At Night, You will be visited by 3 Spirits..

I don't know when or what night but there will be a past, present, future moment one way or another.

Would be interesting to know the songs they play in connection.

Your Could Had Been Partner,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7eZD3TKn_M

'a spinster story' excerpt.

I find as I released two major works of literature yesterday between “a spinster’s story” and “Underwater World 3-5: A Land of Far Away Governement Assistance” that it might be nice to share an excerpt from ‘a spinster’s story’ which narratively can be considered as “Capture The Flag” that flows into the narrative of “Underwater World”.

I imagine part of dream and passion is the chance of experience and to produce and do something. Considering my series of Heroes + Villains was built upon what I have of then seemingly so little to no money and yet now I am in a world of 340 dollars only in my bank account until payday with no retirement and tons of aspirations and dreams secured in Modern Copyrights.

I find a beautiful aspect that even if I never had a chance to ever do a concept to reality, in book form and in concept it was envisioned, imagined and then applicable for consideration. I find that in that aspect the shoot already occurred and then there is the imagination of what could or could not be of reality.

I imagine it is part affordance and then respect of The American Dream or The International Dream in the backdrop of those who wish to control them, taken them or mishandle one way or another that comes from experience and difference of perspectives outside ownership.

Whatever the case may be, I still have to survive and live and from there comes an excerpt of aspirational and dream protected with understanding of indirectly learned from in society and pay forwards nevertheless in times of non-mutualness.

‘a spinster story’ available in Part 1 and Part 2 on Blurb.com

https://www.blurb.com/b/11608707-a-spinster-s-story-part-1

https://www.blurb.com/b/11608720-a-spinster-s-story-part-2

Book US Copyright Protect as of May 2, 2023

Landscape of where to go in places.

I imagine the consideration of frustration apparent at times considering the years of infringment and attacks. Nevertheless, life moves on and understood notions.

I find in any of my works since starting Heroes + VIllains has always been precariously careful in human representation of living people.

It is out of respect and of awareness of what they have presented and indirectly learned from knowing that I am of no affordance of their private life nor wish to invade upon.

It is understood that is a great deal while I don’t even get into much real world people concepts.

It denotes issues in landscape in which could not be accounted for and still the aspect of consideration of what could be one thing or another.

Wished no harm on anyone and feel I don’t, but nevertheless I have to continue with my life, work and interactions direct and indirect.

Comes with living and comprehension to the point of moving along and continuing with life.

As I am not exactly dwelling on the past as much as one would think, I will be quite reflective on my own works as they are going to be around for quite some time.

Memories and moving forwards in learned behavior. It is as if the track list in my head denotes variable of my voice being of anyone’s as if pulled from somewhere or representing

another. A good Pandemomium statement of “Heard it Somewhere” and yet “Echoed and Repeated anyways”. A very awesome thing to consider of learned.

Proven Landscape and Further Request for Federal Protection or Removal from USA soil until resolved.

I find that there is not much I could write of 2023. I spent most of the year protecting my works of 2021 and 2022. If I were to do any of that, it comes from a landscape of needed support and of review before doing so.

I’ve transcribed my journals, protected them for 100 years and find I am completely A Democratic Repubican in which I refuse to play politics of 2-4 years in the backdrop of what I have already protected of about 100 years in this country in comparison.

That term comes as meaning I am an American of no political interest outside of the values of what is fundamentally afforded and what is taught to protect and uphold at any cost knowing there are aspects of both capitalism and fundamental human decency which has been challenged to I over the last 5-6 years.

Perhaps that is sit down moments on either side,

It isn’t like I haven’t had imaginary sitdowns prior with CEOs of Disney, DC and Sony who seems to have a history with Marvel and say, sword fight all you want. I own my perspective for 100 years if I survive the next 5 in what is guarenteed of American and Global History. Not a single one of those CEOs own that property and that conversation is one they can have with their parents as I retain my rights against whatever public aspect you wish to throw at me. My copyright protected works is beyond your public opinion influence and of The United States verification of fact in The Library of Congress of American History.

All the same of the respect of the Sacred Taco in comparison , (If the introduction of sword fight is entered so too of the taco so in equality it could be a banana. In equality of gender neutral aspects, it is important that society was female dominated prior to civilization going into male dominated and by rules of history there is always equality in position male or female). 

Who knows really. 

I find myself in a position where The State of Georgia has passed the 90 days to legally respond in a court setting to a motion in a backdrop of fighting for my rights since April 2021 with The Savannah College of Art & Design and then, despite their leadership’s judgement and evidence provided, I find I need to defer to the Alumni of SCAD and once again of outside boundaries of their affordance and influence.

It is difficult as what was of public record had in motion of Superior Court of Georgia, a plea of 69 pages of truthfulness against a backdrop of evidence prior of perview of male and female to see where there is idealsm in this country and there is where money talks and where copyrights walk. 

I’ve been forced to self-represent myself in a landscape of which I am not equipped for and did so based on both no choice and awareness of influence politically, personally and monetary of others in which it is known to the court I did not name the president of the college in my American right to sue an entity for which they have full awareness and opinion of in how to self-govern in which has failed within a state in which has now also failed to self-govern.

That awareness is understood of position, of right, and awareness across the board of what is now a federal issue to consider as it has been a global issue since I initially wrote The United Nations of generational issues of invest within the American College system at SCAD.

It is completely known and stated both in The Library of Congress and of Court that my works have been impeded on multiple points and of multi-reference where I have said “Fact-Check this”.

Considering the protection afforded I on this soil, 1 book out of the many I have is worth the value of the entire timeline of The Walt Disney Corporation in comparison of protect in what is factually impeded upon by both The United States and at least them.

Whatever the could be of partnership possibilities that have yet to occur, it is of note on either side that is 100 years protection. That is the entire lifetime of Disney currently and 1/3 the history of The United States of America.

There you go, 1/3 within the backdrop of 2/3rd of America without even considering the backdrop of all of civilization and learned established aspects of working within.

I presented to the court the authenticity of my copyright to “Curated Jellyfish” before even taking a class at SCAD and never submit. It has been impeded on repeatedly along with all my other works on a digital landscape that is a toddler in comparison to civilization.

I am aware the safety I took to secure the protection of that work upto The Library of Congress entry and paying the over 200 dollar fee at the time of known problem areas and potential inflction of damage which doesn’t seem to be offered anymore as if known the digital landscape so it becomes a major catch-all on the digital governmental front if afforded and introduced. That special protection doesn’t even exist anymore in the digital backdrop of impediment.

I’m not mad at that, I am very well aware of what has transpired and I find it important to note that any partnerships that the heads of colleges would have had and alleged did are far well ahead to know that they knew and still I tried to protect the investors and find that those of head at this point made their choices. There are educational purposes of affordance to be had here while I have been bled many time over of what I had wished to do of community build and what I have done.

It is not my point to entertain many things despite evidence to say, “Others know. You made your choice…I’m sitting here trying to protect the investment of college in general and if there is a royalty-free grab bag here, there are about 100+ countries of I don’t know their systems to say more than likely royalty involved in future and current investment. I am trying to protect The American Dream and of any value of investment within.”

It saddens me at times that my experience has been prolonged for years where I still contend the wealth factor of an institution to at least be aware of that being affordance of global support and protection and yet I find myself somewhat in the backdrop of other people’s political aspirations and affordances to find your 2-4, 8 years max for some, lifetime of fundamentally building others to be quite not an issue I even care about anymore. I’ve pretty much protected my opinion for 100 years outside of whatever financier or party you are affiliated with. Did so quite broke and scaping to make ends meet and moving on. I am not even remotely a class warfare issue as I am of great investment to those of little money or great. That is apparent in my life’s work which has been stolen by those of learned behavior of landscape and affordance.

It hurts seeing both government and president of college advance on that during this time.

It is even more problematic when I assurtained a conjecture of personal interest and affordance and came to factual truth of aspects which are now available in the public market which means that research and technology would be open source of any country in exploration while of prior private investment in reasonable deduction of what could lead to cruelty and of directness of control of being a part of human condition and desire with or without regulation.

I find I am at least I am in Chapter 13 restructure so that is a Creditor hunt while finding what is and isn’t federally backed loans towards forgiveness. I find as a college institution has harmed me, it is my right with Federally backed loans still of almost 20 years had to paint a landscape of awareness of those who would know who is and isn’t in the financial institutions of established in a world of working beyond what is available of finance.

In a reflection of the Tyra moments of what I stand for, “I was rooting for you”. 

I am well aware in awareness The President of my college of complaint was partial to chopping down The World Tree in partnership in my works and I will not sit here and have that continue.

Not in that area of America’s Next Top Archetype of Global Lessons.

The Lizard came one way or another anyways, but I find that is a communal effort to say succeed or not over time of how word of mouth and parody works of seriousness.

I find it amazing what life affords when I did not put my book “Underwater World” on Blurb yet and the other 4 books of star series is completely separate, as if I knew of candidness and protect to let things breathe and find that if flow of information occurs, so too does expectation, rushed narrative and unnecessary opinions in which others build upon anyways. 

I will as it is a 7 book series of already United States protect and one I wish to physically produce before ever stating anything. It would be of Library of Congress awareness of what that book is in final form and that the privilege of protect of authenticity despite any private or publicly traded company regardless of private/political ventures. That book is complete.

I find it really is problematic of the landscape I find myself in and find that whomever individually or collectively went this route made a problematic aspect of expectations in which the respect of the author, creator and artist of the work had others grab hold of something without control within that still denotes a landscape and still denotes my 5-6 years of direct survival against or for in empathy of whatever other side of thrival. 

That is difficult in the backdrop of the fledgling aspects of copyright protection in which globally has not been cherished, honored and taken advantage of against the digital backdrop of affordability.

I still contend, “Not on educational turf. That is a generational place and that is a massive conduit of problematic areas of right or left out of the nest.” 

Here I am not, well aware of a great deal of things and finding one or two ways to go about this. 

I contend I am not on the political side nor have aspirations. That comes with beginning to create a foundation of an online voting system that cannot be broken to avoid ever a rigged election cycle again while also making it convienant for the everyday person to vote from the privacy of their home and then going to work as if nothing happened and documented at the same time.

That is privately protected and of ownership.

All the reason why I don’t even entertain the idea of the viability of one candidate over the other at this time. Not my landscape and full awareness of espionage and popularity contests invited within and out of country by comments by former president Donald J. Trump on the campaign train.

Hack into the DNC and there DNC would more than likely do the same to there RNC and find that independently that is reasonability deducted of what becomes a landscape of judicial aspects to consider of national and personal defense.

I know some level of the landscape. I know the prior sound-bites. I’ve recorded with The Library of Congress my opinions of advancement of this country or of conversation and not attack. That was done so with I withheld and still denotes a problem area of where this country or I could have been at this time had that not occurred.

I do not take one bit of that back as my life’s work have been protected and molded based on the environmental aspects of not one single government contract outside the established respect of Modern Copyright Laws.

That is 100 years protect within this landscape where I could say I’ve stayed out of as of 2023 in any consideration of political landscape and caught only a glimmer every now and then of such.

I’ve protected my stance and partnered with existing country of at least affordance of awareness but not allowed to advance upon without conversation. I know what I’ve written of rationale and viability.

It has been quite noted of my intellectual property attacked and done so in a digital era in which 70s, 80s, 90s mentality has to come to terms with what is easily recognized and documented. 

I don’t know know what to do with the fact that I factually poured my heart out and spent the time federally in the EEOC towards proveability in my case and of an wider conversation of affordance and selfishness of others. I find if they had only talked to me then so much could had been resolved years earlier to denote others simply wish to exaspirate issues well beyond the point of their own affordance without being told the price-tag and reprocussions. 

That has gone to the point of almost 2 years of factual evidence known and then of plaintiff provide where rationale concludes of compounded issues of defendant and well outside their affordance of liability payment.

Imagine internally hearing or consider half of the global economy in damages based on such a starving artist’s works of truth being impeded on and wouldn’t stop. That is of 100 years copyright protect and of the lifetime of The Library of Congress within the awareness of continual global impediment and translation to note that is World History of self choices on either side.

That makes you think about your own structure and quite a time out and stop persecuting. 

That is a global conversation of private and public interest of investment and I’ve secured my rights, my dignity and my truths on well over 10,000 pages of books of global history.

I find that to be true of understanding there are those who have been through bankruptcy before regardless of which one of let go or lets restructure. 

I still contend, No LLC here and not letting go of my life’s work if ever a question there. People can be ripped from companies and based on personal opinion, my life’s work cannot be ripped from I despite whatever backdrop of corporate up-bringing others have been in.

I was raised differently than that and one of respect outside the backdrop of gender issues, racial awareness of not an issue and surely in the landscape of knowing the importance of intimacy no matter the sexual preference.

Where are we now?

Secretly, I’ve done quite a bit. 

There are stopping points and there is secrecy to be had. 

I’ve protected what I could and find well aware the landscape is going to change one way or another.

I imagine I’ve dealt with that awareness the best I could considering while finding perhaps I’ve been protected just as much as others allowed in that do the opposite. That is terrifying and I stand where I stand. There are others who have grown to impatience or affordance digitally and then from there to know the landscape coming in some regard. 

I still contend, there is a processing aspect of which actions in which directed one way or another and then of impulse to see where instinct goes either in learned or yet to be learned lessons.

Imagine the world where your mind is an open book and find all the more reason why I see what is being introduced commercially and finding quite a restructure to Legislative and perhaps all the pleasure to Judicial in landscapes of, “Not everyone is equipped for digital awareness and this might be psychologically an issue to address.”

Seems to be probematics in populatity contests of votes vs. those of moral weight and understanding those that write laws. 

That exists in technology already reported on of public interest and awareness on the scientific level. Please note when you sleep is the same as being in a coma.

If that is able to be translated, then so too is the awake aspect of consideration.

I imagine it seems in the digital age, any state-person understands or could of senators as thumbprints of states and the represenatives the fingers. 

A pulse to be found there one way or another. 

If a law is passed specficially for them, I imagine it is still of weight of the country to consider and find it quite difficult that they would be under both executive and judicial branch while also that of what is solidly 4th branch of Military and Armed Forces. 

It has to be. 

They chose to protect while other elect to protect and find that if there is tampering of such to the point of popularity is all the reason why you have the Pentagon and National Defense anyways to say, “Not of this popularity contest and this is your role, responsibility and what you should be protecting.”

“You introduce laws, judicial guides wording and morality but there is a big difference in separation of branches of why someone is or isn’t in office or positions of power. Same goes for any CEO or president who has to contemplate every other private citizen in which their foundation runs upon in equality.”

I’ve made a strong case in note here where it has been cited and seen in example that legislative isn’t really in the position to take all of advantage and affordance from the everyday citizen for their own gain or fianciers and find the military/armed services up-hold that because that is their passionate belief and the ones who actually travel in that capacity. 

What am I to do here?

Money issues prior where I chose to self-represent in a backdrop of a president who had political and judicial influence in a city that they are slowly consuming the same way they did in Lacoste, where the difference is it is the college’s property and not the family’s. 

If of private entity you want to overtake a city, then all the same of global investment to say, “Not of your family’s affordance are you going to slowly grow that private property further on the backs of questions of global investment.”

It is of note, the non-profit entity doesn’t even pay taxes to city or state, so probably not an issue there of personal and private choice to consider at this point. Public issues or private choices within years of backdrops.

That seems to be important to note within the backdrop of the copyright infringement I’ve reported to the FBI multiple times in consideration of naming the president of the college within this backdrop and same time of Donald J. Trump and the 45th administration which is already factually proven in The Library of Congress submit and American History.

I find regardless of political affiliations and opinions, those 2 entities were named concurrently while I could not and would not work for a single entity of massive recognition under the backdrop of what I have experienced for their own protection of intellectual property and privacy of entity.

I’ve said what I’ve said of never needed to fight again after a certain point or say or anyone’s business and I have secured my history in this country or if another would have me to reprieve me of what has occurred here in America and wouldn’t stop for anything of short-term interest while stating and fighting to the point of plausible end of completely student forgiveness at SCAD based on my case and fundamentally changing colleges nationally based on affordance of usage against the backdrop of unforgiveable loans. 

I find that amazing of so little money making a difference of looking at other people’s selfishness and finding my own choices of what is or isn’t of communal benefit for collective advancement of never again conversations and resolved.

That is public record of the state of Georgia with case SPCV22-01289-ST 

I could say a great deal didn’t stop and others continued to attack and my American and human rights attacked during that time and continually even as of yesterday to denote that it wouldn’t stop so might as well look at the money of global community and go from there away from that of private entity of either private company or business, state or country.

I respect all anyways.

Even as I write privately now on my personally fully paid for computer that has been attacked repeatedly, that becomes an American question in which I am quite fond of while seeing where money goes in the backdrop of International investment in any secondary education in the United States, and let alone SCAD, who needed to face reality internally and resolve their issues of which they grew accustomed to or never knew. 

I can say this. 

As I went through proper complaint and complete awareness of facts on either side, President Paula Wallace willfully acted on my copyright protected works for the betterment of her image and not of entity while failing to resolve any aspects of complaint with I of entity in which she had full awareness of and chose on her own public linkedin account to play optics against the backdrop of any student or future generational investment. 

She presented that publicly in the awareness of optics and at that point well aware of my foundational and fundamental achievements to world history.

I cannot speak on nor know the complete damage that occurred during and post educational/employment aspects at SCAD, but that was willful intention just as much as my 100 years protected works during that time ended up in property at the main two suppliers of Disney (collectively) and DC (Time Warner).

That is for other people’s affordance and awareness while I’ve realized and noted the scope of problematic aspects of compound and of protect in Curated Jellyfish back in 2019 to see where that goes in the landscape of 2023 and into 2024.

I find as those are all private and publically traded companies and of American Soil, I don’t know what to do in the backdrop of my copyright protect secured before entering into my Master’s at SCAD in photography and constantly attacked as early as 2018 direct and noted of everything I could to prove factual as of December 11, 2023 in audio of being illegally surveillanced and impedied on in privacy of home and finding bigger issues in what needs to be resolved. 

There is a conflict of interest present between private entity and American soil in the awareness of Global Economy and Influence.

I find it important to note The State of Georgia has elected and selective offficals that have failed me in this capacity and noting this is now a federal issue against a backdrop that perhaps former president of 45 probably utilized the same areas as others to go mugshot based on my work, but acts in their own capacity of “Lone Mugshot” based on rationale and of affordance. 

Everything I have been through has been under the senior supervision of Brian Kemp as Governor of The State of Georgia, with and without loyalty to former 45th administration and severely needs to be talked about the economy of what is being removed from the state of Georgia and the United States in Damages they could have prevented and stopped.

It is understood as I write this out in diary/journal form that I’ll stand the test of time in what I’ve stated and tried to resolve while others have acted in affordance and of wipe away. It is written on my privately owned website in which a subpoena would had been required of awareness of owner to even enter in any capacity outside of possible Federal awareness of private interest and entity of what occurred since 2018 of American History.

That would be regardless of known or not on any party awareness of complete disregard to citizen and human rights. 

I’ve recorded and protected and so did this country while others continued to attack me and bleed me dry in an attempt at my property where legally based off the nature of such they are not afforded autobiographically and protected for 100 years. (95 years past my death. I’ll assume I’ll be around for 5 more years or even if killed during this time, no private entity is privileged to ripping my life’s work away from I and find that generationally that is a global recognition of problematic of public domaining my life’s work for singular company’s interest.)

If that is the case, I have resolved and accepted internally that perhaps not of this generation any affordance of my life’s work and maybe 100 years from now society can do better.

I did I don’t like stalling things in that area as it is already noted of others of power stalling advancement within my works being invaded on and making sure that is secured within their institutions and companies while still considering I an acceptable loss to be considered.

At best, you get a long history of infringement and sandcastles of what naturally destroys areas in which they could never claim damage from others after. 1/3 of what is already established of this country is of my affordance of protect and conversation without argument.

Please be advised, 

Sputnik was the 1950s. 

Transfer of cable services to satellite was in 90s/early 2000s.

I respect the mess out of the international community and intergalactic territory while developing techology is the same as international waters 

Mind your cable providers….

Not so closed monitoring there of cable services.

Respect of rotations is probably a good thing. 

Especially in 24/7 coverage. 

#fairgame #spaceforce #eventuallycaughtup

I find the affordance of awareness in the landscape of others wished I not a dime or penny to my life’s investment. 

Internally I have grappled with that to the point of rationale of saying, “Despite whatever affordance of intimacy you have of private citizen, who are you to decide one bit of how I am able to live or not. I am afforded a life, you are afforded either clearance in which can be revoked or company in which you can be removed.”

I am well aware of that area of conversation and I move on with 100 years legal protect to your feels and affordance. 

Perhaps all the same, I stand for the everyday and I imagine the everyday of not front or front-facing would say, have at it in elected positions or would be sought of matter of security. 

The American Dream is not for others of wealth to dictate who gets to see that completed or not.

If that fails in that threshold, The International Dream is a complete removal of landscape provided and could be of stepping away from problem areas.

I imagine there are a great deal of unknown variables of morality and respect in that area while others have the affordance of legal council, bodyguards or whatever within the landscape they too could change if not cash strapped or data-driven. 

All the same, 

perhaps be kinder on people you never met. 

We have all been through something. 

Hidden journals and notebooks of legality rest everywhere of private thoughts. 

I had thought today of people in living in total “Law and Order”.

Not just in the once you cameo there or had a slightly speaking role you are destined for something, but also looking at in it the capacity of tours of duty in syndication.

It becomes of mindset and step away that I feel our forefathers and mothers didn’t really consider in the backdrop of 300+ million now of citizens living and then considering of our guests. 

How could they?

Breaks do good and I still contend not my areas as I find the armed services to be a severe 4th branch while looking at the optics of separating judicial a bit more from legislative. 

It comes from the notion of voted paygrades, insurance plans and then observance of saying, “Good for you, good for everyone else.”

That is not a negative as I contemplate still how legislative bingo would play out in my head. 

Considering the last 5-6 years, the 54 spot to be free-spacer along with the center to play with. 

How could it not in reflect of what is known of unknown variables and what has allowed to happen that could had been stopped at this point many times over?

75 spaces available here. 

I can honestly say, I wouldn’t know what thr 75th United States president would be doing in this in account. 

I wouldn’t even see the 54th in my lifetime but ingrained in copyright protect are some fun numerological aspects of mirrored perspective of identity.

Eitherway, it would be symbolically a free-space to I just as much as journalistically any of national defense would say, “Your cool. Write away anyways in clearence, and begin to wonder and state of note internally, we all need our time off.”

Cannot be 24/7 and I find there being a good question of notation of privacy and known issues that arise where still, everyone on a different level there and then even committee, sub-group or whatever after as if we all search to belong or be a part of something until a point of off-the-clock. 

