visually 15-17 ft. from the same thing walls sitting in a chair to upstairs rooms of possibility and probability.

35.  Feb 4, 2022 – Another letter sent to compliance on what is occurring at work in singled out behavior towards I that I am not responsible for the same reasons/behavior of intital confrontation/discussion/meeting.  A blame for what is other people’s responsibility and was exactly where items were supposed to be. A continual aspect of still no direct response from coworkers on good mornings, despite being told by GM to say it to everyone. Multiple attempts had to no response to rule out ‘they didn’t hear you.’ Scheduling which is again not The Plaintiff’s responsibility and conflict that escalates that comes from lack of oversight by the managers and General Manager.

36.  Feb 5, 2022 – Through the Defendant’s supplied evidence, actions taken negatively against The Plaintiff based on Female Assistant Manager Account without due process towards escalation of detriment to employment, income and education. Cited evidence, that conversations had still with GM of skewed retaliation and discrimination when it comes to job responsibilities of The Plaintiff. Denotes biased despite evidence already submitted to HR and GM’s supervisor proving statements inaccurate, out-of-bounds and liability had transferred to The Defendant.

37.  It is understood from The Freedom of Information Act., the evidence that The Defendant had available to them of a same-position manager writing out-of-protocol to Head of HR, GM and GM’s supervisor frustration on Feb.4, 2022. This was done after-the-fact that The Plaintiff had already cited the initial confrontation and reason to invite one-on-one meetings was actually by their hands and not of The Plaintiffs fault. This denotes, retaliation in good-faith discussions of what occurred professionally in awareness, that this also is past the date of ‘The battle for the Soles’ where discrimination on their hand has already been reported and asked for review. This evidence was available and supplied by The Defendant. It was not viewed or known until after EEOC investigation and upon request denoting The Defendant’s awareness, Federal awareness and the choice to have one suffer without remedy.

38.  Feb 5, 2022 – Due to work environment, being singled out completely, taken away from my own time and made to be perceived as the problem, The Plaintiff files a Temporary Grade of Incomplete as another quarter of school is affected by what should had been resolved in transfer, known affecting of Mental Health and status. Protocol apparently changed from previous quarter where Plaintiff was told it had to be done during quarter and then told this time it has to be done after quarter to accept an incomplete. It is noted that despite best good-faith efforts, HR and The Defendant are perceived not doing so in reciprocate. The student side of The Plaintiff’s identity is being destroyed based on Employee-Employer sanctioned behavior.

39.  Feb. 7, 2022 – A rejection letter is sent to The Plaintiff for SCADpro Director/SCAD ArtSales Director, although it is not opened or seen until Feb. 9, 2022. The Plaintiff responded on 2/9/2022 that he will take his business elsewhere understanding the privileged information of the original email and ownership. ‘Awesome. Thank you for your consideration and I’ll share my business concepts originally sent to the presidents with other interested parties. Thank you for your time.’

40.  On Feb. 10, 2022, it was properly cited in the EEOC in events that occurred of the day. Retaliation, Discrimination and behavior that could had been prevented in proper training was allowed by The Defendant. A hostile work environment continued despite being properly reported with evidence. A planned occurrence happened while questioning who held a meeting and why was it scheduled during the middle of lunch while an assistant manager proclaimed, ‘Time to do what we need to do.’ Before entering into said meeting and refusing to come out when requested to help while on the clock.  At the time of clock-out in proper protocol, fear of physicality and further confrontation occurred and was met in behavior not looked over by the Head of HR and for the supposed benefit of The Defendant yet proves to be detrimental. It is cited that The Plaintiff was relieved that one of the assistant managers finally responded to them when they said ‘Bye’ to the Plaintiff. It is noted willfully what they were doing. The Plaintiff removed themselves from the situation when the GM, not on site nor respondent to texts sent immediately after, vacated their position while HR was notified as The Plaintiff of reporting party status objectively notified of the events that occurred once again in repeated good-faith to what has been occurring under their supervision. Acting in official capacity, The Head of HR, did not follow protocol, was possibly biased based off past education or direction and understanding of past mistakes and misspoken examples cited by The Plaintiff. It was hours later when The Plaintiff was terminated via telephone outside of protocol by the Head of HR where questions were asked and proper procedure and investigation was not done. It was at this point The Plaintiff’s education was also affected from this termination with a screen saying their studies were suspended showcasing lack of distinguishing factors between employee and student in the matter. While looking for remedy or resolve, The Plaintiff was wrongfully terminated from lack of procedure, 2nd hand accounts and from biased opinions that lead towards discrimination and backed up by their 1st or 2nd hand accounts. Lack of training present where HR fully aware of the legality aspect of the environment The Plaintiff was put it and termination done from emotion-based responses. There is a negate of claim present that denotes presumed understanding of the situation where even after the initial first meeting with HR could had been rectified and changed course while discount to real world workplace issues and discount in The Defendant’s own supplied evidence to the EEOC any value to mental health by those of professional status to make such a call. The refusal of the head of HR to discuss how that decision came about towards termination, denotes lack of procedure and The Plaintiff was terminated without due process, in violation of worker’s rights as well as constant ADA complaints for simply a remedy to a situation that affected them as an Employee and as a Student to The Defendant before ever mentioning their Alumni status and obligation to proper work internally before external. It is noted in their own evidence, the awareness of such in that judgement calls where even the internal Defendant lawyer was aware of the initial complaint that went to compliance in April 2021. By the defendant’s own lawyers words, if provability could be found, The Defendant is liable. The evidence was there in February 2022 and proven in the EEOC investigation that started Feb. 28, 2022 and already concluded to the point of filing on my own regardless of money available on the other-side in a right to sue. The Plaintiff wrote a text message at the end of the day, thanking and understanding the original aspect of the relationship with the GM knowing they would not talk to them again.

41.  It is noted that The Plaintiff filed with compliance the day of with documentation of retaliation. It was noted that they found no adverse affect to such and that there was no breach of governance despite it occurring from 2nd hand and liability of discrimination and retaliation based on protected classes. Actions maded by 2nd hand account where the only 1st hand on day off is by one of know retaliation and known discrimination by two 2 parties who never met The Plaintiff or acting in an official capacity prior to being told ‘Don’t talk to them like your students.’. Wrongful termination prior with the incident report with an accurate account of what occurred. It is noted that prior it took 3 months for an accurate Compliance investigation to conclude which occurred only after a request for answers and conclusion which did not resolve the mental health aspect of the case.  Those findings and conclusions lead to an answer of non-conclusion and none of The Plaintiff’s business in their findings. ‘Personal matters’ matter. Especially for The Plaintiff and reporter which came from the HR department of The Defendant to get there. It is unlikely a thoughtful Compliance investigation occurred the final day of employment without The Defendant’s influence in such to denote a need for separation and understanding influence both from an HR stand-point and Federal based on Defendant supplied evidence of such. The Defendant’s evidence denotes wrong-doing of entities within The Defendant and where liability exists while understanding they were in communication with compliance the day off. The Defendant’s head of HR is not a licensed psychiatrist and does not hold a doctorate. They acted in complete disregard for up to 10 months of legitimate claims against mental health and workplace conditions where their educated guess does not hold legal standard of protocol. The Plaintiff acted in good-faith. The Defendant did not. It is the understanding of The Plaintiff that proper evidence was submitted to Compliance to support the claim of retaliation, discrimination and violations against ADA while possible understanding this is filed 10 months after date of incident noting basic rights to workplace conditions and what should be considered ‘standard’ for any workplace.

42.  When filing for unemployment it is understood and documented that The Defendant’s official response to the State of Georgia was denial based on ‘bad attitude’. That denotes slander/libel in an official capacity to a state-entity while the causation for termination changed 4 times over to get to that point. Word of mouth is important in any institution. That causation was rejected by The State of Georgia and The Plaintiff was allowed to seek unemployment while question could arise on why that statement was made to begin with. It is already understood at this point breach of confidentiality. This action also denotes willful-intention to continually deny basic human rights under documented conditions based on emotional-based responses regardless of who responded to The State of Georgia as it would all be second-hand. First-hand account of HR denotes a willingness of The Plaintiff to resolve the issues, work towards functionality and keep the machine running on an employment aspect.

43.  It is noted a request for payout of The Plaintiff’s accrued time-off on in February to an official response by The Head of HR on March 4, 2022. A confidentiality agreement was sent over by the head of Defendant’s HR, where 5 days required to sign and submit back for approval to release garnished wages and earned income. It was disputed the same day in handwriting on several points towards good-faith discussions internally while noting that the discussion has been removed from HR purview and that of legality. The trade-off presented from the beginning was the The Defendant would not be liable well beyond The Plaintiff’s lifetime for anything in regards of the amount of 1113. 13. The Plaintiff, on their own experience and looking over the documents, re-submitted back to The Defendant rebuttal commentary handwritten where they would have the same 5-day requirement to fulfill obligations with seeking council. That went unsuccessful in response and further void of argument. As already terminated upon receipt of agreement allowed to pay out, it does not hold towards confidentiality nor was there ever an agreement to what is consider ‘garnished/withheld income/wages’.

44.  It is noted by The Plaintiff since wrongful termination, that they have been digitally attacked with evidence in regards to deletion of life’s work, creative property sent out via email not of his accord and the compromise of their intellectual property while a student and employee of The Defendant in which they benefit from the accused aspects of rationality that links to either Defendant interest or that of their partners.

45.  It is understood Plaintiff was digitally attacked on Feb. 15, 2022. They sought an audience as shareholder in that regard since childhood against infringement already filed and claimed as social media posts were deleted that sparked reveal of assets and an understanding of what has already occurred and documented in one place or another.

46.  It is understood to The Plaintiff that an April 1st, 2022 email was deleted privately from their personal email in regard to possible discussion point involving The Defendant or pointed in the right direction. Questions lead towards retaliation, but The Plaintiff cites fact in this section. It concerns politics, but also that of perception of The Defendant while also properly analyzing workplace conditions and looking at discrimination properly and at different angles.

47.  The Plaintiff’s personal website has remained compromised with the unintentional nor authorized turning on of ‘The Path to Starving Artist’ which may denote Defendant interest or at least awareness while also citing major personal loss.

48.  The Plaintiff suffered massive digital attacks after wrongful termination such as the deletion of photoshoots authorized on The Defendant’s property and in the invitation of discussion towards ‘recorded keystrokes’ mentioned at prior places of employment in 2018 with evidence to prove such. This was noted by The Plaintiff when they made a decision to not be halfway between their own life and their biological protection. A decision made. It was noted the RAW images of The Plaintiff’s ‘Walrus’ shoot instantly deleted which could denote Defendant interest as it is a property they own before understanding I got permission to shoot there. There is the understanding of personal interest and then that of the interest of partners.

49.  The Plaintiff on March, 3, 2022 whistle-blew exploitation and possible racketeering by The Defendant towards their paying investors on the SCADpro program to The United Nations via blog at https://www.philipbonneau.com/new-blog/2022/3/3/an-open-letter-to-the-united-nations There is no traditional whistle-blowing website for such in this regard. The plaintiff looked up the websites to whistle-blow, none of which they spoke follows under such. The Plaintiff, publicly wrote on their own personally owned website and tagged the President of the United States in something that they don’t know the answer to but gave full disclosure of what happened on American Soil towards the International dream and investment.

50.  The Plaintiff has been attacked very directly since their wrongful termination with evidence to question prior understandings of collegiate copyright that was handled on the BBB side of discussions by the same Defendant Attorney trying to avoid The Defendant’s liability in an area that involves looking at The Plaintiff as separately an Employee and Student which was failed to do so by The Defendant despite warning by The Plaintiff. It is noted even after The Plaintiff sought attorney council against The Defendant, that it could not be done without ‘recorded keystrokes’ present as of 12.13.2022 where it was documented as occurring and published on The Plaintiffs privately owned website. It denotes a failure of basic American liberties inside or outside The Defendant’s purview with perhaps Defendant knowledge. My last note to council in regards to such focused on what questions of what to do solo as I can’t seek council on what is the perameters of my whistleblowing? The answer was sent via phone text email on December 15, 2022, ‘Food for thought per our conversation. If what is occurring and discussed is from a revenue perspective of the student, it could also be looked at as a revenue reducer to the state of GA as their non-profit status denotes income out of state produced in state with the students as paying contract to hire on real world applications.  Since the work creates revenue for the partner companies, world this be considered fraudulant work and income that could be taxed against state and federal as the students are considered in this capacity as "official working students" without proper training for the benefit of corporations in and out of state that could require a W2 on the company? Just thinking a bit more about state loss of income. ’ I have been attacked digitally which is either inside or outside the purview of The Defendant. My property while under the protection of The Defendant as Student and Employee has been affected and compromised. It has been documented in American Copyright Protection.