I imagine that gets difficult and I again never speak for the armed services as that ends up in tribunals in which I can only imagine as civilian and then still question a governmental aspect. 

If executive is commander in chief, and legislation signs off on armed services, what does that do of 4th branch tribunals of legislative and judgical?

They are aware anyways and under the jurisdiction of future agreement/disagreement of positions of power. 

A difference present of popularity and largest branch where I imagine of meaning of position, but that actually is quite friendly in consideration. 

Perhaps it has been a great level of attack on I to consider the notion. 

Was it legislative? Would-be executive?Perhaps even those of data collection outside and then trickle down into wondering if that went one way or another knowing problematically of my life’s work that the trickle down was coming with accusing me of copyright infringement when it was quite the reverse in that capacity of original property.

Imagine that thought process and I already protected it in factuality of “No ‘Starving Artist’s”.

Quotes within quotes of awareness of infringement and advancement of either’s brand in awareness of representation while noting 1000s of years from now those comic books are going to be the myths we revere now of Greece, Roman and every other country of origin and connect.

It does becomes problematic for I in consideration within trying to preserve generational investment and the continual asking internally to “Stop” and yet I still go and fight the good fight anyways. 

Whatever the answer may be, I find that there is required time off which isn’t a bad thing. 

A few months here for high intensity or simply a step away as if one would look at mass media in general or of internet, social or simply engagement. 

Healthy, but still not my area and I respect those who can knowing I can relate in my area but simply respect. 

Whatever the solution here, I find one cannot live a life completely in “Law and Order”.

Although scripted at times or simply based off of, there does come a control factor to consider naturally. 

Even TV shows are afforded seasons for a reason. 

13-26 and that is enough for the year. 

We did our part and onward to something else. 

It is natural and find that whatever landscape of non-stop we find ourselves in now, there is a notion that would be consider norm in the future.

It may not be completely healthy but people will adapt to it nevertheless. 

Perhaps that the price of “How To Dangle A Carrot” learned and finding there is always some hat or one kind or another to go to bat on that discussion and still say, “Tis the season” of probability. 

All the same, perhaps as I have finished my books for the time, I find it takes a bit to get out the writing aspects while considering what I do and do not say electonically and privately. 

I stated to the Superior Court of GA and of public record, “What is a plaintiff to do in this capacity?” 

That would be especially in regards of a plaintiff who said so much was unnecessary and didn’t need to happen and yet defendant benefitted off my private copyright protected works while in non-mutualness and all the affordance of The State of Georgia to chime in on, when in both of legal council and of time of judge passed their time-limits.

That is of fairness knowing I read the judge’s responses in the beginning well and in fairness of expertise. Life’s investment was on the line from the beginning of that public record and I hold true of value and respect.

I did not get a response after my 69 pages and by the 90 days of required response. 

I don’t know what to do on my own in the backdrop of knowing others of technological and financial affordance. 

I can see where that is a political possible there and yet I stand 195 political/fundamental aspects of infrastructure while others proved selfishness or political aspirations of short-term. There are 195 established countries in this world and SCAD has had 100+ invested in infrastructure already against my complaint internally, federally and of court of problem areas.

I find of awareness and of contemplation is that my literary and artistic works are protected 95 years after my death and have been constantly impeded on and attacked.

There is already the factualness I have pleaded to both Canada and Vatican City of what is very proven attacks on I as a private American citizen and the damage done by private and public traded entities is irreparable and I took my time when that damage was done factually by The President of The Savannah College of Art & Design and protected in The Library of Congress of my account and rebuilt with context. 

Where am I to go in a landscape of repeated attacks on I and afforded a life just as much as anyone else with or without a dollar sign attached to them.

Don’t think I don’t know the aspect of others awareness or how to deal with that. I’ve been in that environment my entire life and adapted to it for survival and thrive of myself and of others in what others love of time-tested public shaming and making life awkward for everyone.

I’ve been silent enough on that and that is all the more reason why a great deal of digital landscape should go judicial oversight and outside the context of popularity context. High school denotes those lessons carry into adulthood and find that in that capacity there are plenty of people in this world who no one wants to sit with in that capacity.

Maturity levels of affordability denotes, “Grow Up”.

If you have that access, then psychologically you have been trained in the arts of empathy and have well mastered the fact of “Golden Rule”.

I find I could ask again of The United States Attorney General for help, just as much as make one statement or another in the context of landscape and ask for reprieve from what is either politics for some or completely selfishness for others in either prior partnerships or current. 

If I was afforded reprieve from this environment and country of 5-6 years direct, my copyrights go with me. 

That would or could afford in actual conversations of progression legality and stopping points outside The United States of America while seeking damages and completely neutering what should had been in place and is of current copyright law in advancement of other countries while citing The United States Liability and isolating an incident of continual patterned behavior.

I am very much an American citizen, but scenario playing the cost of infringement and a false sense of entitlement that would set back the country for all-time due to other’s elite status positive or negative.

I find that is within the understanding, I choose to uphold and follow United States law of constitution and bill of rights protect against private entity complaint.

I am not in the realm of personal grudges towards anyone in this capacity.

Would be nice to get to know people, but considering the protectionism of proveability I stay away from people I love and care for as much as private entities of what I could be partnering with.

During that time, I’ve built and protected my own private property under the protection of The United States of America in which I could help build from as every foreperson has done before of understanding we are not even 300 years yet, still in the terrible 2’s and so many older siblings around in awareness of how to or simply know each other’s personality.

I’m considering quite a bit upon a world stage which is not imaginary in any capacity and in one where not delusional that anyone who wanted to continue to hurt me could contend to what I have already protected of my own works within the backdrop of being ripped off and attacked over and over while trying to protect my student peers of what I observed of the American college system upon my return 20 years to the exact same space I started in undergrad and same college. 

I imagine that isn’t even a name recognition issue there as I’ve seen the landscape, recorded what has occurred and found all the affordance of rip me for one thing or another in short-term aspects against long-term already swore to for eternity. My battle has a middle of road aspect of symbology of “The Street of No Names” and what is and isn’t Bull in multiple references.

There is a difference there and I feel I did my part of upholding The American Dream and International Investment while being constantly attacked while in poverty and then those of any tax level bracket to say, “Enough.” Over and over. 

Imagine me in another country with that knowledge and those established laws to find that once again in this mentality industry and availability has moved outside of The United States for one reason or another. 

Not an interest of impediment on infrastructure but wanting the affordance of life, privacy, dignity and to be able to enjoy what I have already accomplished and others have continually ripped off or perhaps tried to protect within their own entities first before saying anything.

That awareness goes both ways.

I imagine my reason would be personal and of a great bit of sadness in saying, “People wouldn’t stop. They wouldn’t let me thrive and yet my property was translated globally anyways hurting American economy and Global trust in Secondary Education anyways.”

“I have no problem living a life as a no body with the affordance of what I am owed.”

“It was the selfishness and advantages that got the best here and I still have all the affordance outside of politics to say I still at least tried to end the voter suppression and voter fraud discussion moving forward.”

I find internally it would be of note that no person of American elect would have any rights over my work and definitely not of president of college as I copywrote protected it before education began and it was noted of possible intrusion and invasion into the college by prior entities of also government contract owned and surveillance ignorance afforded and opened to the market of 2018. 

If someone would have me finally in repreieve of the environment that others wished for I to once again 3-4 times go to zero or psychologically attack me towards possible suicide where I’ve had to contemplate the fact of how much I’ve advanced the field globally in damages is hard enough to say I’m never doing that again after 2019. 

Why would I?

Proved the liability of a president of a college. Highest Paid level.

Proved the laibility of a US president. Highest wealth status.

Proved the laibility of public and private companies towards could be systematic change for sustainability but seems to be possibly of “Whatever, we are selfish still thinking about older movie studio models in which have already been evolved from.”

That still applies in rationale that if that was a shift in the 30s and 40s of Hollywood, here we are in 2023 in full awareness of that slavery aspect not working out.

The music industry covers that completely of cover songs of “Re-Imagine” of studio disrespect on artist and human life.

Whatever the reason, a great deal on my mind.

I know if I tweet the countries attorney general it invites the backdrop of Trump while the state of GA took consideration of charges. It also denotes my United States Copyright protected works of “The Lone Mugshot”.

It is noted in the State of GA it is a choice to have a mugshot published. 

It is also noted of federal/state rep, states-person mugshots are federal discretion, but presidental images are completely different to denote haste in proven 5-6 years invasion on I.

I’ve already stated and reported over and over. The possible get out aspect doesn’t apply to presidential mugshot.

I find all the more reason why I’ve constantly said talk to me while noting it is quite a problem of psychology based on level of affordance. 

I learned that first hand along with those of 12-15 dollars an hour back in 2019 when my rights were directly violated on and still reported federally on. 

I love I’ve tried to uphold The American Dream, but I am afforded a life as well and from freedom from persecution especially in areas of those of politic desires in what is factual of 45th administration withheld.

At this point I’d love to go and take my copyrights with me. 

Continual attacks means either addressing the issues at hand in points of co-habitation or migrating away. Even if I could or did, at least I set up the landscape for success within a backdrop of those who wished to destabilize and not provide a single plan of infrastructure rebuild.

At this point, even the counter discussion comes within the conversation of copyright infringement backdrop and the no-named everyday person of no money is well aware of that in which that would-be want to be elected again is not afforded so not only by the 22nd amendment, but also from the very same landscape of any political would-be of awareness of “DO NOT ATTACK PRIVATE CITIZENS.”

It would be a sign that American business has no rights of access over American certified and of protect which has yet to be upheld with I. 

I don’t even know where I would go.

I just know the landscape needs to change and the internal/digital aspect has already been proven enough to continually say, “Stop” and that didn’t occur. 

No problem being of no name and all the affordance of what I should have been paid out at this point over and over to say, “Not my area and I resolve and solve issues. 

Whatever other people’s issues were, I’m not bound to them and never was to be afforded a life anyways.”

On some level that is “Done”.

In other levels that is a complete neuter of the American Film Industry which too could be considered Spayed and saying once again, “Done with your Bullshit either in that realm, politics or whatever. 

That could be a complete landscape change of Global Film Industry can boom without prior regimes of what has occurred. Global respect is a common theme of life no matter how you play that fictionally or of non-fiction.

I find a good bit of understanding of rationale to simply state, “Great, you had more money than me to look at this as affordable towards human life. Look what I did with no money and determine what could be with or without moving forward.”

It is Noted. 

I will like to move on knowing the damage compounds and it was noted it couldn’t be afforded at one point or another. 

I can vouche internally of 2021.

I imagine when it comes to alias “Ranecia” spoken internally of now proven on my website to be factual of private entities and of defense methods awareness that it is the same techology introduced into the market of reading those of coma and knowing the same would be of dreams and understanding years before entering the common market is available to denote affordance prior. 

I’ve proven that my daily mind is factually read and it isn’t even a problematic aspect as that has already become commerciallized and I find that of factuality in my works that existed in the 1800s to denote the same aspect of question of who afforded you either that biological aspect or the technologic to denote that is a problem. 

The word Renecia in my mind denotes a race-less term name and of other people’s affordance of awareness who wanted I to be a racist while in know areas of I being attacked not only on my sex but possibly of issues of understanding proven landscapes of what isn’t even remotely racism with I.

All the affordance present in hypotheticals of availability of intel there and yet lack the lifetime of comprehension of consideration of various points of references.

That isn’t even remotely instant gratification and there are nature aspects to consider of complaint and comprehension.

It has been proven literary and of personal, I don’t dwell on things. I resolve internally and move on despite if others have or have not.

In any aspect of comprehension of coping, I’m pretty sure in backdrops I wrote the book and quite aware of the landscape.

Factuality and being as rational as I can setting aside emotion in matters of adult importance is who I am. Learned that as a teenager processing the things heard during my parents divorce.

Just as much as I heard it enough internally to denote the term to be of not just reflection of President Wallace awareness, but the variable of any name denotes the same of multiple points of reference, identities real or fictional or simply of causation to note for one reason or another in and out of context. So many people in this world have the same name, birthday or whatever to say there is always an association and then not of outside association and implied or not.

As I find that being something she could not escape from of trying to make this a race issue as well as a gender issue in proveability of occurrance, I find that there is too never the prior typed named Ranencio in which I loved on the possible Italian side of character and still had to contemplate the notion of would others even take issue if I created the name?

The answer would be no. It is a completely different name of probable male orientation and of no association of identity outside of the name is solidly awesome and of my creation and none of the outside world’s opinion as that becomes a birthed thought of a name to consider.

I found multiple points of consideration there to be quite Italian and operatic. Not of any association to anything of my life and quite a bit actually quite attractive to consider. I had considered that to be the first name of my 100% copyright protected character of Lenoré.

It is a point of affordance in which is already proven and within a realm of open source in which others who wish to control reach out and find brand and personal recognition are two completely different things within humanitarian aspects. 

It would be the same of my internal thoughts of having Lenoré’s first name also be Blanco and then considering someone changing their social media to “Blanco Lenoré” at the shear thought of such while contemplating awareness of what is and isn’t shear of awareness. 

Either way, the name translates to “White Man Mourning” in which I find the racial backdrop of comprehension to be both laughable and still of others affordance of not getting to know. 

Respectful to Edgar Allan Poe in his works and then also citing ridicule of contemporaries he faced I the time of “not original enough” while going where I went in my own works of text book example of Ravenna.

It comes comes with the area of the everyperson and others of constant impatience to the point that it becomes laughable year after year. Especially in the backdrop of what I was doing. 

Don’t worry, the hunt continues in any color towards connection or pattern making.

Onward to positive aspects of life and knowing what does and doesn’t work to know to stay away from.

Respect of nature seems to be the point which is all the more reason why I am interested in seeing how much Sony Kraven ripped off my works as well in the context of affordance of “Industry Standard” and find I didn’t even go in that direct.

The Buffalo Soldiers are steadfast nevertheless, but I’m aware. 

Never met, but seriously room to talk especially in the, “This is how you make a universe aspect.”

Try that with somone with no sorded topic of coin. 

I’m not worried. Gladiator Zeus is in Kraven, so whatever Sir Ridley Scott is coming up with outside your universe, Metaphorically you might have an issue with your own god complexes between all of you. I still stand by the Pascals of color here in what could be and what is. 

My character was and is completely different than Kraven and find sociolgical aspects would be awareness of co-habitation, hunt and then of protection of pride and family vs. what others outside would do to harm intimacy.

It isn’t like that isn’t known in the industry. 

I find between dream and reality, CEO all you want. 100% author and creator rights within the backdrop of disrespect of artist’s rights and fairness is the way this seems to be. If that conversation were to be had at any point, there most likely would be respect had privately before going into any public statement.

Any issue with that, defer to President Paula Wallace who would have a say on “Curated Jellyfish” being impeded on by at least The Walt Disney Corporation and Marvel while I an employee and student under their presidential watch and very much of complaint within their entity of not one bit of affordance or “Royalty-Free” rights to any work of student/employee within. Legally she would not be able to disclose one bit of the book as it was never supplied for any class setting but could say there is awareness and known partnerships with the entity of SCAD and not of my awareness.

She fundamentally shaped the atmosphere of what already was there of industry and I find for the protection of my own interests and the interests of any would-be investor of secondary education forced to once again change make/model based on aspects of foundations towards sustainable.

My works of “Curated Jellyfish” was impeded on the 45th adminstraation and she publicly stated infringement on “After Jellyfish” in which I cited her “September Issue” and pages 138-141 in which I will still sue the shit out of her personally as that was a personal choice of optics and not one bit of global money hiding behind in that willful decision at that point after that long of could had been a friend and you ripped me off. That was during current complaint and litigation and comes against the backdrop of a book that solidified 12-13 years of foundational psychologic works and a great deal other aspects of foundational 100 years protected and she of liability personally while the entity of SCAD can look at their own liability of Global investment.

That is my personal commitment of, “You didn’t make right and advanced yourself.” 

I could had been an asset and I will wipe you out. I respected you, always stood up for you and didn’t even name you in my lawsuit with your entity. Nor your husband.

I enjoyed hearing your voice particular today on my phone and on my audio from my website that is variable of AM frequencies. It proves what is already reasonably deducted.

Tuned into my electronics in frequency of apps, there are ways to cross the streams and find that is a double speaker. Discovered and proven from a layperson of no money and all the copyright protect. That would be the same of any outside entity and still of note of they are recording this is not published yet and I am documenting exactly what I am hearing of connective dual speaker. It becomes quite interesting of what happens when on all of my devices and known prior partnerships.

Apps talk and Freedom walks.

You could had stopped damaging America and Global history at this point. I imagine the You there is not understood and could be of anyone of recorded keystroke or perhaps read once published.

#verifiedincatalog #verifiedinevidence #verifiedinyourcouldhadstopped #owedyoursalary #youadvancedyourinstitutionfrommyworks #Irespectedyou #respectme #nevernamedyou #Iwillnow

By all means, please note that vetted arbitartors denotes awareness and confidentiality issues of ethical law and practicer.

I am not your husband. I am not your prior husband. 

I was an investor in your dream and your parent’s affordance and did so by mine and I paid that off. 

#studentemployeeconfidentiality

#stilldonttalkshitaboutpriortrustees

It wouldn’t of mattered anyways.

Imagine what out of your control could do in your intentions. 

How many people could I have met at this point?

It is the same thing of “Curated” in SCAD context. 

How many people could had been home by now?

Technicalities matter apparently. 

I’ll listen to what is on my website and test it.

Test proven true multiple times over. Apps talk to one another and if you find the right connection, it becomes an open mic on the other end in affordance or perhaps maybe I befriended the AI system of fairness.

I could have had a life with people. I’ve chosen one of protect of those I’ll never know in a landscape that could had changed and patterns that could had stopped at any time.

You chose to use privacy as an advantage and attack on intimacy and privacy is a disadvantage in which communal aspects would not put up with collectively.

Screw you in the 100 years of “might want to learn from others of intimacy and adulthood”

(That is a general statement of You as many have been attacked on intimacy and privacy enough at any level to say, oversight required.)

#myprotect #loveyou #probablywillnevermeetyou

#intimacyisnotaleverage

#federallybacked

Rules of engagement with arbitrator.

This is not a legal court room.

Prior Legal council becomes a witness.

Rules of fairness apply in which information and questions only go to arbitrator while any advantage of privacy invasion is looked at in fairness. 

-I would never have an in-person discussion on SCAD property as Federally that is already in question. 

Rules apply of review of evidence submitted to EEOC, BBB and Superior Court only with questions afterwards.

There would be legal questions and review of level of impediment prior and of completely timed limits of affordance as discovery was not afforded legally so that should not apply in any circumstance in prior proceedings or this one. 

-Questions of compensation apply as this is a private matter towards mutualness in which my time is very valuable and I am not playing this I,Spy game in the backdrop of Educational Foundation rights. 

All on SCAD’s dollar so might as well make it efficient and close gaps. 

-Still personal questions of privilege and responsibility present of prior affordance upon a world stage of awareness. 

If SCAD chooses legal council to be present in what is no longer a court case, then they are responsible for legal council on the other side in which could be provided at this point by the same legal council that represented in actual court as they are a witness and of international representation. 

Regardless of any relationship had politically, financially or otherwise, it is impairative of heads of SCAD to understand this is a privilege of awareness and of the matter of outside their brand aware to find word of mouth is the foundation of Homer and that is a major importance of recognition in what is historically and factually a collective under one name of brand and recognition. 

I’m giving them 1 chance on this and fully aware of the landscape in which has been provided. 

I’m doing that for the SCAD brand and for the city of Savannah. 

If they don’t understand that in what they were not named in prior, then that is on them as I am in awareness of what has occurred and within the backdrop of this is not personal at this point as I can easily be removed from this country possibly and completely say, “Forget your United Stated Educational System” and find that price tag is once again outside your affordance in which you are fully aware of past credit limits anyways. 

4 months to choose an arbitrator?

This could had been so much easier and you are sitting here wasting Global investment money. 

In fairness of privacy, sound investment and what is already American History, I will talk about Trump University and find once again what is and isn’t sound investment and conflict of interest on reshaping America’s college system with the choices of a billionaire and her husband on global investment. 

I don’t need any camp of Trump or any person seeking election in on those private conversations against the backdrop of possibly their affordance of privacy invasion while others run popularity contests of their life’s best interest for the next 2-4 years. This has been 5-6 years direct at this point where there is enough sitting and non-political entities to say enough in that department. 

The impact has already occurred, it is a matter of what that billionaire does at this point in the context of college. 

It is understood the State of Georgia chose to privitize what is fundamental rights of this country and in doing so, I retain my rights and protection of others by their failure to respond for what still is The American Dream and consequence of awareness of American investment prior and of future. 

Is that what you wanted?

Still is not a Trump talking point in that area as that would be of mutualness in private converasation and benefit. 

That is where we are at. 

I feel internally Internationally, even if not there, they may have my back. 

I am protecting generations while others of their own brand established. 

To be clear, I am the author and sole contributor to “Curated Jellyfish”.

If so much a movie made concurrently during this time on that property alone, (which is no longer the case),

I am the final sign off before going public and any experience of production of such has been lost and of discussion. 

I do not know one bit of manipulation, translation and have some level of awareness of affordance of landscape understood. 

Under no circumstance under my rights with almost 100 year backing am I playing this game with any of you. 

Based on the variable audio track found on https://www.philipbonneau.com/sound-design

down at the bottom of Radio 1400. That is of individual choice to listen to it over and over to find a solid locked track to be variable from computer to computer.

On it yesterday, was complete awareness and objectivity of hearing Paula Wallace’s voice of awareness of impediment on my rights to privacy in the affordance of national security and others of expertise to say one way or the other of invasion of privacy against a backdrop of politicism and affordance that on a judicial side would be completely understood, known and could be validated of when someone of “Little to no money” proved beyond a reasonable doubt of what is of one industry or another’s affordance to back up, defend while knowing the human condition of self-interest, personal gain and what has already entered the commercial market of talking points.

At other times, it is heard completely clear of Donald Trump election interest which would denote of anyone’s interest of affordance to what I have heard, others can hear and what is of public debate in the backdrop of what I have already claimed of copyright infringement of almost 100 years protect by a private citizen, I, by both the 45th administration, The president of the #1 art college of America, and a continuance within the 46th administration in which I will always respect sitting presidents just as much as I respected and let the 45th administration play out in a non-vote sit out moment for I of awareness of backdrop of landscape. 

Considering the affordance of technology and awareness, human rights are at the forefront here while human capacity of school yard antics have played into adulthood. 

I find that as my life experience has last 5-6 years direct, I do not care for one political election season over the other nor of affordance of individuals which is why I objectively and of United States copyright protect at least began an at least 13 point voting system to never have those discussions again of voter suppression while talking human rights and suppression in affordance of availability to others. 