51.  It is noted from evidence received from The Freedom of Information Acted that female entities acted in grudge towards The Plaintiff in both discrimination and in falsehood leading towards adverse work employment and decision making outside the scope of expertise towards rationally, professional decision outside the sole interest of The Defendant. In regards to 2nd hand accounts supplied by The Defendant to the EEOC, it is proveable with zero doubt that The Defendant and their Heads acted in accordance illegally and of biased of gender, mental health or ignorance of the law towards the detriment of The plaintiff’s employment and future cut off and gone in another direction from their liable actions. The Defendant willfully knew knew their liability 10 months ago before understanding the attorney hired and staffed knew their liability 20-months ago to The Plaintiff.

CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

COUNT 1:

Breach of Contract

52.  Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates all prior allegations in this Complaint as if fully set forth here from both an employee side and that of a student. From GM’s words of official capacity, ‘Employee first, Student Second.’ Denotes rights on both sides. The Plaintiff reserves their right as Alumni according to The Defendant’s User Manual on either aspect of Student or Employee.

53.  Defendant’s actions constitute a breach of contract entered into with Plaintiff, as describe above. Defendant’s actions have caused Plaintiff economic damages in a capacity where it was understood they were degree-seeking which would had went towards better places of employment at the proper pay-grade within their field that they were not resting in at the time, but building towards. It is understood in good-faith and based of social, internal and other records to find that the commitment of such is valid to support that the Plaintiff more than likely would had received their Master’s degree, went on to be either an educator or continue with their Doctorate in dissertations already worked towards while confined to a basement thrown under a double-decker bus.

54.  Defendant breached contract not only on the employee aspect of the situation, but that of the student which holds higher priority in different capacity as the students pay the bills in certified relief and payments (not including interest, which wouldn’t go to The Defendant).

55.  Defendant failed to separate the Employee from the Student, without taking the Alumni status into equation to denote failure on procedure and protocol to do such despite Plaintiff asking to do so of legally trained and allowed council.

COUNT 2:

Unjust Enrichment

56.   Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates all prior allegations in this Complaint as if full set forth here. They do so without a train attorney because that is what life has been afforded with an understanding of evidence to provide or what has occurred of the setting up for success or the setting up of failure so that other’s can succeed off other’s successes. In the alternative, Defendant has been unjustly enriched as a result of the labor Plaintiff both from the employer status and from the of the protector status of ‘Secondary-Education’. In regards to whistle-blowing and questions of non-profit status, it was ascertained that status to held is not for the best interst of the student investors of degree-seeking nature to pursue understanding the value of innovation with questions of where that goes in what The Defendant does or does not do with intellectual property understanding their disregard for protected brands before going into those not established.

57.  It is alleged where The Defendant could say one way or the other, if through their system based on fact, did they allow partners to impede in a capacity that denotes invasion of creative property and interest that was outside school or work employment for their own benefit and that of others in partnership.

58.  Defendant’s actions have caused Plaintiff damages in the amount of real world value of $2,963,112,84. That total is calculated with a combined figure of actual job at the time and where The Plaintiff would had done with their Masters degree post-employment into the educational system of secondary education at the median rate. That number is determined based on retirement age until 70 with noting that there was 3.5 years left of employment under the normal conditions to get to life outside a basement. Figures provided if necessary understanding both the multiplier aspect of such and the deterrent factor to behavior that should never be allowed. As it is understood The Defendant’s president makes 112-120 million a year, the deterrent is understood to be either acceptable and of value or something to take into consideration consider the president is first-hand involved in questions regarding this case. There is a times 5 factor to such in this regard where it is understood the basic factual aspects of such towards determination. My lifetime value outside of introduction of my personal/professional accomplishments comes to a total of $14, 815, 564.20 with the times 5 multiplier based on factual figures based on time of employment at $15.95 an hour towards the median salary online of a Defendant professor of which I would had been eligible to obtain status. That total is based on facts before looking at The Plaintiff’s life and what they contributed to society or themselves and what was compromised and sought after by others which is outside that figure and astronomical if taken into account. American copyright can attest to that statement. What I cannot take into account is what my salary would had been as Manager, SCADpro director/SCAD Art Sales Director/Photographer or Art Director in all positions applied for at The Defendant’s entity that I could had been transferred to or of qualifications to uphold but chosen not to despite an internal understanding of what was occurring in basements. The number increases with those variables while questioning why wasn’t The Plaintiff transferred while seeing in factuality what occurred internally or of partner privilege.

59.  It is understood in partner privilege, as noted publicly and privately as there is no difference now for The Plaintiff with evidence that the detriment of partnership exceeds person gain and goes back to the initial whistle-blow to The United Nations.

60.  It is understood in the unjust enrichment section that The Plaintiff still call out the non-profit status of The Defendant and state it is of a detriment to Student Degree-Seeking investors in their current make and model. If enrichment occurred from the sake of university status, then remedy should be reviewed of those exploited as student investors toward degree-seeking opportunities of higher pay of degree status.

61.  It is understood that The Plaintiff argued their case without an attorney or law-firm as noted as prohibitive to EEOC claims where it must be stated as such internally and without outside council before escalation. It is noted The Defendant did so in a capacity of knowledge and understanding knowing The Plaintiff success argued against a degree/licensed attorney without one in return towards rationale and provability with The Defendant’s own evidence they were not afforded while an investigation was occurring.  It is noted The Defendant proceeded weighing responsibility incorrectly on liability.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

62.  WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests the following relief:

-A money award judgment entered against Defendant for Plaintiff’s damages in the amount of $14, 815, 564.20.

-An award of post-judgment interest on any money damages awarded at the current statutory rate citing my ignorance and that I’ve been forced to do this alone and in acknowledgement of financiers one way or another.

-There is an understanding The Plaintiff has been forced to do this without legal council and needs to make sure this never happens again in ‘acceptable losses’ of what occurred citing ignorance of the law and where The Plaintiff has been left at a disadvantage based on privilege and income available 10 months after-the-fact. Legal Compensation should be included in this aspect as The Plaintiff has been forced to do this as a ‘Starving Artist’ against an attorney that could advise one way or another towards what is factual. The understanding of possible ‘bleeding someone dry’ towards desperation exists where even the real world value is not even 20% of the annual salary of the president of The Defendant. A blip to one is not any resolution to the recourse of the problem that was attempted to be resolved in good-faith and met not in return.

-The Plaintiff does not know that actual value of what has been lost based on actual evidence. The Plaintiff can look at the fact that The Defendant’s partners invaded and impeded on my work while I was in good standing while employed and very directly afterwards leading towards choice to protect The Plaintiff’s biological family while still protecting their emotional family.

-It is an understanding based off of The Defendant’s practices that The Plaintiff calls into question their ‘School of Innovation’ and if they had any accord to such while still withholding where they faulter in such. It can’t even be questioned in this regard with proven beyond a shadow of a doubt recorded keystrokes. The Plaintiff contends ownership based on original idea that they were not qualified for the position and a determination of perpetual non-profit status of The Defendant in understanding of their make/model.