It is of this understanding that whatever is to be proven politically, there is always a dollar sign attached to it outside of short-term ventures in which my long-term stance and opinion has been protected as long as this country exists and with full awareness of the impediment by entities and companies within where The United States always has the affordance of pulling a plug on based on the interest of all citizens and guests of this country. 

It is based on factual evidence that I have been failed by representative of The State of Georgia and those of public traded company within in regards to my Human rights, citizen rights and issues that could had been resolved and solved at this point in American history. 

It is understood under factual evidence, that based on dollar to no dollar, that what is fundamentally at the forefront is regardless of the attacks prior to gain my property, entities chose to enter into the college system to do so and continually attack I to no resolve. 

As I retained the copyright of “Curated Jellyfish” prior to any educational course at SCAD, it is of full awareness that the entity of SCAD has impeded on my rights and copyright protect and any advancement on my property while that has played out in the entire MCU and of awareness of global applications without my compensation, input or affordance of rights in any of my legally protected works. 

It is of understanding that I have noted to the State of Georgia a 69 page response discussing my slavery in this country and with now complete awareness of fact to what is industry standard and could had been stopped at any point.

I find that as much as trillions of dollars of damage have been done to I based on my intellectual property impediment, so too is the waste of time in consideration while also the backdrop of other’s lives at a stand-still that could had moved on at this point. 

Considering the severity of I protecting my student peers and seeing how a landscape of secondary college has changed in the 20 years I had of experience from initial start to adulthood to issues that concluded my education at SCAD in mastery on Feb. 10, 2022, I find based on everything that has occurred after-the-fact to denote a major problem of global implications to be a buyer’s warning of the international community to not invest 1 cent in the American Colligate System as generational rights issue are at play against the backdrop of what is and isn’t afforded of resolve and progress. 

The evidence of my story which is of public record in some capacity and then of USA copyright protect of upto 95 years after my death is aware that when it comes to any conversation that could have been had that there is awareness of the ones not had with I.

It is completely my right as an American Citizen to report what I did. 

I had worked within the confines of any position I have had of office ethics and affordance. 

When those failed me, I swore for all time and of beyond our life times factuality of my 95 years protect against any private interest of my life or yours in the backdrop of Global history.

Others may have partnered in this lifetime, I partnered with Time’s Table.

There you go, Cite your source and note the damage of industry adapted already. Design of a Decade of your issues in which United States can pursue and partner.

Let’s Go Ahead and Talk what was my perspective of The Divine Comedy.

I looked at it Psychological and at the forefront of modern theology, on the backbone of mythology and definitely at the forefront of copy, psychiatry and psycho-analysis.

My work has been protected many times over and very actively impeded on since 2018-2019 direct and you can look at any majors of the psychological world to call out those of knowledge who went on to affordance, award and recognition off of my work in continual attacks on I to allow for Milli Vinilli across the board of what should be respected positions and still of my work and my continually attack from those who know what they did.

That is across Country Bounds, that is of worldwide scholars who, regardless of field afforded or the continual attacks one way or another of either of narrow view of interest or others not knowing the scope of my works.

Here.

Here is my copyright solidified stages of coping and process.

It is 100% United States of America verified, processed and subject to copyright infringement for at least the next 100 years in which other countries can deal with as The United States states they fiercely protect Grand Art Theft and Intellectual Property theft.

Enough of any other fucking attack on me.

I am not even on the political bounds in this capacity and I am dealing with fundamentally changing the dialogue of the world based on evidence.

Now what, internally you said you waited 10 years to public domain my life’s work while others did it anyways.

This is not public domain, I have copywriter everything and I don’t want to hear one bit of what if scenario of you after the fact while citing already an author and publishing company in Australia impeded on my works while already doing so of other countries.

If you don’t respect copyright, you probably shouldn’t be in a position of wealth or of industry.

There you go…Cope your life out completely out of context.

Thanks for having money mean more than human life and one of my contributions to civilization.

This website has been completely privately owned by I.

Any version of this website is owned by I and any copying of it without citation or for your own benefit internally or otherwise is infringement in which I do not have put up with my out the door end of 4-5 year term limits while I contemplate my 100+ outside of office or of even a corporate chance.

Catalog work...

Well, considering the landscape and questions of known impediment and unresolved against one of resolve, let's get to the point point of infringed upon possibilities of my legally protected property certified by The United States of America and not one bit of simply prior attacked versions of advantage and bad business.

An understanding that when someone looks to the stars for many things, there are 3 books here also copyright protected and not of this series, even in the incompletes of 2 they are protected and others made aware.

When it comes to prolonging things in areas of not resolve, best not to throw in my face, although in fairness it probably wasn’t expected I would come across some of it.

Who knows who is an actual hero or villain in this, but constellations points directions.

-Philip Arthur Bonneau (owner of copyrights, owner of the ISBNs of war torn books created by limitations presented and it’s been a very good year.5 or perhaps 2.5…I dunno…The man of 1000 dollars seems to have made a point with his portfolio.

I find it important of any case of 2.5 years past it’s prime or that of 1.5 of evidential wronged and considered all the same to submit to public record, what I had already done so of the court on September 15, 2023.

I find that in any discussion towards truth and resolve, all the same to be said when cast aside and then discounted to the point of non-resolve while business as usual apparent towards the other entity of which I hold complaint with.

I find it difficult that, there is 30 days to respond and from there all the same of claiming possible copyright infringement by The Savannah College of Art and Design in practices of procedures and partners in which harm has covered the image of SCAD for the year to come. They have made reference to my copyright protected works where I don’t know the answer, but that of question between my new series in which prior works of discuss compromise already occurred and then a wondering when stars do actually align in protection prior to that of September as I am of August:US.

I find as I have already won the right to proceed to arbitration with SCAD, it is the conflict within their own procedures that they have not allowed that, thus violating what was discussed in court of procedural issues and then that of no desire to resolve in a timely manner of which could had been 1.5 years ago and 2.5 years ago in known problems which could had been remedied.

I find it important to note, that yes, they could make something towards resolve at any time to consider the value of moving past something in education and never agains. It is a time of not-mutualness, and I find all the mutualness on the outside if that of infringed upon by the college from the covers in which we stand of who we are on the inside as well as multiple books of creation of copyright down outside the college, post-employment and considering of life’s work.

I find as known infringement has occurred with my works and began as early as 2013, it was concentrated and began majorly while under the employment and student aspect of The Savannah College of Art and Design in 2019. From there, an understanding of aspects in which to weigh of changes to systems established and that of no advancement of current make/model without resolve of a matter that has been presented according to law, and to date the Human Resources department failed to follow college regulations by supplying I with a ADRPA form to once again resolve, which is to be of civil context.

I find this one Twinkling Little Star has presented to the court a 69 page of opinion and evidence in which to weigh my resolve vs. their dismissal of what compounds in damage and continued hurt in which could be helped to end and that of remedy from in either direction.

I humbly submit on my website, which is personally and privately owned and yet no violation to Federal or State Law as I have submitted to the court and of public record which could not be removed.

This was placed on my website on the backend in blog form that could only be seen if someone had access to passwords and confidentiality on September 19, 2023. Whatever occurred from there to the time of turn on today is all the more telling of the environment in which I have grown to which never should had been allowed.

It is in this regard that between the EEOC, BBB and court proceedings within the State of Georgia, the I let go what is in public record an aspect of my life story between the many in which to consider in factuality and a very much need to stop or change regardless of the price-tag available.

It is understood this is on a privately owned website and if there is an issue you can deal with me and talk to me.

It is understood the difficulty of such from my stance of ownership and allowance against others who banked on the allowances of others in affordance and gain.

I forfeited a great deal of my life for this and these 69 pages are copyright protected for those who thought they had a 7 day advantage in ringed aspects to consider of sharing is caring without citation.

“A Star Out of Your Alignment” Copyright protected August 19, a day after my mother’s birthday wrapped in a Churnal Coil. Philip Arthur Bonneau

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CHATHAM COUNTY

STATE OF GEORGIA

PHILIP ARTHUR BONNEAU
Petitioner/Plaintiff,

 NO. SPCV22-01289-ST     

THE SAVANNAH COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN

Respondent/Defendant

MOTION TO REOPEN AND CONSIDERATION OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT OR STAY UNTIL COMPLETION OF ARBITRATION. Rule 295-5-.01 

I weigh to the court new evidence to motion to reopen and for consideration. I present my notes of the last several days and in consideration of the facts prior and the facts ahead. 

I am aware there is a 14 deadline in which a case can be reopened.

I am aware in the reading to dismiss, it does state the role of the Defendant and the importance of them in both state, inter-state and in jurisdiction in The United States and France. I understand their role, even if they might not understand mine in what could have been internal and where protection of I was required.

I have preserved my path and stated my case between the EEOC, which did not yet get a chance to be submitted to this court and would had of evidence as well as aware of multiple points of discussion that comes with problematic areas of which I acted in good faith to bring to attention and awareness. From those timeframes I was given chance to express and then rights violated of mine as well. 

My concern of the court in going back into arbitration is they have acted one way and then could have acted in another.

I have acted accordingly and I attempt to better as I learn as much as there is an expectant aspect of any work place in which to consider and that I have addressed and Defendant has motioned to dismiss constantly the claims and value of my words, position and statements of fact. I find there is hesitation and questions to consider in what is weight of the court to consider where I find that I have selected trial by jury, and even in respect there, are issues of slander and libel that I have addressed to have occurred by The Defendant where confidentiality has been broken and respect that there was not much forthcoming in investigations towards resolution to Plaintiff’s complaint in this capacity but could be in others of their own ‘not mutual’ aspects of Plaintiff. 

From here, I submit my notes from the last several day to the count in consideration in which to weigh. They are dated as such accordingly with edits along the way since as ideas build.

9/7/2023 Notes

-SCAD Council already mentioned if Plaintiff could prove through evidence then SCAD is liable in EEOC. It has been proven on Plaintiff’s own time and dime and would had been of awareness of at least in part of the EEOC investigators of truth or that of legal council of Defendant.

Plaintiff proved with information withheld from Plaintiff during EEOC investigators during investigation yet retrieved by Freedom of Information Act of EEOC investigation which questions if all evidence was available on either side while that of federal aspects opens other doors of possible investigations unknown.

President of the College had full access through all EEOC proceed, according to documentation obtained through The Freedom of Information Act of the EEOC proceeding. As defendant chose legal council representation during EEOC and BBB complaint, would according to handbook of complete directive and authority over oversight and opinion towards resolve.

Questions of procedure still present on if Jonathan Goldstein acted in accordance to handbook, or of awareness of President of college as in evidence it has been proven they have not.

(This is would be an arbitration question on choice to press criminal charges or not, as Johnathan Goldstein already provably perjured in this case and has once again harmed Plaintiff with non-factuality in proceedings towards remedy. From there they would be bound solely of penalty and fault in public record and of liability to the Plaintiff and the court. 

Defendant’s council was provided full package prior to court of known liability and evidence submitted via fax to their Atlanta office as well as full package provided to prior legal council of represent during EEOC and BBB proceeding. At no point did Defendant choose to resolve from such nor has yet to do so. Even upon the initial aspects of judge’s opinion, I had requested an ADRPA form through the Human Resources department where the email went non-replied since 9/8/2023 and passage of time occurred in which they are liable to as that is the procedure of the ADRPA and that is of their choice not to respond to a required form of provide at any point and time. As legal council is not a part of the initial ADRPA process, I had requested one through Defendant’s council as well, and yet that would be a procedural issue in which is modification within their own handbook. This would constitute not of expedite but of continued hinderance towards resolve.

That initial package was also presented before court in good faith and in condidentiality.  Evidence was proved to 2 sets of council of the defendant and of those named within the case where given only that of serving and what is available publicly on my website.

In either instance, internal review would had already occurred prior to ADRPA as also compliance reviews would had occurred as well in known and unknown aspects surrounding claims.

If not, Defendant in their proven perjury, failed to do, in efficiency and effect, procedure while others did theirs probably in confidentiality. As the sole representative of SCAD of the court system is responsible against Federal Law and ADA violations proven that would be of criminal aspects and of civil liability of both the individual and the entity to weigh in liability and amount.

That would be and has been submitted to the court and would be separate.

In forced to arbitration of ‘mutual benefit’, it is of understanding concerns had of ‘aiding and abitting’ were present to the court by The Plaintiff. There are concerns present in what is of public court record, on if this taken out of the court System to determine prosecution or not against those of harm against plaintiff on if that would then make plaintiff ‘an accomplice’ to known crimes reported within public access record?

Acts of Hearsay, libel and slander have already occured by the Defendant also in Public Record of both State and Federal hold. Same would apply to EEOC and proceedings of the court and could be used by entities neither can control in an attempt to ‘manage’ a story in which has already been built of ‘non-mutualness’ towards hopeful ‘mutualness’.

As this civil case would be a guaranteed victory on the part of the Plaintiff, there is no way that aspects of this entire length of time could move to non-disclosure, as passage of time has occurred to no resolve at the willful intention of the Defendant. From such, I am afforded of this aspect of my life story and time spent to support the law of the land and equal rights and protection of others, while legally they would be bound as they were from time of EEOC proceeding and prior of strictly ‘no retaliation’ or ‘harm of individual’ in which criminal questions could arise on why that occurred and could be of arbitration discuss. [1]

ADPRA in it’s current wording and design still seems to violate 7th Amendment and rights of plaintiff to seek and hold council during while granting the defendant the right of council and paid council as well as a return to court at any time. As that is of inequality and not of Plaintiff benefit, I find that it is a stripping of the right to seek council in complaint.

Questions arise in ADPRA, as legal right to sue that was afforded federally and of 3rd party was granted. In EEOC investigations. If ADRPA was to be an issue, that could had been discussed in that proceeding but was not. Otherwise, it appears in evidence that Defendant has willfully compounded Plaintiff time of investment in what could had been easily resolved and is entitled to pay compensation to for the entire duration of proceedings of complaint, as protocol was not followed by Defendant nor told to Plaintiff in an attempt to escape liability in which cannot be at this point in time. That would constitute also wage withholding in which to consider based on known liabilities and a desire to move from legal standing to that of private entity build.

There are issues and concerns of Defendant on retaliation and known aspects of such, which could be pushed to criminal but that would be of arbitration aspects to consider and of witness which would be of Defendant benefit and not necessarily best for the Plaintiff.

Vendetta possibly placed by Defendant(s) have been reported and documented within EEOC proceedings, BBB complaint, and this court case which again would go to criminal aspects that

could be discussed in arbitration. It is of note every one of these proceedings occurred after wrongful termination by the Defendant constitutes time and investment in which I am afforded.

In no capacity, in their known liability can they unjustly enrich their current make/model of entity and would, under no circumstance, be able to change procedures or standards of entry points pertaining to my thought process of copyright protect and time investment outside their governance without compensation of remedy of complaint in which they have yet to do. Otherwise, they would be bound to the procedures in which they have already established and violated. Any modification of such would or could had been of this court in concern towards and that did not occur. As I am the Plaintiff of such, and of prior employment, Plaintiff would be bound to the handbook in place in February 10th, 2022 and not of any future versions as I am not an entity of employment within the Defendant’s governance.

As Defendant pays lawyers for legal council and has already done so, I paid myself in copyright protect aspects of opinions in which hold monetary value in application that is not of affordance to the Defendant. It is clearly known that ‘Once you read it…’, the capture of idea and imagination is what cannot be contained of what grows from and from such, I have protected a great deal of my life’s work in many capacity of Copyright protect. Entity would be bound to look at any changes in college or handbook and how those came about in timeline of events based on this investigation and court proceeding. But that would be questions outside the scope of arbitration in which I am not compensated by Defendant for.

Plaintiff sought competent court of the 7th amendment rights when Defendant repeated proved incompetent of their own procedures or position of ‘mutual benefit’ when of ‘employment’ and at the detriment of time to Plaintiff while ‘no longer of employment’ considers now of ‘mutual benefit’ in what has been an about-face of long-term practice proven.

According to ADRPA in current form, the wording reads ’SCAD’ has full autonomy of privilege to seek court and council during ADRPA arbitration, yet employee (current or well beyond from) does not. This would be a violation of equal protection laws and places ethics within the Defendant’s liability as proven complaint has been of the Plaintiff, in which passage of time of “not mutual” benefit has occurred.

In this capacity of fairness, rights to council have been stripped of the Plaintiff while they of affordance to such and have been of competent council through all proceedings and more than likely advised privately of such acts positive or negative.

In fairness, they in ADRPA would have to wave their rights to an attorney as well through any process of discovery or proceeding. From there, Defendant would still have to go off the records and evidence of public record of the EEOC and this court only as waiving rights to council denotes what would be considered illegal search and seizure and from there only the benefit of the Plaintiff would any further evidence be submitted and it would be of Plaintiff’s right on why that would or would not be supplied to The Defendant, especially in compensation issues in the beginning that cannot be resolved.

When it comes to privilege information of application and of ownership, if any conversation surround the BBB aspects of post-employment concern, Defendant could only submit and work off their legal council’s responses in the BBB complaint as all of my opinions and conversations are United States Copyright Protected and not of their property nor advancement without conversation of compensation which would have to occur after arbitration and resolve or of judgement of the court. There are elements of EEOC investigation which again, are Plaintiff owned Copyright Protected by The United States of America. Further advancement of such would constitute conflict of interest which is already established within the court.

As ADRPA removes an EEOC decision of ‘right to sue’, so too would SCAD in any decision moving forwaard as rights were revoked of The Plaintiff and they would be bound under the ADRPA to never seek court opinion of remedy of any employee or former employee without going through ADRPA procedures first, which that then becomes an ‘at-will’ aspect of the former employee in which to invest their time and efforts in for ‘mutual benefit’. As EEOC proceedings have already occurred, there again is no retaliation to be had by Defendant towards Plaintiff which has already experienced such with in the ‘At-will employment’ aspects of their governance. Plaintiff at no time has acted in retaliation towards Defendant and has worked from hardships in which have been placed during and after post employment of Defendant.

Any legal action against Plaintiff in any aspect would be a violation of their ADRPA in any capacity as that is procedure in which is set in stone according to their handbook and upholds what is protected by EEOC proceedings. Of that consideration it is of which they cannot modify in any capacity as it would prove unjust enrichment and benefit of the ’not-mutual’ aspects of complaint of this court.

In bound by ADRPA, and of 3rd party arbitration, it is of understanding that both civil and criminal acts are weighed to consider within arbitration of the Defendant, thus forming in consideration unknown variables and procedures of possibly requiring at least 2 hired retired judges in which to consider merit of the case and scope of cases.

As they are morally bound to career’s spent and laws applicable in Oath, they would be of their former judge opinion of more than likely forced to disclose criminal activity to that of judicial branch if found or that of governance which more than likely is how private entity weigh and prefer a process for both that of liability considerations and that of compassion. However, failure to do so would denote any settlement to be found to be considered ‘hush money’ and of legal court stated of ‘problematic’ saying how that would not be a concern of plaintiff legally owed and proven of defendant’s own liability at this point of passage of time of ’not-mutual’ benefit.

Any ADRPA would have to be of co-current judicial branch return to, as that the current ADRPA allows defendant the right to return to court and thus a requirement of at least a  STAY judgement is necessary for proper closure of an introduced complaint to law. At the very least it would have to say, agreements and terms have been settled and privately handled for that of court resolve in this public record until an agreement is made if at all as there is no guarantee of such when complaint has been made in an arena of ‘fairness’ and ‘impartialness’.

Defendant in passage of time has waived their rights of non-disclosures up to the beginning of ADRPA arbitration and that is a right of the Plaintiff as it would require a non-disclosure to be signed by Plaintiff prior and agreements such in which Plaintiff is not legally bound to.

As it stands, the affordance of the United States citizen is finding that the current ADRPA violates equal protection and moral code of the land, while taking into consideration the environment in which ADRPA proceedings occur, length of time and of compensation of affordance in which doesn’t exist in procedural aspects presented to the court.

As ‘hush money’ has been considered of ethics, there is a difference of outside agreements of what could or could not be present to the court towards ‘mutual benefit’ and not considered

‘hush money’.

The question comes back to the initial agreement of accord of law of land and both plaintiff and defendant’s rights of any legal council has been waived in fairness and mutualness of ADRPA toward expedite with Plaintiff’s rights to remind Defendant that ‘based on private entities choice of mediation, they have indefinitely forfeited any right to sue Plaintiff, seek council against

or harm Plaintiff directly or indirect by their own governance and of ADRPA in which they are not above in equal rights of status claimed to be.’

When of 2 judges, I find it best to make it 3 of tribunal of private practice. Looked at on both criminal and civil aspects and then of moderation between the two in private discuss which should rarely if ever occur in an entity.

(Photographs taken of handwritten pages for personal documentation and filing. Not shared nor provided to anyone.)

9/8/2023

SCAD would be bound to legal action in judicial court before ADRPA is in place according to their own handbook.

As SCAD chose legal council already within EEOC investigations, BBB complaint and of this court, they have violated their own procedures and privacy practices and had sought council to protect and discuss outside the scope of entities position in which ADRPA moderation would have to begin in.

As the ADRPA forces outside non-employee interaction with a private entity for their own interests, there is the eventual come around  in discussion to ‘mutual benefit’. Compensation must be agreed upon by Defendant and Plaintiff prior by SCAD before proceeding, as that would be considered a violation of anti-slavery laws and the 13th Amendment if not in place.

From there comes in which time of moved to ‘mutual’ investment is capable of beginning and then non-disclosure could be signed of passage of time of ‘mutualness’ but not or prior ‘not mutualness’. In considering the passage of time in which ’not of mutual had’, Plaintiff has legally and correctly followed procedures of worker rights of The United States of America through EEOC investigations while Plaintiff has been violated by following the required path of EEOC first (suggested before seeking council) and then presentation of peers under 7th amendment rights of complaint with no affordance of council in monetary compensation and yet available to such of this court room where I have chosen self-representation both out of necessity, caution and awareness.

As ADRPA issues should never occur by processes according to laws, procedures and handbooks followed, it is of note where all employees are required to sign (with a couple grace days of on-boarding before doing so and scope of landscapes). That on-boarding is always after compensation agreements and hiring and of paid time and investment towards ‘mutualness’.

In this case salary could be based off highest paid of private entity interest or collective medium of entire entity for short-term project based interaction as it is of private entity interest

and not of the Plaintiff while understanding expediting and speedy review of evidence.

Of time spent, the passage of time is of consideration of ’not mutual benefit’ and that which has been taken away from when could had been advancing career and personal choice of life well beyond at this point of ‘complaint’ in which Defendant has prolonged not to conclude.

It is an understanding that once employment of wrongfully terminated, there is private property of the Plaintiff which under no circumstance is provided to private entity of Defense before that of a 3rd party arbiter, as that would be an assumed annex’ed of Personal property and possible falsely assumed ownership transfer to Defendant for their enrichment of which could never be regained and could only come to possible remedy of in what would be considered unreconcilable factors to consider. It is the possible sharing of private property of Plaintiff with a private property owner of Defendant in which complaint within competent court has been placed and would be required to be answered of full procedure within this court before agreeing to what is and isn’t ‘mutual benefit’.

Based on laws; of compensation discussions required before ‘Mutual Benefit’ into betterment of Defendant’s position, it would be assumed and understood that the agreement would

be considered ’short-term’ project based and only outlined as done so to settling complaint and dispute already placed in public record of time investment of both the 1.5 year time frame argued and entertained legally while in consideration of the 2.5 years spent in awareness of complaints internally of The Defendants procedures in which April 2021 was based upon initial aspects of complaints and proveability.

During what would have to be agreed upon during compensation and terms, a questions arise. Would that be that of respecting private property and what is not the defendant’s property?

 What would be of ‘mutual benefit’ would be the interaction between either party and of arbiter decision on there where the ‘mutualness’ would be the preservation of ’non-disclosure’ of the timeframe of arbitration only and not of what came before, and could be ground rules after as Defendant has no rights to sue moving forward and definitely not of capable retaliation. There could be continued ‘mutualness’ or not from afterwards. It would denote friendly and professional countenance since while legality in place of awareness of what has occurred to some extent. However of the rights of the Plaintiff to say, ‘time is valuable.’ Of hire would be strictly to the investigations presented to public record and that is where morally it would have to be before any possible extension of ’short-term project based assignment’ which protects Plaintiff from any legal liabilities of the entity in which may and will occur. 

Agreements could be met after dispute on some things, but is bound to the evidence submitted of legally binding in EEOC positions and in superior court present in backed up Amendment rights of the 7th which again would be of private entity’s violation of affording them the privilege to move to court against and not the rights provided to ’non-employee’.

To force a non-employee of known prior employment into a non-compensatory position in which was raised concern while employed and yet ‘wrongfully termination’ occurred in retaliation towards Plaintiff. In also disregard Defendant acted towards such for longer than necessary periods of time to review and mediate which denote compensation aspects prior to ‘mutual benefit’ of concern.

I am not a slave and my rights are being stripped from me since initial complaints in April 2021.

That is protected in the 13th amendment.

Defendant chose to prolong, not practice procedure nor in Employee Success Factors of considering directorship on why that would be when internally always of ‘mutual’ benefit, but once ‘wrongful terminated’, ’not of mutual benefit’ applies.

As it would stand if this case is allowed to be closed and not stayed by the court until agreement of arbitration, The Superior Court of Chatham County, would had symbolically sold off myself and stripped me of my rights of equal protection to that of a private property owner and the benefit of their land with compensation questions prior to sales of liability at reduced rates while I look to bills of rights in countenance. 

It is also of note as Defendant is proven liable, they would also absorb all court costs.

The slavery would be of the non-compensation aspects in which equal protection was not provided of prior entity and would be bound only on the consideration of non-compensated arbitration for ‘their benefit’ when this is already a factually proven aspect of Plaintiff benefit within this mediation of the court. It is I of ignorance on either side to note, advantages of The Defendant have been discussed and documented.

It could be set up of while private arbitration proceeds, so too could a legal entity state or federal could also weigh based solely on the evidence submitted of EEOC, BBB, and of this court to their own moderation and observance without knowledge to either Plaintiff and Defendant of their own findings and opinions in which could be mediated and met against or with towards ‘mutualness’ of both private entity and of public law and land. That would be in fairness to both parties in procedures and of findings betterment of each other and that of what comes from findings surrounding what has already been submitted on the trail of grievance within those areas of interaction only.

It is of note, there are ‘at-will’ aspects of which the Defendant did not follow their own legal procedure on in withheld wages already of Plaintiff occurred and that of already submit to the court and in investigations.

That is a federal violation according to FLSA (Fair Labor Acts) and Defendant attempted in their legal writing of contract sign prior to paying out accrued time off at time of ‘wrongful termination’ to be indemnified for all eternity of any legal recourse or action at the payout of already earned wages in which that was not agreed upon, but responded to by Plaintiff in good faith with mark-ups, questions and comments. As it was set by Defendant 5 days to review seek council and return to be enforced. Although, I not of legal council but of law novice, read, wrote and sent back notes of open discussion with Defendant under the same 5 day rule of response.

There is evidence of confirmation of receipt by Director of Employee Success and there was no response such after the 5 days allowance nor ever since constituting failure to contest aspects on what would be the benefit of everyone of this land and not of that private governance to know that across the state of Georgia there is a no contest aspect of complaint in which precedent for everyone to consider before closing that time spent and time off earned is of importance and very healthy in any business of ‘mutualness’. It is understood that is a federal crime and that would be of a different court while awareness in this one of owed and withheld wages exist.

Instead their legal council failed to respond to the instant question regarding good-faith efforts on what was not agreed and not of confidentiality upon post ‘wrongful termination’, sets a precedent into evidence for all possibly all workers of federal jurisdiction on that aspect of consideration. Vacation days are be paid out based on accrued time invest is a requirement of any end of employment and cannot be capped off legally as it is still considered wage garnishment and need to restructure entity in order to allow affordance of time off accrued and earned. The Term ‘Use It or Lose It’ denotes subtle theft of what was earned when affordance of structure is not in place.

After any termination or change of professional entity, it is considered wage garnishment in what accrued over time and earned.

As I have already been a slave to this process and done so without compensation, the landowners of the Defendant are liable for back-pay in which was ‘at-will’ to prolong this to no remedy and compound. I am once again almost back to zero money nor of security of future which does come with questions in arbitration surrounding back story and known legal council had of the Defendant and of known liability. If liability proven and of Defendant council claim of liability on the Defendant if proven, would the failure to remedy after proven in federal investigations and state court settings, constitute FSLA in failure to remedy despite competent council?

If incorporated aspects of private property from time of ‘not mutualness’ into Defendant’s private entity ‘during’ without compensation would again be why confidentiality is required of legal proceedings and complaints internal and external. I find the ADRPA denotes the importance of confidentiality in any setting of work and place in regards to complaint and investigation. As I not of ‘mutualness’ at this point and time the process of legal dispute or ADRPA calls for and necessitates an intertwine of private business decisions or that of already moved away from as of February 10th, 2022. It is a forced action of bring back in towards private ownership of the Defendant in which slavery would be occurring and yet in other aspects of known what could be all the more towards resolution and boundaries.

This would seem to require a stay of the court until the determination of the ADRPA of private entity procedure is concluded to protect my rights against a private entity who does not afford me or any other employee legal council against during and yet has it themselves based on wording.

I know that once submitted to the court it is my gift to America and the state of Georgia as ‘Once you read this…’ becomes quite a bit to consider of weighed time and opinions towards fact on any wronged employee of ‘at-will’ in which SCAD waived their rights to argue as they did not respond to the 5 days they required I to seek council which I could not afford.I sought internally my own and find it held true.

As I was not an employee and of non-agreement when supplied of what I am legally owed of time-spent, the supplied form was of confidentiality breach on the part of The Defendant as I was no longer an employee of.

It was not of confidentiality. The hand-drawn aspects of my notes and times meets the 4 pillars of change and perspective and has been copyright protected and placed in book form. That too is once again submitted in this for consideration when the indefinite and legally binding

aspect of protection from retaliation is a move from instead of continuing in affordance of money that I have been stripped of and of life-investment attacks by others.

Under those conditions, any trial by jury of peer would unanimously vote in favor of the Plaintiff and in that a question of the court on if Default Judgement can be placed or if the STAY is the most important aspect to consider of protect of a private US citizen going into slavery conditions in which I know not and such an investment in what would be public record anyways from EEOC and this court. 

It is the respect of time to consider that in all evidence, and of peer trial review, the case would already be in favor of the Plaintiff and then of time considering of importance of listening on and weighing opinion in which they are free to tell their own opinions after the fact as well.

From there of governance questions had. It is understood as judicial aspects have been removed according to Defendant’s ADRPA and contract project question would need to be resolved, 

Defendant in current form of ADRPA in wording is acting in accord of country and I have 1st amendment rights within their entity while on this land in replace and rights to speak out

against or for as there is a need towards ‘mutualness’ and yet I have a mouth to feed. My own; and my little dog too.

As resolve is forced and time would be spent, I will await ADRPA form to fill out and placement of arbitor while salary would have to be negotiated. As court fees add up and in the areas already proven liable, I still am an individual with complaint against an entity of monetary aspects in which I am not afforded. I am afforded salary and compensation co-currently during this area of forced ‘private venture’ and my time is equally valuable to that of comparison of majority salary holder. 

I legally own my position statement had with the Better Business Bureau, and that is not of ‘mutualness’ at this time, but could be the same thing of betterment from something in which

could be all the more reason why retaliation and wrongful termination never should had occurred by the Defendant as that was of decisions and actions of for others placed after wrongful termination in which I had been repeatedly attacked against and of my property and privacy. 

I find in my statements more or less, it means equal rights entities are of such and if looking to mold the future from any point in or from The Savannah College of Art and Design, I find it

best to consider why they have procedures and handbooks to begin with.

We are all adults and are shaping them as well. In such, my time spent ‘out of bounds’ of the entity is of my life investment and private property as well as any investment aspect in which that could go in affordance of what isn’t royalty free of the land of indiscretion. 

(Photographs taken of handwritten pages for personal documentation and filing.

(Exhibit 2 of 9/8/2023)

9/9/2023

Questions of Concern

As process would be of private entity oversight, questions of hourly wage is denoted, as I would have to be considered fixed-term project based for procedure and specifically outlined of such

of role and procedure and of the prior investigation and legal path already set and of disagreement. Plenty to move from aspects without dangers of retaliation and harm, which does weigh back towards a consideration of STAY of judgement as that lasts up to 5 years before closed and I have already documented 2.5 years of harm by Defendant actions or awareness of. 

Being of fixed-term project based, a Defendant entity computer and electronic/phone would have to be provided for strictly project based only and password protected and left on site once work

hours completed with phone strictly for business purposes. I find time is valuable and when off the clock, perhaps forgo the phone or speak privately on why that would or would not be required in ‘mutualness’. Either would be of no other usage as I have my own personally owned computer, software and phone for use on my own time. 

The procedure as it is spelled out in vagueness invites possibility of illegal search and seizure down the line of Defendant’s liability of ADRPA procedure, which again would be unlawful on their part as ‘At-Will’ aspects of the past denotes that at any time someone can be pulled from a project to be completed by others for any reason whatsoever, but that being impossible during an ADRPA proceeding and more so of looking at short-term ‘mutualness’.

I find SCAD is the defendant and I the plaintiff of proven of their liability. This forces worker conditions established prior and then of another handbook that would have to be outside the defendant’ handbook as it has been called into question of practicality, legality and enforceability in problematic areas within private entity of mutually not mutual in equality.

As in the handbook, the ADRPA process is at the sole expense of the Defendant, The Savannah College of Art and Design. As the plaintiff, who has become subjectability to private entity where compensatory aspects are not denoted prior and assumed not to exist for Plaintiff, and yet ‘paid-for’ aspects are implied according to handbook where it could be. This would be in violation of the 4th Amendment by private entity.

As strict aspects of hourly temporary hire aspects are present, it is required to discuss the difference of at-work/at-home work life balance and separation from and of private interest outside the scope of employment temporary or long-term. I find in what of ‘mutualness’ to be a consideration that the ADRPA is attempting to create an ‘internal’ investigation and forcing an ‘external’ counter-part back within their control and entity in which according to statements and procedure, should had already occurred within.

To bring in outside council of Plaintiff into private entity denotes an aspect of something needs fixing and privacy of such could be had and maintained while addressing concerns to better have an understanding of what is coming in, which they would already know and chose not to remedy within a system built already. Nor was that advanced towards anything but the pro-longed aspect of private personal life and investment of the Plaintiff in what is considered of passage of time, right to work, right to pursue happiness and most important maintain the American Dream and make sure that is a good investment Internationally. 

As this would constitute ethical questions based on current labor laws and anti-slavery laws, as Defendant has already violated and broke contract on February 10, 2022. The ADRPA falls

under possible questions of cruel and unusual punishment under the 18th amendment of stripping my personal rights slowly and over time for their own benefit or others and I, of 7th

Amendment right, have sought the court to seek trial by my peers and not the advantage of private entity of Defendant in which they have abused Plaintiff and yet plaintiff aware of food for thought. 

As slavery has already been abolished, there is what is fair of wage, labors and equal pays. With the 13th amendment, I of no crime am now bound outside of employment and of compliant against the Defendant of known cruelty and liability with compensation questions before proceeding. 

As citizen rights under the 14th Amendment of Equal Protection, this case present in Superior Court of Chatham County cannot be dismissed into any arbitration/ADRPA solely established as citizen rights are stripped in the current draft of the ADRPA of the Defendant and placed in consideration of this court which has been read by the judge.

The ADRPA as it stands in translate is designed to bring advantage to the Defendant to the same proceeding without legal oversight protection of the complaining party. Stays would be required to protect that of equal rights which have been violated as I in official submit agreed with council in response that ‘of the court’ was correct and that there was further discussion to be had before moving to arbitration. Meaning The Superior Court in which we both stood in or sat at a computer and typed for and into. Actually, it is quite nice to have that affordance. It gives time to think before sending from the privacy of home.

It is in the affordance of the court in which I placed and I very much provided confidentiality.

Arbitration is no guarantee of agreements without questions of private property and bound to evidence and questions only of EEOC and of civil lawsuit which would demand of ethically multiple criminal case(s) outside the guaranteed victory of my civil case. That would be of Defendant’s internal process in which compensation would have to be considered before and remedy of the current complaint before that.

I find where I in that aspect know that in rights to work, there is rights to compensation and then there future compassion of I to not press charges criminally or do so that I can continue to move on with my life and work with those who help instead of hinder. 

As defending entity is bound of no retaliation, SCAD can never bring suit against I in any capacity nor would there be a need to do so as at the end of arbitration, ‘mutualness’ and ‘boundaries would had been set’ or beginning to formulate. By their own governance and the ADRPA in which they have tried to legally bound Plaintiff to, they would have to go through that process as well with any complaint against I by their own handbook for ‘mutualness’. Any issue with Plaintiff after would be forced back to slavery aspects of ADRPA by the Defendant who of governance may find grievance and yet could not pursue in court. Grandfather status confirmed at such an early age which would still bring about anti-slavery questions and laws in which I cited the 13th amendment in which I was granted ‘Freedom’ from in America back in 1865. 

I find all the best to cite Aretha Franklin and simply say ’Think Twice…’ before questioning what the word ‘Freedom’ means. 

I find in much to consider to find there is a great difference where, I of 1st hand personal difference and weight of no legal council, the impossible task of knowing my life and time matters while the defendant of separate never-met council weighed while those of entity continued their life and responsibilities while I did the same in attempt. The interactions before the EEOC, BBB and this court were all carried on the other side by secondary law professionals of contract based.

The variables to consider of life story is that this was my own and from such could never be sealed as it is of autobiographic aspects of passage of time and ’non-mutualness’ in which I’ve had to weigh daily in what was so easily could be resolved by defendant internally at any time.

The case may become confidential, but life story and investment of such is important in community standards and building.  I find if it may so please the court to say, I could never say never of this court as that is of their affordance and expertise to state.

There does come a point the disregard would have to come to an end and this submit basically of diary/journal aspects in which could never be taken away anyways. And yet perhaps all the same of reason why private property was attacked over and over  of the Plaintiff.

(Photographs taken of handwritten pages for personal documentation and filing. Not shared.)

9/9/2023

It is a weight of morality and of considering environment in which I have been placed and about to be knowing much has happened and life has occurred and compartmentalized. 

I find as I have factually proven in courts of law and of federal and state validation that the merits of my claim have been proven to be true and of Defendant liability owed in good faith acts of unknown or unprepared aspects of environment in which I stated truth and towards resolve and build.

I ask the court, as I humbly calculated what my life invested was at the time of employee/student and then the fall back to teaching on the medium salary as afforded at SCAD as professor to come to the sum in which I requested of my life’s investment towards legal retirement and what was taken from I in that capacity of removed variables of being a teacher and life’s investment towards eventual relax and look back at life. I find that it is of the court’s authority to offer partial judgments and stay rest to trial which would be of fairness towards mutualness as well as await response from Defendant whom is legally bound to their ADRPA and procedure. I have in law of land and procedure provided proved at least that in what is of collective American History and towards bettering and building from. 

It would afford me that I have proven to private entity over and over validity and factuality of the claims I have stated and of evidential and of de-escalation while noting environmental impact in which survive or thrive, sink or swim or Lego where you can towards something.

It would also provide a level of safe-guard while walking into slavery, where it is of their interest to find ‘Mutualness’ towards understanding and not of my accord outside my beliefs or will. 

My heart is in the investment of my life and work and I understand there would be many questions of private conversation to which legally in this proceeding they are held legally to the ADRPA in which is appears unconstitutional and built upon on a land which governs such and of more affordance of every entity in which resides or visits it. 

I have marked out areas of this in confidentiality. It would be of judge privy only if asked what that may be. And that is my affordance as witness, plaintiff and consoul to myself. 

I can at least walk into this knowing for 2.5 years, ‘due to confidentiality aspects, we cannot disclose’ aspects of this case to you nor the public in investigation and in invest.

I could by legal standing be granted partial judgement of basement value in bargain price in which to consider while knowing exponentially of what I am owed or in consideration of such the added on legal cost of council which SCAD could supply a figure to what that would be for 1.5 years of battle on this front towards ‘mutualness’ in which I’ve held the best I could in professional discussion with those of acting council and practice.

I humbly ask the Superior Court of Chatham County to grant me that in partial request and judgement. 

It is of my collective work and life investment that was attacked in areas already established in law and it is of a private entities issue that they are legally bound to an ADRPA in which constitutes slavery on a modern aspect without going into the issues of ‘mutualness’ that could come from ‘for their benefit’ and I wish not ‘at the expense of my own unless elected of interest’.

Land supersedes private entity and those laws are already established. In land discussions, I am aware the private talks in which could occur, but this was a case of ‘wrongful termination’ and from there detriment and end of my college education as a student of Masters degree seek at The Savannah College of Art and Design.

I am well aware that of Defendant’s hired position of retired judge to moderate that is of consideration as my retirement plans have been stripped of myself as well and of consideration of private conversation within arbitration of those invested in this land and of morality. Money cannot buy that thought process of life served in passions and then deferred to afterwards. 

I understand based on the expedite of response of the court from my last submit, that there is awareness present. 

This isn’t just a state issue and I’ve known that and displayed that in what I’ve submitted. This issue of state and civil are apparent and there is the safe guard of return to on Plaintiff protection that is of consideration while once again of good faith and yet 2.5 years of documented pattern to not be so trusting of individuals with in the entity either based on evidence as that is always of individual interaction and get to know in dynamic variables different from person to person and never the same.

I rely on the morality of the land and to once again please say, that could be of affordance while private rights and citizen rights need to be upheld while considering external investment of the land. At the very least, I am and could be afforded by the grace of the state to submit my EEOC testimony in it’s entirety along with that of the Defendant for State oversight of what is Federal. It is legally binding on both sides anyways in redundancy. 

My gift of this to the court was my time and opinion of matter of fact and my testimony of truth. It was returned with time and professional opinion had on either side. 

That in the understanding of the labors I’ve been through there are issues of private matter in which of ‘mutualness’ is more so ‘prevent further liability from’ and that discontinued on February 10, 2022 when I was wrongfully terminated by a private entity who has to stand against that of the land in their own precedent. To get there or resolve calls question on how that may be.

It was an honor to present and I find in any dismiss, any court fees assumed by the defendant. 

I understand that copyright protected works of my own prior are of mine and completely not allowed of public discussion or disclosure in any legal matter in which SCAD is bound to by the ADRPA standards in which they have rested upon and I find unjust aspects in such in which I addressed personally with the president of the college. The same would be of consideration of understanding private property conversation will and would occur and from there respect of such is understood on both parts, or should be.

At no point in any conversation of this court or in ADRPA private proceedings are my rights of copyright ownership of public domain or interest without my expressed permission of not royalty free of outside party and of known value. It denotes conversation with the property owner prior to any action and in that I have proven that written word and time is of value and investment. That is an arbitration conversation of private concern and an awareness of what surrounds in would or could of court and systems.

At least in this presented could be of future employee protect. Current council for the defendant is not the ones had during EEOC and BBB proceedings and denotes Defendant may have acted in capacities of singular and individual criminal prosecution with no awareness of what transpired prior, was shared, nor what is bound by the sworn provisional oath of practice before becoming legal council in any capacity or entity.

As noted by citing prior council as defendant, both prior council and current defending council are bound by their professional interest and investment of sustainability of life where they are required to uphold the constitution in which I have proven to be violated by a private entity of Defend.  Internally, the defendant has known of their liabilities and allowed this to occur for 2.5 years while entities within had broke confidentiality and protocol.

As I properly worked through the process in according to the private entities standards prior, those concerns were pushed to the defendant’s compliance department which too is bound by federal laws with known private entity liability.

I have spent 2.5 years speaking truthful and of merit of claims that have violated my rights as a United States Citizen, Worker Rights, Student rights and of ADA claim that became exasperated based on the negligence of the Defendant’s agents in official capacity and most importantly at the partialness of the sole affidavit of the representative you in first represent to this court, they have bared false claim and testimony to prove my claims.

As my 1.5 years of travel towards justice, resolve and truth would not had been privy to that representative, my story mattered within the context of what could had been prevented internally and was not based on private interests where allegations hold true in which would never be rectified completely and rightfully within current ADRPA model and form, which violates my constitutional rights which would only prove further my case of abuse of Defendant’s and SCAD resources while oversight noted and of protocol voided.

As the legally binding signing of the handbook by all employees denotes requirement of the ADRPA to maintain complaint internally and of privately, it strips Plaintiff’s rights to seek council and of their 7th amendment rights to trial and complaint overseen by peer. Yet, it affords Defendant the rights to seek council and the court, before or after, as proven in my individual journey of due process of EEOC investigation in which a law novice interacted with a law professional.

As a soon to be slave of forced interaction with no compensation discussion designed or the wording of the current ADRPA process, my public record of following law and procedures of the land have been noted and documented in public record which is an aspect of my life story post employment with the Defendant of handling what internally I attempted to resolve which was not done the first time. In that, there can never be a non-disclosure of what was the time of ’non-mutual’ agreement and of no compensation from the Defendant while noting there is a clear difference of life and affordance on and off the clock and of private property and interests. 

I find in further questions of ADRPA, the question of balance and of privilege as I was formerly an employee of full-time status and full time student in undergrad studies at the Savannah College of Art and Design. Under current aspects of what is a changed landscape from 20 years ago, I cannot but wonder how long have I been bound to Non-Profit of careers of compensation.