-Plaintiff's reasonable costs and disbursements for bringing this action.

This includes as The Plaintiff has less than 2000 dollars in their bank account and nothing for savings while still in the same boxes brought down from Atlanta in 2019, that The Plaintiff successfully argued their case in what was unnecessary, privileged in some and in that regard may had gone elsewhere. The plaintiff is not the only victim in this regard as already recorded back in 2019 before employment of The Defendant and years of consideration to take into account of The Plaintiff doing the right thing and reporting properly. The Plaintiff is not an attorney. The Plaintiff could have a life. The Plaintiff never had to go through this but others thought it was an acceptable loss. The Plaintiff is fighting for more than themselves but what carried on is separate from the flat out discrimination, retaliation and lack of procedure from heads of The Defendant’s entity. The defendant may be used to using money for things to go under the table in mock trials and situations. From April 2021, this was documented and recorded. 3rd parties have their own evidence and internally they have theirs. What led towards The Plaintiff’s termination on Feb.10, 2022 was also the termination of their college education where someone chose not to make a difference and there is zero trust present afterwards based on evidence to ever go back into the program. The Plaintiff’s statement is not just for themselves, but aware the breach of trust and knowing their BBB argument opens the door towards total Collegiate forgiveness based on facts and proven arguments.

-Any and all other relief the Court deems just and reasonable under the circumstances.

Respectfully submitted on:  December 23, 2022

By:   Philip Arthur Bonneau

Plaintiff, pro se

2309 New York Ave.

Savannah, GA, 31404

(404) 786-62621

philip@philipbonneau.com

VERIFICATION

   I, Philip Arthur Bonneau, hereby declare that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that I understand they are made for use as evidence in court and are subject to penalty for perjury.

Dated:  December 23, 2022

By:   Philip Arthur Bonneau

Plaintiff, pro se

‘Starving Artist’.

*This Article has been updated since publish with the date added at the end. 12.23.2022

2022 done. Understood and 2023 ready.

I can look at this a couple of ways today.

Yes, I understand what has been occurring in my Apple Notes.

Yes, it is documented and proven.

I still have to continue with life and expression because we don’t want to break the foundation of the digital age.

I understand the importance of such and in doing so the candidness of today one way or another.

Hmmm…a continued life of understanding and acceptance that there isn’t much I can do.

I reported. It is up to others.

Those dollars make sense in that regard so I am not entirely sure but understand what occurred and the liability here where there are those who know and those who don’t. I am just a layperson. A novice in one area of another. One localized incident multiplied by the potential of 300+ million. Was it just I? It doesn’t matter. The capabilities of such is there. Where was the advantage to understand the security feature of such to denote proven aspects of life according to 2018.

Often I do a recap around this time, but I love what I did then and simply doing this in reflection of what this year was. It is written and not as I still contend with actual evidence that the pen is mightier than the keyboard in one regard yet, the spread of information (none for my benefit or approval at this time) occurs in the outreach program yet to be discovered know I was probably never to benefit off my own work and still it was known of such in a multi-faceted document stating toward dissertation there and elsewhere.

I reviewed a great deal today knowing what I say one way or another is important. Strangeness found as this is Year 1 and what Year Zero brought.

Topics of discussion for the year.

Edamame (although the conversation at-hand was mukimame) This is very important. It involves several discussions and seriousness of such to know even if I was not the preparer of mukimame, it is a delicate conversation of such that should be handled with the utmost respect when placing of what gets tossed on a salad) Perhaps false advertising there and the audacity of such in that regard. Was it group efforts or solo adventures? In either regard it happened, it was witness and it became a highly contentious talking point.

Manderella (stories of 3 years trapped in a basement only to discover supposed invisible or imaginary companions in a one-in-a-lifetime first trip and introduction to Paris only to return back to work under the same conditions that could also be explained in interview processes towards one thing of a life that simply was a dream and legal prevention towards answers understanding the passion of such knowing tenacity to attend a meeting and not be late but to report back to work promptly in the same clothes as if nothing happened. (Although I had to spoil such when forced conversations were had denoting perhaps look internal for your answer before you paint me one way or another.) In either aspect, Manderella walked out the basement, reported properly and the rest is one thing or another. But proven such from the most important Square and cross-road for SCAD. A February adventure. I could paint it as a way as Undercover Boss in that regard as I applied and saw first hand what entities say or do of students into the SCADpro program. One may never know now 10 months later of at least I’m not back in the basement and I can breathe in reprieve outside discrimination and retaliation. A breathe of fresh air of understanding a choice on one side and once completely terminated and schooling suspended the day of, I social media the fact I transformed 1 answer to the Sphinx riddle, but actually did it with all 3. Outside employment while whatever happened of ‘Curated Jellyfish’, welcome to transformation to 1000s of years of correct answers, incorrect. This country is not even 300 years old and I didn’t even have the opportunity to go elsewhere if I wanted to. They made sure of that. That has happened for years. That history remains well beyond the hundreds. On American soil I fought on principle and considered the principals in this one and that cannot be taken away in this regard. A term is nothing to factuality and world history.

Wrongfully Terminated on Feb. 10, 2022. It happens. It happened before at PureRED under the same circumstance and understanding of what occurred was preventable. Time to breathe and realize school is done, that dream done and the understanding of what occurred happened to denote protection of others while in awareness of what occurred. An understanding of prevention yet, I spoke the truth and whatever interest in that regard on one side or the other was disregard of simply awareness of the fact that I protect those who are after I as well as myself and those who came before.

I picked myself up and did what I had to do. Field Day a prime example of such to throw yourself out there while understanding any detriment on opposing teams still present and available to paint one thing or another. Not every year does someone get to the Super Bowl, but i enjoy the aspect that done with secondary education was had understanding there was no respect for I as Student/Employee/Alumni. I’ll take my chances but really constantly rebuilding my life and moving on from whatever wants to just be a part of my life and too shy to talk directly and still goes into the under-reach towards what they like about me anyways.   