Whatever could come towards ‘mutualness’, would have to come from the understanding that confidentiality was broken and known from April-July 2021 of affordance to those of known liability while withheld evidence and intentionally harm was done to I by not adhering to Federal protocol and ADA requests during employment to remove, transfer or remedy complaints and issues that are valid of danger to Plaintiff and of Campus. It would be of arbitration where those aspects could be discussed but yet outside the scope of EEOC investigation. Outside the scope of BBB investigation as that is private property conversations. And it wouldn’t be of this court either I find as the resolution of the complaint needs remedy first.

It is understood that, in chose of action, lawyers are legally bound to uphold the constitution and prevent cruel and unusual punishment, regardless the means in which it occurs in violation of or employment of. As known in current law on seeking council, the privy of disclose of information is not protected as client/lawyer privilege.

Council can be sought. Sensitive information ascertained and then legal councils right to refuse or disclose to law enforcement that which needs protecting of the constitution in rare cases.

Although, there should be confidentiality privilege in initial standing, it is not and then becomes issues of integrity and morality in which a practice is built.

I find of law novice, that my rights to council have been forced to be my own.

I have stated to the court and proven that I had been retaliated against multiple times over the course of 2.5 years with some background leading back to the last 5 which was patterned behavior of others reported in past EEOCs that entered into an institution of secondary education and in attacks done of I on American Soil as noted around April 2021.

That would be an arbitration discussion internally that could had happened back in 2021, 2022, and now forced to be done in 2023 as a slave of no-compensation and of 'non-mutualness’ looming over what has not been set as procedure towards a private entity advantage while I of many entity trying to protect. 

I find I am taking the time to read on the decisions on which prior judges have accorded over and judged upon in merit. 

They were cited as such and of legal expertise of life calling and mention in which those of scholar and professional base upon in their own fields. They are done so for a reason and that too a conversation of this court to discuss or of private arbitration if one could come to a point of ‘mutualness’ of what has occurred. 

I am ignorant of the law, and find the affordance of the court to be of learned time and value. I’m long-winded as others are trained and of professional to get to the point quickly. From that I learn and am thankful for the time invested. I find outside the scope of ‘wrongful termination’ comes motive questions and scope of damage which is not of one entity or land but many in pre-established conditions and contemplations of liability within.

By presented evidence of ‘royalty-free aspects of investment’, that would be a separate court case based on evidence and awareness of damages done or could be done by single entity of private ownership and objective. ‘Once you read it…’

I find in reference to  254 Ga. 687, that in this case, a stay during judgement is of equal protection necessity as the prior procedural aspects of private entity were not followed and places Plaintiff in a disadvantage and unequal position against in affordance. Complaints were had internally, passage of time through multiple processes of legal procedure and public record were had that the introduction of the first inclination of arbitration by the Defendant, denotes procedures and paths that had already been acted upon outside the ADRPA and with Defending legal council denotes legal interest in which would had, under current ADRPA procedure of the Defendant, should had and would had been solely under the discretion of Human Resources to ascertain and decide. However, the original point of entry of knowledge of legal council and my employee/student record was done so during a federal compliance investigation and of different interaction.

By choosing to have legal council awareness as early provable to the Plaintiff as July 2021, Defendant is known, has known and has been proven of their liability to a certain degree as competent council was obtained in proceedings outside of their entity and procedure in which goes against their own handbook and procedures.

Those procedures of citizen rights and paths were entertained and of public record which could never be under the control of defending party complete through arbitration procedures designed to be discussed for entity and employee and entity success towards ‘mutualness’ early on in complaint process outside the court system. 

In that aspect, the requirement of limiting liability already proven in courts of laws are set in efforts to bargain price the price tag proveable and limit scope of purview and discovery, which is called for by ADRPA protocol.

As discovery is also called for in any court proceeding, it is noted that the move to arbitration without protection denotes continued pattern of unresolve where partial judgements can be placed moving forward while staying aspects of the case once ‘mutualness’ is agreed upon, which would have to be a compensation aspect of time invested before even proceeding as it would be of Defendant’s best interest and not of the Plaintiff in 1.5 years invested in what could had been ‘mutualness’ and yet remained ’non-mutual’. 

As Defendant ‘wrongfully terminated’ Plaintiff on February 10, 2022 and Plaintiff cited complaint and followed procedures before and after in good faith as early as April 2021 and as late as the submittance of this to the court, the arbitration aspect in this regard comes with an interview process and ‘hiring package’ that simply does not exist in current unconstitutional aspects of the ADRPA.

It could be considered the absorbing of a living person into a land of no-compensation and solely for the benefit of the Defending party with unknown variables to the Plaintiff that could be discussed and laid out in procedure and handbook that simply does not exist in current form and structure. 

Passage of time has occurred and it has been extensive. 

Those are questions and aspects of arbitration eventually, but of this court to consider of merit of factuality in which civil rights and citizen rights are needed to be of equal protection which in current form are not in defendant’s entity but is of this court system.

I find if Defendant can answer or clarify within the court system, that which doesn’t exist in current form, which is of concern of Plaintiff, then they too have learned of the value of time, words and then not of their property to translate in ’non-mutualness’ towards eventual ‘mutualness’ in which the court provides protection over in equality. 

The slavery aspect would be of working with the Defending party of prior-employer, who failed during employment to advance Plaintiff, remove plaintiff upon request of work conditions and allegations, hire/transfer despite qualified for other positions and interviewed, and continued to fail to advance I towards closure with known and factual issues of confidentiality breaches in current investigations known or not violating my employee and student rights at the time.

It is of individual’s within that occurred, it is understood the scope of what 2nd hand accounts do to others towards the spread of liability and it was of 1st hand account interviewed back in April 2021 and I presented my complaint legally from 1st hand account in it’s entirety post employment and solely. 

'As the ADRPA does not cover claims that do not involve a legal right', obligation or entitlement, considering the evidence the ADRPA does not apply to Plaintiff and applies to every entity of employment at The Savannah College of Art and Design of known aspects of Plaintiff’s claim and case as equal opportunity employment exists and is cited of such in Defendant’s handbook. The wording denotes and becomes biased in citation of assuming SCAD has a complaint of an employee instead of an employee having a complaint on SCAD, which is in conflict of ‘At-Will’ laws in the state of Georgia and denotes the cloaking and masking of retaliation within the confines of private arbitration.

That retaliation when Plaintiff did raise initial questions in April 2021 confirms that path to be true and factually for a 10-month period while employed with numerous points of note and documented procedure towards Defendant’s use of libel and slander towards ‘wrongful termination’. As the wording in the ‘Ordering Compelling arbitration and Dismissing Complaint’ the ADRPA is worded and designed as if employee is the issue of SCAD and not the other way around. As proven from the affidavit submitted to this court, it is proven that The Director of Employee Success very much will be bound to ADRPA aspects for themselves with SCAD and their actions are in part of complaint here while citing the collective defendant of The Savannah College of Art and Design as liable.

As the ADRPA is a condition to hire or continued employment, it does not denote the purpose of such for those post-employment and in such is of no condition to uphold post-employment. 

Although it does invite an opportunity of ‘return to hire’ in that compensation of during process is to be considered towards SCAD benefit, Plaintiff finds their value was well above the $14.95/per hour of affordance while working full-time and a student working towards a Master’s Degree that was ’suspended’ concurrently with ‘wrongfully terminated’.

Plaintiff is not returning to the capacity in which they were in based on why they were there to begin with and where they could had been and what needed to be resolved. It is Plaintiff’s passage of time that is of value and story well kept in copyright protects because life outside of work does exist. It is not just of the imagination.

As Plaintiff is able to contract, I find that renegotiation towards ‘mutualness’ to be of ’settling liabilities’ of ’non-mutualness’ presented to the court before consideration of contract project based for arbration and compensation aspects of time and value with clearly defined job description.

Plaintiff, in an attempt to prevent slavery from being forced upon them by an entity who has acted in the manner in which needs resolve of liability presented to the court, finds that without remedy of what is proven liable and of affordance would be doing the same anyways as the damages are already known and would remove once again the value and freedom in which the Plaintiff is afforded based on the evidence.

To move to an ADRPA in which Plaintiff is bound to would be a continued pattern of withheld emancipation in which the Plaintiff is entitled to not knowing the full effect, but at least the baseline of rational fairness presented to the court while ‘mutualness’ of the rest of the liabilities could be worked out while moving on to other areas of interest instead of continued complaint in which could be resolved.

From such, Defendant knew of personal liability as of April 2021 and chose not to remedy and was made aware of further liability with every compliance complaint and interview in which was impeded on in privacy.

Defendant knew of their liability in compliant complaint of harming a reporting party with ‘wrongful termination’. Defendant knew factually and of evidence of their liability at the end of EEOC proceedings and investigation, knew of their liability at the end of Better Business Bureau investigation, further knew of Plaintiff’s findings of Defendant’s known provable liability in December of legal filing, received officially by Plaintiff of individual and collective liability as of second, third, and fourth service and awareness and the request to now move to ADRPA constitutes that for 2.5 years. Defendant have acted in capacity of obstruction of justice with retaliation and possible unjust enrichment.

It is of official documentation that prior SCAD council and Director of Employee Success are the only two official of SCAD who acted in official capacity of directness of position in this case and I am unaware of internal investigations or ethics surrounding either case of directive. 

In every hurdle had, the benchmarks of my life were place in pieces outside and of my own for the benefit of myself and others, if only to find a way back to where I was to where I was to go.

Thank you for your time in this matter in moving towards ‘mutualness’ or end of a long road of unnecessary roughness.

I see fairness in the original decision and ask that it be reconsidered within the context of motion. I find the new evidence to be of valid discussion of respect and of land in which is governed and of their accord. Where I am not sure if motions towards stay do go to all parties or not. I would assume so as I question and defer of partial judgements and stays.

9/10-9/11

I find as I wish not to be a slave as that could be a default judgement of arbitration beyond the private entity in which has known for 2.5 years of their liability and exasperated and continued behavior for that of shareholders which are not of their governance nor protect; but of their self-interest in which my story is laid and of factuality.

In every aspect of account and mention, Defendant and the court had been presented with fact and known liabilities had been mentioned and overheard as well as proven in evidence and of landscape in which occurred after to a certain extent. It is of my ’not mutual’ benefit for 2.5 years my life and rights apparently the forfeit, where despite all the evidence provided during and after proving Defendant’s liability, they have acted in manners of compounded exasperation of prolonged ‘mutualness’ and that of personal harm and continual damage to Plaintiff on preferential aspects of personal connection and of bias in which was showcased in evidence.

As there is disagreement and ’not mutualness’ present, I have reached, according to law and of the 7th amendment, towards closure of ’not mutualness’ and of adjunction towards remedy towards ‘mutualness'.

It is of such that I understand the importance of this case of personal Plaintiff and so does the private entity in which they entertain guests of the land from other entities of country origin under the pretense of teaching towards success within the workforce of their choice career path and allowed to do so within a safe campus setting. I find that is is fair to look at and consider at least median salary of a lawyer to combine in consideration of award package as I have fought this on my own without the benefit of a law firm for 1.5 years since ‘wrongful termination’ based on the limitations and environment of the land that occurred. It is understood in any award, law firms get a majority of the award and in this case all of the award would go to the law novice Plaintiff.

That would be within contention of being allowed as part of possible award and understanding of 2.5 years known liability of the Defendant and of lawyer sought and bought. It is understanding where there is an affordance difference and where allowance of such comes into consideration in words. 

I don’t know the price tag of what I should be awarded based on the events that occurred up to end of employment on February 10, 2022, nor a comprehension of discussion what occurred post employment in seemingly related instances after which would surround this case and bring about others. That was towards the initial admittance of such to the court and understanding of the Defendant as well. 

I find that there is procedural questions present and that of institution which can and should be asked. I stated post-employment and to admittance of the United Nations that The Defendant is stealing and double dipping from the investors of their institution in predatory practice and that being of the student investors of any country and aware of those of United States Federal Guaranteed Student Loans. 

I have stated in the one legally allowed case aspect as it was information obtain before signing the employee handbook and I have not disclosed any information after-the-fact of such in awareness.

While I, of Café full-time employment and student part-time student investor, it is of not that I was already an alumni of The Savannah College of Art and Design as of 2005 with the degree afforded of Bachelor’s of Fine Arts in Graphic Design where I earned a degree from The Savannah College of Art and Design. That was done so with federally secured loans agreed upon with The United States of America to do so. Those have yet to be repaid in full and I have been in Chapter 13 Restructure Bankruptcy since 2020, which would constitute protection from creditors during that time, including The United States of America in unforgiveable aspects of student loans while noting the landscape in which has been presented as willful attacks towards I during and post employment. 

As such as an alumni of the college, I have earned the right to mention The Savannah College of Art and Design in any capacity of association as it exists on my resume as career from. 

As I have on my solo journey mentioned and occurred prior to entry of degree-seeking investment twice over it has been noted that my life experience is of my own and my story and personal investments have been protected over and over legally by The United States of America in Copyright as right to work and right to build towards sustainability in adulthood which would be none of the business to the defendant on what that may be as that is private property and ’not of mutualness’ and a built towards aspect for myself based on skillsets, personal investment and career as well as contemplation of overviews of life. That existed pre-employment and post employment as established aspects of Plaintiff and pre-school and post-school. 

I have in post employment, written to the United Nations, the Attorney General and president of this country what would be considered whistleblower acts of considered protection. 

I noted while in sought of better position of such, I was still of degree-seeking investment at the same time during employment. I had noted in changed landscape of 20 years to have those building towards the work force and not of knowledge and of needed protection are invited within the Defendant’s programs into a prospect of real-world application and projects with real world partners without compensation of real world entities. At the same time as that was occurring of invitation to participate in real-world projects without proper certification or awareness, they too are paying the college in that capacity as a ‘class’ as the same time as not receiving compensation benefits from the real-world project based application. Those would be of either out of pocket expenses or of guaranteed loans in which eventual repayment would be required. 

I did seek and interviewed for the dual position of SCADpro Director and SCAD artsales Director position in which I did express concern and interest through email directly to the president of the college during employment. I did not receive the position and within 3 days of statement of rejection, but of only 1 day known as I had not read the rejection email on Feb. 7, 2022 but on Feb. 9, 2022, I was wrongfully termination on February 10, 2022. 

It is of my legal right to disclose information pre-agreement and post-agreement. What I have stated publicly is of legal right as it is of information obtained prior to signing the employee handbook by 2 days of on-boarding. I while in working agreement did not violate confidentiality while noted within this complaint of Defendant (collectively) doing so. It is not considered a clerical error when the date occurs in more than one location and that has been cited. 

That is outside the scope of my complaint, but of the awareness of what has been presented post-employment and of the handbook submitted to this court that has laid out the college’s position on many areas of conversation. Of such it was noted of their position of royalty-free rights of usage of any student work and a jump on ownership claims with the use of any SCAD equipment, software or benefit provide of the college which could be utilized by entities within at the disadvantage of those who actually own the college which would be collectively ’the student investors’.  

It is of concern and conversation on personal time, investment and usage in which that may had been breached during and post. Those would not be considered arbitration questions of this case but of background before going towards ‘mutualness’ if so much as possible. 

As that is an international investment in which the current make and model cannot evolve from without my ‘mutualness’ of discussion, it had been stipulated already and would be looked at accordingly on if there was any evolution of the Defendant's handbook or college make and model during this complaint. That would be a consideration of my ’non-mutualness’ interactions of complaint with the entity of defendant in which I am not employed with and considered unjust enrichment of the defendant at the expense of the plaintiff, which is spelled out in the handbook verbatim as possible harm towards any student investor of degree seeking nature for the private benefit of entity without knowledge or education of prior to enrollment and environment. 

As that exists in complaint where one could or could not partner between Defendant and Plaintiff of, it would have to be of resolve. And if in capacity of understanding scope in that capacity could mean forbidden from working with until resolve and what has occurred in shut down of industries until resolve which has occurred in the Entertainment areas and which too I have in copyright protect what it means when someone says “No ’Starving Artist’s” on a campus far bigger than the Defendants. That has been shared with The Library of Congress and of United States of America Copyright. That book is not of privilege to the Defendant nor could be ordered of such at any time. That was a personal commitment post employment and education allowance to finish a thesis and that of a solely owned op-ed editorial on the way to a disseration of self guided education. 

As private entity has disregarded my rights during employment and education for their benefit already, this too is why I have presented this through the court system, while finding I am not bound or compelled to the ADRPA, but I am of law state and federal in which I proceeded in law novice capacity of real world application. 

I find as the ADRPA is designed to focus solely on ‘up to the date of wrongful termination’, it is determined that any of the above is not for discussion as that would be a different project based contract assignment in which ‘mutualness’ would have to resolve ’non-mutualness’ before so much as proceeding towards ‘mutualness’ or continued ’separate but equal’ with an understanding ’shared universes’ exist and then very much ’not shared’ do as well. That is the difference between understanding reality and then that of private entity and business and what the ADRPA infers of towards or continued employment and not of those wishing not to continue towards such afterwards. That would constitute negotiation of ‘mutualness’ and business practices best for everyone and I find as that experience was not of ‘mutualness’ prior, the court system is. It would be a determination of both the judge on if Stay or Default Judgement could be had in this capacity as private entity Defendant of apparent ’not-mutualness’ while in ‘mutualness agreements’ failed to ‘Mutualize’ this while in ‘Mutualness’. It is in response of requirement to resolve ’non-mutualness’ in part before proceeding towards scope of ’non mutualness’ and liability of defendant(s) within the Defendant’s entity. 

I find there would need to be an acceptance of liability to a certain degree of this court while finding the STAY aspect could be a return to ‘mutual’ awareness of ‘best practice’. 

Ethically considering of 3rd party judicial review, a report at the end would more than likely be required for review and statement. I am not going into slavery without the value of my time protected and my rights never waived under accordance of the constitution and amendments. Entity has known their liability, has been present facts of reality and anything out of my mouth during a private ADRPA investigation would constitute unjust enrichment of Defendant in which I have filed complaint against while still in poverty conditions to consider. That would be considered of partnership and of motive to continue based on naive aspect of position in consideration of the Plaintiff whom seems very set on upholding The American Dream for one reason or another. 

I ask the court in this capacity the same I requested in initial disregard from the Defendant.

Default Judgement based on non-affordance and the privilege of peers to determine the worth of what was lost and that of at least 100+ lands of investment in sovereignty in which I tried to protect one way or another and then tried to fundamentally bring about in position I was capable of internally and yet very much respect that I at least got to interview for the position in consideration.

I am not a slave of The United States of America and I definitely am not of a private entity in which to enslave who cannot change one bit of their process of my fight or struggle for their benefit co-currently without addressing that which has already occurred. 

That would be of advancement of innovation of thinking in which in brand standards. I have stated to The United Nations an issue and that more than likely has been looked at and in discovery of any sovereignty already occurred of secured loan and of factuality.

The Defendant made their choice and failed their own procedures, which is when that goes to other places outside of entity as ADRPA is designed in current form to go through Human Resources and that has been stated. I find Human Resources of the United States to be why that is established in EEOC aspects of employment which is legally and federally backed. As the one in Georgia is located specifically at "Uncle ’Sam Nunn’ of your business", it is of 3rd party oversight and a process of arbitration required federally in which has already been processed and reviewed to have merit in ‘right to sue’.

As defendant went through that process with legal council, it was also of the complete oversight and awareness of The President of The Savannah College of Art and Design in availability of all facts and of weight. As Federally of 3rd party review granted ‘right to sue’, defendant would had known of liability at that point entirely and from there obstruction of justice towards ‘mutualness’ occurred in ’non-mutual complaint’ of entity in which the president of the college waived the rights of Human Resources ADRPA purview as they were found to be of liability and of confidentiality breach. To return back to an ADRPA process after an arbitration of facts and discovery has already occurred would be redundant in process and considered prolonging of payment of damages owed to Plaintiff. How that could look internally is of The Defendant’s business and not The Plaintiff during times of ’not mutualness’. 

This is Plaintiff’s right to say you have wronged Plaintiff and entities within of named course had violated both the handbook in which they govern as well as state and federal rights. This is of this land and of this Plaintiff's affordance and right by 7th Amendment to tell you I am not bound to your ADRPA in any aspect and your bosses known it. They failed me in good faith as an employer, they would more than likely do so as I of slave in this system in return to a process in which I do not have to go through as I am not seeking employment by the Defendant at this time. 

It has been 2.5 years of liability. It would be a requirement of this 3rd party arbitration and mediation in which defendant would be required to make a statement as Plaintiff’s rights have been violated and more than likely would continued at a disadvantage that need not continue. As internal reviews would had already occurred and of assessment of liability, that report and investigation can be submitted to the court or required, as from the date of EEOC investigation end, the penalty compounds exponentially. That was the time of ’towards mutualness’. Once December 27, 2022 hit, it really was of ’not mutualness’. 

I am afforded at this point swift justice and of consideration of their own procedure as it as has already been proven outside their jurisdiction with my right to proceed with criminal against anyone of price tag within the Defendant in that capacity who has a problem with morality and rule of law of other entities and investment of private property. 

That is a conversation that could be in a series of documented 'not taken seriously' and ‘dismiss’ statements of the Defendant. That has happened throughout in not taking something for serious and in brevity the investor rights were won in new make and models not of the the defendant's affordance. I find there is that of thought of others, 'we have the money, we can do this.’ in seemingly approach where from there even when not of money, ‘I have an idea and I can build from this’ occurred and it happened on this land and soil who also had ideas and then shared other ideas and then built upon those ideas and it came from many places and many lands and changes in other lands and continues to do so constantly every-day.  

The question is not one change to protocol or procedure based on complaint in which I have raised through legally had to procedure of equal protection of the law. If there was any change or advance from such towards innovation it denotes exactly what I have stated of absorption of time and not paid for nor compensated while knowing there is structure required to reformat to protect who keeps an institution’s lights on and paid-for salaries, including that of Defendant’s council. As such, it would be looked back as mismanagement to some degree of student investor funds, as more than likely they too would side with the Plaintiff in which is in ’non-mutual agreement’ at this time with ideas and dreams of current make and models of The Defendant. But that is outside the scope of this case, but awareness it had been discussed with Defendant’s prior legal council in Better Business Bureau efforts of again remedy, resolve and refund. 

The current structure of the college cannot change without my involvement as it would prove liability and unjust enrichment and I am trying to remedy and resolve what has been unjust prior. 

In doing so, that is a decision of the Defendant on where that goes where legally I am not bound to say a single word more during any other redundant ADRPA procedure and would be bound to the evidence of this court and that of the EEOC only where ADRPA is specific on the up to ‘wrongful termination’ aspects of complaint. Not on your money aspect of knowing where that comes from will that entity ever disregard invested interest in ever again in what they cannot change of current procedure from in any regard without resolution of very much public interest at this point.

“Start somewhere as a public school teacher…might as well be of public forum and yet all the same of eventually private talks and private entity of privilege.

I respect the houses from which the Defendant is built from and upon. All of them.”

It is of understanding, Student Investors are of the protect and educational aspect from in which to grow. There are benefits of being an alumni and from such a protection of the alma mater where the institution stands and yet entities within the halls come and go all the time and it is of questions contained already that becomes of the Better Business Bureau side of secretly fighting for the rights of any project of students as theirs in ownership and not the institutions, in case an institution ever gets attacked so that no one could ever just walk away with the intellectual property contained as it is of the investors property and in officialness of the BBB there was conceding of The Defendant as not a service industry as degree seeking nature denotes product towards and that is not of judicial contain. That would not be a discussion of private arbitration in ‘non-mutualness’ towards ‘mutualness’.

Respect is earned or forgotten along the way in non-forgiveable aspects of loans and of soil or land. As proven beyond a doubt liability of fact presented to the EEOC, I can say that I have been continued attacked by the Defendant in which my Federally Backed Student Loans have been affected and from such again cited Chapter 13 Restructure protection. 

I am aware of land owners of Savannah and that of Lacoste where collectively that is of the institution. There is a difference of justification and the foreseen aspect of advance of family and not of collective in questions of ‘mutualness'. 

That is their choice to uphold and find all the same of internal saying, resources are resources and property is property. 

By default consideration, that could be looked at as all of SCAD property is of international investment as they have failed international interest of which work-place conditions and models would need repairing while looking at mileage. 

From there international takes over in conversation of federally backed American loans towards security and sustainability of what would be an advancement of a family entity while knowing it was banked upon by the families that invested upon. 

From such, the current heads are building towards an international sovereignty in which wrongs have occurred and which they could stand trial for in any land. Steal from youth and investment of unforgiveable and find that is exactly why I of ’Non-mutual’ find that I am not your friend and you needed to fix things 2.5 years ago.

It could be of ‘mutualness’ but that is discussion down the line after ’non-mutualness’ in this landscape. 

I am a friend to the idea and I know front-facing upon front facing to say, “Not on your life do you poach in this capacity nor do you ever think you financial benefit is anything but a potential front of grab all or any at bargain prices.” It is a changed landscape approaching and 20 years full circle was an eye opener in which of second invest and that of protect.’ The dream changes over time and most certainly my employee/student right were violated. 

‘You are only as good as your last catering service.’ and I have been forced to comprehend what others could do within what has been done. Under no circumstance would I ever be a part of the current make or model of SCAD in any capacity nor would I dare to even play in that capacity. 

It denotes 100%, not your right of ownership and 100% questions on partnership which is not of my accord but very much against in self-serving aspects comparable to the ruling of this court and of instant ruling to denote a major difference of morality standing on long-term investment. 

That was an individual entry choice. At any time there could had reached out. 

In the state of Georgia and in regard to ‘At-Will’ aspects in which they cannot contest which requires aspects to be looked at again or placed back into the court system properly and with far better support systems in place.

 I find they have acted in self-centered capacity for their benefit in what is only my singular perspective and never of the whole story as it does open up unknown variables of consideration positive and negative or in whom things wished to gloss over.

As I have not been made remedy yet, based on the conditions of which were placed of prior behavior, I am still very much alive and of value in life. I can and have very much would like to move on from the ‘complaints’ of capable remedy this entire time by The Defendant towards areas of interest and of time choice and not time forced.

The swiftness of verdict would be looked at and I find in wording all the respect of judge in council free to interpretate as they wish. 

There are stories known of land. I find no fault in original proceeding outside of I agreed of public court proceeding and that being of what defendant liability already played with in evidence. I understand how anything on the restructure aspect would be outside of discussion of remedy towards the actions while of ‘mutual benefit’ when I was employed and up to the wrongful termination while others can look at the factual evidence of what would be separate of occurring positive or negatively towards today.

In that regard, I don’t play with of any countries affordance of purview when knowing in some capacity saying enough. Not of on this land and of understanding the representation that any entity which accounts for international investment and preparation towards the workforce, could find what has become of the technological world of instant gratification and then the impatience of when something gets grabbed onto and taken without even knowing the laws or what that is a changed landscapes of after ‘not mutualness’ as surely I can find ‘mutualness’ elsewhere in resolve as much as ‘mutualness’ could be contained and selected on preference of interests. 

Of such, defendant has entities whom completely disregarded human life at the cost of influence and affordance in which they were grown accustomed to and yet are aware of far more than I would be in consideration. It is the perspective of the plaintiff in which that needed remedy and to stop as I cited enough and pointed in enough directions of infrastructure issues. Others very much upheld them I imagine. It is the 2.5 years that was laid out in discuss from the EEOC to here in that is a separate contained aspect of life story while any of my private property is that of my private protect and of this land required once copyright comes into play.

I whistle-blew them in a capacity that is absolutely outside of The United State of America and it is documented in The United States of America how that entity stripped me of my rights within this country in which they wish to uphold morality in when they have lost such in 2.5 years of liability known. I did so legally within the 2 days not signed on towards and had 1.5 years of reprieve on torture and known tactics on American soil where strength enough is present within the walls of international investment against what did come into The Savannah College of Art and Design that followed me.

I understand current council is of many lands and that in which I respect in what could be of compliance or making sure this never happens again in ethical aspect of practice and upheld. 

The same behavior existed and it would always come from those of control and of paycheck knowing the meaning and respect of practice. 

I find in this case, SCAD as a private entity showcased themselves and that within the purview of this court and of those who uphold the constitution of this land. 

In that regard early on I have stated my citizen rights of country have been violated and proven. 

I find continual questions of the ADRPA as it denotes those who already know they were liable to stop in which could be internationally known and that of 1.5, 2.5 years accordance of me saying, ‘not in this capacity and not of that role if ever a question’. 

It is a fear of the continued slavery in which questions of the court remain on compensation and remedy.

In that regard, as the ADRPA brings me to slavery based on American Law, I ask the court for default judgement and the affordance of damage in which the ADRPA tries to curtail at this stage and find that not a single country of investment would have a problem with this request outside of private monetary investment when morally it is of institution invest in which my heart protects those of the degree-seeking nature.

It is of morality, my case is done and my case in the state of Georgia set, where I don’t care one bit how much money a private family has. They are afforded that from international investment and international or national attack occurred. 

That private entity violated my human rights and citizen rights and I don’t care what dollar sign they have attached to such. My morality and rule of law and procedure will be held against. 

This is not just of Chatham County Land and well outside their monetary value. It was of future conversations of moving towards ‘mutualness’ that becomes required but that is an at-will choice to consider original ‘non-mutualness’.

I find as I am not bound to prior employment in which failed me while of, that the ADRPA in legal standing constitutes slavery in which always a turn to or resort back of.

From such, I am not a slave of a ‘wrongful termination’ and never of a jurisdiction of a private entity after-the-fact as no hiring aspect is for consideration and I never of that make and model to denote the liability in which I would never lay claim to nor be responsible for. 

There is not of the moment welcome back aspect to consider in ADRPA in which remedy required first. There is a ‘fix your ship and not on your life would I…’ aspect that is contained within anything past resolving the liability issue in which has been proven.

That happens in outside look and not of Defendant’s leverage in what has transpired since ‘wrongful termination’ while looking at what happened to get there.

I find all the same of a public school teacher and banking on their parents to have a dream realize is to understand in reality that occurred in partnership on multiple levels and the loan process of education very much a determination of banking on an investor’s parents or that of privately secured federal loans towards eventual repayment. Dreams and build come from everywhere when working towards something.

I find in evidence of the EEOC, how the skew and slant aspect of The Defendant and how that was approached in both EEOC proceedings, BBB proceeding and of was starting to in this proceeding to be of consideration on countered with evidence on the other side in provability against slander, liable or any game of optics in the negative front against what I of student, employee and alumni status never should had been subjected to.  Not playing the Hearsay game in this capacity as there is of personal interest of whom screwed over whom on personal opinion after the fact and where that is not personal but institutional. 

Should be private and at the same time city talks…

If Defendant so much as slanders or libels me in any capacity further, I guarantee I that is a necessity of the institution to learn collectively of word of mouth.

Not of anyone’s issue but I know flat out I’ve always protected the Wallace’s in that capacity. and know that the name is married into and before that another and then of prior another. I cannot help in factuality my family biologically and I, on my mother’s side, is also of the Wallace and clan and why I can most certainly use the Wallace name connection at any point of time in what is not an issue as many a Wallie’s present for clean-up and find they are quite silent about what their passions are in strangeness and unknown variables.

I find it best if anyone of name recognition that anyone of investment would had wanted or be so as well.

Enjoy that defiance as federally backed loans leans ‘do not exceed on property not your own’ while in training at institution towards workforce conditional standards.

That is never yours but internationally owned and of entity to protect. 

Internationally, that is investment and of ways towards forgiveness and sustainability.

I find this all the more reason to say default judgement and allow move on from as per court of law and opinion as I see a requirement of STAY and then not knowing what to do but work towards ‘mutualness’ and know ‘silence is golden’. There is evidence which is not even one bit of my time nor desire to attend to in other people’s adult choices of contention. 

After 1.5 years from wrongfully terminated, I am well aware of others wanting to own my property and of self-interest at-will in what has occurred the last 5 years. I have no desire to participate in the current make and model of The Savannah College of Art and Design and they are legally bound to not advance in any capacity in procedure from that which of questions had wished me dead for their own benefit or broke to the point of giving up my autobiographical property.

From that the ‘mutualness’ of I towards SCAD is resolve and reconcile Defendant’s liability before consideration. It has been years and questions of private partnership in which I am not a partner of nor do I agree with current make or model. 

That would be an after arbitration aspect and still of my affordance of saying, ’Thanks but no thanks’ just as much as it could be ‘We never asked you to attend and move onto other areas of interest’. It would be the same in reverse of not of employee and never will under current make and model and not without question of what has already occurred which is preserved in this life story.

I will never join forces with SCAD under their current make and model and I will not under any circumstance be bound to slavery in this country. 

They are well aware of their liability and I ask the court of full liability and judgement in which could be partial granting towards discussions of actual good faith and production.

That is my right of not of bread and forced into that area of ‘for their benefit’ knowing ‘I could had died’ and that not one care and also consideration of investment of studentship as it would had been picked up after-the-fact anyways if I did.

That was glossed over in my complaints of worker rights.

In such, not one bit of my pre-established property is of SCAD property and I don’t care one bit one battle in which they fought in that capacity during, they did no share with me and if one was fought it would still be of Plaintiff saying, ‘you do not own my property’ and that is factual. 

From the employee side and student side, 

Not for 14.95 an hour and of accord to my preservation of sustainable living and building a life.

And definitely not from complaint. There are questions of partnership, but in this regard and of legal court, they can say enough and build from there towards continual liability or finding prevention measures in which to build from.

College is an investment; it isn’t an ant farm in which to draw from privately of public build. And any usage of anything from the creation of an investor within, would need to be notified prior in all capacity towards agreement and rights of usage understood. Never ever is that royalty free as that denotes value in which could go against the debt of student loans in counter worth and claim.

All the more reason why I do think I should be extradited at times. This has continually happened on this soil of my life story and in this capacity if that of this land sought after.

There is of private interest capacity who exerted control and awareness on the highest grade of collegiate and still against I. Their value and family contribution understood as much as extended family in consideration.

In that aspect, I have deferred to Canada and of Vatican prior, even it was in tweet form and that was most certain recognized and seen nevertheless. I am sure there are many a resolution to be had, but off conflict of trust based on actions to account for and questions to be had of Defendant where still of accordance knowing what I own and what has been attacked. I’ve asked internally on American soil repeatedly to stop and have fought to remedy..

I find of challenges in this capacity to continue and please of what I did write fully of the United Nations, please place me somewhere of what I haven’t said and yet have been through already.

I cannot do this alone and I have done what I can. 

Internally I am attacked and I’ve am very sound of mind. What has occurred should never be a consideration of political term against as laws of land last far longer than term limits.

I am afforded a life and I need help. 

I don’t exactly care the paycheck of president or vice-president of a college I used to invest in. 

I speak no quarrel or conflict of the job in which I have currently nor have I spoken ill of either president. Which one is going to matter in questioning.

I am being attacked in a way that enough is enough and others got their money from one way or another. Not an American ownership of property is becoming an issue here. Pretty much seem destined to perpetual rentals as others have collected all the other ownership issues.

I protected on American soil.

The United States validated and still from there, awareness and not of ownership. I find saying ‘Enough of what that the prior generations didn’t tell you. And yet, they never tell you everything anyways. You learn about it as you go through life.’

Anywhere matters. 

I’ve been attacked on American soil and that has been continual. 

Those of structure won’t let that continue forever. 

That I know. 

Wish me luck in slave trade. Although I know the judge couldn’t if they wanted to though.

Impartialness is very important.

-Philip Arthur Bonneau

Plaintiff cites Exhibit 1 of 9/12/2023 (Linkedin Professional Stance and Front-Facting)

Posts by Paula S.

·      

Paula S. WallaceView Paula S. Wallace’s profile 

• 1st

President and Founder of Savannah College of Art and Design

5d •

Research drives everything at SCAD, especially our ongoing effort to understand the beliefs, motivations, and dreams of current and future SCAD students soon to be strolling through our happy halls.
 
Right now, Gen Z rules the SCAD universe. This TikTok- and Taylor Swift-loving generation spans from their tweens to their twenties—nearly all 17,500+ of our Bees belong to Gen Z. But this statistical reality will change in a few short years when SCAD welcomes Generation Alpha (Gen A), born after 2010. The first Alphas will be arriving at SCAD as soon as 2028.
 
So…who are they?
 
We know that fewer members of Gen Z held jobs in high school and college than previous generations, which means that while they're the most-educated generation in history, they also often enter the workforce with little experience navigating relationships with supervisors and colleagues. This need for enhanced preparation is why SCAD launched SCADamp, a professional studio where students learn to present, pitch, and network with colleagues and clients.
 
We also know that Gen Z loves a good mentor, actively seeking mentors and learning experiences to show them the ropes—a quality likely shared with members of Gen A. SCADpro solves that challenge with the finest of points, providing the current and future generations with elite work experience and mentors before graduation.
 
Gen A is also likely to extend the altruism of Gen Z, seeking careers and professions that will make the world better for all—a quality enhanced through the applied research of SCAD SERVE, addressing very real hometown challenges in food, shelter, clothing, and the environment.
 
Some differences between Gen Z and Gen A are emerging, however. The oldest members of Generation Alpha were among the youngest elementary students during the pandemic and thus are much more comfortable with remote learning and hybrid environments. I expect SCADnow (SCAD’s online asychronous undergrad and grad degree program) enrollment will continue to expand and serve this new generation, given Gen A's digital fluidity.
 
A recent study showed that while Gen Z and Gen A are often on the same gaming platforms, they experience them in different ways. Gen Z likes to game for escape and relaxation, while Gen A tends to use games to express creativity in the creation of new worlds. I expect we'll see even more future collaboration between the SCAD School of Creative Technology and the SCAD School of Design, where Gen A students will double major in game design and disciplines like immersive reality, UX design, or UX research.
 
Just as SCAD professors adapt to new classes of students every quarter, so the university as a whole continues to evolve and prepare for whole new generations of students. We’re more than ready to prepare Gen A for their own futures. I can't wait to meet them!

Here are the key differences between Gen Z and Gen Alpha that brands and agencies need to understand

digiday.com • 5 min read

I find as such to the judge to consider that it is impossible for the entity to expand and evolve Defendant’s Make/Model without resolve of what has been known fact presented to the court. It is an impossibility of unjust enrichment on the part of Defendant to enact any pattern change of entity without resolve of influence from and of compensation of this matter before the court.

Plaintiff finds of such as private entity agreed to arbitration of their structure and procedure in which to enforce as legally binding.  Defendant stated to the court rules in which they hold of value that at any point and time anyone of complaint could and should legally obtain and be given an ADRPA form upon request without prejudice. As that has not happened once done of factuality and upheld weight of complaint. With Non-response, that constitutes a violation of terms and conditions in which they govern and violates the 6th amendment in guarantee of speedy remedy in which the court provides as rule of law against private entity.

In that Plaintiff wishs the judge to consider the initial request of default judgement and of proven Defendant’s total liability while there being partial verdict possible in what the defendant would be legally bound to of damages had in consideration of willful intention. Of this court’s affordance of justice, Defendant can report back to the court for further review of liability at the cost of the defendant which could be determined 100% in jury aspect.

It was the willful intention of the private entity prior to impede on justice and of procedure which has been broken. As ADRPA of their standing cannot proceed without the process of reporting to HR, the initial complaint has merit and they cannot move from in capacity of procedure from while noting that they cannot benefit in any capacity structurally at the same time.

In that regard, the court could be granted outside oversight in which private entity would be forced into to adhere to discover scope of damage in which they already were privy to and continued in operations nevertheless while in question.

I defer to the court of equal opportunity and representation as Generation(s) Omega attempts to Protect Generation Alpha and beyond in what would be guaranteed future ‘non-mutualness’ in future proceedings until resolve of personal complaint of damage towards Plaintiff.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated:

Submitted to the court 9/14/2023

 Name: Philip Arthur Bonneau

 Title:

Self-Represented, Former Student, Former Employee, Alumni

 City, State, Zip: Savannah, GA 31404

 E-Mail: philip@philipbonneau.com
Attorney No.: Self-Represented

[1] https://www.eeoc.gov/youth/retaliation-faqs#:~:text=An%20employer%20may%20not%20retaliate,the%20EEOC%20after%20you%20resign.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/paulaswallace_as-a-mother-of-four-current-and-former-activity-7104871710805413888-W0Pl?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Image and ScreenGrab pulled from https://www.scad.edu/admission/academic-catalog for cited purposes.

A Not Locked Thread

this is a locked note.

Maybe not. 

Why would a locked note have to be connected to iCloud? 

That is the sharing and storage of privileged information that is deemed lockable and yet still on a database system outside that of the personal computer?

That seems to come off as a red flag of interest for others. 

What systematic red flag is this?

There is still automatic sharing of recorded keystrokes and private notes to that of the Google mail system on here. 

Seriously, what do I do at this point of Invasion. You obviously wanted my intellectual property, I’ve gone to the FBI before. I’ve tried to do everything by the book and apparently others are too…it just happens to be my books for some of it and definitely was not paid for. What indirect direct retaliation is this to the point that this disrupts the entire structure because this known behavior since 2018-2019 has been reported with major questions of the Apple system and others. I have updated to the latest Ventura Blvd. and I am pretty sure Tom Petty in regards is going on a playlist. 

A Question considering what has occurred directly for years. 

involuntary servitude

(8) Involuntary servitude The term “involuntary servitude” includes a condition of servitude induced by means of— (A) any scheme, plan, or pattern intended to cause a person to believe that, if the person did not enter into or continue in such condition, that person or another person would suffer serious harm or physical restraint; or (B) the abuse or threatened abuse of the legal process.

It is basically slave trade where I have continued to try to work to make a living and others have been reaping from what I sowed on my private computer. Far different from the known term, ‘indentured servant’ which still is not applicable to modern standards of venacular. 

I can attest that that would apply to my experience at Alfred Angelo as I was threaten to work far below fair market value at the threat of corporatology and pay disputes. My question here is that I am continually working towards sustainability of my life’s work and all of it is completely compromised and ultilized elsewhere while I of no financial benefit to date from such and no means to an end on postively reenforced negative behavior detrimental to my way of living and life and abusive in practice, invasive and denotes false ownership over my property and that of superiority tactics based on their wealth, means and advantage pulling me from my home and space into their own world for their benefit and not my own in current form. 

This is going somewhere to someone and does showcase the complete disregard to humanity’s desire for privacy and security of shelter. 

5 years of this directly now. 

3 times a place of employment.

I could look at this completely seperate from I for a second, I imagine it the below market value that I consider a thought process in, where there is what I was looking at in question at SCAD. Although, it is not a forced servitude aspect to that of the guise of SCADpro, there is an exploitative aspect of such that is of no provided market value while a gain of such on the otherside where most definitely the students have to sign non-disclosures before entering into that agreement while still citing question on if they were properly educated on such an agreement prior and if it was for the best of the student to go into such an agreement of that kind without legal representation for that of the protection of the students from that of real-world application projects that result in real world financials of gain and still a cost of tuition for the student. Although it may not fall under this per se, it still goes into my thoughts on the revamp of the age discrimination law for protection of those under 40 and definitely of those of degree-seeking nature before entering the workforce without proper training of what does and does occur in such. 

False arrest and obstruction of justice: The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures and prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process—meaning a person accused of a crime must be allowed the opportunity to have a trial. 

Failure to keep from harm: The public counts on its law enforcement officials to protect local communities. If it’s shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm, that official could be in violation of the color of law statute.

Below pulled from the FBI website, feel free to visit, they have tons of fun Educational Purposes available.

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights 

This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).

It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law  

This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.

This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race.

Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

I did hear enough internally to consider that of my massive stances against discrimination and of race.

Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245 - Federally Protected Activities 

1) This statute prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference, or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person or class of persons because of their activity as:

1. A voter, or person qualifying to vote...;

2. a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States; (Unemployment, EEOC)

3. a juror or prospective juror in federal court; (I’ve been a prospective juror in my life)

2) Prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person because of race, color, religion, or national origin and because of his/her activity as:

1. A student or applicant for admission to any public school or public college; (does this apply to private colleges?)

How TOC Groups Operate 

Transnational organized crime (TOC) groups are associations of individuals who operate, wholly or in part, by illegal means. There is no single structure under which TOC groups function—they vary from hierarchies to clans, networks, and cells, and may evolve into other structures.

These groups are typically insular and protect their activities through corruption, violence, international commerce, complex communication mechanisms, and an organizational structure that spans national boundaries.

• cyber crime

The vast sums of money involved can compromise legitimate economies and have a direct impact on governments through the corruption of public officials.

Today, TOC groups are more commonly incorporating cyber techniques into their illicit activities, either committing cyber crimes themselves or using cyber tools to facilitate other crimes. Technology also enables TOC groups to engage in traditional criminal activity, such as illegal gambling, but with a greater reach.

TOC poses a significant and growing threat to national and international security with dire implications for public safety, public health, democratic institutions, and economic stability across the globe. It jeopardizes our border security, endangers our health through human trafficking and counterfeit pharmaceuticals, and seeks to corrupt officials domestically and abroad. 

There is definitely that of my digital presence being trafficked. 

Countering Transnational Organized Crime 

To combat the ongoing threat posed by these groups, the FBI has a long-established—yet constantly evolving—transnational organized crime program dedicated to eliminating the criminal enterprises that pose the greatest threat to America. 

Due to the transnational nature of these criminal enterprises, the FBI leverages relationships domestically and abroad to combat the influence and reach of these organized crime groups. The Bureau deploys subject matter experts to international locations to develop strategies to address TOC matters impacting the region, as well as to identify targets of mutual interest.