I don’t find myself political at all, yet found myself in a situation where from the early posts on my own personally owned and operated website an explanation of a photo-shoot that occurred in December 2018 knowing what occurred during employment at Freud/Diablo and not knowing the they or which they speak in that manner. It doesn’t really matter in that regard as it was approved behavior by then candidate and from there 45th president that espionage is totally cool while also denoted emotions matter and influence does one thing or another. I recall what I went through in 2018—2019 knowing it led to a suicide attempt. In that aspect it is fair to what I talked to my employer and their contract partner in regards to entry on a sick day. I’m not biased on that aspect. Where this went after-the-fact was signed off approval of behavior after behavior. Such a waste of saying one thing or another about the spirit of America or simply the right to be an asshole to people. It exists in any level of such and understanding. Once privately, I always understood why it didn’t matter if Trump won or not against Hillary in the initial discussion. He would of commented on her presidency the entire time in either retaliation, bitterness or ego. It was best to let him have office. Let him pull out exactly what is in society while ego does its own thing. His refusal to say what he would do if he lost was enough to show character just as much as he invited espionage and did it while he was in office based on opinions of others that still hold true to the first amendment. A little different knowing when resources available might had not been available while I question if he did or did not receive a salary. I actually threw out the question this year that he might not be legitimately the 45th president on such and thus the damage of privilege of others also illegal because it boils down to he either lied to America or he had no business of altruism in office being a billionaire of such and loves flaws and exploits. It denotes private interest as he would not divest. I wouldn’t either as building elsewhere is had and completely still flabbergasted at the 400K presidential salary. I’m pretty sure it was invited interest of cabinets to understand it was not for America the interest sought as he divided it over a flag and even saying one thing or another. An upside down book remembered knowing I stand or kneel by what you divided. It is reflection and idealism understanding what occurred prior and what can come from thought.

- I know I said a great deal political on my website this year. From understanding or simply seeing what others got away with. ‘Can’t prosecute’ is nothing to ‘Promising Pardons’ with enough information to say the manipulation that occurred of those ‘under’ and lives ruined believing one thing or another. That was enough then. Called out and I reported to The Department of Justice the stance of prime example why this is why the 22nd Amendment applies to once out of office in a presidential capacity you are done. I still don’t understand it from a business sense to go a round 2 outside of actually pardoning those promised knowing it can’t be delivered or catching up and understanding at any point you could have united the country. You chose to divide. As a president you are a leader to all. That is not just the ones who voted for you in an understanding of where that lays. That is not a Democratic President or A Republican President. That is THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES (not just of one party but of many) and their words matter in unity or discord. I look at the prior administrations actions as disruption of rule of law and towards favoritism that is an affordance outside of office. It has been made very clear by multiple points why he doesn’t get a social media output, doesn’t get a social media platform and it is for the best of civilization on why that is while understanding he too under the same scrutiny of recorded keystrokes, open mics or intentions elsewhere. Never an ‘insurrection’ uttered. The idea of such denotes a complete problem with the land in which you governed and you had 4 years to fix that privately or publicly. You made people doubt real news. You made people become divided. You made people say we have a free pass on espionage and we will send it to you eventually. How does that play out in your words televised and coming back to haunt you?

I think of copyright. I thought of it in 2019 and what I had to do. I know what was on the backside of my website in explanation that if I die (knowing I am not going to commit suicide again), none of these people are going to get the last laugh in that regard. With every copyright that is a part of American history and stored, documented and recorded. 70-90 years after I. What did you do in those 70-90 years? It is noted. It is documented and it would come out where neither you or I the advantage, but the truth is there buried or to the forefront. No matter your privilege as I am not a class warfare in that regard at all. Do you know how many people amass the chance for vacation and a life while there are those that do so off of others?! An understood discussion understanding what I protected earlier this year in photographic evidence and in United States Copyright of Lorem Ipsum: Child of Someone before going into what was compacted in Untitled Short Story I not even knowing how much of civilization is telling either myself or others the lesson of such. An understood as I continue writing my note knowing just today it was transcribed via email as I went and then stopped when I started to go into what they didn’t share and it went through anyways. I protected beyond the years of personal interest. Did so in 2019 when my life the forfeit and reclaimed elsewhere with strength to provide for others knowing whatever the personal motivation there, a belief in what I was working on prior being bigger than I in concept and beginning to understand. It that regard then and now, the only reason one would write in response is perhaps from knowing what I already did and going from there understanding the disclaimer before other books of knowledge and simply the human condition doing one thing or another. Beauty of such, to own your words and testimony knowing what occurred and what is outside the bounds of privilege and into vernacular.

I know what I wrote by hand and I know as of today everything I transcribed via keyboard was absolutely compromised. What is that damage? What is that arrogance? Where are we now? Doesn’t matter as I know I have 1500 in my bank account and perhaps I care for those who know while understanding the position I have been put in. Obviously I have a sense of humor but at what point do you want me to live a life knowing others do not and ready one way or another with the same conversation of what was understood in 2019. Privileged information denotes emotion and spinning one way or another. Capability of such denotes personal opinion either for or against. Easily done with information available. I understand what I’ve already experienced and that could never be taken back. From there an understanding that could happen to anyone and probably does. The technological aspect of such is amazing where if I the enemy now, you the attacker later. Impartial aspects in that where in my regard, public domain made so true of other people which is the shame and opposite of who I am. Simply an understanding that interest goes uphill, yet if this was a presidential aspect or even if I entertained the idea of privileged from a religious standpoint. What happens in public domain where separation is understood and still going to be revealed one way or another after our lives and with far more influence to embarrass or make proud. I imagine that a different step in the ladder in understanding the truth is out there and revealed after your death which still denotes either pride or simply keystrokes recorded and you did one thing or another.

I think today of the AI system of facial recognition and others thinking of ticketing. I internally challenged the idea of identical twins the matter before going back to the humorous aspects of Fraternities and Frat parties that are not of gender exclusive. Wouldn’t work in that capacity while the government in proven documentaries loves testing and separation of biological children only to be found later one. A blame of a twin known or unknown. It exists in this country where never the similarities had in connection to the fact that children split at one point or another. Try triplets or more in that capacity. I still smile of the ideas of joining Frats. Even females are a part of that fraternal coil. The opposite though is always an invite only but I still laugh understanding never I of a fraternity or Sorority. Snap cups available there in understanding interconnection and the humor of discovering adulthood and who and who doesn’t talk about one interaction or another. Nothing but praise in that cup from child to adult to simply college antics. I suppose we are all of the ’Snap Cup’ or the ‘Clap Cup’ when talking positive or negative about someone. Organizations know one way or another in comfortability of moments knowing there is a system to such talk.

I either regard and understanding, this year I have said to myself on multiple occasions, ‘I too am Bruiser’s Mom.’ A profound statement of being sought after in one area and discarded in another. Make-up required forced or not, weddings are important and despite the legalese of such, someone out there hears the plea. I do not have the outfits for Washington as I only came semi-close to Black wear in 2019 and all I had until Feb. 2022 was jeans and grey.

In any regard, a necessity of interest one way or another by people who simply want to ticket, cited and exploit. How do I process that in this regard? Considering of such of what I have been through. Even AI would say this looks like I but this is Siri or Alexa or someone else. Why the constant need to prosecute without understanding the facial recognition goes towards prime status one way or another. So many unknown variables to denote the common interest and simply something that could be challenged beyond a reasonable doubt. Maybe I have a twin out there. Students of prior employment say so.

I still content to the aspect that there is a long standing tradition that if someone famous looks like you then you are destined to not be famous. A humor approach as the same as Greek and Roman there are ideals and there are key traits. Perhaps a chance had for I or others, yet those seem to be the rules of a single ‘James Dean’ at a time and we process looks one way or another. The idea of sex symbology only goes so many ways and we cannot cross-brand accordingly. In either regard, humor of such knowing Highlander aspects of similar traits occurs.

I could go small or big in this year knowing it could go one way or another. I like to think of it as a continuance to dreams and carrying on. I’m full aware of what happened on one side or another and I have no interest in the negative understanding I have to state it anyways. The other-side is far more amazing, whatever happens to I, it is understood protection, acknowledgment and perspective. In that regard, it is simply as much as truth as what could had been resolved 10 months ago simply says others intentions go one way or another and not my problem yet I see where it could be for myself and others. An acknowledgment that I have a right to sue, will and it is completely proven the disregard of human life that occurred and what was unnecessary of those of knowledge of law and those of not. In that regard, remodels exist.

I came home one more time when torn based off of environmental life instances. Never a fault there as once again, it was proven true what was occurring. I could say the end of a relationship, yet in the same aspect I protect them just as much as I had to do what I had to do to prove what was bigger than us and simply a combination of many of things where digitally or vocally, you don’t know everything internal. I was valid to protect my family back in 2019 as much as I was to do so in 2022. That was proven today as much as it was proven over and over in what The United States could say was an investigation or simply money does one thing or another. I’m still here. Single for months and whatever the scenario was or is, I’m consolidated to the point that my family and the assets of my original works is protected and known in American History to be impeded on many times over in copyright works impeded on. The joys of the non-disgruntled employee. I care not for the long lasting aspect of Café life knowing it was not mine to begin with or of something I take much personal value. Do you job and go home I tell myself. School on the sidelines knowing the importance of what one thing is and doing my job in others. I still cited law and the illegality of such to the Head of HR and the general manager of my employment who gave me an opportunity for a job after what I experienced in 2019. I’m not really that interested in what was presented professionally. I know my last discussion in such is proven where once again they are wrong and anymore is complete damage to the school and what they stood for or what they got away with in the past. I was a friend, but I am already on the outside knowing how difficult it is to explain why one of 100 million a year would be influenced by another of 1 million a year without understanding what one or the other did. I am at peace in my record of EEOC and BBB in government control if anything happens to I and outside the ’non-incentive’ program of not trusting the foundations on which this country was built on. If that mentality existed and came about from 45, then all the more reason to re-look at things after 45 knowing he is never allowed to run for president again under the 22nd Amendment and calls into question exactly what I wrote about that when it comes to adult children and evidence and history on either side for others to objectively say one thing or another.

So where do we go from here. Obviously completely proven at this point my entire life’s work has been impeded on and wouldn’t stop. Was this government or cooperation? Perhaps it doesn’t not matter as I reported it such since 2018 and somehow can go through the list if ‘Curated Jellyfish’ to say yup…attached to other properties without my benefit as one wanted to do or many. In any regard, I continue knowing my legacy of something I didn’t think too much about but do now understanding it is already implanted in places of not my benefit during my life-time. A fond memory of life as I have no dream to express in such manner and really have not done so since 2018 where my life was stolen and if I dared to express such, it would simply be another avenue for others to destroy or look into. Each day loved understanding even if after college what occurred during it did not negate what occurred prior to masters and studying.

I look at this year as I had a chance of happiness and privacy and life. Others wanted in and here I am single saying what do you want? I say the same outside of SCAD saying I saw what 20 years later does to the educational system while knowing the corporate world and what became of it. In either regard, I simply understand discountment and disregard. I understand many things which still leads to what I wrote on one day or another knowing things prior to that and the happy ending of where things fall. Honestly, if you wanted my work, you did not have to steal in real time and could had helped me months or years ago in that regard.

In any aspect, school is done. No faith based on evidence and whatever the next year is, I have zero idea of such. It has been made very clear to steal my dreams and translate elsewhere. I keep internal and just keep on in this aspect doing the impossible everyday understanding the amazing aspect of 2022 and what got written and acted on.

Cheers to 2023.

Not that it matters if I privately type or not. Proof today that from keyboard to my email, someone did not give a shit about privacy and had not done so for years with I.

It is not like it isn’t known at this point what occurred and what is or isn’t industry awareness and standard. In all mysteries, there are multiple avenues to the solution. It is proven in 2022, the retaliation and impediment sped up after Feb. and The Walrus is one of many collecting one thing or another. May not be my Walrus, but shells and stories collected in what has been flat out invasion of a private citizen and undeniable. Outside the scope of what I could say one way or another as we have tackled many things this year. But at least it is understood that today, in real time, as I typed in an Apple Note, it was transcribed through my Google mail of paid service in real-time where they eventually stopped when I copied what they didn’t send through usually and still goes for intention and purpose to denote evidence of one thing or another.

Whatever happens next year I do not know. So much of my life and expectancy stolen. All I know at this point if I have enough evidence and proof of the prior EEOC claim to collect 100% of the proceeds from citing error and not needing a lawyer to do so while the other team’s lawyer has their own oath of position to consider.

A Reflection on Where We All Come Together on Flags.

I wrote this today in reflection. I don’t believe it my right to copyright The Pledge of Allegiance in any modification, but I did modify it while looking at the history of it. My reasoning can be, yet it is more important to I to understand the ideals of one thing and where we are in others. A thought process of where we connect and at least knowing where it came from.

“I pledge allegiance

to the Flag

of the United States of America,

and to the ideals

for which it stands,

one Nation

built from Many,

indivisible,

with liberty

and justice

for all.”,

Section 4 of the Flag Code states:

should be rendered by standing (not applicable for all) at attention facing the flag with the right hand (not applicable for all) over the heart. When not in uniform men should remove any non-religious headdress (questions on why the difference of
removing headdresses between uniform/religious) with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart (not applicable for all). Persons in uniform should remain silent, face the flag, and render the military salute.”