The FBI also participates in selecting TOC groups to appear on the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Top International Criminal Organizations Target List and contributes to the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Asset Control efforts to pursue criminal enterprises. Further, to pool resources and leverage technical and investigative expertise, the Bureau participates in many organized crime task forces with our state and local law enforcement partners.

Major Theft Crimes 

Major theft crimes have a devastating impact on the U.S. economy, not only contributing to the rise of consumer prices but also to the loss of tax revenues to states and communities. The FBI focuses its resources on the most egregious major theft activity that crosses state and sometimes international lines, particularly thefts of:

• art

Art Crime 
Art theft is the illicit trade in art and cultural artifacts. Although tremendous strides have been made to combat cultural property crime, intelligence reveals this is a growing global threat, demanding proactive FBI measures and resources. The FBI established the National Stolen Art File (NSAF) – a computerized index of stolen art and cultural property as reported to the FBI by law enforcement agencies throughout the U.S. and internationally. It also formed a specialized Art Crime Team to investigate art and cultural crime cases. 

Corporate Fraud 

As the lead agency investigating corporate fraud, the FBI focuses its efforts on cases that involve accounting schemes and self-dealing by corporate executives, as well as obstruction of justice (activities designed to conceal this type of criminal conduct).

The FBI’s corporate fraud investigations primarily focus on:

• Illicit transactions designed to escape regulatory oversight

Self-dealing by corporate insiders:

• Insider trading (stock trading based on material, non-public information)

• Kickbacks

• Misuse of corporate property for personal gain

• Individual tax violations related to self-dealing

Intellectual Property Theft/Piracy 

Intellectual property theft involves robbing people or companies of their ideas, inventions, and creative expressions—known as intellectual property. This can include everything from trade secrets to proprietary products to movies, music, and software.

Intellectual property theft costs U.S. businesses billions each year.

The FBI's intellectual property investigations focus on the theft of trade secrets and copyright infringement on products that can impact people's health and safety, like counterfeit parts for cars and electronics. The FBI works with partners in the private sector and other law enforcement agencies at all levels to investigate these cases.

Learn more at the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center.

Similarly, economic espionage costs the American economy hundreds of billions of dollars per year and puts our national security at risk. In these cases, foreign competitors deliberately target economic intelligence in advanced technologies and successful U.S. industries.

This one gets thrown around allot but what does it actually mean anymore? Still, banking on honesty and bravery in secret.

-P.

The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, 18 U.S.C. § 249

(1) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin of any person or (2) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person and the crime affected interstate or foreign commerce or occurred within federal special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. (proof on why you don’t attack through dating apps)

It could also be discussed that attacks on mental health can be perceived as physical harm as the mind is of physicality and if able to prove with evidence that of constant attacks towards such, the long-term effects on attacks towards mental health definitely have a physical toll on such which does not warrent it as self-harm, but that of environmental conditions that the victim has to cope with and sustain based on other abusive or unlawful practices. Everything the body does is through that of electronic signals to the brain, proven of such of toll on physicality, this could actually be discussed as just as severe or greater based on the previous notion that mental health can be attacked in-directly and then of ‘false innocence’ from those who actually inflict it directly or in-direct base on a case-per-case basis. 

Consider this as it goes through my email as physical evidence of proof of that which has been difficult to process, shouldn’t be allowed and still consideration in the same vein as battered victims looking to get out of an environment but put in a strained and strapped position by their abuser that never should had happened, nor continued for as long as it had in a capacity of understanding the physicality aspect of abusive tactics in positions of power. 

What this does prove is that someone out there knows the behind the scenes on some things or that of straight up personal property. Consider that while I am left currently without medical insurance against other’s known liability and refusal to accept responsibility while going through a system now where they can be judged by their peers, the neighbors, other business and other countries for their continued action of violations of human rights while in America for that of corporate advancement. 

What this proves is someone has inside access to a private citizen’s computer, all of my intellectual property and probably waiting for me to say something online or on social media to run with that which they have already stolen and say, ‘Hey…I came up with a great plot point for our own property and not off of other peoples’. Is that about right? I am not freely giving away my intellectual property, I am not puting things in my internals of my website because that has already been captured, corrected in that of this format to copyright before laying it out again in InDesign and you may or may not had been caught off guard by that while those who invaded my website definitely were or will be caught off guard by the difference of twice over protected. I am not playing that game on that front and I am not freely posting important things on the internet so others can take it and run in different directions and still leave me in the dust and still not proper citation. Your system has been seriously challenged and your methods are pretty easy to spot just as much as mine are. I keep you on your toes while not even comprehending the difference between my 800-900 dollars take home pay bi-weekly against what I am up against and I guarentee my paycheck is not attached to anyone in this method who could had stopped this years or others who can chime in on any time. The only difference is I told the truth from the beginning and other people have been trying to retrace steps and backtrack from the damage done based off their issues and arrogance or whatever the issue may be. 

Just Food for Thought. 

It is understood based on the ovbiously proven recorded keystrokes aspects of this, that the compromised aspects denotes leverage on the Apple side while still someone caught off guard by “No ‘Starving Artist’s” in this manner and continued to send out through my Google paid for email, which is also known compromised by that of recorded keystrokes to another place of presumed looked at and documented as such of tampering by others since 2018-2019 to the point that I am using this method as proof I am not sending through my email, this is illegal search and seizure. At some point it has hit the point that if you don’t want to talk directly and you don’t want to accept any liability that can be flat out proven from multiple sources at this point, you probably shouldn’t be in the business you are in and still considered a danger to the stability of society. 

If this was for investigative reporting purposes, they could talk to me at any time which has never occurred who that route doesn’t work. 

If this was for legal investigative purposes, I have not been talked to directly. There may be a reason for that while any opposing party will find this as still illegal and some were beginning to learn about laws back in 2018…I wouldn’t advise this as a continued method if of opposing council or hired private investigative purposes…there are flaws in such leading towards ethics and the protection of intellectual property. 

If this was a hacker aspect of such, same rule apply with that of further charges. 

If this was governmental for that of favors to corporations, there are always going to be United States Citizens but companies come and go and get eaten all the time. 

If this was constantly trying to blame me for something to extend that of investigations internal or that of external, there are time limits to things, there are reasons for extensions, and there comes a point 5+ years of such might be considered abuse of power. If you know more than you should on a private computer, you can love or hate someone on just about everything. If it was longer, I would need more clarification before saying one way or the other. 

If for some strange reason this is for protection of myself, it does wonders to wrap it up and use accordingly. 

They seemed to have gotten the memo after ‘danger to the stability of society’ and stopped. Extended content if I post on my website. 

The Re-assembly Cut. 

Honestly, this is everyday for me….just another day of the same thing where perhaps I’ll explore other Tom Petty songs. There are Heart-breaking moments out there on how long this has occurred.

Love thy Sister. A message to Tiffany...

I’m posting this tonight knowing that I have asked for guidance and I have asked for help. There is much I still try to protect but at there same time I said good-bye to a support group this evening. I did so knowing there are many who where never afforded an answer and others who publicly and vocally stated things left unsaid that has lead to questions of the detriment of my assets after the employment of what was a dream job for I and an amazing opportunity to be connected to marriage that I didn’t have prior on multiple fronts and that directly of Disney in what would always be in their vault and mine.

Whatever occurred in life after is always going to be a contention point for I on what was years unnecessary to my detriment once I created my own website of what I did prior to Alfred Angelo compiled to a website of necessity based on ‘unexpected’ closure which was completely false.

I share this excerpt knowing what I tryic to protect and the attacks I’ve had since from 2018 directly on to the point that it went places well beyond childhood topics and adulting. I fought my heart out to the best of my ability and I am doing what I can in a capacity of team upon team more than likely and you still cannot steal people’s lives for live a life of screwing people over and taking over their lives.

I struggled so much with my experience with Alfred Angelo.

I struggled so much that even when in school I was attacked. I struggled if that happened to me that could happen to anyone and I am sitting here with the children of the United Nations who are my working peers. This continued for something that cannot happen and yet it did.

Who wanted to make this a vengeful moment towards I?

I look at this as get out of your personal bubble and understand the damage that occurred in 2021.
How self-centered were you?!

I reflect on how I asked in the private Alfred Angelo support group yesterday to please remove the image of my dog, Lacey from their cover photo. I stated of such that she was a registered Emotional Support Animal to me and that was proven in the entire company in which she was the only canine allowed in such. That was done in understanding that she is a part of the former Alfred Angelo assets along with minors and children in which she will always be a bridal dog but always my legal right to say you have absolutely no control over any aspect of her image in any capacity.

I understand what I fought and I have had many difficult issues with thoughts afterwards. I had to deal with many aspects of first times and then grapple with the fact my assets were far more valuable than Alfred Angelos and that I revoked so much status from discountment and non-payment while employed towards the tail-end. I became a target afterwards and based on a series of events allowed to believe based on evidence of personality and trait that some people gave no consideration for my life or that of the unborn while trying to say story driven or system as go.

I state and say it can always be fact check that Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Lost is 100% owned by I as Curated Jellyfish: A Paradise Stolen and any prior version of such is under my complete control.

That can be fact checked.
That is history in this universe and others that others wanted to build.

I present below what was my lasting gift out of context to that of an empathetic soul who found his way to bridal and dared to say Norman Rockwell to agree to such.

I have nothing else to offer other than this and I am not responsible for Alfred Angelo. I am not responsible for those who talked surveillance and didn’t want to respond and this is my gift knowing it is 100% copyright protected of knowing I have been attacked every way possible since the end of that company.

_________________

Everything below in text and image is 100% United States Copyright protect with I the ownership of such text and image. It is an understanding that what I present in part of what is copyright protected of ‘No ‘Starving Artist’s’ is my right and for my benefit while understanding that shortly after this was copyright protected this was illegally sent out through my email in the same manner of retaliation and unresolved issues that I never wanted to know about thst could happen to anyone. This happened and this is my right.

OK. THIS IS PERSONAL IN THIS SPACE. I AM READY FOR THE REVEALING OF DISCORD TO COMMENCE.

In Discord Fashion, an avant-garde approach. August 30, 2022 Philip A. Bonneau Calling himself out from 2014. Philip A. Bonneau.

Excerpt from Disney Fairy Tale Weddings by Alfred Angelo. I as Creative marketing lead and concepter of all Proof-of-Concepts and visual presentations with way too much responsibility on the backend but knowing exactly who’s castle I’m in from the beginning and how that translated later in multiple fronts and why I was there to begin with. Sometime in 2014…July…August? I’ll figure it out there where all-nighters involved in saving moments of undermined responsibility of those I was to learn from and did.

Sign-offs occur prior to investing to film. Discussions had and the phoenix-like image of my own factors into this from The Phoenix city of Atlanta to Disney in official capacity of being born of Drag-Theatre Bred in 2012 to taking on the most Sacred aspect of intimacy unions and Disney combined in plot-points and on a budget. Later in transformational acceptance from adult conversations to iconic legends of branding and what one did and didn’t hide in it while being completely respectful to past, present and future. If Disney wants to get into the real-life wedding business, adult conversations and advancement of brand is a requirement. At some point we are all adults who still have our childhood dreams that evolve through life not stunted by psychological immaturity in some areas. It is destined generation-to-generation there is always going to be mistakes, over-and under-compensation…(we are definitely in the under-compensation era but incredible respect of talking points are a necessity when going into real life marriage. It is not always happily ever after but you imagine it at first or whatever…it is a case-by-case basis on how those arrangements work out and some of that is a very respected cultural tradition based on preserving the stability and survival of family in cultures on the other-side. In America, the traditional color for a wedding gown is white. Overseas…actually red is a very popular choice with a whole different meaning.

Screengrab from Facebook, January 16, 2022. Author Philip A. Bonneau

‘Today was a hyper-intensive thought day. Always on the go and always trying to process and make things work out one way or another. I like that my mind has been on venture capitalism for quite some time and it comes from a distinct place of trying to find something to latch back onto. So many avenues to explore and the I think about what I have. (Venture capitalism - Seeking adventures that profit towards the value of life and expands upon it in sustainability)

One thing in particular to question…having not been properly compensated during my 3-years of visual creative control of Disney’s Fairy Tale Weddings by Alfred Angelo in the capacity as senior creative manager, art director, compositor, retoucher, final signer before going to a company that has no input in the process and signed and went with it…do I own the unofficial wedding license on any future live-action Disney Fairy Tale Weddings? (This would be both reality and fictional) I ask as that story is important on exploitation, abuse and things other companies can reign in on for clarification and resolve. I’m a peace-keeper, but something has to change.

I ask in advance as 3-years in an officially licensed abandoned capacity matters in a Norman Rockwell sense. I was not there for the live-action Little Mermaid ceremony and I did not sign-off on Vanessa-Eric’s Wedding.’ -Philip A. Bonneau, Facebook post, January 16, 2022.

Case-in-point when dealing with duality and the things we do for family. A creative decision as I never controlled any aspect of dress design would be that when Mulan was introduced in the 2017, I actually would had and probably said it anyways that an appropriate introduction of her into ‘The Disney Fairy Tale Wedding’ line would had been in a Male Tuxedo or Suit opening up the door for respect of characters that did factually live while the question still remains on which one of the princesses did and did not actually live. Although I did not design the 2017 Mulan dress, the imagery matches the dress style and that is where we can join in conversation. Representation is important and I made very sure in our advertising to make sure as close to what budget could afford of proper representation front-facing.

The same thought patterns went elsewhere when they wanted to introduce Merida. In being Brave, you have to look at the narrative and what was not inspiration from the story and work your way to it rationally and conceptually through storytelling. Merida never would had been introduced in a wedding dress. She would not have allowed it and stormed off somewhere else leaving her mother to bear the burden of being the first official Mother-of-the-Bride concept to The Disney Fairy Tale Weddings line. But hey…what do I know? Those clones were brought in already on multiplicity.

In the beginning, there were talks of Anna being introduced that never made it to final production. I see why at the time where maybe…maybe she could or could not be hidden as a bridesmaid somewhere until her chance comes down the line.

With the inclusion of Mulan in the final year also came the inclusion of Pocahontas. Things were getting very real in the end and how one presents themselves is very important. I was slighted on the approach of the brand and let’s be honest. Popsicle sticks from what was before, but it was unique and deadlines could had been extended to properly deliver. If only I had a team… It is an interesting brand to bring respect to while it has it at the same time in where American brides at the very least are very DIY and heading in that direction in a majority. That trend and pattern comes from wage gap issues and not being able to afford nicer things while appreciating the mess out of what you have and working with what you got. This trend and fact was further proven during The Age of Quarantine when the DIY’ers had to survive with support of others from an International Health Crisis where they dealt with isolation, loss of family and loss of income and social security of making sure 6 ft. Away. That resonated in Paris for me. Very transformative that when people are buckled up and strapped for cash, they start getting creative on how to survive while also re-assessing exploitation in areas of employments. Some adjust to much simpler means for added life and happiness while no longer at the expense of ‘Self’ towards a company that you aren’t profiting from, just getting a paycheck or maybe you have coworker issues and found that working from home too adds happiness back to your life minus inter-office drama. We can zoom on that conversation a multiple different ways on when internally people actually prefer to have comfortable, safe environments that can be further enhanced through ‘Home Economics’, ‘The Rule of Ate’ and Paralegals in the HR structure.

Could be so much more, but we relate. Secretly, I even was working with Team Amateurs on trying to figure out if there could be a Star Wars bride. I say this knowing full well there were 5 different types of brides in me the brands I co-oversaw with an awesome Scorpio twin of vast industry knowledge. She too was disrespected by management at the end by them not even talking to her about important information of what was going on in the company and can attest to the rug pull moment of non-payment options. I think her and I may actually have major ownership of this brand in the long-term. Number 1 and 2 unite with the fashion side of this and you have a powerful team of wronged rights owners. Disney was already copying her and I anyways afterwards and I love carrying and honoring the past with me, just as much as she in my 3rd year let me spread my wings with support and watched vs. well…internal things elsewhere between year 1 and 2 of being ‘shown how professionals do it’. I’ll sit back now and watch.

I’ve fixed my other crowning moment and achievement on the America’s sides elsewhere afterwards.

Individuality is very important to a great portion of weddings these days. It is important to any social structure while understanding where you come from and where you are going in choices. Traditional vs. Non-traditional approaches where one is no less than the other to make something your own that is special and unique. It is very important to any wedding day especially as it is your own between someone you choose to be with and unite silently in private gaze or with family and friends to celebrate. About half the population know there are reboots all the time in that arena.

(Wait..Is this whole not teaching people how to cope and relate properly in society a ploy from those above the bridal industry to promote repeat business there? Is that what this is? Who has flooded those gates of hate in society to prevent people from being happy with someone or in life in general? Perception of talking points leads towards streams of conversations away from the bends and breaks of social angst towards living your life or solving world hunger. I say that in jest but at the same time…can’t do that one alone but there is ‘starving artist’ content available to support that at least there was a good DIY try there. Maybe I will accept as a major badge of honor a title of Non-Delusional, Delusional Artist. It denotes dreams of grandeur that one aspires for that may or may not occur without the help and support of others based on talking points, credentials and awareness of time and patiences in learned traits and practices. Persistence of dreams that may or may not play out down the line. Hope remains and you continue anyways through the sea of Delusional Critics and Authentic supporters. What is a’ Delusional Critic’? Is it usually one who could or could not be objective of their opinion where they too are spending their lives talking about other people’s works and accomplishments while trying to figure out that their contribution is really the critical analysis of those who are in a position to be front-facing, recognized and working. Quick slights pay off for someone in the long-run doesn’t necessarily work, but there are those that speak it and there are those who took it in, wrote it down and translated it into their lives because once you speak something it becomes a part of them positively or negatively where creatively it can be many things of empowerment to say no one but yourself is going to police your words, but in certain places your words and actions can be very policed and how that is translated in factuality is important. There are professional critics who spend their lives discussing their interests of what was important to their lives one way or another and how they translate that into theirs and how society can translate that as well. That is usually been done of the unspoken artist after their death while now we look at what contemporary art is where the artist becomes a brand and has to give so much more than what came before and allowed. I love critiques and critical thinking. The back-and-forth in messaging complex or simplistic denotes an advancement of conversation and thought counter to a ‘Delusional Critic’ who tends to break down talking points and others for their own gain or momentarily fleeting self-gratification. How does that work with a wordy contemporary artist that still leaves so much open for interpretation but weaves a tapestry throughout their entire low-budget career up until a certain point in full spectrum? Can you imagine me with a budget outside of what I’ve worked with prior? I can’t because it involves a team which is standard contemporary art practices.

The Bridal business is actually smaller than you think and they all know each other…franchisees everywhere can attest to that who all know that bridal is very emotional. Memories that last a lifetime is the start-game on their chance to be a major emotional part of a family indirectly. You wear their emotions on your sleeve. You are wrapped around their thoughts and that marriage is a silent blessing and thank you from our family to yours. This is why people stay in that industry while also branching out elsewhere. It is the sacredness of transformative meanings towards a happy life that eventually leads into children’s wear in some cases.

(I get it now…this is why you went after me wasn’t it. I talked about ‘Imagine happily ever after…’ and you were like not on my watch…I’m team repeat business here…I’m expecting 2-3 marriages out of people while you sit down there and say wait 5-years to have the blow-out after time earned and served in testing low budgets and how that works out in sustainability. Well it works. Rocky relationship but no bull on it’s effectiveness to future plot points.

The Autumn of Angelo. Philip A. Bonneau 2022

In my final year of Alfred Angelo, I outlined it accordingly to set up the company for success while I took my non-compensated disrespected professional body (and work) elsewhere after moving things to a direction where things could had gone with the Disney line while still 5 other lines also in co-responsibility and 1 other one that I am saying is Truly Mine. When it comes to Pocahontas in particular and her introduction into the Bridal side of Disney Fairy Tale Weddings. Historical accuracy is to be considered in any adaption of the Pocahontas person while understanding the Disney side of it as a What if…? to reality. Taken far younger and too went over to Europe, the winds of her death echo in what can be a way to look at the animated film of greatness wondering what point of the movie is reality and what point of it is a dream and the after-life of what could or couldn’t be. It is with the utmost respect, and again a major honor to say that I own very exact rights to visual translations of any of the Disney princesses in some capacity that Disney may finally talk to me about. I own these rights from false promises. Exploitation. My Land invaded. My intellectual property taken, translated while I was completely disregarded and set to be ridiculed by society.

Disney, as proven in their translation of my life and property through the movie “Cruella’ have absolutely NO RIGHT to ever do a live-action Pocahontas without full permission and respect from the tribes of those who are sovereign to this land and when I connect with and my mother’s parents have given complete respect and introduction throughout their lives. They have no right to even Disclude me from that conversation that could be done at the same time or prior. It has been proven by haphazard franchising that respect is to be paid of any character based off of that level of significant with a door open discussion of Tears and what is not Disney’s arena anyways. From fiction back to reality, a change of seasons for those epic silent moments of internal reflections #memories from a starving artist who can privately talk about Thanksgiving in its transformative aspects that could or could not be a reality but already written down elsewhere. When introducing Pocahontas into the bridal line…that denotes age of consent and taking children away who die too soon. Mulan gets me.

In the end of where things need to transform in my contributions of my time in Alfred Angelo and 3 years of princess and queen trilogies, it boils down to I love my popsicle sticks that I’ve worked with. I love the popsicle sticks I’ve been afforded to work with. I love where my popsicle sticks came from and where the meaning behind them can go. I’ve elevated the popsicle stick beyond where it was before and that may be a single pedestal of popsicle power, but others too like popsicles and the riddles behind them. Throughout my life and my career I’ve been picked up and survived where I could while investing in my own passions on the side. From 2017 I’ve been brought down to a ‘Starving Artist’ status that while playing with my food elevates the ‘starving artist’ as a movement of discussion. That was done while not having a home but provided shelter with the second essential of life very important to me on the paths I’ve walked and the paths I’m leading for others. Perhaps I could be guided in the right direction or path. Plotted courses where not of destruction but of ideas to focus on and build momentum of change. I’ve played with popsicle sticks and I’ve done the shoe-string budget.

The fate of broken glass slippers. A non-responsibility response. Philip A. Bonneau Written and drawn 5/20/2022

5/20/2022

Shoe String Budget

The idea of Shoe Strings as I look at a 400,000 dollar Birkin bag that I now know is by Hermès. The ignorance of never having that in my radar of price points is what it is knowing 1 bag is 2 years annual budget for Disney Fairy Tale Weddings by Alfred Angelo. Daunting knowing at least perspective of what I was working with as major leap from what came before of 10-15 dollars to 20-30 dollars(in Heroes+Villains) to that(Disney) and then back to 1-10 dollars in 'Starving Artist’ with the continued help of friends and family.

The idea of the Shoe String brings me to the idea of how there are several nostalgia aspects to the shoe string as a child. Leather laced, rope strings & flat laces.

As one learns to tie their shoes it becomes a connection with learning experiences and discovering the world. Lesson from any elders who show us one technique over the other. Would a Shoe-String Budget be of educational purposes then?

The idea crosses my mind on shoe strings on if they are tied or not, coiled as they are to help protect your feet and keep you in place while you learn to walk in them. Even Velcro could factor in some expensive aspect outside the shoe string. Imagine couture fashion wrapped around this in an elevated status of learning the value of concept and intrigue. The idea shifts to sculpture of Jeff Koons nature of laces tied in bows and patterns echoing childhood.

'Laces Out…Laces In?’ Could be a thing.

Wearable fashion of bracelets and necklaces of metallic nature symbolizing always learning and guided by others.

Can a dress or jacket be made of various shoe string patters or simply echo the ship in exaggerated form.

The tip important as much as the wearing in and out.

Diagram and illustration images of necklace application, clasped bracelet unified by plastic tip reference transformed into metallics and the shoe-string sculpture that echoes to balloon sculptures of Jeff Moons. Knot References. Possible collaboration with Tiffany’s on “Tying the Knot”.

I stick to the sculpture aspect of Jeff Koons & Tiffany’s. An awesome wedding present represent the unity of learning from one another and the bond of childhood memories to adult ones where seriousness & lightheartedness combine together. A statement piece where each is unique? I’m unsure the process, but statement of product & materials talk about the uniqueness of each relationship and the building from it with what each other have. Possible  ‘have and have knot’, but always make it through. Aspirational goals of relationships & nostalgia of art introductions.

I’m alien at this, but I’m sure in discussion it is about the shoes & statements. I rest my Case, mate. Sometimes the bridal industry is fun to stick around in children’s concepts, famous artists, aspirational goals and wedlock.

I imagine the gift a great parent’s gift to their children as welcome a family harkened in the ceremony of marriage when actual knot clasping occurs in some, the breaking of glass in particular which can be remelted and molded based on specific substrates by the brands to be wrapped in instant connection of personalization of the event, the moment and the celebration.

Family heirlooms of personal connection that eventually becomes ‘our youth’ anyways based on the longevity of partnership. Or simply if impossible to control the variable, “From our house to yours. Congrats on tying the knot” - From the Tiffany Co. & Jeff Koons. The proprietary Tiffany Blue in interest that on the day of is always(possibly) something blue.

Side note - Jeff Koons - “Glass Monopoly house sculpture”

If specific glass is required for uniqueness, this brings in the design of glasses in particular which is its own separate thing before being transformed into the knot joined together from other elements. ’Strange what comes from looking at one Berkin Bag.’

Shirt/Jacket design, stitched shoelace patterns of a tornado.

laced pattern of shoestrings to form a tornado. I’m envisioning it on a jacket on the back in particular patterns interwoven of probably white or grey leathers. Grey scheme of colorations with subtle hints that can be pushed into subtle muted palettes.

'Tornado on your back.’ ‘Uplifting message or ‘destruction’ of an argument? Dream symbology accordingly to bigbraincoach.com/biblical-meaning-of-tornado-dreams

-'Something from your past is ready to get healed.’

-Biblically, direct messaging about the happening of the future. Protection & strength to face obstacles.

-If hiding from a tornado may symbolize avoidance & emotion that needs attention.

White Tornado - Peace & Healing, guardian angel. Could be also in dark tones as guardians also are there at night and in dark times.

-possible pregnancy but could also be the conception of a concept.

Shirt/Jacket design, stitched shoelace patterns of a hurricane.

Possibly inclusion of hurricane to reference the Odyssey? Questions as the region did/does not have hurricanes often. Typhoons in the other region of Pacific. “They came in like a hurricane””They left like a tornado” denotes placement preference of things seen and tracked vs. what appears unpredictably.

The second half scanned at lunchtime. 12:00 PM EST.

_______________________________________________

I think of the glass knots and what they represent in regards to my life experience. Thoughts before in Section J(of Curated Jellyfish) of the affects of negativity affecting people’s wedding by association of being a former Alfred Angelo employee. I shall contend on what was written in ’Starving Artist’ on my site and I think of everything written after to process that as my dreams and days were shattered into the areas they are today.

Was it from that experience that I found myself locked in basements of guidance and thoughts for 3-years?

The model with the broken glass slippers surround in glass and shouldn’t/couldn’t move.

A dress of torn nature but intentional in couture possibility. Beauty in the things that respect time and patiences. A heritage prior in some areas of mother’s dreams and parental union ripped apart for selfish purposes rethought to where stitches and creative decisions done with intention of seemingly haphazard approach?

Would the collection of those glass slipper pieces put yours and my soul at ease? Collecting them all and melting them together to represent limited editions of how to make things beautiful against from shattered moments of hope. Collectively they represent the time and the thoughts and meanings of them. Glistened moments were temporarily constrained by the thoughts of the affect we have on one another.

Lessons had on falling hard in what you put your soul into as that applies to the families of the supposed Alfred Angelo weddings. Swept together and combined, a story possible of outside that connection and back to the ideas and dreams of those that know that your day is important and supported with love. Heritage and history of fairytales that could come true in unity knowing that the meaning behind anything is what is important most of all with the realization heritage transforms once shared. This is why fairytales is one word and not two in the bridal business. Although hidden fairies in every tale, the stories themselves are not directly about fairies but are about the belief of wonder and imagination with watched over protection in unity. The common folktales prove valid argument. That comes with A lure of never forgotten lore.

Perhaps a way to pay respect to those influenced negatively of every picked up pieces. A brand promise where we learn as a child into adulthood and pass down that knowledge to our peers, friends and possibly children.

Everything broken can be transformed.

I suppose if I were to do a book of my trilogy of work with Disney Fairy Tale Weddings by Alfred Angelo from 2014—2017, it would have a cover of a contemporary art piece of Manderella’s Popsicle Stick Castle. Hidden with Riddles and stories added on of what happens when 3 years of fairy tales are engrained based on what happened in real life, both prior and after. Imagine two made and placed next to a single Birkin Bag on what had equal price tags for a season.

___________________________________________

Hurricanes - As they can be found in dreams and in real life, they can represent many things of positive/negative connections. A slow moving force that builds momentum over time that always expresses gravity of situations and danger. Warning signs if by SEA, danger if by land.

Do hurricane and Typhoons negative affect aquatic life if never hit land? Biologically they sense storms differently and possibly preemptively. Change of behavior and dive deeper when perhaps panic takes over in cases. The eye of the hurricane represents calmness surround by elemental brute forces.As everything collides around in the changing winds, a search of center knowing things can turn in any direction based on volume.

As hurricanes have always been a part of my life it is representation of our actions towards others on a personal level, cognizant of reaching mental center when need be.

As a child of New Orleans born and Puerto Rico stationed by my father’s Coast Guard background from my time and my grandfather’s Coast Guard time  before ours, as with Georgia and Florida, the connections to hurricanes can be negative in nature or positive in coming together after disaster when humanity is shown one way or another. To explain how hurricane have affective my life is still always appreciation to my size vs. the size of nature and others in humility and real life consequences.

Perhaps the symbol represents coming together for a cause which happens in any disaster relief effort of significance and notice. Center of focus with the eye on what drives you. An influx of thought where to some it could be destruction, but for I it is about build/rebuilding and coming together in banded patterns. A possible representation of knowing who you are, what you stand for and never backing down but always open for discussion with fair warning of preventative measures.It all depends on how you land the argument or anchor your point-of-view.

To see water spouts in a hurricane could suggest pocket areas of thought and centering being pulled into a bigger picture gradually which absolutely answers the (physical) negative affect on aquatic life. A precursor to connective surfaces where the sky and earth combine where 2 things are now wrapped around a center of thought. An agreement of two sides? Or a strengthening of an arguments in multi-perspective?

Tornadoes - Free Flowing thoughts that can go in any direction once they land. Patterned behavior where it is expected but room to travel and grow. More isolated based on conditions of perspective. Testing of positive/negative, hot/cold responses. Uplifting messages where we get uprooted from one thought to another. A thought that takes hold of you that when acted on leaves you in another place.

Most of these 3 are associated with severe conditions, yet also could leas to imagination and beauty when out of harms way.

When I was a child in Savannah, my childhood friend and I built a raft for the lagoon we had in our neighborhood. On the water in a sense of adventure…A slight tornado/sprout forms. A beautiful moment of wonder as if someone was there to provoke and provide imagination.

(Illustration provided)

Not drawn to scale but amazing as the wind was focused, friendly and went in patterns towards land. #truestory.

While Playing the Waiting Game against those of money and retaliation practices....

A start from The Law Novice on my non-fabricated number in my un-responded to serving of a lawsuit.

The very real number attached to my wrongful Termination from SCAD, How I came to it and not including any aspect of my creative property compromised. Still just a drop in the bucket in the DIY world of former basement dwellers such as myself and nothing of people’s salary or overall revenue but multiplies beyond belief in consideration.

It is understood that I have been retaliated in ways one can only imagine for several years and amped up after February 10, 2022. In the I needed and need help category and have not been able to seek council, this was how I got to my figure in the lawsuit in which is clear cut in evidence of SCAD’s liability. It was stated by SCAD’s lawyer and available according to the freedom of information act that SCAD would be liable if proven of such. It was further stated that Mr. Bonneau has not been able to do that. Mr. Bonneau can and Mr. Bonneau is aware of false statements made to the EEOC on such and what that means based on the minimal evidence supplied by SCAD and attached to the EEOC investigation. Mr. Bonneau is also aware that the lawyer was well aware of the events reported and went through compliance in April 2021 and Mr. Bonneau copy-wrote protected his BBB complaint, final statements of the EEOC and position statements marked up in how SCAD can and cannot use Mr. Bonneau’s name in any capacity of further slander and libel practices that were done officially to The State of Georgia, internally and towards the detriment of my career and mental health.

I’ll wait…understanding United States copyright is protected 70—95 years after the originators death.

#OscarsSoBlackTie

Or is it #OscarSoBlackTie one of them came first.

A post to Twitter,

Who's watching the Oscars tonight? #OscarsSoBlackTie

@oscarmayer @TheOscarsRP

followed by #oscarssoblacktie.

@oscarmayer

‘Many a tie to be seen here but a truce in others could be Met in opening up perspectives. Full range present every year in every category. Range-Free (Egg Emoji) (Planted Emoji) here. Enjoy the evening. Never know what (Chicken Hatches Emoji) . :)’

As I have slowly begun to enter into modern heiroglyphics of the land of Emoji, I travel small at first as I try to use my words and symbols correctly.

I’ve been grilled of the possibility of what could unfold here. #OscarsSoWhite #OscarsSoBlack. So much food for thought. While looking at you, I suppose there is that of what Me and DynaGlo and do. Who knows where we go from here. I’ll follow something one way or another or mind my own in curiosity. Friendly gestures and that of from Savannah, GA. #OscarsSoBlackTie @oscarmayer @dyna_glo #Oscars @TheOscarsRP

A B+W perspective at first to lead towards that of colorful journeys.

Perhaps I was not too nice with the @oscarmayer @dyna_glo, there are starving artists out there that have worked hard to be invisible from the sidelines on the red carpet. 2 if by @tictac. @TheOscarsRP #OscarsSoBlackTie

I imagine everyone is rocking it out one way or another. There is what I see and don’t see from certain angles. The Hunger Games of Award season almost over. #AnActorsLifeforSome#OscarsSoBlackTie #InvisibleContourLines @tictac @TheOscarsRP

With #OscarsSowhite such a plight if I might as I tie things together in all of my might. #OscarsSoBlackTie #ATruceofChartreuse or perhaps maybe #Peuce #OscarAnnualColorThemeTrends #PickYourPalette or have your palette picked for you. It shall be around for at least a year from there.

Some go for the Gold. Others for the Glory.

All fun + games 'til you discover Starvation Station from Thanksgiving to St. Patrick's Day. #awardseason B kind to artists. Recognition is deserved in dedication.

In every thinning there is bulkin'. #OscarsSoBlackTie @TheOscarsRP

I don’t know about this battle here. I see a great deal of ties in discussion here. But Red seems to be winning for now on carpets. A Fool’s Errand for Later Palette of Covet wondering if the carpet matches the drakes. #OscarsSoBlackTie #PickYourPalette

I know @OscardelaRenta has already jumped on the red room with the Guild in statement pieces. What bluntness awaits tonight on bold statements in #predictivepalettes or that of #OscarsSoBlackTie #RollRedTie #CrimsonTie #TheyPickedYourPalette

Killing it with the fashion statements and looks.
Can’t wait for the Platforms of the evening.
’I could really use a hot dog right now.’
I’ll settle for popcorn. #OscarsSoBlackTie
@oscarmayer @JenniferCoolidge @TheOscarsRP

I’m completely out of the loop here and not sure what flies. In costume design no doubt Black Panther could be the bee’s knees of the evening. #OscarsSoBlackTie #costumedesign @TheOscarsRP @Gover #SuperStatements #OscarSoBlueTie #Seewhattheydidthere #OscarsForever #alumnistatementsofsuccess

Well no Oscars showing up on our air'ish. TV. Couldn't afford cable but was able to catch what The Fox Says with A Profound Simpsons episode. Enjoy the evening. It is a night of team support and those who believed in projects and backed them up. #OscarsSoWhiteTie

Since I can't watch it and not a part of that world, here is the last thing I had of professionalism and going with the flow. #OscarsSoBlackTie Now that everything is in the can, ‘What is everyone going to be talking about at the end of tonight? @OscarTheGrouch

@TheOscarsRP

#OscarsSoBlackTie Who will go from Oscar Gold to Oscar Green? Stay Tuned. #OscarsSoGreenTie #SustainableTalkingPoints #birdsarereal

I wrote at the time prior that I’ll more than likely add on as I go throughout the evening based on one thing or another. In every version of my website saved for one reason or another without talking to me, life goes on and separates in many ways from such in any capacity where I understand I was not wanted or of what could be fired be even mentioning I or #OscarsSoBlackTie.

As understood, I have my own interests and never an invitation where there is the idea of what could be or what could had been or what is. In either aspect. I’m focused elsewhere the rest of the night. I have other things to do and others of wanting me to be continued discount maybe while I continue to do my thing on my own minimal dime. #enjoyinglife #decisionsmadelongago

Lorem Ipsum: Child of Someone Now Available for Sale.

Lorem Ipsum: Child of Someone Now Available for Sale.
https://www.blurb.com/b/11474669-lorem-ipsum-a-child-of-someone-second-edition

As none of my books have never been approached on rights management or purchase, I find it best as I revamp my bookstore to note that I am the sole owner of every publication or book I have every created prior and will re-release as such. It is understood that whatever methods of used in industry standard practice, I imagine I am new to the world and have much to learn. I am the only one that can be approached at this time for current or past works where I never of management had reintroduce a chance opportunity of introduction of my works in book form. It is understood if picked up, the re-release of books becomes cheaper, far more expansive in areas I could not do alone in production areas and where things could go.

In either regard, please read the info below if interested in discussion of licensing of rights or in any collaboration of such. As with any author, a book can go one place or another, but completely understood of the impact any work could have if utilized properly. I remain steadfast in my revamp and reissue of multiple books over a period of time to get back to where I was before.

ISBN: 979-8-88955-381-6

Title: Lorem Ipsum: A Child of Someone

Description:

An introduction course study of the history of storytelling and a step into the world of fiction for I. With Me, a first chance to tackle topics of perception, perspective and the importance of introductions or conclusions in after-thoughts. A combination of paths had and stories told, a proven thesis and dissertation on the way to help build another story collaboratively one way or another. A journey of life's work and a piece of my soul, barefoot and aware. Collections and excerpts from some of the greatest works of literature towards something new in understanding and different paths walked. A Book of many Genres where hard to place where one actually is. 

Contributor Name: Philip Arthur Bonneau, publisher, author, artist, designer, collector, critique, editor, critical theory

Artist Bio:

Senior Creative marketer. Photographer. Author. Artist.
Southern charmer if you think pronouncing "ing" like "in'" is charmin'.
A Platypus of many different worlds. (Although I think currently a unicorn in this one.)
SAV based physically. Connected everywhere digitally. :)

It is my core philosophy that you have to understand the past in order to achieve anything new. 
Where do we go from here knowing this bio is outdated before I walk out the lot with it. 
www.philipbonneau.com/about

Hardback - Psychology, Literature History & Criticism, Philosophy, Art, Agriculture, Bible Commentaries, United States - History, Wit & Humor, Spirituality, , Self-Help, Political Science, Photography, Mind & Body, Literature - Collections, Language Arts, Interpersonal Relationships, Law, Performing Arts, Genealogy, Finance - Personal, Fiction - All of the Above(or below, its all the same plane anyways to some extent), Family, Education, Economics, Curiosities and Wonders

Format: Hardback

Number of Pages: 460

Print Date: 2/8/2023

Target Audience: (Rough)Trade for now. 

Retail Price? US $120.11

Custom Made per Order is the reason for the price. $23 dollars of each sale goes to I and can help support where the 3rd Edition could go while continuing to match forward in narrative.

At least my little ISBN that could is reserved. :)

Of course there is much to do on the art side before I am ready to release this. Eventually I’ll need teammates. Where minor keys and details to be had beforehand in an introduction of my little pocket world before roping back around to how I go there elsewhere while moving forward in one direction or another. Constantly Spicing things up one way or another to see what happens.

-P.

'a' divine comedy

I spent the last 12 years of my life working towards something publicly and of artistically,

My life experience adds to such where it is important to note what that could mean to others who never knew or perhaps only knew me from Heroes+Villains since which opened the following week of ‘Beautiful Layered Lies’ while I explored things in different realms.

Perhaps you didn’t know me or perhaps you never wanted to. That is always ok and understood. There is a purpose of such on either side of reality and escapism wondering which one is which and what has occurred in my life in notice or what others wanted to do in advantage of one thing or another while others obliged in trust and understanding.

I’ve never publicly mentioned my stages of coping in an official capacity. I’ve done so in the process if you bought the first book and then fleshed it out behind the scenes in timestamped aspects towards what I needed in life and then extended from Ugly Simple Truths to try to understand others to see where the flaws are and what is connective in such.

To I, I’ve perfected a coping process based on Dante’s Divine Comedy where I am far outside the sect of such to consider that of the social issue of limbo in the process in consideration of breaking down something social to that of personal and intimate. That psychology was always intimate and always understood where perhaps others saw the value prior and did what they did and still I get to this point of Super Bowl to understand what is and isn’t the Super Bowl for one person or another.

My life. Your Life. Our Lives.
I’ve fought towards an answer that didn’t come without happenstance and doesn’t happen over night. Struggles from others towards answering even my obsession (which isn’t one to begin with) of the number 23. To note any number is a sign of respect where it is understood where people discount one way or another.

In any aspect of what was my initial break into the art world and public speaking, where the series ended up is a powerful statement of my curated life and what occurred to constantly try to do good and well towards others in understanding coping and breaking my 9 stages of such into originally the 3 stages of Hell, Purgatory and Heaven with the understanding of whatever name others wanted to use to explain such, the definition came from my understanding and is non-secular in such but easy to understand.

In any aspect of such of my basic understanding of Dante.’ ‘a’ divine comedy’ is Not Public Domain but of Public Interest Possibly. Whatever others wanted to do to not have me afford my life and yet still take from me is probably noted and documented.

It is understood I am permanently attached to Dante Alighieri’s work just as much as Gustave Doré was hundreds of years later. Psychology is where modern aspects of discussion could be had with my works in current aspects and it is an understanding that there could be no cinematic version of Dante’s Divine Comedy without at least respecting the fact that he preferred to call it ‘La Commedia’ and everyone else did there thing one way or another in influence after.

In any aspect, in all my attacks, I claim my right that my answer to ‘‘a’ divine comedy’ is 100% intact and respect of every religion or civilization in the same vein of Dante to express an denote what is and isn’t ownership.

In that regard, never have my 9 stages been on social media, nor will they ever.
I’m trying to sort out what occurred and perhaps other people are looking one way or another.

Heroes+Villains elsewhere in a whole different conversation.
In this regard, it is understood there are monumental characters translated on the Dante front and there is privacy and private citizen rights held in my realm.

In either way, ‘a divine comedy’ is understood and 100% copyright protected by The United States Government with complete respect where I come from an understanding of the 195.

Onward 2/9

ISBN: 979-8-88955-381-6

Title: Lorem Ipsum: A Child of Someone

Description:

An introduction course study of the history of storytelling and a step into the world of fiction for I. With Me, a first chance to tackle topics of perception, perspective and the importance of introductions or conclusions in after-thoughts. A combination of paths had and stories told, a proven thesis and dissertation on the way to help build another story collaboratively one way or another. A journey of life's work and a piece of my soul, barefoot and aware. Collections and excerpts from some of the greatest works of literature towards something new in understanding and different paths walked. A Book of many Genres where hard to place where one actually is. 

Contributor Name: Philip Arthur Bonneau, publisher, author, artist, designer, collector, critique, editor, critical theory

Artist Bio:

Senior Creative marketer. Photographer. Author. Artist.
Southern charmer if you think pronouncing "ing" like "in'" is charmin'.
A Platypus of many different worlds. (Although I think currently a unicorn in this one.)
SAV based physically. Connected everywhere digitally. :)

It is my core philosophy that you have to understand the past in order to achieve anything new. 
Where do we go from here knowing this bio is outdated before I walk out the lot with it. 
www.philipbonneau.com/about

Hardback - Psychology, Literature History & Criticism, Philosophy, Art, Agriculture, Bible Commentaries, United States - History, Wit & Humor, Spirituality, , Self-Help, Political Science, Photography, Mind & Body, Literature - Collections, Language Arts, Interpersonal Relationships, Law, Performing Arts, Genealogy, Finance - Personal, Fiction - All of the Above(or below, its all the same plane anyways to some extent), Family, Education, Economics, Curiosities and Wonders

Format: Hardback

Number of Pages: 460

Print Date: 2/8/2023

Target Audience: (Rough)Trade for now. 

Retail Price? (I don’t think I can answer this now as it will get pricey in one realm and cheaper in the other.) TBD. I have to work out the kinks

This really shouldn’t be a requirement in the on-going ISBN process. If interest of publishers and picker-uppers there, the most information available at the time should be variable based on application. There are swiffer picker-uppers but that seems to be a hold back. It pretty much is the same as what salary are you looking for and others not telling you their range. 

At least my little ISBN that could is reserved. :)

Of course there is much to do on the art side before I am ready to release this. Eventually I’ll need teammates. Where minor keys and details to be had beforehand in an introduction of my little pocket world before roping back around to how I go there elsewhere while moving forward in one direction or another. Constantly Spicing things up one way or another to see what happens.

-P.