‘Persons in uniform should remain silent, face the flag’

-in this regard, as long as one is facing the flag, it is only required of military to salute. Otherwise the personal reflection of what a country is or could be is the proper reasoning for having anyone look at a flag of any nation in respect or in introduction to ideas and principles. As not everyone is afforded a chance to stand or use their right hand, it is important that looking at the flag in reflection or aspiration is the important aspect of why we are made to look at it in the first place. Even in darkness of sight, a reflection of words brings the same thought of concept. Although, this is more of those not of uniform, it is the aspiration of united fronts and those all on the same plane that should be remembered to bring together and not divide the foundations of which is personal and collective.

The two changes made are done from completely different purposes in the spirit of revision since the initial phrase was coined in 1892 by Francis Bellamy, it was modified by Eisenhower in 1954 by the rejection of the daughter of Bellamy. (It was said to be added due to Communist threats of the time.)

The first change is to the word Republic to the word ‘Ideals’.

This is done so because The United States of America is not a Republic. It is a hybrid Democratic Republic. To change the word is done so to not show political bias which divides the country while acknowledging the original term as incorrect. Proving a point on bias and inaccuracy the word could not be changed to ‘the Democracy’ for which we stand for the same reasons and also being incorrect to what is America. A division of those two words exist knowing we are both a Republic and a Democracy. Division is the exact opposite of the intention of The Pledge of Allegience and the word does that internally which then gets challenged when placed against other flags of the world as not being a United Front or representation constantly in battle with itself. A change to the word ‘ideals’ seem more applicable as it applies to the idea of which the country was founded on and where it could go in growth and in aspirations. A look forward for the country to strive for our best selves individually, communially and collectively as a country. All connections to the fundamental aspects of The United States and the principles that joined 13 colonies originally to where we are now with 50 states and the 13 stripes knowing there has been several revisions to the flag since it’s original creation and assumed it could continue to change in future aspects of participation of the entity of The United States of America.

The second edit, the removal of the words ‘Under God’.

In this edit I look at the daughter of Bellamy and understand her father to be a minster who came up with the phrase. Now knowing his belief of it wanting to be applicable of any country, it is important to know that not all religions are the same nor in every country. Principles and way of life is vast and differing where in unification the word must be removed even if there in Spirit it remains in older versions. As introduced in a time of division and a statement from Communism, it is important to note the difference of the worlds of the 1950s to where we are now. Unification is important when discussing the concept of The American Flag. As a country of immigrants from all over the world it is important to note that our heritage is vast and covers the rest of the world from one generation to the next and biologically connects us to other nations. To change ‘Under God’ to ‘Built from Many’ still has the essence of intention of Eisenhower, but denotes back to the founding of this country and where unification is brought back in as the flag represents a combined effort of States while looking vastly as The United States of America a combined effort built from the help of the brother and sister nations of the world since it’s founding. To change Under from Built denotes a constant work-in-progress and that it was done so from those who have their own beliefs where we build together equally vs. under someone based on our own beliefs for the country and our private motivations for such.

In this version, it seems more appropriate to Bellemy’s original intention where although it wouldn’t be a pledge of every country to their own flag, ‘The United States of America’ phrase is interchangeable to any country in this regard. I imagine where it would stray would be ‘with liberty and justice for all’ which is more specific The United States of America on founding principles translated as such as an ideal of liberty and justice for all globally but understanding the difference of cultures. It would be an interesting test to send out to all nations with the concept of Bellemy’s original intention to see where phrases connect or do not in subtle differences or how it is used for translation in any country and what they hold most in values.

The Reason for 'Partially Inspired by...'

There was a time when I was building my site that I knew the secrets of my Heroes+Villains beforehand. That holds true now as well. In any mention of iconography, it is always important to cited where things come from in one fashion or another. A basis of thought with the understand that at least lead to the direction of one area of influence before delving into anything prior or echo and similarity.

As I have always approached my artwork on many levels, I see the beginnings of one thing to another where you aren’t going to find that full answer on my website, but rest assured it has been written and protected in that regard. I look at my time at SCAD and removed an aspect of my Heroes+Villains (first introduced publicly in December 2011) from navigation that was early on exploration while also pushing the boundaries in new direction of contemporary art. You find value in words and explanations and you find value in descriptors towards originality or process. As much as art history influences my work, so does culture which is unavoidable with every costume we dress up in on Halloween or in the office. We all wear associative masks where one might find me the opposite of dissociative as I connect and learn from anyone really. Character Studies and Words removed by self on website. Far better as a book, but really the only time you will get me to ever do that at this stage in my life is either in documented settings or in a fine art auction aspect of knowing what my worth is and the value of my words yet to be given or straight up taken for over 3 years. No contract signed on that agreement and I understand what has and has not been incorporated.

If my entire series was about acceptance, it is important to note it is about acceptance of ‘Self’ before going into acceptance of others in any group or in general. If someone doesn’t want you around, that is totally fine not to be around them either. They will or will not tell you one way or another. Eh….question it for a minute and then just move on. Someone will accept you or you will learn the comfortability of individuality and finding other things that make you happy non-contingent of others. As quiet as I am, I am quite vocal on a keyboard and actually internally hilarious at times while I keep back any aspect of in-direct discussion at this point because simply put. ..people may not want you around but they notice the shiny tributes anyways on things in modification and workarounds.

I’d remove the names but they exist and the meaning behind each image is what is withheld but was always with respect of everyone. I’ve re-examined my Heroes+Villains series and felt it best to give them justice by classifying each section as “Partially Inspired by…” To think of anything one dimension denotes what you see first before questioning and prodding around to find one other reference or another. As each individual is unique in character study, so too the question of the reference of the model and also that of the artist. There has never been brand confusion and never would be in my lowbrow approach of working with what I got. Have I inspired you? There is a difference once you go commercial vs. fine art and there are always bridges to be made or burned in that arena. It is understood my life of recent and what has occurred. In that regard, I am also aware where things could be at a major + in areas but also - in others. It is understood there is always face value and there is what is beneath, behind and to the side of things.

Whatever the reason, the idea of any aspect of connection denotes an invitation to associate with a person with the merchandising of every toy or any costume to where over time the incorporation aspect becomes something of cultural connection and reference. As it is understood I have not been able to sell anything of mine for years now, I resorted to my words where that too became attack after attack. Even in school, one must question ownership of what is yours and what is theirs. In the end considering everything, there are other plans where I am better suited with the understanding of what has already been incorporated and where things have not. In the end, there is always a difference.

I imagine in any message that ever needed to be sent to me, it has been understood at this point as I continue doing my own thing wondering what respect is given in that regard in return? Probably none or probably some. Any critical aspect of conversation for someone to take the time to mention anything or anything matters as recognition where love it or hate it, you acknowledged it and we go from there. #3daystil40

I have 90 days for help. December 26th, 2022 is the cut off day.

I have 90 days to file. I may or may not need a lawyer on this. It is questionable if I can find one in Savannah based on known history of the deep pockets and tactics of The Savannah College of Art & Design when it comes to legalities in their 42-year history.

I have won the right to sue The Savannah College of Art and Design. My discussions were done in a proper manner and evidence supports that a private citizen of law novice expertise went up against arguments with a hired lawyer on The Savannah College of Art and Design side. The discussion of evidence was met with constant deflection, defamation and libel on their behalf while failing to address any of the issues set forth in discussion on the EEOC side and on the BBB side. With no justification on their behalf for their failure to maintain a safe work environment, they acted in total disregard to their own user manuals (employee and student handbooks) and against Federal laws when it comes to reporting parties and failure to not act in retaliation methods leading towards wrongful termination. Through failure of their own compliance departments, retaliation was had on their part from both months long of reporting to the swiftness of concluding an entire investigation in a single day. Those acts on both accounts were unlawful and requires education of what is and isn’t the law.

For months, I asked repeatedly to be transferred, applied for other positions within the organization and made ADA requests for transfer that went not acted on. As noted in The Savannah College of Art and Design’s reasoning for denying me Unemployment benefits, SCAD changed the reason for my termination 4 times officially and decided it was best to put in the hands of the State of GA that ‘bad attitudes’ was an accepted excuse for denying unemployment benefits. I’ve countered that in a glass door approach on why it is legally acceptable to put determination of unemployment benefits on my digital resumé in matter-of-fact approach of verbatim. In document after document provided of objective first-hand account, I have been privy to the slander and libel that was allowed to continue personally and professionally by The Savannah College of Art & Design and their employees. My charges of discrimination were gender based predominantly while also citing areas of question on if my discrimination was racial based as well. I approached this towards SCAD in all aspects of internal first to their inaction to through the EEOC where the escalation of lawyer vs. layman determines failure on their part to follow protocol where that argument should had been had with the head of HR representing SCAD in that manner. SCAD knowingly and willfully did not provide a safe work environment, retaliated against me personally and professionally while I cited elsewhere the possible theft of creative property.

With their lack of confidentiality protocol, SCAD was unable to provide my rights or distinguish the difference of such as an Student, as an Employee and as an Alumni. In insult to injury, SCAD also has stolen my accrued time-off during my wrongful termination in theft of an at-will wrongful termination. With incidents reported as early as April 2021, SCAD failed to provide a safe campus work environment and has gone against the standards of any college institution while failing to protect myself from my work place environment. I have made claims and charges on how they have failed to protect the entire student body while exploiting them into real-world scenarios of contract-to-hire ‘employment’ through the SCADpro system. That system, designed for real-world experience, teaches first hand before entering the workforce properly that corporations can and will exploit talent where as designed, at least by the end of my employment on Feb. 10, 2022, the students and their families were paying SCAD to allow corporations to rip them off of creative real-world applications without compensation to the student outside of their degree-seeking nature. In doing so SCAD has been pimping out the children of the 195 countries into corporate exploitation without compensation of their contributions to society going towards their benefit outside of a degree-seeking nature. That tactic goes into a relook at the age discrimination laws of The United States in revisit of sliding scales where those under 40 were being exploited and taken advantage of based on their lack-of-experience vs. those of industry standard expertise. Questions on the innovation of business tactics and lack of education provided in copyright/trademark/patents brings into question what innovation is being taught in their school based on the foundations of what was already occurring. As cited in examples on the BBB and EEOC side, proof exists that they are not acting on the best behalf of their student investors while maintaining a very healthy product of student innovators to the real-world corporate environment. That case and example challenged how their non-profit status is detrimental to the student investors while calling into question their own thoughts on copyright/trademark/patent protection.

I am a supporter and advocate to the student body and Alumni to The Savannah College of Art and Design. I am a supporter of the faculty and staff as any teacher will tell you the value of the responsibility they have towards student investors and career-building. Through the BBB, I have argued and successfully laid a ground argument for protection of the students, claims of current collegiate structure and possibly began laying the bricks down towards student loan forgiveness with a pathway towards a new make and model to the collegiate structures. Starting at a very concentrated location of every single country’s creative contributions in a single campus of need for protection from ‘pulling from the archives’ for ‘educational purposes’, it is essential the argument of who keeps the lights on and who actually has copyright claims vs. why the institution does not.

As a ‘Starving Artist’, I don’t have the funds for representation as my work elsewhere has been a 3.5 year discussion point. I see in special cases one can be provided by the US District Court. In what was more than enough information to support my claims, my final words to the EEOC officer on the phone was saddening and I apologized for stating that they failed to protect where it is now I, as a sole individual, am having to fight against an entity publicly and in places of possible harm or exposure possibly on my own when the evidence supported what was needed. On both the EEOC and BBB side, I copywrote my arguments and they cannot be incorporated into The Savannah College of Art & Design without my permission. Once again, questions remain on confidentiality and who was interacting with the SCAD lawyer within the institution. The same went for other’s listening in on compliance meetings in where SCAD’s privacy issue is about the lack of privacy of student/employee/alumni.

As much as I am a supporter to the SCAD dream and always an undergrad Alumni of The Savannah College of Art and Design as of 2005, it saddens me that almost a year of events that never needed to continue has to be had now. They had every opportunity to make this right internally while towards the end of my employment painting me as the problem, the aggravator when I was the victim, the one going by the book and went daily into hostile work environments that I repeatedly did everything I could to maintain professionalism while my Master’s education as a Graduate student was affected, ruined and ultimately cancelled. I am not the enemy, but I have to stand up for my rights as an Student, Employee and Alumni.

-Philip Arthur Bonneau

September 30, 2022

I imagine who knows from here. Help is there. I just have to find it.

That's a Wrap!

September 26, 2022 - A day at the beach after the end of years long adventure coming to end in cinematic style of combined image and dialogue. Along the beach after some much needed rest, a chance to move forward now that I’ve landed on the shores.

The cumulation of years of works comes to a conclusion on the final day of shooting on September 23 and the 24th, 2022. A marriage of ideas where things comes together in union and promises for the next day. Stages set and we move onto what is always a part of you after an experience but onto other arenas for other stories that expand or contract in different directions. 2 days had.

What is to come of full transparency in current trends and waves? Washed up only to be thrown back to see or buried in elements? Went with the flow and floored by the end result.

Secrets everywhere from the existence of unicorns and other fantastic things. A journey well spent in where travel occurred unknowingly and product placement is very important.

Through the looking glass of an artist’s camera, we find ourselves or see our Heroes+Villains.

That’s a Wrap!

-P.

#nextchapter #newbook

{. }
SS

Editor’s Note - revised with dates and punctuation.